Minimum

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT delivers a solid 1080p and 1440p experience in Minimum, but the data shows a clear drop-off at 4K. The measured FPS scaling indicates a shift in bottleneck from GPU-bound at lower resolutions to a more balanced load as pixel count rises.

Resolution Scaling

The performance curve from 1080p to 4K tells a clear story about where this combo's limitations lie. At 1920x1080 with High settings, the system averages 138 FPS, which drops to 89 FPS at 2560x1440, a 35.5% reduction. Moving further up to 3840x2160 High shows 48 FPS, a 46.1% drop from the 1440p figure. This scaling pattern is typical of a GPU that has enough headroom at lower resolutions but gets progressively saturated as pixel count increases.

The 4K results are telling. At Ultra settings, the average FPS falls to 36, which is below the 48 FPS seen at High and just barely above the 74 FPS at Low—wait, that ordering is inverted. Reading the data again: Low at 4K gives 74 FPS, Medium gives 57 FPS, High gives 48 FPS, and Ultra gives 36 FPS. The spread from Low to Ultra is 38 FPS, which indicates the GPU is the primary limiting factor at this resolution. The fact that dropping from Ultra to Low nearly doubles the frame rate (36 to 74 FPS) confirms that graphical settings have a massive impact at 4K.

At 1440p, the scaling is less severe but still GPU-bound. Low settings yield 138 FPS, which drops to 106 FPS at Medium, 89 FPS at High, and 68 FPS at Ultra. The gap between Low and Ultra here is 70 FPS, showing that even at this resolution, the RX 6750 XT is working hard. At 1080p, the picture changes: Low hits 214 FPS, Medium hits 164 FPS, High hits 138 FPS, and Ultra hits 105 FPS. The Low-to-Ultra gap of 109 FPS is larger in absolute terms but proportionally smaller, suggesting the CPU starts to play a larger role at the very high frame rates achievable at 1080p Low.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT is built on the RDNA 2.0 architecture with a Navi 22 chip on a 7 nm process. It carries 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The base clock is 2150 MHz, with a boost clock of 2600 MHz and a game clock of 2495 MHz. Its shading units number 2560, with 160 texture mapping units and 64 render output units.

The GPU's benchmark percentile sits at 71, meaning it outperforms 71% of all GPUs in the database. Its average benchmark score is 26011. The nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon R9 M395X with an average score of 25891 (0.5% delta), the AMD FirePro W7100 at 25856 (0.6% delta), the AMD FirePro D700 at 25842 (0.7% delta), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile at 25740 (1.1% delta). These deltas are all within 1.1%, so the RX 6750 XT is competitive with these parts, but not dramatically ahead.

In Minimum, the 12 GB VRAM capacity appears sufficient for the measured settings, since the data does not show any stutter or min FPS collapses that would indicate VRAM overflow. The Medium preset at 4K reports a min FPS of 48 and a max of 66, which is a reasonable frame time variance. At 1440p Medium, the min is 90 and max is 122, and at 1080p Medium, the min is 139 and max is 189. These ranges are consistent with a GPU that is handling the workload without memory constraints, but the average FPS drops at 4K suggest the core compute throughput is the limiting factor rather than memory capacity.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the Ryzen 7 5800XT and the RX 6750 XT holds a combo rank of 1689 out of 3712 tested combos in Minimum. This places it in the 45.5th percentile of all combos tested for this game, meaning roughly 54.5% of tested configurations perform better. The rank reflects a mid-pack position that is neither outstanding nor poor.

Given the CPU's percentile of 81 against all CPUs and the GPU's percentile of 71 against all GPUs, the combo rank is lower than either component's individual standing. This suggests that the pairing is slightly less efficient in Minimum than its component parts would imply, likely because the game's engine does not fully utilize the CPU's multi-threading capabilities or because the GPU becomes the bottleneck at higher resolutions. The rank of 1689 out of 3712 indicates that many other combinations of components can achieve better results in this specific title, but it also means this combo is ahead of more than 2000 other tested configurations.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the measured results show a wide range depending on settings. Low settings deliver an average of 214 FPS, which is the highest figure recorded for this combo. Medium settings drop to 164 FPS, with a min of 139 and a max of 189. High settings average 138 FPS, and Ultra settings average 105 FPS. The step from Low to Medium is 50 FPS, from Medium to High is 26 FPS, and from High to Ultra is 33 FPS, showing that each preset tier has a meaningful impact.

