Minimum

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 pairing delivers a high-refresh-rate experience in Minimum, a 2014 third-person shooter. The data shows this combo ranks in the top percentile of tested configurations, with average frame rates ranging from 61 FPS at 4K Ultra to 356 FPS at 1080p Low. The following analysis breaks down the measured performance, component roles, and optimal settings based solely on the provided benchmark data.

FAQ

*Q: What is the overall performance ranking of this CPU and GPU combination in Minimum?*

A: The combo ranks 246th out of 3712 tested combinations, placing it in the top 6.6% of all configurations tested for this game.

Q: How does the RTX 4080 compare to its closest rival in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The RTX 4080 has an average benchmark score of 54247, which is 0.1% higher than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER (score of 54209). It also leads the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X by 1.1% and the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB by 2.6%.

*Q: What is the best performance result recorded for this combo in Minimum?*

A: The highest average FPS recorded is 356 at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings. The highest at Ultra settings is 174 FPS at the same resolution.

Q: Does the CPU present a bottleneck at lower resolutions?

A: The data suggests the CPU becomes more influential as resolution drops. The FPS jump from 1440p to 1080p on Low settings is significant (230 to 356 FPS), indicating the GPU can render frames faster than the CPU can process at 1080p, though the game remains highly playable.

Q: What is the expected performance at 4K with Medium settings?

A: At 3840x2160 with Medium settings, the combo delivers an average of 95 FPS, with a minimum of 80 FPS and a maximum of 109 FPS, ensuring smooth gameplay.

Q: How does the Ryzen 7 5700X's multi-threaded score compare to its direct rival?

A: The CPU's average benchmark score is 27578, which is identical (0% delta) to the Intel Core i5-12600K's score of 27578. It is also 0.2% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 5800 (score 27535).

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 is the primary driver of frame rates in Minimum, especially at higher resolutions and settings. Its 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus provides a bandwidth of 716.8 GB/s, which is more than sufficient for a game from 2014. The GPU's high pixel rate of 280.6 GPixel/s and texture rate of 761.5 GTexel/s ensure that the rendering pipeline is well-fed. Based on the measured data, the RTX 4080's performance is the deciding factor between 1080p and 1440p, where it can push well beyond 144 Hz on most settings.

The RTX 4080's boost clock of 2505 MHz and its 9728 shading units allow it to handle the game's DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) API with ease. The GPU's benchmark scores reflect this capability, with a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6567 and a Passmark G3D score of 34457. The percentile ranking of 86 for the GPU places it above the vast majority of graphics cards. This raw power translates directly to the measured FPS: at 1440p, the average frame rate only drops below 100 FPS when Ultra settings are enabled (112 FPS). The GPU's dominance is most apparent at 4K, where even with High settings, it maintains 79 FPS, a result that many lesser cards cannot achieve.

The data indicates that the RTX 4080 is not the limiting factor until you reach 4K Ultra, where the average FPS drops to 61. Here, the GPU's compute resources are fully taxed, but the result is still a playable frame rate. The gap between Low and Ultra settings at 4K is also substantial, with a 63 FPS difference (124 to 61), confirming the GPU's workload scales heavily with visual fidelity. The card's end-of-life production status does not diminish its performance in this title, as it remains a top-tier option for high-resolution gaming.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700X, with its 8 cores and 16 threads based on the Zen 3 architecture, provides ample processing power for Minimum. The CPU's 32 MB of shared L3 cache and 4.60 GHz boost clock are key to maintaining high frame rates, particularly when the GPU is not the bottleneck. In synthetic tests, the CPU scores 13184 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 1499 in single-core, showcasing a balanced performance profile. Its average benchmark score of 27578 places it in the 79th percentile of all CPUs, making it a strong partner for the RTX 4080.

The CPU's role becomes more evident at 1080p resolution. The measured FPS at 1080p Low (356) is significantly higher than at 1440p Low (230), a jump of 126 FPS. This indicates that at 1080p, the GPU has enough headroom that the CPU's processing speed starts to cap the maximum frame rate. However, the CPU is not a severe bottleneck; even at 1080p Ultra, the average FPS remains high at 174. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 6858 and the 8-thread score of 5768 suggest that the CPU can handle the game's multi-threaded workloads without issue.

The Ryzen 7 5700X's performance is competitive with its nearest rivals, as it matches the Intel Core i5-12600K in average score (27578) and sits just 0.2% above the AMD Ryzen 7 5800 (27535). This means the CPU provides a stable foundation for the RTX 4080, ensuring that it does not hold the GPU back in most scenarios. The data shows that the CPU is only a contributing factor to the FPS ceiling at 1080p, and even then, the game remains exceptionally responsive.

