Minimum

Minimum

AVERAGE FPS
82
good

This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 82 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 27 36 47 57
1440p QHD 52 67 87 110
1080p Full HD 85 112 132 167

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 57
3840x2160 Medium 47
3840x2160 High 36
3840x2160 Ultra 27
2560x1440 Low 110
2560x1440 Medium 87
2560x1440 High 67
2560x1440 Ultra 52
1920x1080 Low 167
1920x1080 Medium 132
1920x1080 High 112
1920x1080 Ultra 85

Minimum with Intel Core i5-14400F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, In-Depth Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14400F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti delivers a mid-pack result in Minimum, ranking 1268th out of 1733 tested combos. This places the combo in the lower third of all configurations, though the game’s 2014 release date means even modest hardware can achieve playable frame rates. The CPU holds an 88th percentile ranking against all processors, while the GPU sits at the 69th percentile, indicating the graphics card is the more limiting component in this pairing. Benchmark results show the combo excels at 1080p, but struggles to maintain high refresh rates at 4K, particularly at higher quality presets.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo’s rank of 1268 out of 1733 tested combinations places it firmly below the median performer. This ranking reflects the RTX 3060 Ti’s aging architecture relative to newer GPUs, even though the i5-14400F provides strong computational support. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 32508 places it within 0.2% of the Intel Core i7-12800H (32513) and AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 (32446), while slightly trailing the AMD Ryzen 7 250 (32584) and Intel Core i7-13705H (32586). These rival CPUs are all within a narrow performance band, confirming that the i5-14400F is not the bottleneck in most scenarios.

The GPU’s average benchmark score of 25120 sits close to the AMD Radeon RX 6700M (25180, delta -0.2%), the AMD Radeon RX 6600 (25235, delta -0.5%), and the AMD Radeon 890M (25246, delta -0.5%). The closest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP (25287), shows a delta of -0.7%, meaning the RTX 3060 Ti is statistically equivalent to these cards in synthetic benchmarks. This explains the overall combo ranking: the GPU is competitive with mid-range options from several generations, but cannot match the higher-tier cards that dominate the top of the leaderboard.

In-game, the ranking becomes clearer. At 1080p Low, the combo achieves 167.4 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay. However, at 4K Ultra, the frame rate drops to 27.4 FPS, making the experience borderline unplayable. The data shows a strong correlation between resolution and performance, with the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 256-bit memory bus becoming a limiting factor at higher pixel counts.

GPU Role

The RTX 3060 Ti features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This configuration is adequate for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but the memory capacity becomes a constraint at 4K, especially with High or Ultra settings. The GPU’s base clock of 1410 MHz and boost clock of 1665 MHz are modest by modern standards, yet the Ampere architecture’s 4864 shading units and 152 texture mapping units provide solid raw throughput. The pixel rate of 133.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 253.1 GTexel/s help explain why the card performs well at lower resolutions.

In Minimum, the GPU’s performance scales predictably with settings. At 1080p, the difference between Low (167.4 FPS) and Ultra (84.5 FPS) is substantial, representing a 49.5% drop. At 1440p, the same comparison shows a drop from 109.6 FPS to 52 FPS, a 52.6% reduction. At 4K, the gap widens further: Low delivers 56.7 FPS while Ultra drops to 27.4 FPS, a 51.7% reduction. This pattern indicates that the GPU is the primary driver of performance, with the CPU providing sufficient headroom even at the lowest settings.

The GPU’s 38 ray tracing cores and 152 tensor cores are present but unused in this title, as Minimum does not feature ray tracing or DLSS. The DirectX 12 Ultimate support (12_2) ensures compatibility with modern APIs, but the game’s 2014 engine likely relies on DirectX 11. The PassMark DirectX 11 score of 163 versus the DirectX 12 score of 78 suggests the card is better optimized for older APIs, which aligns with the game’s release era.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data reveals a clear scaling pattern across resolutions. At 1080p, the combo delivers 167.4 FPS on Low, 132.4 FPS on Medium, 112 FPS on High, and 84.5 FPS on Ultra. Moving to 1440p, these figures drop to 109.6 FPS, 86.9 FPS, 67.4 FPS, and 52 FPS, respectively. At 4K, the numbers fall to 56.7 FPS, 46.9 FPS, 35.6 FPS, and 27.4 FPS.

The percentage drops from 1080p to 4K are revealing. For Low settings, the frame rate falls from 167.4 FPS to 56.7 FPS, a 66.1% reduction. Medium settings drop from 132.4 FPS to 46.9 FPS, a 64.6% reduction. High settings go from 112 FPS to 35.6 FPS, a 68.2% reduction. Ultra settings fall from 84.5 FPS to 27.4 FPS, a 67.6% reduction. These consistent declines indicate that the GPU is the limiting factor at higher resolutions, as the CPU’s performance remains constant regardless of resolution.

