Minimum
This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 182 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 62 | 86 | 102 | 130 |
| 1440p QHD | 122 | 155 | 189 | 244 |
| 1080p Full HD | 183 | 243 | 288 | 378 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Minimum with AMD Ryzen 5 7600X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080, In-Depth Analysis
Resolution Scaling
The measured FPS data for the AMD Ryzen 5 7600X paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 in Minimum reveals a classic pattern of resolution-dependent scaling. At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the combo produces 378.3 FPS, which drops to 243.8 FPS at 2560x1440, and further to 130.3 FPS at 3840x2160. This represents a 35.6% performance reduction from 1080p to 1440p and a 65.6% reduction from 1080p to 4K at Low settings. The scaling curve is steep, indicating that the GPU becomes increasingly dominant as the pixel count rises.
At High settings, the trend continues but with a different slope. The 1080p result of 242.5 FPS falls to 155.1 FPS at 1440p (a 36.0% drop) and then to 86.1 FPS at 4K (a 64.5% drop from 1080p). Interestingly, the percentage losses between Low and High settings are nearly identical across resolution steps, suggesting that the scaling penalty is consistent regardless of the preset. This consistency points to a well-balanced pipeline where neither the CPU nor GPU creates a disproportionate bottleneck at any single resolution.
The Ultra preset shows the most dramatic scaling. Starting at 182.9 FPS in 1080p, the frame rate declines to 121.9 FPS at 1440p (a 33.4% drop) and then to 62.3 FPS at 4K (a 65.9% drop from 1080p). The 4K Ultra result is the lowest measured value in the entire set, falling below the 60 FPS threshold that many titles aim to maintain. This suggests that Ultra settings at 4K push the RTX 5080 to its limits, with the GPU clearly being the limiting component at this extreme configuration.
When comparing the resolution scaling across settings, a notable pattern emerges: the delta between 1440p and 4K is consistently larger than the delta between 1080p and 1440p. For instance, at Medium settings, 1080p yields 287.7 FPS, 1440p yields 188.6 FPS, and 4K yields 101.9 FPS. The 1440p-to-4K drop of 46.0% is more severe than the 1080p-to-1440p drop of 34.4%. This nonlinear behavior is typical of GPU-bound scenarios where the increased pixel throughput at 4K saturates the render pipeline. The data indicates that at 1080p and even 1440p, the Ryzen 5 7600X's six cores with Zen 4 architecture are sufficient to feed the RTX 5080, but at 4K the GPU's computational load dominates the frame time.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 is the undisputed performance driver in this configuration, particularly at higher resolutions. Its 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus provides 960.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is ample for the textures and geometry required at 4K. The memory clock runs at 1875 MHz with 30 Gbps effective transfer, and the GPU's boost clock of 2617 MHz (base 2295 MHz) allows it to sustain high throughput across all settings. The Blackwell 2.0 architecture, built on a 5 nm process with 45,600 million transistors, delivers 56.28 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, which directly correlates with the frame rates observed.
The GPU's role becomes evident when examining the FPS deltas between presets at each resolution. At 1080p, the difference between Low (378.3 FPS) and Ultra (182.9 FPS) is 195.4 FPS, a 51.7% reduction. At 4K, the same preset comparison shows a delta of 68.0 FPS (130.3 vs. 62.3), a 52.2% reduction. The proportional consistency of these deltas suggests that the RTX 5080's shading units (10752), texture mapping units (336), and render output units (112) scale predictably with the workload intensity. The pixel rate of 293.1 GPixel/s and texture rate of 879.3 GTexel/s provide the raw throughput needed to maintain high fill rates even at Ultra settings.
The VRAM capacity of 16 GB is never a limiting factor in these measurements, as even the highest preset at 4K yields playable frame rates. However, the Ultra preset at 4K (62.3 FPS) sits precariously close to the 60 FPS line, indicating that the GPU's compute resources, not its memory capacity, are the binding constraint. The RTX 5080's percentile ranking of 89 among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 59188, places it well above typical competitors. Its nearest rival, the Intel Arc A570M, scores 58239 (a 1.6% delta), while the AMD Radeon Pro W5500X trails at 57661 (a 2.6% delta). These benchmark deltas align with the GPU's strong real-world performance in Minimum, where it consistently delivers high frame rates even at demanding settings.
How This Combo Ranks
The combination of the AMD Ryzen 5 7600X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 achieves a combo rank of 72 out of 1733 tested combinations in Minimum. This places the pairing in the top 4.2% of all configurations, a strong showing that reflects the synergy between the CPU's single-thread performance and the GPU's raw power. The Ryzen 5 7600X, with a percentile ranking of 83 among all CPUs, contributes a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24128 and a single-core score of 3406. Its nearest CPU rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 5700X, scores 26214 in average benchmark (a 0.2% delta), showing that the 7600X is competitive with older eight-core parts despite having only six cores.
The GPU's percentile rank of 89 and average benchmark score of 59188 further bolster the combo's standing. The RTX 5080's nearest rival, the Intel Arc Pro A60, scores 60326 (a -1.9% delta), while the Intel Arc A580 scores 57756 (a 2.5% delta). These margins are narrow in synthetic benchmarks, but in Minimum the measured FPS data shows the combo performing consistently above the median for its class. The rank of 72 suggests that only 71 other CPU-GPU pairings deliver higher average frame rates across the tested settings and resolutions, a signal of the balance achieved with the 7600X's 5.30 GHz boost clock and the RTX 5080's 2617 MHz boost.
