Minimum

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT delivers a remarkably fluid experience in Minimum, a third-person shooter from 2014. The measured data shows this combination is capable of extreme frame rates, often exceeding the refresh rate capabilities of most displays, making it a powerful choice for competitive play. This analysis breaks down the specific performance metrics, scaling behavior, and component roles based on the provided benchmark data.

Settings Recommendations

The measured FPS data indicates that the best experience depends entirely on the target resolution and the desired balance between visual fidelity and frame rate headroom. For players prioritizing maximum smoothness and responsiveness, the Low preset is the clear winner, but it comes at the cost of visual quality. At 1920x1080, the Low preset achieves an average of 300 FPS, which is likely hitting a hard cap or the absolute limit of the rendering engine. This is ideal for high-refresh-rate esports monitors, as the data shows it is 70 FPS faster than the High preset at the same resolution.

For a more balanced experience that maintains high frame rates while improving image quality, the High preset is exceptionally strong. At 1440p, High delivers an average of 124 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS standard and suitable for 120Hz displays. The jump from High to Ultra is significant, with the average FPS dropping from 124 to 95 at 1440p, a loss of 29 FPS for what is often a marginal visual gain in older titles. The data suggests that High is the sweet spot for 1440p, offering a substantial 53% performance increase over Ultra while still providing a high level of graphical detail.

At 4K, the choice becomes more critical. The High preset at 3840x2160 yields an average of 67 FPS, which is playable but not ideal for fast-paced competitive shooters. Ultra drops to 51 FPS, which may feel less fluid. The Medium preset at 4K provides a frame rate of 80 FPS, which is a higher average than High and comes with a minimum FPS of 68, suggesting a more consistent experience. Given the data, the Medium preset offers the best balance of visual quality and performance at 4K, as it provides a 13 FPS advantage over High and a 29 FPS advantage over Ultra, while also having a higher minimum frame rate than the High preset. Ultimately, the best preset is resolution-dependent: Low for maximum FPS at 1080p, High for the ideal blend at 1440p, and Medium for the smoothest 4K experience.

FAQ

*Q: What is the highest average frame rate recorded for this CPU-GPU combo in Minimum?*

A: The highest recorded average frame rate is 300 FPS, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with the Low settings preset.

Q: How does the Ultra preset compare to the High preset at 1440p?

A: The data shows a significant performance cost for Ultra settings. At 2560x1440, the High preset averages 124 FPS, while the Ultra preset averages 95 FPS. This represents a 29 FPS decrease in performance when switching to Ultra.

Q: Is the game more demanding at 4K for this specific setup?

A: The benchmark results show a clear drop in performance at 4K. For instance, the High preset averages 193 FPS at 1080p, 124 FPS at 1440p, and 67 FPS at 2160p. This indicates that the higher resolution places a significantly greater load on the rendering hardware.

Q: What are the minimum FPS numbers for the Medium preset across the tested resolutions?

A: The Medium preset has recorded minimum FPS values that vary by resolution. At 1920x1080, the minimum is 195 FPS. At 2560x1440, the minimum is 126 FPS. At 3840x2160, the minimum is 68 FPS.

Q: Does the game support ultra-wide or specific high-refresh-rate modes?

A: The provided data does not contain any information about supported display modes or aspect ratios beyond the three standard resolutions tested (1920x1080, 2560x1440, and 3840x2160).

Q: How does this combo perform at 1080p with High settings?

A: At 1920x1080 with High settings, the combination achieves an average frame rate of 193 FPS. This is a very high frame rate, indicating that the system is not heavily stressed at this resolution and settings level.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT plays a dominant role in shaping the performance landscape in Minimum, particularly at higher resolutions. The GPU's memory configuration includes 20 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 320-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 800.0 GB/s. This substantial memory capacity and bandwidth ensure that texture streaming and frame buffering are not bottlenecks, even at 4K resolution where memory demands are highest.

The GPU's clock speeds are also a key factor. The base clock is 1387 MHz, with a game clock of 2025 MHz and a boost clock of 2394 MHz. The high boost clock allows the GPU to reach its maximum potential when thermals and power allow, which is crucial for maintaining high frame rates. The architecture is RDNA 3.0, built on a 5 nm process, which contributes to its efficiency. The GPU has 5376 shading units, 336 TMUs, and 192 ROPs, providing a robust foundation for pixel processing.

The data suggests that the GPU is the primary scaler for performance. When moving from 1080p to 4K, the frame rates drop considerably across all settings. For example, at High settings, the average FPS drops from 193 at 1080p to 67 at 4K, a 65% reduction. This indicates that the RX 7900 XT is being pushed harder as resolution increases, confirming that it is the main component responsible for handling the increased pixel load. The GPU's 84 RT cores and 51.48 TFLOPS of FP32 performance are likely underutilized in this older title, as it likely does not feature advanced ray tracing or compute-heavy effects. The performance is instead driven by the raw rasterization power of the 192 ROPs and the high memory bandwidth.

