Minimum
This combination offers playable performance with an average of 58 FPS, though you may want to lower settings for smoother gameplay.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 21 | 30 | 33 | 41 |
| 1440p QHD | 36 | 48 | 59 | 78 |
| 1080p Full HD | 62 | 76 | 95 | 121 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Minimum with AMD Ryzen 9 5950X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB, In-Depth Analysis
The AMD Ryzen 9 5950X paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB delivers a highly variable experience in Minimum, a 2014 Third-Person Shooter. The data shows a configuration that is firmly mid-pack, ranking 1566th out of 1733 tested combinations, with the GPU landing at the 50th percentile. While the 16-core, 32-thread Ryzen 9 5950X provides ample processing headroom, the 4 GB frame buffer of the RTX 3050 becomes the primary constraint as resolution and settings increase, leading to a predictable pattern of performance degradation that is critical for users to understand before adjusting in-game options.
FAQ
*Q: Is this configuration capable of running Minimum at 1080p?*
A: Yes. The measured data shows the Ryzen 9 5950X + RTX 3050 4 GB combination achieves an average of 120.9 FPS at 1920x1080 with Low settings, and 75.8 FPS with High settings. Even at Ultra settings, the average FPS remains playable at 61.8.
Q: How does the CPU compare to its closest rivals in synthetic benchmarks?
A: The AMD Ryzen 9 5950X has an average benchmark score of 49062, placing it at the 93rd percentile of all CPUs. It is nearly identical in performance to the Intel Core i5-14600K, which scores 49166, representing a negligible -0.2% delta. It also trails the Intel Core i5-14600KF by -0.6% and the AMD EPYC 4345P by -1.1%, while leading the Intel Xeon Gold 5318H by 0.7%.
Q: What is the limiting factor for performance in this game?
A: The data indicates the GPU is the primary bottleneck, particularly at higher resolutions. For instance, moving from 1080p to 1440p at High settings drops the average FPS from 75.8 to 48.4, a significant reduction that points to the graphics card struggling to maintain frame rates as pixel count increases.
Q: What is the difference in performance between Low and Ultra settings at 1440p?
A: The performance gap is substantial. At 2560x1440, the Low preset yields an average of 77.5 FPS, while the Ultra preset drops to 35.8 FPS. This represents a performance loss of over half the frame rate when moving from the lowest to the highest quality settings.
Q: Does the 4 GB VRAM of the RTX 3050 affect performance at 4K?
A: Yes, the data strongly suggests so. At 3840x2160, even the Low preset only manages an average of 41.3 FPS, and the High preset falls to 29.6 FPS. The Ultra preset is nearly unplayable at 21.4 FPS, indicating that the combination of high resolution and demanding settings overwhelms the GPU's resources.
Q: What is the best preset for a smooth 60 FPS experience at 1440p?
A: Based on the measured data, the Medium preset is the only option at 2560x1440 that achieves a playable average above 60 FPS, with a score of 59.1. The High preset at 48.4 FPS and the Low preset at 77.5 FPS are the alternatives, but Medium offers the highest quality settings while staying near the 60 FPS threshold.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB is the decisive component in this pairing. Built on the Ampere architecture with a GA107 chip on an 8 nm Samsung process, it features 2048 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 ROPs. Its core clocks are set to a base of 1545 MHz and a boost of 1740 MHz, which, combined with its 7.127 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, provide a baseline of compute capability. The 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus provides a bandwidth of 192.0 GB/s. This memory configuration is the critical weakness; the capacity is modest by modern standards, and the data shows that as resolution increases, the demands on this frame buffer cause frame rates to collapse.
In Minimum, the GPU's role is paramount. The synthetic benchmarks for the Ryzen 9 5950X are exceptional, with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 38607 and a Passmark multithread score of 45424. Yet, these CPU strengths do not translate into high frame rates at 4K. The measured FPS at 3840x2160 with High settings is 29.6, which is a clear indication that the RTX 3050 is saturated. The GPU's 32 ROPs and 55.68 GPixel/s pixel rate are insufficient for the sheer number of pixels at 4K, especially when combined with higher quality settings that increase the fill rate demand. The RTX 3050 is simply not a 4K-class part, and the benchmark results confirm this, showing that even the Low preset cannot maintain 60 FPS at that resolution.
