Minecraft

Minecraft

AVERAGE FPS
153
excellent

This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 153 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 43 69 87 110
1440p QHD 82 132 166 210
1080p Full HD 131 209 263 332

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 110
3840x2160 Medium 87
3840x2160 High 69
3840x2160 Ultra 43
2560x1440 Low 210
2560x1440 Medium 166
2560x1440 High 132
2560x1440 Ultra 82
1920x1080 Low 332
1920x1080 Medium 263
1920x1080 High 209
1920x1080 Ultra 131

Minecraft with AMD Ryzen 9 9900X + Intel Arc B570, In-Depth Analysis

# Minecraft with AMD Ryzen 9 9900X + Intel Arc B570 — Benchmark Analysis

This combo pairs a 12-core, 24-thread AMD Ryzen 9 9900X with an Intel Arc B570 GPU, producing measured frame rates that scale predictably across resolutions and settings in Minecraft. The dataset shows a system that comfortably handles the game at high refresh rates at 1080p, remains playable at 1440p, and only begins to struggle at 4K with the Ultra preset. The Ryzen 9 9900X sits in the 92nd percentile among all CPUs, while the Arc B570 ranks in the 65th percentile among GPUs, suggesting the processor has substantial headroom in this workload. The following sections break down how this combination behaves across every measured configuration, what the data implies about bottleneck characteristics, and where the optimal experience lies.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data reveals a clear and consistent pattern of performance degradation as resolution climbs from 1920x1080 to 3840x2160, with the magnitude of the drop varying by settings preset. At the Low preset, average frame rates fall from 332 FPS at 1080p to 210 FPS at 1440p—a reduction of approximately 37%—and then to 110 FPS at 4K, representing another 48% drop from the 1440p figure. This steep scaling at Low settings strongly indicates that the Intel Arc B570's pixel throughput becomes the limiting factor as resolution rises, since the CPU is far from saturated at these frame rates.

The Medium preset shows a similar but slightly less dramatic pattern: 263 FPS at 1080p, 166 FPS at 1440p, and 87 FPS at 4K. The percentage drops here are roughly 37% from 1080p to 1440p and 48% from 1440p to 4K, nearly identical to the Low preset's scaling. This consistency across presets suggests that resolution scaling is driven primarily by GPU fill-rate and memory bandwidth constraints rather than by settings-specific effects. The Arc B570's 380.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 200.0 GPixel/s pixel rate are being taxed progressively harder as the pixel count increases.

High settings follow the same trajectory: 209 FPS at 1080p, 132 FPS at 1440p, and 69 FPS at 4K. The drops are proportionally similar to Low and Medium, reinforcing that resolution, not preset complexity, dominates the performance curve in this game. At the Ultra preset, the pattern becomes more extreme: 131 FPS at 1080p drops to 82 FPS at 1440p—a 37% reduction—and then plummets to 43 FPS at 4K, a 48% fall from the 1440p result. The Ultra preset at 4K is the only measured configuration that dips below 60 FPS, making it the sole point where the experience becomes marginal for smooth gameplay.

The data indicates that at 1080p, even the Ultra preset achieves 131 FPS, which is well above typical refresh-rate thresholds, implying the CPU is not the binding constraint at this resolution. However, as resolution increases, the GPU's workload grows quadratically, and the Arc B570's 10 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus becomes a limiting factor. The 4K Ultra result of 43 FPS is less than half the 1080p Ultra figure, underscoring that this GPU is not designed for maximum settings at 4K in this title. The scaling pattern across all four presets is remarkably uniform, suggesting that Minecraft's rendering pipeline at these settings is primarily resolution-bound rather than shader-bound.

Settings Recommendations

The measured data provides a clear hierarchy of playable configurations, with the optimal choice depending on the target resolution and acceptable frame rate floor. At 1920x1080, every preset delivers at least 131 FPS, meaning users have full freedom to choose Ultra settings without sacrificing smoothness. The jump from High at 209 FPS to Ultra at 131 FPS represents a 37% performance cost, but the absolute frame rate remains high enough that Ultra is the recommended choice for 1080p displays, particularly those with high refresh rates.

