Minecraft

Minecraft

AVERAGE FPS
246
excellent

This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 246 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 69 111 140 177
1440p QHD 133 213 268 338
1080p Full HD 211 337 424 536

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 177
3840x2160 Medium 140
3840x2160 High 111
3840x2160 Ultra 69
2560x1440 Low 338
2560x1440 Medium 268
2560x1440 High 213
2560x1440 Ultra 133
1920x1080 Low 536
1920x1080 Medium 424
1920x1080 High 337
1920x1080 Ultra 211

Minecraft with Intel Core Ultra 5 245 + AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT, In-Depth Analysis

The pairing of the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 with the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT produces a high-performance system for Minecraft, demonstrating a significant capacity for high refresh rates even at demanding resolutions. The measured data reveals a configuration that scales predictably with settings and resolution, with the CPU providing the foundational single-thread performance necessary for the game's core logic. Analysis of the 1080p results indicates that the framerate ceiling in this title is exceptionally high, while the 4K data shows the GPU becoming the primary constraint as pixel count increases.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245 is a 14-core, 14-thread processor based on the Arrow Lake architecture, built on a 3 nm process. It operates with a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, which are the key specifications for understanding its performance in Minecraft. The CPU has a 24 MB shared L3 cache and supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. Its benchmark percentile stands at 90, indicating it outperforms the vast majority of processors in the database.

For a game like Minecraft, single-thread performance is often the primary driver of the framerate, especially when the GPU is not the bottleneck. The Core Ultra 5 245's strong single-core capability is reflected in its benchmark scores, such as a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4648 and a PassMark single-thread score of 4394. These results place it in a competitive position against its nearest rivals, with its average benchmark score of 48995 being only 0.4% lower than the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G and 0.5% lower than the AMD Ryzen 9 7900. It is also 0.6% and 0.8% higher than the Intel Xeon Gold 5318H and Intel Core i5-14600K, respectively.

The data shows that at 1080p with Low settings, the system reaches an average of 536 FPS. This exceptionally high framerate suggests that the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU with enough data to achieve performance levels that far exceed typical display refresh rates. The core count of 14, while not directly leveraged by Minecraft's primary game loop, contributes to overall system responsiveness and ensures that background tasks do not interfere with game performance. The processor's 65W TDP is a modest figure, suggesting efficient operation even under sustained load. The CPU's performance in this game is clearly sufficient to push the system to its limits, with the GPU becoming the limiting factor as resolution and settings increase.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture and features 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s. Its boost clock is rated at 2544 MHz, with a game clock of 2171 MHz. The GPU has 3456 shading units, 216 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. It holds a 67th percentile ranking among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 22549. This places it in a mid-to-high tier, with its nearest rival being the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile, which it edges out by 0.5%, while it trails the RTX 4060 Mobile by 0.8%.

In Minecraft, the GPU's role becomes increasingly important at higher resolutions and settings due to the game's rendering load. The 12 GB VRAM capacity is ample for the game's textures and draw distances, ensuring that memory capacity is not a limiting factor in any of the measured scenarios. The GPU's raw compute power, quantified by its FP32 performance of 35.17 TFLOPS, is a significant resource for handling the game's shaders and visual effects.

The benchmark results demonstrate the GPU's scaling. At 1080p, the GPU is not the bottleneck, with the system achieving 337 FPS on High settings and 536 FPS on Low. However, as the resolution increases to 4K, the GPU's workload grows substantially. The data shows a clear progression where the GPU's performance ceiling becomes the dominant factor. The GPU's 67th percentile ranking suggests it is a capable performer, but the results in Minecraft indicate that it is the component that limits the maximum possible framerate at higher resolutions. Its performance is comparable to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080, which it trails by 1.5% in the database.

Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component

The measured FPS data reveals a clear and consistent pattern of scaling across resolutions, which provides insight into the system's bottleneck. At 1080p with High settings, the system achieves an average of 337 FPS. Moving to 1440p, the average drops to 213 FPS, a 36.8% decrease. At 4K, the average further falls to 111 FPS, representing a 67.1% decrease from the 1080p result and a 47.9% decrease from the 1440p result.

This scaling pattern is characteristic of a system where the GPU becomes the primary limiting factor as resolution increases. At 1080p, the framerate is exceptionally high, suggesting that while the CPU is providing a high ceiling, the GPU is still able to keep up with the relatively light pixel workload. However, the dramatic drop in performance when transitioning to 4K indicates that the RX 7700 XT is working near its maximum capacity, as the number of pixels to process quadruples.

The data for Low settings further emphasizes this point. At 1080p Low, the system achieves a staggering 536 FPS. At 1440p Low, this drops to 338 FPS, and at 4K Low, it falls to 177 FPS. The drop from 1080p to 4K is 67.0%, nearly identical to the percentage drop seen at High settings. This consistency across settings strongly suggests that the GPU's fillrate and shading capabilities are the limiting factor at higher resolutions, regardless of the visual complexity. The system is well-balanced at 1440p, where it still delivers very high framerates, but the 4K results show that the GPU is the component that prevents this combination from achieving the same level of performance as at lower resolutions.

Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience per the measured rows

The measured data provides a clear picture of how different presets affect performance, allowing for a recommendation based on the desired balance between visual fidelity and framerate. At 1440p, the High preset delivers an average of 213 FPS. This is a very high framerate that is well-suited for competitive or high-refresh-rate gaming, while the jump from High to Ultra yields a significant performance cost, dropping the average to 133 FPS. The Medium preset at 1440p offers an average of 268 FPS, which is higher than High but comes with reduced visual quality.

At 4K, the choice of settings becomes more critical. The High preset delivers an average of 111 FPS, which is generally considered a good target for smooth gameplay on many displays. However, the Ultra preset drops the average to 69 FPS, which may be less desirable for those seeking a very smooth experience. The Medium preset at 4K provides an average of 140 FPS, a substantial increase over High and Ultra, but at the cost of visual detail.

The data suggests that the High preset is the optimal choice for this combination, particularly at 1440p and 4K. At 1440p, it offers a framerate that exceeds the refresh rate of most high-end monitors, while at 4K, it provides a solid 111 FPS average, which is a good balance. The Ultra preset is likely to be too demanding for 4K gaming, as the 69 FPS average may be below the target for users with high-refresh-rate 4K displays. The Low preset, while providing the highest framerates, would not be recommended for general use due to the significant reduction in visual quality. The Medium preset is a viable alternative for users who prioritize framerate above all else, but the High preset appears to be the sweet spot for this system.

How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245 and AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT combination holds a rank of 319 out of 1176 tested combos in Minecraft. This places it in the top 27% of all systems tested, indicating a strong overall performance. This ranking reflects the balance of the two components, as the system is capable of delivering high framerates across a variety of settings and resolutions.

The rank of 319 out of 1176 is a specific data point that contextualizes this system's performance relative to a broad range of hardware. While it does not reach the top tier, it is clearly a high-performing combination that will satisfy the demands of most gamers. The ranking suggests that this combo outperforms the majority of systems in the database, but there is still a significant number of combinations that achieve higher framerates, likely those featuring more powerful GPUs or CPUs.

The fact that this system ranks in the 27th percentile of all tested combos is notable, considering the CPU and GPU are not flagship models. This indicates that the pairing is well-matched for Minecraft, with neither component holding the other back to a significant degree. The high rank is primarily driven by the exceptional performance at 1080p and 1440p, where the system can reach very high framerates. The 4K performance, while still good, is where the system loses ground to higher-end combos with more powerful GPUs. Overall, this ranking confirms that the Core Ultra 5 245 and RX 7700 XT is a very capable pairing for this game.

FAQ

Q: What is the average FPS at 1080p with High settings?

A: The system achieves an average of 337 FPS at 1920x1080 with the High settings preset.

Q: How does the system perform at 4K resolution?

A: At 3840x2160, the average FPS ranges from 177 on Low settings to 69 on Ultra settings, with High settings providing an average of 111 FPS.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU more likely to be the bottleneck at 4K?

A: The data indicates the GPU is the limiting factor, as the framerate drops significantly from 1440p to 4K, showing a typical GPU-bound scaling pattern.

Q: What is the highest average FPS recorded for this combo?

A: The highest average FPS is 536, which was measured at 1920x1080 resolution with the Low settings preset.

Q: How does this combo rank compared to other tested systems?

A: This combination is ranked 319 out of 1176 tested combos for Minecraft, placing it in the top 27% of all systems.

Q: What is the performance difference between High and Ultra settings at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, the High preset achieves an average of 213 FPS, while the Ultra preset achieves 133 FPS, a difference of 80 FPS.

Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers

The following table outlines the exact average framerates recorded for each resolution and settings preset combination.

| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |

|:--- |:--- |:--- |

| 1920x1080 | Low | 536 |

| 1920x1080 | Medium | 424 |

| 1920x1080 | High | 337 |

| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 211 |

| 2560x1440 | Low | 338 |

| 2560x1440 | Medium | 268 |

| 2560x1440 | High | 213 |

| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 133 |

| 3840x2160 | Low | 177 |

| 3840x2160 | Medium | 140 |

| 3840x2160 | High | 111 |

| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 69 |

For the Medium preset, additional data is available showing the variance in framerate. At 1080p, the system recorded a minimum of 361 FPS and a maximum of 488 FPS. At 1440p, the minimum and maximum were 228 FPS and 308 FPS, respectively. At 4K, the framerate ranged from a minimum of 119 FPS to a maximum of 161 FPS. This data illustrates the stability of the system, with the variance between minimum and maximum being relatively consistent across resolutions.

Hardware Specifications

Intel Core Ultra 5 245

Cores / Threads 14 / 14
Base Clock 3500 MHz
Boost Clock 5100 MHz
TDP 65W
Socket Intel Socket 1851
View Full CPU Details →

AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT

VRAM 12 GB GDDR6
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2544 MHz MHz
TDP 245 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for Intel Core Ultra 5 245 + AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT in Minecraft

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 177.0
3840x2160 Medium 140.0
3840x2160 High 111.0
3840x2160 Ultra 69.0
2560x1440 Low 338.0
2560x1440 Medium 268.0
2560x1440 High 213.0
2560x1440 Ultra 133.0
1920x1080 Low 536.0
1920x1080 Medium 424.0
1920x1080 High 337.0
1920x1080 Ultra 211.0

Minecraft with iUltra 5 245 + Other GPUs

See how Minecraft performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Minecraft with RX 7700 XT + Other CPUs

See how Minecraft performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with iUltra 5 245 + RX 7700 XT

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.