Minimum
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 83 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 28 | 37 | 45 | 60 |
| 1440p QHD | 53 | 69 | 84 | 112 |
| 1080p Full HD | 85 | 112 | 135 | 173 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Minimum with Intel Core i5-14400F + AMD Radeon RX 7600, In-Depth Analysis
The Intel Core i5-14400F and AMD Radeon RX 7600 pairing delivers a distinctly CPU-favorable balance in Minimum, a 2014 Third-Person Shooter. The processor’s 10 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost of 4.70 GHz, provide substantial headroom for this title’s engine. The CPU’s Raptor Lake architecture, built on a 10 nm process, includes a 20 MB shared L3 cache, which is ample for the game’s data demands. In synthetic benchmarks, the chip posts a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21914 and a single-core score of 3093, alongside a Geekbench multi-core score of 11209. These figures place the i5-14400F in the 88th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 32508. Its nearest rivals—the Intel Core i7-12800H and AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7645—are effectively matched, with deltaPct values of 0 and 0.2 respectively. For a game like Minimum, which relies on consistent frame pacing rather than extreme thread counts, the i5-14400F’s strong single-thread performance (PassMark single-thread score of 3723) ensures that the CPU rarely becomes the bottleneck at lower resolutions. The measured frame rates show that at 1080p, even the Ultra preset achieves 84.6 FPS, indicating the processor is feeding the GPU adequately. The data suggests that the CPU’s capability is the anchor of this combo, providing a stable foundation that allows the GPU’s performance to scale predictably with resolution.
GPU Role
The AMD Radeon RX 7600, built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture with the Navi 33 chip, is the primary driver of visual fidelity in Minimum. It features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU’s boost clock of 2655 MHz and game clock of 2250 MHz allow it to handle the game’s DirectX 12 rendering efficiently. In compute benchmarks, the RX 7600 achieves a Geekbench OpenCL score of 82501 and a Vulkan score of 90825, with a PassMark G3D score of 16634. This places the GPU in the 63rd percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 20258. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT (deltaPct 0.6) and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile (deltaPct -1.3), showing it sits in a competitive mid-range bracket. For Minimum, the GPU’s role becomes evident at higher resolutions. At 4K Ultra, the combo drops to 27.8 FPS, a clear sign that the RX 7600’s 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit memory bus are strained by the game’s texture and shader demands at that extreme. Conversely, at 1080p Low, the GPU produces 172.9 FPS, demonstrating that its raw rasterization power is more than sufficient for lighter loads. The data indicates that the RX 7600 is the limiting factor at 4K, while the CPU holds its own across all tested settings.
Settings Recommendations
The measured FPS rows reveal a clear hierarchy in Minimum: the Low preset provides the smoothest experience, while Ultra is only viable at 1080p. At 1920x1080, the Low preset yields 172.9 FPS, which is far above the refresh rate of most monitors, offering a highly responsive feel. The Medium preset at the same resolution delivers 134.6 FPS, still an excellent figure for competitive play. For players prioritizing visual quality without sacrificing fluidity, the High preset at 1080p (112.2 FPS) is the sweet spot, as it maintains a triple-digit frame rate while improving textures over Medium. The Ultra preset at 1080p (84.6 FPS) is playable but begins to show the GPU’s limits, with the frame rate dropping below 90 FPS. At 1440p, the situation tightens: High produces 68.9 FPS, which is acceptable, but Medium (83.7 FPS) is the better choice for a smoother experience. The Low preset at 1440p (112 FPS) is the only setting that fully exploits the display’s resolution without compromise. At 4K, only the Low preset (59.5 FPS) approaches playability, while High (37.3 FPS) and Medium (45.4 FPS) are too choppy for a third-person shooter. The data recommends that users stick to High at 1080p or Medium at 1440p for the best balance, and reserve 4K for the Low preset if resolution is non-negotiable.
How This Combo Ranks
In the comprehensive database of tested configurations for Minimum, this specific combination of the Intel Core i5-14400F and AMD Radeon RX 7600 ranks 1183 out of 1733 combos. This places it in the lower third of all tested pairings, which is surprising given the individual component scores. The CPU’s 88th percentile standing and the GPU’s 63rd percentile standing do not translate into a top-tier gaming rank, suggesting that the game’s engine favors other hardware combinations. The rank indicates that while the parts are individually competent, their synergy in Minimum is not exceptional. Compared to the nearest GPU rival (the RX 7600 XT, which is 0.6% faster), the RX 7600 holds its ground, but the combo rank shows that many other pairings—likely with higher-end GPUs or CPUs—outperform it. The data suggests that the i5-14400F is overqualified for the GPU at lower resolutions, but the GPU’s limitations at 4K drag the overall ranking down. For a game released in 2014, the combo still delivers playable frame rates at mainstream settings, but it does not stand out among the 1733 tested configurations. The rank of 1183 implies that users seeking top-tier performance in Minimum would need to pair a stronger GPU with this CPU to climb the leaderboard.
Resolution Scaling
The frame rate drops from 1080p to 4K clearly illustrate where the bottleneck lies. At 1080p High, the combo produces 112.2 FPS. Moving to 1440p High, the frame rate falls to 68.9 FPS, a reduction of approximately 38.6%. Stepping up to 4K High, the average FPS plummets to 37.3, a further 45.9% drop from 1440p. This scaling pattern is steep, indicating that the GPU is the limiting component as resolution increases. The CPU’s performance remains constant, but the RX 7600’s 8 GB VRAM and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth are insufficient to maintain high frame rates at 4K. In contrast, the Low preset shows a more graceful decline: 172.9 FPS at 1080p, 112 FPS at 1440p, and 59.5 FPS at 4K. The percentage drops are still significant (35.2% from 1080p to 1440p, and 46.9% from 1440p to 4K), but the absolute numbers remain playable at 4K Low. The data reveals that the CPU’s strong single-core performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3093) keeps the frame rates from collapsing at lower resolutions, but the GPU’s thermal and memory constraints become apparent at 4K. The Ultra preset is the most punishing, with a 1080p score of 84.6 FPS that drops to 52.5 at 1440p and 27.8 at 4K—a total decline of 67.1% from 1080p to 4K. This analysis confirms that for Minimum, the AMD Radeon RX 7600 is the primary scaling bottleneck, while the Intel Core i5-14400F provides ample headroom for future GPU upgrades without needing a platform change.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core i5-14400F
AMD Radeon RX 7600
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core i5-14400F + AMD Radeon RX 7600 in Minimum
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 59.5 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 45.4 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 37.3 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 27.8 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 112.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 83.7 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 68.9 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 52.5 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 172.9 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 134.6 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 112.2 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 84.6 |
Minimum with ii5-14400F + Other GPUs
See how Minimum performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Minimum with RX 7600 + Other CPUs
See how Minimum performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with ii5-14400F + RX 7600
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.