How This Combo Ranks

In the database of 3712 tested combinations, this pairing of the AMD Ryzen 7 5700X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 holds the 246th position. This ranking places it in the top 6.6% of all configurations, indicating a highly capable setup for Minimum. The high rank is a direct result of the synergy between the CPU's strong multi-threading and the GPU's immense rasterization power. When compared to other combos, this pairing is positioned to deliver top-tier performance in this specific title.

The combo's rank of 246 is impressive given the game's age, as it suggests that the hardware is far beyond the minimum requirements, allowing for maximum settings at high resolutions. The data shows that this combo outperforms the vast majority of systems, making it a top-tier choice for enthusiasts. The ranking reflects not just the average FPS, but also the consistency across different settings and resolutions. The CPU's percentile of 79 and GPU's percentile of 86 combine to form a balanced system that ranks high in the game's specific benchmark. This is not a case of one component holding the other back; instead, both parts contribute to a smooth and high-performing experience.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The provided data gives a clear picture of performance across three resolutions and four settings presets. Here is the exact breakdown:

1920x1080 (Full HD):

• Low: Average 356 FPS.
• Medium: Average 273 FPS (minimum 232, maximum 313).
• High: Average 229 FPS.
• Ultra: Average 174 FPS.

2560x1440 (Quad HD):

• Low: Average 230 FPS.
• Medium: Average 176 FPS (minimum 149, maximum 202).
• High: Average 148 FPS.
• Ultra: Average 112 FPS.

3840x2160 (4K UHD):

• Low: Average 124 FPS.
• Medium: Average 95 FPS (minimum 80, maximum 109).
• High: Average 79 FPS.
• Ultra: Average 61 FPS.

The data shows a consistent scaling pattern. At 1080p, the combo is capable of driving high-refresh-rate monitors, with even Ultra settings staying above 170 FPS. Moving to 1440p, the performance remains excellent, with the average FPS staying above 110 FPS on all presets. At 4K, the performance drops significantly, but the card still manages to provide a playable experience, with all settings averaging above 60 FPS. The Medium setting at 4K offers the only reported min/max data, with an 80 to 109 FPS range, indicating stable performance.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS, the optimal settings depend on the user's display and refresh rate. For users with a 1080p 144Hz monitor, the Ultra preset is the best choice, as it provides an average of 174 FPS, easily exceeding the refresh rate. For 1440p 144Hz displays, the High preset (148 FPS) is the recommended starting point, though Medium (176 FPS) will provide a higher frame rate margin if desired. At 4K, the Medium preset (95 FPS) offers the best balance between visual quality and performance, as it is the only setting that provides a substantial frame rate buffer above 60 FPS, with High (79 FPS) also being a viable option for a smoother experience.

For competitive play, the Low preset at 1080p (356 FPS) or 1440p (230 FPS) provides the absolute highest frame rates, which can reduce input latency. However, for a single-player experience, the Ultra preset at 1440p (112 FPS) offers a significant visual upgrade while still maintaining a high refresh rate. The data suggests that the Ultra preset is not recommended for 4K, as the 61 FPS average falls below the threshold for many high-refresh-rate displays. The High preset at 4K is a solid choice for a cinematic experience, but Medium is the most balanced for a mix of quality and speed.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS scaling from 1080p to 4K reveals the relationship between the CPU and GPU. When moving from 1080p to 1440p on Low settings, the average FPS drops from 356 to 230, a 35% decrease. This is a significant drop, but it shows that the GPU is still capable of high performance. The drop from 1440p to 4K on Low settings is steeper, from 230 to 124 FPS, a 46% decrease. This indicates that the GPU is becoming the primary limiting factor at 4K, as the workload on the GPU doubles from the increased pixel count.

The pattern is consistent across all settings. For example, on Ultra settings, the FPS drops from 174 at 1080p to 112 at 1440p, and then to 61 at 4K. The scaling from 1440p to 4K is more drastic, showing that the RTX 4080 is being pushed to its limits at the highest resolution. The data suggests that at 1080p, the CPU has a more significant role, as the FPS is high enough that the CPU's processing speed can become a factor. However, at 4K, the GPU is the clear bottleneck, as the frame rate is directly tied to the GPU's rendering capabilities. The analysis shows that this combo is best suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, where it can leverage its full potential, while 4K is playable but with a more significant performance trade-off.