The 4K results are particularly telling. Even at Low settings, the combo only manages 56.7 FPS, just above the 60 FPS target. At High settings, the 35.6 FPS average makes the game feel sluggish, and Ultra’s 27.4 FPS is below the threshold for smooth motion. The data suggests that 1440p is the practical ceiling for this combo, with High settings delivering 67.4 FPS, which is playable for most users. At 1080p, all settings are viable, with Ultra still achieving 84.5 FPS.

FAQ

*Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Minimum?*

A: The data shows 1080p is the most consistent. At 1080p Ultra, the combo achieves 84.5 FPS, while 1440p Ultra drops to 52 FPS and 4K Ultra falls to 27.4 FPS. For a smooth experience, 1080p with any preset is recommended.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The i5-14400F has an average benchmark score of 32508, which is within 0.2% of the Intel Core i7-12800H (32513) and AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 (32446). It trails the AMD Ryzen 7 250 (32584) and Intel Core i7-13705H (32586) by 0.2%, making it statistically similar to all four.

Q: Is the RTX 3060 Ti capable of 4K gaming in this title?

A: Only at Low settings, where it achieves 56.7 FPS. Medium drops to 46.9 FPS, High to 35.6 FPS, and Ultra to 27.4 FPS. The 8 GB VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth are insufficient for consistent 4K performance above Low.

Q: What causes the large FPS drop between 1080p and 4K?

A: The GPU becomes the bottleneck as resolution increases. The drop from 167.4 FPS (1080p Low) to 56.7 FPS (4K Low) represents a 66.1% reduction, while the CPU’s workload remains unchanged. The GPU’s pixel rate and texture rate limits are exposed at higher pixel counts.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its closest rivals?

A: The RTX 3060 Ti’s average benchmark score of 25120 is within 0.7% of the AMD Radeon RX 6700M (25180), AMD Radeon RX 6600 (25235), AMD Radeon 890M (25246), and AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP (25287). All five cards perform nearly identically in synthetic tests.

Q: What is the highest playable setting at 1440p?

A: High settings deliver 67.4 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS threshold. Medium settings achieve 86.9 FPS, providing additional headroom. Ultra drops to 52 FPS, which may be acceptable for some users but falls below the smoothness target.

Settings Recommendations

The measured FPS data shows that the best experience depends on the display resolution. At 1080p, Ultra settings provide 84.5 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS target and offers the highest visual quality. The drop from High (112 FPS) to Ultra (84.5 FPS) is noticeable but acceptable for most players. For competitive play, Low settings at 167.4 FPS maximize frame rates, though the visual trade-off is significant.

At 1440p, High settings (67.4 FPS) strike the best balance between image quality and performance. Medium (86.9 FPS) offers a safer margin for demanding scenes, while Ultra (52 FPS) dips below the 60 FPS threshold. For users with 144Hz monitors, Low settings (109.6 FPS) are the only preset that fully utilizes the refresh rate, but the visual fidelity suffers.

At 4K, no preset consistently maintains 60 FPS. Low settings (56.7 FPS) come closest, but the average still falls short. Medium (46.9 FPS) and High (35.6 FPS) are playable but noticeably less smooth, while Ultra (27.4 FPS) is not recommended. Given the data, the optimal configuration for this combo is 1080p Ultra for the best balance of quality and speed, or 1440p High for users prioritizing resolution over maximum frame rates. The GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for 1080p and 1440p, but the 4K results indicate the card is out of its depth at that resolution.

Hardware Specifications

Intel Core i5-14400F

Cores / Threads 10 / 16
Base Clock 2500 MHz
Boost Clock 4700 MHz
TDP 65W
Socket Intel Socket 1700
View Full CPU Details →

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

VRAM 8 GB GDDR6
Base Clock
Boost Clock 1665 MHz MHz
TDP 200 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for Intel Core i5-14400F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti in Minimum

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 56.7
3840x2160 Medium 46.9
3840x2160 High 35.6
3840x2160 Ultra 27.4
2560x1440 Low 109.6
2560x1440 Medium 86.9
2560x1440 High 67.4
2560x1440 Ultra 52.0
1920x1080 Low 167.4
1920x1080 Medium 132.4
1920x1080 High 112.0
1920x1080 Ultra 84.5

Minimum with ii5-14400F + Other GPUs

See how Minimum performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Minimum with RTX 3060 Ti + Other CPUs

See how Minimum performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with ii5-14400F + RTX 3060 Ti

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.