For 2560x1440, the Medium preset at 166 FPS offers the best balance between visual quality and performance, according to the data. High settings at 132 FPS are also viable, but Ultra drops to 82 FPS, which, while playable, reduces headroom for demanding scenes. Low settings at 210 FPS provide the highest frame rates but sacrifice visual fidelity for a benefit that is unlikely to be perceptible on most 1440p monitors. The Medium preset's measured range of 141 to 191 FPS indicates consistent frame pacing, making it the sweet spot for this resolution.

At 3840x2160, the situation changes dramatically. The Medium preset at 87 FPS is the highest average that remains comfortably above 60 FPS, with a measured minimum of 74 FPS ensuring no significant dips below playability. Low settings at 110 FPS offer extra headroom, but High at 69 FPS is borderline, and Ultra at 43 FPS is not recommended for serious play. For 4K users, the data suggests Medium as the default choice, with Low reserved for those who prioritize maximum smoothness over visual detail. The 4K Medium frame range of 74 to 100 FPS demonstrates that even this preset has occasional dips, so users with 60 Hz displays will be fine, but those with 120 Hz panels may prefer Low.

The overall recommendation across all resolutions is Medium as the default preset, since it provides the most consistent frame rates relative to visual quality. At 1080p, however, the performance headroom is so large that Ultra is justified, while at 4K, Low or Medium are the only sensible options. The data does not support using Ultra at any resolution above 1080p if the goal is to maintain 60 FPS or higher.

GPU Role

The Intel Arc B570's specifications and benchmark results contextualize its measured performance in Minecraft. The GPU features 10 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus, delivering 380.0 GB/s of bandwidth, with a base and boost clock of 2500 MHz. It has 2304 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, and 80 raster output units, producing a pixel rate of 200.0 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 360.0 GTexel/s. Its FP32 throughput is 11.52 TFLOPS, which is moderate for a desktop GPU in this class.

In the broader benchmark database, the Arc B570 achieves an average benchmark score of 20556, placing it in the 65th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile (avg score 20534, deltaPct 0.1), the Intel Arc A750 (avg score 20582, deltaPct -0.1), the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M (avg score 20480, deltaPct 0.4), and the AMD Radeon R9 M390X (avg score 20662, deltaPct -0.5). These deltas are all within 0.5%, indicating that the Arc B570 sits in a tightly clustered performance tier.

The GPU's measured frame rates in Minecraft align with its mid-pack standing. At 4K Ultra, the 43 FPS result shows that the card's 80 ROPs are insufficient for maximum settings at that resolution, while at 1080p Low, the 332 FPS figure demonstrates substantial fill-rate capability when the workload is lighter. The 10 GB memory capacity is adequate for Minecraft at these settings, as the game's texture requirements are modest, but the 160-bit bus width limits bandwidth scaling at higher resolutions. The GPU's DirectX 12 Ultimate support (12_2) ensures compatibility with modern rendering paths, though Minecraft's Java-based engine may not fully utilize these features.

The Arc B570's 150 W TDP and dual-slot design with a single 8-pin power connector suggest it is a mid-range card, consistent with its benchmark percentile. Its PCIe 4.0 x8 interface could theoretically limit performance in some scenarios, but the measured data does not indicate a bottleneck at this interface width for this game. The GPU's 5 nm process node and 19,600 million transistors on a 272 mm² die position it as a modern, efficient design, though Minecraft's rendering workload appears to be more dependent on raw pixel throughput than on compute features.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X and Intel Arc B570 achieves a rank of 882 out of 1176 tested combos in Minecraft, placing it in the bottom quarter of the database. This ranking is notable given the CPU's strong absolute performance—the Ryzen 9 9900X has an average benchmark score of 57498 and sits in the 92nd percentile among all CPUs. The GPU's 65th percentile standing is the more likely constraint on the combo's rank, as the measured frame rates at higher resolutions suggest the Arc B570 limits overall performance.

