Minimum
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 103 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 37 | 48 | 57 | 77 |
| 1440p QHD | 67 | 89 | 104 | 138 |
| 1080p Full HD | 103 | 139 | 164 | 212 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Minimum with AMD Ryzen 7 7700 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060, In-Depth Analysis
AMD Ryzen 7 7700 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 deliver a solid 1080p and 1440p experience in Minimum, a 2014 Third-Person Shooter. The data shows this combo ranks in the 50th percentile of tested configurations, with performance scaling predictably across resolutions and presets. The RTX 5060’s 8 GB of GDDR7 memory and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth prove sufficient for this title, though 4K Ultra demands more than the GPU can consistently provide.
FAQ
*Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Minimum?*
A: Based on measured FPS, 1920x1080 is the sweet spot, delivering 138.6 FPS on High and 212.4 FPS on Low. At 2560x1440, the combo still performs well, with 89 FPS on High and 137.5 FPS on Low, but 3840x2160 drops below 60 FPS on all presets except Low (76.6 FPS).
Q: How does the combo rank among all tested systems for this game?
A: It ranks 861 out of 1733 combos, placing it in the middle of the pack. This suggests a balanced configuration rather than a top-tier or entry-level performer for Minimum.
Q: Which settings preset provides the most balanced experience?
A: Medium settings offer the best balance of visual quality and performance. At 1080p, Medium hits 163.7 FPS, while at 1440p it reaches 103.7 FPS. Both are well above playable thresholds and maintain high frame rates.
Q: Is the CPU or GPU more of a bottleneck in this game?
A: The GPU appears to be the primary constraint at higher resolutions, as FPS drops significantly from 1080p to 4K. The CPU’s strong multi-threaded performance (29302 in Cinebench R23 multicore) suggests it is not limiting at 1080p, where frame rates exceed 200 FPS on Low.
*Q: Can this combo handle 4K gaming in Minimum?*
A: Only at Low settings, where it achieves 76.6 FPS. At Medium, 4K drops to 56.8 FPS, and at Ultra it falls to 37.3 FPS. For a consistent 60+ FPS experience, 1440p or lower is recommended.
Q: How does the RTX 5060 compare to its closest GPU rivals in synthetic benchmarks?
A: The RTX 5060’s average benchmark score is 30109, nearly identical to the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT (30097, deltaPct 0). It also edges out the NVIDIA Tesla M60 (29969, deltaPct 0.5) and RTX 5070 Mobile (29928, deltaPct 0.6), but trails the AMD Radeon RX 570 (30158, deltaPct -0.2).
How This Combo Ranks
The AMD Ryzen 7 7700 + RTX 5060 combination sits at rank 861 out of 1733 tested combos for Minimum, placing it squarely in the median tier. This ranking reflects a system that can handle modern titles at mainstream resolutions but is not optimized for extreme settings or 4K dominance. The CPU’s percentile vs all CPUs is 91, indicating it is a high-performing processor, while the GPU’s percentile is 73, showing it is above average but not elite. The delta between these percentiles suggests the GPU is the limiting factor in this pairing.
Compared to the CPU’s nearest rivals, the Ryzen 7 7700 posts an average benchmark score of 40468, slightly ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 7940H (40431, deltaPct 0.1) and AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (40262, deltaPct 0.5). It also outperforms the Intel Core Ultra 5 235T (39995, deltaPct 1.2) but trails the Intel Core i9-13905H (40712, deltaPct -0.6). This indicates the CPU provides a strong foundation for gaming, though its advantage over rivals is marginal in synthetic tests.
In practical terms for Minimum, the combo’s mid-pack rank (861/1733) means it outperforms roughly half of all tested systems. The measured FPS data supports this: at 1080p High, it achieves 138.6 FPS, which is excellent for a third-person shooter. However, at 4K Ultra, the 37.3 FPS result reveals the GPU’s limitations, pulling the overall ranking down from what the CPU alone might suggest.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 features 8 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This memory configuration is adequate for Minimum, which is a 2014 title with modest texture requirements. The GPU’s base clock of 2280 MHz and boost clock of 2497 MHz provide the raw compute headroom needed for high frame rates at 1080p and 1440p.
The GPU’s 3840 shading units and 30 RT cores support the game’s DirectX 12 Ultimate features, though Minimum does not heavily utilize ray tracing. The 48 ROPs and 120 TMUs contribute to the pixel rate of 119.9 GPixel/s and texture rate of 299.6 GTexel/s, which are sufficient for the game’s rendering demands. The passmark G3D score of 20891 places the GPU at the 73rd percentile, confirming it is a capable mid-range part.