At 2560x1440, the averages are 138 FPS on Low, 106 FPS on Medium (min 90, max 122), 89 FPS on High, and 68 FPS on Ultra. The scaling from Low to Medium is 32 FPS, Medium to High is 17 FPS, and High to Ultra is 21 FPS. The relative gaps are smaller than at 1080p, indicating that the GPU is becoming more of a limiting factor.

At 3840x2160, the averages are 74 FPS on Low, 57 FPS on Medium (min 48, max 66), 48 FPS on High, and 36 FPS on Ultra. The gaps here are 17 FPS from Low to Medium, 9 FPS from Medium to High, and 12 FPS from High to Ultra. The 4K Ultra figure of 36 FPS is below the 48 FPS minimum of the 1440p Medium preset, showing how resolution dramatically impacts playability.

The data shows that at 1080p, even Ultra settings achieve 105 FPS, which is well above playable thresholds. At 1440p, Ultra drops to 68 FPS, still acceptable for many players, but High at 89 FPS is the better balance. At 4K, only Low settings achieve 74 FPS, with Medium at 57 FPS being borderline and High and Ultra falling below 50 FPS.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT is an 8-core, 16-thread processor based on the Zen 3 architecture, codenamed Vermeer. It runs on the AMD Socket AM4 platform with a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. The processor has a 32 MB shared L3 cache, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 64 KB of L1 per core. It supports DDR4 memory in dual-channel mode with a bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. The TDP is 105 W, and it uses a 7 nm process from TSMC.

The CPU's benchmark results show strong multi-threaded performance. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score is 23794, and the single-core score is 3359. The 3DMark 16-thread score is 7683, while the 2-thread score is 1879. PassMark multithread score is 28053, and single-thread is 3535. The CPU's percentile against all CPUs is 81, and its average benchmark score is 29879.

The nearest CPU rivals include the AMD Ryzen 7 7840H with an average score of 29868 (0% delta), the AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS at 29955 (-0.3% delta), the AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS at 29955 (-0.3% delta), and the AMD Ryzen 5 9600X at 29713 (0.6% delta). The 5800XT is essentially tied with these parts, all within 0.6% of each other.

In Minimum, the CPU's role is most evident at 1080p Low settings, where the 214 FPS average is likely near the engine's maximum frame rate cap or limited by the CPU's ability to feed the GPU. The fact that 1080p Low achieves 214 FPS, which is 55 FPS higher than 1440p Low's 138 FPS, shows that at lower resolutions, the GPU has spare capacity but the CPU can still push high frame rates. However, the CPU's 8-core, 16-thread configuration is likely underutilized in this Third-Person Shooter, as the game's release date of 2014 suggests it may not scale well beyond 4-6 threads.

Settings Recommendations

For the best experience with this combo, the measured data points to specific presets depending on your target resolution. At 1920x1080, the High preset delivers 138 FPS, which is smooth for any display. Ultra at 105 FPS is also excellent, so if you want maximum visual quality, Ultra is viable at 1080p. The Medium preset at 164 FPS is unnecessary unless you have a very high refresh rate display that can take advantage of it.

At 2560x1440, the High preset at 89 FPS is the sweet spot. It provides a solid frame rate with good visual fidelity. Ultra at 68 FPS is playable but closer to the edge, and the 21 FPS drop from High may not justify the visual gain. Medium at 106 FPS is also a strong option if you prefer higher frame rates over visual quality. Low at 138 FPS is there for competitive play, but it sacrifices too much visual detail for most players.

At 3840x2160, the situation is more constrained. Low settings at 74 FPS is the only preset that consistently stays above 60 FPS. Medium at 57 FPS is borderline, with a min of 48 FPS that could cause noticeable stutter. High at 48 FPS and Ultra at 36 FPS are below acceptable thresholds for fast-paced gameplay. If you must play at 4K, Low settings are recommended, but the data suggests that stepping down to 1440p High or Ultra provides a much better experience.

The overall recommendation is to play at 2560x1440 with High settings. This preset achieves 89 FPS average, which is above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay, while maintaining visual quality. For players with 1080p displays, Ultra at 105 FPS is the best choice. For those with 4K displays, the choice is between 4K Low at 74 FPS or dropping resolution to 1440p for a significant quality improvement. The measured data clearly shows that this combo is best suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, with 4K being playable only on the lowest settings.