The CPU's nearest rivals in the benchmark database include the AMD EPYC 9015 (avg score 57555, deltaPct -0.1), the AMD EPYC 7313 (avg score 57399, deltaPct 0.2), the Intel Core i9-14900 (avg score 58115, deltaPct -1.1), and the Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M (avg score 58323, deltaPct -1.4). These deltas are all within 1.5%, indicating that the Ryzen 9 9900X is statistically tied with these server and high-end desktop chips in synthetic benchmarks. However, the combo's in-game rank of 882 out of 1176 suggests that Minecraft's performance is not strongly correlated with raw CPU benchmark scores.

The rank implies that most other tested combos—294 of them, or about 25%—perform worse than this pairing, while 882 perform better. Given the CPU's high percentile, the rank is likely dragged down by the GPU's mid-tier standing. Combos with faster GPUs would naturally achieve higher frame rates in Minecraft, and the database's 1176 entries presumably include many configurations with more powerful graphics cards. The 4K Ultra result of 43 FPS is particularly indicative of this GPU-bound limitation, as a stronger GPU would likely push that figure well above 60 FPS.

FAQ

Q: What is the highest average FPS this combo achieves in Minecraft?

A: The highest measured average FPS is 332, achieved at 1920x1080 with the Low preset. The next highest is 263 FPS at 1080p Medium, followed by 210 FPS at 1440p Low.

Q: Can this combo maintain 60 FPS at 4K?

A: Yes, at Low, Medium, and High settings, the average FPS is 110, 87, and 69 respectively, all above 60. However, at Ultra settings, the average drops to 43 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: How does the Intel Arc B570 compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Arc A750?

A: The Arc B570 has an average benchmark score of 20556, while the Arc A750 scores 20582, a deltaPct of -0.1%, meaning the A750 is marginally faster by 0.1%. This difference is negligible in practical terms.

Q: What is the CPU's percentile ranking among all CPUs?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X ranks in the 92nd percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 57498. Its nearest rival, the AMD EPYC 9015, scores 57555, a deltaPct of -0.1%.

Q: What is the lowest average FPS recorded for this combo?

A: The lowest average FPS is 43, recorded at 3840x2160 resolution with the Ultra preset. This is the only measured configuration that falls below 60 FPS.

Q: Does the Medium preset show consistent frame pacing across resolutions?

A: Yes, the Medium preset has measured min/max ranges at all three resolutions: 224–303 FPS at 1080p, 141–191 FPS at 1440p, and 74–100 FPS at 4K. These ranges indicate stable frame delivery without major stutters.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combo delivers its strongest performance across all presets. The Low preset averages 332 FPS, Medium averages 263 FPS with a range of 224 to 303 FPS, High averages 209 FPS, and Ultra averages 131 FPS. The spread from Low to Ultra is 201 FPS, meaning Ultra runs at roughly 39% of Low's frame rate. The Medium preset's minimum of 224 FPS ensures that even in demanding scenes, the frame rate remains exceptionally high.

At 2560x1440, performance scales down uniformly. Low averages 210 FPS, Medium averages 166 FPS with a range of 141 to 191 FPS, High averages 132 FPS, and Ultra averages 82 FPS. The drop from 1080p to 1440p is consistent across presets: Low falls by 122 FPS (37%), Medium by 97 FPS (37%), High by 77 FPS (37%), and Ultra by 49 FPS (37%). This uniformity confirms that resolution scaling is the dominant factor.

At 3840x2160, the data shows the largest absolute reductions. Low averages 110 FPS, Medium averages 87 FPS with a range of 74 to 100 FPS, High averages 69 FPS, and Ultra averages 43 FPS. From 1440p to 4K, Low drops by 100 FPS (48%), Medium by 79 FPS (48%), High by 63 FPS (48%), and Ultra by 39 FPS (48%). The consistent 48% reduction from 1440p to 4K, compared to 37% from 1080p to 1440p, indicates a nonlinear scaling relationship tied to pixel count.