At 1920x1080, the GPU’s performance is strong: it reaches 212.4 FPS on Low and 138.6 FPS on High. The 163.7 FPS at Medium shows the card handles moderate settings without issue. Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates drop to 137.5 FPS on Low and 89 FPS on High, still smooth but showing diminishing returns. At 3840x2160, the 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit bus become more apparent, with only Low settings (76.6 FPS) maintaining playability.
The GPU’s 145 W TDP and 1x 8-pin power connector indicate an efficient design, but the 300 W suggested PSU highlights that system power draw is modest. The PCIe 5.0 x8 interface provides ample bandwidth for this game, and the 28 Gbps effective memory speed ensures data transfers are not a bottleneck.
Settings Recommendations
For the best experience, Medium settings at 1920x1080 or 2560x1440 are recommended. At 1080p Medium, the combo delivers 163.7 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS threshold and provides headroom for smooth gameplay. At 1440p Medium, the 103.7 FPS result is equally impressive, offering a balance of visual fidelity and performance.
High settings are also viable at 1080p (138.6 FPS) and 1440p (89 FPS), but the jump to Ultra introduces a significant performance cost. At 1080p Ultra, the frame rate drops to 102.8 FPS, and at 1440p Ultra it falls to 67 FPS. Given that Medium and High look nearly identical in a 2014 shooter, the extra GPU load from Ultra is not justified.
For 4K gaming, Low settings are the only option, with 76.6 FPS. Medium at 4K (56.8 FPS) is borderline, and High (47.7 FPS) or Ultra (37.3 FPS) are not recommended due to inconsistent frame pacing. Players prioritizing visual quality over frame rate may accept 4K Medium, but the data suggests 1440p High is the optimal ceiling for this combo.
The measured rows show that the GPU’s performance scales roughly linearly with resolution and settings. The 1080p Low result of 212.4 FPS is 2.8x higher than 4K Ultra (37.3 FPS), indicating the card’s compute resources are taxed heavily at higher resolutions. For competitive play, 1080p Low or Medium provides the highest frame rates, while 1440p Medium offers a more immersive experience without sacrificing responsiveness.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the combo delivers its strongest results. Low settings produce 212.4 FPS, Medium achieves 163.7 FPS, High reaches 138.6 FPS, and Ultra drops to 102.8 FPS. These numbers show a clear hierarchy: each settings tier costs roughly 25-30% performance. The gap from Low to Ultra is 109.6 FPS, indicating the GPU has ample headroom at this resolution.
At 2560x1440, performance remains solid but drops noticeably. Low settings yield 137.5 FPS, Medium hits 103.7 FPS, High comes in at 89 FPS, and Ultra falls to 67 FPS. The transition from 1080p to 1440p costs approximately 35% of the frame rate across all settings, reflecting the increased pixel count. The 1440p Ultra result of 67 FPS is still playable, though it is the first preset to approach the 60 FPS threshold.
At 3840x2160, the GPU begins to struggle. Low settings achieve 76.6 FPS, Medium drops to 56.8 FPS, High falls to 47.7 FPS, and Ultra bottoms out at 37.3 FPS. The 4K results show a steep decline, with Low being the only preset that maintains a consistent 60+ FPS experience. The difference between 1080p Low (212.4 FPS) and 4K Low (76.6 FPS) is 135.8 FPS, illustrating the massive computational cost of 4K rendering.
Across all resolutions, the pattern is consistent: Low settings provide the highest frame rates, followed by Medium, High, and Ultra. The delta between Low and Ultra is largest at 1080p (109.6 FPS) and narrowest at 4K (39.3 FPS), suggesting the GPU becomes the bottleneck at higher resolutions regardless of settings. For players seeking the smoothest experience, 1080p Low or Medium is optimal, while 1440p Medium offers the best visual-to-performance ratio. 4K is only viable at Low settings, and even then, the 76.6 FPS result is modest compared to lower resolutions.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 7 7700
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 7 7700 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 in Minimum
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 76.6 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 56.8 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 47.7 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 37.3 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 137.5 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 103.7 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 89.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 67.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 212.4 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 163.7 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 138.6 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 102.8 |
Minimum with Ryzen 7 7700 + Other GPUs
See how Minimum performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Minimum with RTX 5060 + Other CPUs
See how Minimum performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 7 7700 + RTX 5060
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.