The combo's ranking is particularly notable given that the Ryzen 5 7600X's six cores and 12 threads might be considered modest for a high-end GPU pairing. However, the CPU's L3 cache of 32 MB shared and dual-channel DDR5 memory support with 83.2 GB/s bandwidth ensure that data feeds the GPU without starvation. The 3DMark single-thread score of 1060 and multi-thread score of 6845 indicate strong per-core performance, which is critical for a title like Minimum that likely relies on a few heavily utilized threads. Compared to the 1733 total combos, the 72nd rank reflects that this pairing outperforms the vast majority of alternatives, including many with higher-end CPUs that may not scale as efficiently in this particular game.
Settings Recommendations
Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings depend heavily on the target resolution and desired frame rate. At 1920x1080, all presets deliver well above 180 FPS, with Low hitting 378.3 FPS and Medium at 287.7 FPS. Even the most demanding Ultra preset achieves 182.9 FPS, which is sufficient for high-refresh-rate monitors. For competitive play at 1080p, the Medium preset offers a strong balance, delivering 287.7 FPS while likely preserving visual fidelity over Low. The High preset at 242.5 FPS is also viable, providing a 15.7% reduction from Medium but potentially better image quality.
At 2560x1440, the recommendation shifts. The Low preset produces 243.8 FPS, but this may underutilize the GPU's capabilities. Medium at 188.6 FPS is the sweet spot for most users, offering a 22.6% improvement over High (155.1 FPS) while maintaining smooth gameplay. The Ultra preset at 121.9 FPS is still playable and may be preferred for visually demanding scenarios, but the data suggests that Medium provides the best frame rate-to-visual quality ratio. For 1440p esports, Low at 243.8 FPS exceeds the refresh rate of most monitors, but High at 155.1 FPS remains above the 144 Hz threshold.
At 3840x2160, the choices become more constrained. The Low preset at 130.3 FPS is the only setting that comfortably exceeds 120 FPS, while Medium at 101.9 FPS and High at 86.1 FPS are both viable for 60-100 Hz displays. The Ultra preset at 62.3 FPS is marginal, barely clearing the 60 FPS line. For 4K gaming, the Medium preset is recommended as it offers a 18.3% improvement over High while remaining well above 60 FPS. Users prioritizing visual quality over frame rate may opt for High at 86.1 FPS, but Ultra should be avoided unless the player accepts the risk of occasional drops below 60 FPS. Across all resolutions, the data indicates that Medium is the most balanced preset for this combo.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive view of performance across three resolutions and four settings presets. At 3840x2160, the Low preset achieves 130.3 FPS, Medium reaches 101.9 FPS, High produces 86.1 FPS, and Ultra falls to 62.3 FPS. The progression from Low to Ultra at 4K shows a 52.2% reduction in frame rate, with each preset step costing approximately 20-25 FPS. The 4K Ultra result of 62.3 FPS is the only measured value below 80 FPS in the entire dataset, highlighting the extreme demands of this configuration.
At 2560x1440, the results are substantially higher. Low delivers 243.8 FPS, Medium reaches 188.6 FPS, High produces 155.1 FPS, and Ultra achieves 121.9 FPS. The delta between Low and Ultra at 1440p is 121.9 FPS, a 50.0% reduction. The Medium preset at 188.6 FPS offers a 33.1% improvement over High, making it the most efficient setting at this resolution. The 1440p results demonstrate that the RTX 5080 has ample headroom, with even Ultra exceeding 120 FPS.
At 1920x1080, the performance is exceptional across all settings. Low produces 378.3 FPS, Medium reaches 287.7 FPS, High achieves 242.5 FPS, and Ultra delivers 182.9 FPS. The 1080p Low result is the highest measured value in the entire dataset, more than double the 4K High result. The scaling from Low to Ultra at 1080p shows a 51.7% reduction, consistent with the other resolutions. The 1080p results indicate that the Ryzen 5 7600X is not a limiting factor at this resolution, as the CPU's 3DMark single-thread score of 1060 and PassMark single-thread score of 4135 provide sufficient processing power to keep the GPU fully utilized.
The complete FPS table shows that the combo delivers playable frame rates (above 60 FPS) in every tested configuration, from 4K Ultra at 62.3 FPS to 1080p Low at 378.3 FPS. The data reveals a clear hierarchy: resolution has a larger impact on performance than settings presets, with the 1080p-to-4K transition costing roughly 65% of frame rate regardless of preset. The settings presets themselves account for a 50-52% performance range at each resolution. This analysis confirms that the RTX 5080 is the dominant component, with the Ryzen 5 7600X providing adequate support across all tested scenarios.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 7600X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 in Minimum
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 130.3 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 101.9 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 86.1 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 62.3 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 243.8 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 188.6 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 155.1 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 121.9 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 378.3 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 287.7 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 242.5 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 182.9 |
Minimum with Ryzen 5 7600X + Other GPUs
See how Minimum performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Minimum with RTX 5080 + Other CPUs
See how Minimum performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 5 7600X + RTX 5080
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.