How This Combo Ranks

In the overall database of tested combinations for Minimum, the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F and AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT combo holds a rank of 739 out of 3712 tested combos. This places it in the top 20% of all systems tested for this game, indicating a very strong performance level. The high percentile ranking reflects the power of this pairing, which is capable of delivering frame rates that are unattainable by the majority of systems in the database.

This rank reflects the combination's ability to handle the game's demands with ease. The data shows that it can push beyond 300 FPS at 1080p and remain above 60 FPS at 4K with most settings, a feat that requires a well-balanced and high-performing configuration. The rank is likely pulled down by the fact that Minimum is a slightly older title, and the immense power of the RX 7900 XT is somewhat bottlenecked by the CPU at lower resolutions, preventing it from achieving even higher scores that might be seen in more modern games. The top 20% placement, however, confirms that this is a formidable setup for this specific title, ensuring a highly responsive and visually smooth experience. The rank of 739 means there are 738 other combinations that perform better, which likely include newer, more expensive components, but this combo still represents a top-tier performance tier.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data reveals a clear and consistent trend in resolution scaling. The performance decrease from 1080p to 4K is substantial, demonstrating the increased workload on the system at higher pixel counts. This scaling behavior provides insight into which component is the limiting factor at different resolutions.

At Low settings, the average frame rate drops from 300 FPS at 1080p to 193 FPS at 1440p, a 36% reduction, and then to 104 FPS at 4K, a further 46% reduction from 1440p. This significant drop suggests that even at the lowest visual settings, the GPU is being heavily taxed by the increasing resolution. The fact that the frame rate is not constant across resolutions indicates that the GPU is the primary bottleneck; if the CPU were the limit, the frame rate would remain relatively flat regardless of resolution.

The trend is similar at High settings, with a 36% drop from 1080p to 1440p (193 to 124 FPS) and a further 46% drop from 1440p to 4K (124 to 67 FPS). This consistent pattern across different settings confirms that the resolution is the dominant factor in performance. The scaling is not linear, with the jump to 4K being particularly punishing. This is expected, as 4K has 4 times the pixels of 1080p, requiring significantly more GPU work. The data implies that the CPU, the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F, has enough headroom to feed the GPU at 1080p, but the GPU's rendering capabilities become the limiting factor as resolution increases. The high frame rates at 1080p, exceeding 200 FPS, suggest that the CPU is not a bottleneck at this resolution, but the GPU's raw power is what determines the final output at 4K.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The following is a detailed breakdown of the average frame rates measured for this combination across all tested resolutions and settings.

1920x1080 (1080p)

• Low: Average 300 FPS. This is the highest recorded frame rate, suggesting a performance ceiling or engine limit.
• Medium: Average 230 FPS, with a minimum of 195 FPS and a maximum of 264 FPS. This shows a wide variance but a still excellent performance.
• High: Average 193 FPS. This is a very strong result, suitable for high-refresh-rate monitors.
• Ultra: Average 147 FPS. This is the most demanding preset at this resolution but still provides a high frame rate.

2560x1440 (1440p)

• Low: Average 193 FPS. This is identical to the 1080p High preset, showing the scaling of resolution.
• Medium: Average 148 FPS, with a minimum of 126 FPS and a maximum of 170 FPS. This is a solid result for 1440p gaming.
• High: Average 124 FPS. This is an ideal result for 120Hz displays, offering a smooth experience.
• Ultra: Average 95 FPS. This is a playable frame rate, but the drop from High is significant.

3840x2160 (4K)

• Low: Average 104 FPS. This is a playable frame rate at 4K, but it is a large drop from lower resolutions.
• Medium: Average 80 FPS, with a minimum of 68 FPS and a maximum of 92 FPS. This provides a smoother experience than High, with a higher minimum FPS.
• High: Average 67 FPS. This is a playable frame rate, but it may not be ideal for fast-paced competitive play.
• Ultra: Average 51 FPS. This is the most demanding preset at 4K and results in a frame rate that is below the 60 FPS target.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture. It has a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, which provides strong single-threaded performance. The processor has a TDP of 65 W and is built on a 5 nm process. In the context of Minimum, the CPU's role is to feed the GPU with draw calls and game logic data.

The benchmark data suggests that the CPU is not a significant bottleneck for this title. At 1080p with Low settings, the frame rate hits 300 FPS, which is likely a cap. Even at High settings, the frame rate is 193 FPS, which is very high. These high frame rates indicate that the CPU's 6 cores and 12 threads are more than sufficient to handle the game's processing demands, even with the high boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The CPU's single-thread performance is likely a key factor here, as older games often rely heavily on a single or a few cores.

The CPU's performance is supported by its benchmark scores. It achieves a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22799 and a single-core score of 3218. This strong single-core performance is crucial for maintaining high frame rates in games that are not heavily threaded. The processor also has 32 MB of shared L3 cache, which helps reduce latency and improve performance in gaming workloads. The data implies that the CPU has enough headroom to handle even higher frame rates if the GPU were not the limiting factor. At 4K, the performance drop is entirely attributable to the GPU's rendering load, as the CPU is likely waiting for the GPU to finish its work. The Ryzen 5 7500F is a capable partner for the RX 7900 XT, ensuring that it is not holding back the powerful GPU in this specific game.