Resolution Scaling
The performance scaling from 1080p to 4K paints a clear picture of a GPU-bound scenario. At 1920x1080 with High settings, the average FPS is 75.8. Moving to 2560x1440 at the same settings, the average FPS drops by 27.4 FPS to 48.4. This is a significant 36% reduction in performance for a 78% increase in pixel count, which is a typical response for a GPU that is being pushed harder. The trend continues at 3840x2160, where the High preset yields only 29.6 FPS, a further drop of 18.8 FPS from the 1440p result.
This scaling pattern indicates that the limiting component is definitively the GPU. If the CPU were the bottleneck, the frame rate would be more consistent across resolutions, as the processor's workload would not change as drastically. Instead, the frame rate falls proportionally with the increase in pixel workload. For example, the Low preset shows a similar trajectory: 120.9 FPS at 1080p, 77.5 FPS at 1440p, and 41.3 FPS at 4K. The Ryzen 9 5950X, with its 16 cores and 32 threads, is more than capable of feeding the GPU at all of these resolutions. The data suggests that the CPU's high single-thread score of 3470 in Passmark and 5450 in Cinebench R23 is not the limiting factor. The consistent drop in FPS with each resolution increase is a textbook example of GPU-bound performance, where the RTX 3050's compute units and memory bandwidth are the primary constraints.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data for the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB combination reveals a wide range of performance that is heavily dependent on user settings.
1920x1080: At this resolution, the configuration is capable of exceeding 60 FPS on all presets. The Low preset delivers the highest average at 120.9 FPS. The Medium preset achieves 94.8 FPS, and the High preset drops to 75.8 FPS. The Ultra preset, while the most demanding, still manages a respectable 61.8 FPS average. This is the only resolution where all settings are fully playable.
2560x1440: The jump to 1440p introduces a clear performance ceiling. The Low preset maintains a high average of 77.5 FPS. The Medium preset falls to 59.1 FPS, which is just below the 60 FPS target. The High preset averages 48.4 FPS, and the Ultra preset drops significantly to 35.8 FPS. This resolution is best suited for Low or Medium settings to maintain smooth gameplay.
3840x2160: At 4K, the RTX 3050 4 GB is clearly out of its depth. The Low preset is the only one that approaches playability, with an average of 41.3 FPS. The Medium preset falls to 33.3 FPS, and the High preset drops to 29.6 FPS. The Ultra preset is effectively unplayable, averaging only 21.4 FPS. None of the presets at this resolution can achieve a consistent 60 FPS experience.
Settings Recommendations
The benchmark data provides a clear directive for users of this hardware. For a target of 60 FPS or higher, the only viable resolution is 1920x1080, where all presets meet this goal. For users with 1080p displays seeking the best visual quality, the Ultra preset is a valid choice, as its 61.8 FPS average is sufficient for a playable experience. The High and Medium presets offer even higher frame rates, with 75.8 and 94.8 FPS respectively, which could be beneficial for competitive play or for users with high refresh rate monitors.
For 1440p displays, the recommended preset is Medium, which provides a 59.1 FPS average. This is a compromise that yields acceptable performance while retaining a moderate level of visual fidelity. The Low preset is also a strong option for those who prioritize frame rate above all else, delivering 77.5 FPS. The High and Ultra presets should be avoided, as their average frame rates of 48.4 and 35.8 FPS respectively fall below the smoothness threshold.
At 4K, the data suggests that this configuration is not suitable for a quality experience. The Low preset's 41.3 FPS average is the best possible outcome, but it still falls short of a 60 FPS target. Users should consider lowering the resolution to 1440p or 1080p to achieve better performance. The Ultra preset at 4K, with its 21.4 FPS average, is not recommended under any circumstances. The 4 GB VRAM and the GPU's compute limits make high-resolution, high-detail gaming an unrealistic expectation for the RTX 3050 in Minimum.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 9 5950X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB in Minimum
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 41.3 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 33.3 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 29.6 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 21.4 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 77.5 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 59.1 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 48.4 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 35.8 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 120.9 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 94.8 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 75.8 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 61.8 |
Minimum with RTX 3050 4 GB + Other CPUs
See how Minimum performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 9 5950X + RTX 3050 4 GB
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.