Minimum

# Minimum with AMD Ryzen 5 7500F + AMD Radeon RX 7700

FAQ

Q: What is the combo rank for this CPU-GPU pairing in Minimum?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7700 ranks 1298 out of 2939 tested combos in Minimum, placing it in the upper-middle portion of the database.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The Ryzen 5 7500F has an average benchmark score of 24964, sitting within 0.4% of its closest competitors. It trails the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F by 0.2% and the Intel Core i7-13620H by 0.2%, while leading the Intel Core i7-11850H by 0.1% and the Intel Core 5 210H by 0.4%.

Q: What is the GPU's synthetic benchmark standing relative to its peers?

A: The Radeon RX 7700 scores 15852 on average, placing it just 0.1% behind the AMD Radeon R9 370X and 1% behind the AMD Radeon RX 9060. It outperforms the AMD Radeon Pro W5500 by 1.1%, but sits 1.7% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti.

Q: What are the best and worst frame rates recorded at 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the combo delivers 214 FPS average, which is the highest recorded. The lowest 1080p result is 105 FPS average at Ultra settings, showing a substantial spread across presets.

Q: Does the GPU have enough VRAM for Minimum at 4K?

A: The Radeon RX 7700 features 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with 624.1 GB/s bandwidth, which is more than sufficient for this title. At 3840x2160 Ultra, the combo still manages 36 FPS, indicating the memory capacity is not a limiting factor.

Q: What is the CPU's multi-threaded performance in Cinebench?

A: The Ryzen 5 7500F scores 22799 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, 9575 in R20 multi-core, and 2298 in R15 multi-core. Single-core scores are 3218, 1351, and 324 across the same versions respectively.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 7700 brings 16 GB of GDDR6 VRAM running at 2438 MHz with an effective 19.5 Gbps transfer rate, feeding a 256-bit memory bus that delivers 624.1 GB/s of bandwidth. This memory configuration is substantial for Minimum, a 2014 third-person shooter that does not demand excessive frame buffer capacity. The GPU's 2560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, and 96 render output units provide the raw throughput needed to drive high refresh rates at mainstream resolutions.

Clock behavior plays a defining role in the measured results. The RX 7700 has a base clock of 1900 MHz, a game clock of 2041 MHz, and a boost clock of 2459 MHz. The gap between base and boost clocks means the card can scale its frequency dynamically based on workload intensity and thermal headroom. This is reflected in the frame rates observed: at 1080p Low, the combo reaches 214 FPS, suggesting the GPU is operating near its boost ceiling. At 4K Ultra, the average drops to 36 FPS, indicating the GPU is fully saturated and likely holding closer to its sustained game clock rather than peak boost.

The GPU's architecture is RDNA 3.0 on TSMC's 5 nm process, with 28,100 million transistors packed into a 346 mm² die. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with Minimum's rendering requirements. The 40 ray accelerators are present but irrelevant for this title, which predates ray tracing by several years. The card's 25.18 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 393.4 GTexel/s texture rate provide ample headroom for a game from this era.

In synthetic benchmarks, the GPU scores 20974 in Passmark G3D and 106028 in Geekbench OpenCL. Its percentile rank of 58 among all GPUs places it slightly above median, though its nearest rivals in the database include the R9 370X and RTX 3060 Ti, showing it competes with products from different generations. The Passmark DirectX 11 score of 186 and DirectX 12 score of 96 indicate the card's driver overhead and feature set handle legacy APIs effectively.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of Ryzen 5 7500F and RX 7700 achieves rank 1298 out of 2939 tested combos in Minimum, placing it at roughly the 56th percentile. This is a respectable position for a mid-range pairing, though not exceptional. The CPU's percentile rank of 77 among all processors is notably higher than the GPU's percentile rank of 58, suggesting the processor has more headroom relative to its peers than the graphics card does.

The rank reflects the balance between the two components. The Ryzen 5 7500F, with its Zen 4 architecture, 6 cores, 12 threads, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache, provides strong single-thread and multi-thread performance. Its 3DMark scores range from 974 in single-thread to 6379 in max-threads tests. The GPU, however, sits in a more crowded field where its nearest rivals are within 1.7% in average benchmark scores, indicating tight competition.

For Minimum, the combo's rank suggests it delivers a playable experience across most settings, but the 4K Ultra result of 36 FPS shows the pairing is not designed for maximum fidelity at the highest resolution. The data indicates this is a 1080p and 1440p-oriented combination, with 4K requiring settings reductions to maintain smooth gameplay. The rank of 1298 means over 1600 combos tested faster, but also that the majority of tested configurations (roughly 44%) fall behind this pairing.

The CPU's nearest rivals in the database — the Intel Core i7-11850H, AMD Ryzen 5 8400F, Intel Core i7-13620H, and Intel Core 5 210H — all have average scores within 0.4% of the Ryzen 5 7500F. This clustering indicates the processor is well-positioned in its performance class, and the combo's overall rank is more heavily influenced by the GPU's mid-pack standing.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combo delivers its strongest performance across all presets. Low settings produce an average of 214 FPS, Medium yields 164 FPS with a minimum of 139 and maximum of 188, High achieves 137 FPS, and Ultra drops to 105 FPS. The 1080p results show a clear progression: each step up in quality costs roughly 25-30% of the previous setting's frame rate, with the gap from Low to Ultra representing a 51% reduction in average FPS.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance scales down predictably. Low settings average 138 FPS, Medium reaches 106 FPS with a range of 90 to 121 FPS, High delivers 89 FPS, and Ultra settles at 68 FPS. The 1440p results maintain playable frame rates across all presets, with even Ultra staying above 60 FPS. The drop from 1080p to 1440p at each setting is consistent: Low falls by 35.5%, Medium by 35.4%, High by 35%, and Ultra by 35.2%.