Across all resolutions, the Medium preset is the only one with complete min/max data, providing the clearest picture of frame pacing. At 1080p Medium, the 224 FPS minimum is still above the 1440p High average, demonstrating the CPU's ability to feed frames quickly at lower resolutions. At 4K Medium, the 74 FPS minimum is close to the 60 FPS threshold, suggesting that occasional dips could occur in more demanding scenes, though the average of 87 FPS provides adequate headroom.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X is a 12-core, 24-thread processor based on the Zen 5 architecture, codenamed Granite Ridge, manufactured on a 4 nm process by TSMC. It has a base clock of 4.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz, with a TDP of 120 W. It supports DDR5 memory via a dual-channel interface with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth, and its cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 64 MB of L3. The CPU's 16,630 million transistors are spread across a 2x 70.6 mm² die size, and it uses the AMD Socket AM5 platform.

In synthetic benchmarks, the Ryzen 9 9900X achieves a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 32172 and a single-core score of 2253, along with a Geekbench multicore score of 22174 and a single-core score of 3010. Its 3DMark scores range from 1286 in single-thread to 13929 in max-threads, showing strong scaling across thread counts. PassMark results include a multithread score of 54643, a single-thread score of 4672, and a physics score of 3381, with floating-point math at 120083 and integer math at 181056.

In Minecraft, the CPU's role is less pronounced than in synthetics, as evidenced by the combo's rank of 882 out of 1176. At 1080p Low, the 332 FPS average suggests the CPU can drive frame rates well beyond what the GPU can render at higher settings, but the data does not isolate CPU versus GPU limits directly. The CPU's 92nd percentile ranking indicates it is far more powerful than most processors in the database, yet the combo's in-game rank is much lower, implying the GPU is the primary limiter.

The CPU's 12 cores and 24 threads are likely underutilized in Minecraft, which is not known for heavy multi-threading. The single-core Cinebench R23 score of 2253 and 3DMark single-thread score of 1286 indicate strong per-core performance, which is more relevant for this game's rendering engine. The L3 cache of 64 MB and DDR5 memory support with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth provide ample headroom for game data, but these resources do not overcome the GPU's constraints at higher resolutions.

The CPU's nearest rivals—the AMD EPYC 9015, EPYC 7313, Intel Core i9-14900, and Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M—all score within 1.4% of the Ryzen 9 9900X in average benchmarks, yet none of these are mainstream gaming CPUs. This suggests that the Ryzen 9 9900X's performance class is well above what Minecraft requires, and the measured frame rates are more indicative of the Arc B570's capabilities than the CPU's. The 120 W TDP and 4 nm process node ensure efficient operation, but these characteristics do not translate into a higher in-game rank when paired with a mid-tier GPU.

Hardware Specifications

AMD Ryzen 9 9900X

Cores / Threads 12 / 24
Base Clock 4400 MHz
Boost Clock 5600 MHz
TDP 120W
Socket AMD Socket AM5
View Full CPU Details →

Intel Arc B570

VRAM 10 GB GDDR6
Base Clock
Boost Clock 2500 MHz MHz
TDP 150 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for AMD Ryzen 9 9900X + Intel Arc B570 in Minecraft

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 110.0
3840x2160 Medium 87.0
3840x2160 High 69.0
3840x2160 Ultra 43.0
2560x1440 Low 210.0
2560x1440 Medium 166.0
2560x1440 High 132.0
2560x1440 Ultra 82.0
1920x1080 Low 332.0
1920x1080 Medium 263.0
1920x1080 High 209.0
1920x1080 Ultra 131.0

Minecraft with Ryzen 9 9900X + Other GPUs

See how Minecraft performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Minecraft with Arc B570 + Other CPUs

See how Minecraft performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with Ryzen 9 9900X + Arc B570

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.