At 3840x2160, the picture changes dramatically. Low settings yield 74 FPS, Medium averages 57 FPS with a minimum of 48 and maximum of 65, High drops to 48 FPS, and Ultra falls to 36 FPS. The 4K results show the GPU struggling at higher quality presets, with Ultra producing frame rates that are borderline for smooth gameplay. The transition from 1440p to 4K is steep: Low drops by 46.4%, Medium by 46.2%, High by 46.1%, and Ultra by 47.1%.

The Medium preset is the only one with recorded minimum and maximum FPS values across all resolutions. At 1080p, the range is 139 to 188 FPS; at 1440p, it is 90 to 121 FPS; and at 4K, it is 48 to 65 FPS. These ranges indicate frame pacing consistency, with the spread narrowing as resolution increases, suggesting the GPU becomes more consistently saturated at higher pixel counts.

Resolution Scaling

The frame rate scaling from 1080p to 4K reveals a GPU-bound configuration. At Low settings, the combo produces 214 FPS at 1080p, 138 FPS at 1440p, and 74 FPS at 4K. The 1080p to 1440p drop is 35.5%, while the 1440p to 4K drop is 46.4%. For Medium settings, the corresponding drops are 35.4% and 46.2%. High settings show 35% and 46.1% drops, and Ultra shows 35.2% and 47.1% drops.

The consistency of the 1080p-to-1440p reduction across all presets (between 35% and 35.5%) indicates the workload scales uniformly with pixel count at this step. The 1440p-to-4K reduction is larger and also consistent (46.1% to 47.1%), reflecting the 2.25x pixel increase from 1440p to 4K versus the 1.78x increase from 1080p to 1440p. The frame rate drops are proportionally smaller than the pixel count increases, which is typical for GPU-bound scenarios where higher resolutions improve efficiency per pixel.

This scaling pattern points to the GPU as the primary limiter at higher resolutions. The CPU's strong synthetic scores — including a Passmark multi-thread score of 26825 and Cinebench R23 multi-core of 22799 — suggest it can feed frames faster than the GPU can render them at 4K. The 1080p Low result of 214 FPS indicates the CPU can drive high frame rates, but the GPU cannot maintain proportional performance as resolution climbs.

At 4K Ultra, the 36 FPS average represents a 83.2% reduction from 1080p Low. This steep decline confirms that the RX 7700 lacks the raw pixel throughput for maximum settings at 4K, despite its 16 GB VRAM. The memory bandwidth of 624.1 GB/s is sufficient, but the 236.1 GPixel/s pixel rate and 25.18 TFLOPS compute are the binding constraints at this resolution.

Settings Recommendations

For 1080p displays, the data supports using Ultra settings. The combo averages 105 FPS at this preset, which is well above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay and provides headroom for high refresh rate monitors. Even the minimum observed frame rate at Medium (139 FPS) suggests the system rarely dips below playable levels at 1080p, so users can safely maximize visual quality without sacrificing responsiveness.

At 1440p, Ultra settings remain viable with a 68 FPS average. This is above 60 FPS, though with less margin for demanding scenes. High settings at 89 FPS provide a more comfortable buffer, and Medium at 106 FPS offers excellent frame pacing with a recorded range of 90 to 121 FPS. For competitive play, Low at 138 FPS is the optimal choice, but for visual fidelity, High appears to be the sweet spot that balances quality and performance.

For 4K displays, the recommendation is more nuanced. Low settings average 74 FPS, which is playable but visually compromised. Medium settings yield 57 FPS with a minimum of 48 FPS — borderline for smooth gameplay, and the minimum suggests occasional stutter in demanding scenes. High settings drop to 48 FPS average, and Ultra falls to 36 FPS, both below the 60 FPS threshold for ideal smoothness. The data suggests 4K users should either accept Medium settings with variable frame rates or drop to Low for consistent performance.

The Medium preset deserves special attention across all resolutions. It is the only preset with recorded minimum and maximum FPS values, showing a consistent pattern: 139-188 FPS at 1080p, 90-121 FPS at 1440p, and 48-65 FPS at 4K. The frame ranges indicate this preset delivers stable performance with acceptable variance. At 1440p, Medium's 106 FPS average with a 90 FPS minimum provides a strong balance of quality and smoothness that suits most users.

Given the data, the best overall experience for this combo is 1440p with High settings. The 89 FPS average provides smooth gameplay with substantial visual improvements over Medium, while maintaining a comfortable margin above 60 FPS. Users prioritizing frame rate over visuals can opt for 1080p Ultra at 105 FPS, while those with 4K displays should temper expectations and use Medium or Low presets depending on their tolerance for frame rate variation.