Microsoft Flight Simulator

Microsoft Flight Simulator

AVERAGE FPS
65
good

This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 65 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 37 39 51 66
1440p QHD 50 52 69 89
1080p Full HD 62 65 86 111

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 66
3840x2160 Medium 51
3840x2160 High 39
3840x2160 Ultra 37
2560x1440 Low 89
2560x1440 Medium 69
2560x1440 High 52
2560x1440 Ultra 50
1920x1080 Low 111
1920x1080 Medium 86
1920x1080 High 65
1920x1080 Ultra 62

Microsoft Flight Simulator with Intel Core i7-12700K + AMD Radeon RX 9060, In-Depth Analysis

The Intel Core i7-12700K paired with the AMD Radeon RX 9060 delivers a playable but firmly mid-range experience in Microsoft Flight Simulator, with performance that scales predictably across resolutions and settings. The data indicates this combination is best suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, where it can maintain respectable frame rates, while 4K Ultra presents a significant challenge that pushes the GPU to its limits.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS drop from 1080p to 4K reveals a clear GPU-bound scenario at higher resolutions. At Low settings, the average frame rate falls from 111 FPS at 1920x1080 to 89 FPS at 2560x1440, a reduction of 22 FPS. Pushing further to 3840x2160 brings the average down to 66 FPS, meaning the transition from 1080p to 4K at Low settings costs 45 FPS—a 40.5% performance reduction. This steep decline indicates that the RX 9060 is the limiting component when resolution increases, as the CPU has ample headroom at these lower graphical loads.

The scaling pattern becomes more pronounced at higher settings. At High settings, the averages are 65 FPS at 1080p, 52 FPS at 1440p, and 39 FPS at 4K. The jump from 1440p to 4K alone removes 13 FPS, while the full climb from 1080p to 4K removes 26 FPS. At Ultra settings, the trend continues: 62 FPS at 1080p, 50 FPS at 1440p, and just 37 FPS at 4K. The difference between 1080p and 4K at Ultra is 25 FPS, nearly identical to the High-setting delta, which suggests the GPU is saturated long before resolution becomes the sole bottleneck.

Interestingly, the Medium settings tier shows the most consistent scaling pattern with available minimum and maximum data. At 1080p Medium, the average is 86 FPS with a range of 73 to 99 FPS. At 1440p Medium, the average drops to 69 FPS with a range of 59 to 80 FPS. At 4K Medium, the average falls to 51 FPS with a range of 44 to 59 FPS. The consistent 17 FPS drop from 1080p to 1440p, followed by an 18 FPS drop from 1440p to 4K, indicates a linear relationship between pixel count and performance loss, typical of a GPU that is handling the rendering workload without CPU interference.

The data suggests that for users targeting 60 FPS, 1080p is the only resolution where this combo consistently achieves that goal across all settings. At 1440p, only Low and Medium settings break the 60 FPS barrier, while at 4K, no settings tier reaches 60 FPS. The 4K results—ranging from 37 to 66 FPS depending on settings—demonstrate that this resolution is best reserved for lighter graphical presets or users comfortable with sub-60 FPS performance.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 9060, built on the RDNA 4.0 architecture with the Navi 44 chip, plays the dominant role in determining Microsoft Flight Simulator's frame rates, particularly as resolution and settings increase. The GPU's 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus provides 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which appears sufficient for the game's texture streaming demands at 1080p and 1440p but becomes a limiting factor at 4K Ultra where the 37 FPS average suggests memory pressure or shader complexity is overwhelming the hardware.

The GPU's clock behavior reinforces its central role. With a base clock of 1700 MHz, a game clock of 2400 MHz, and a boost clock of 2990 MHz, the RX 9060 has a wide operating range. The 21.43 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 191.4 GPixel/s pixel rate are the raw resources that must process the flight simulator's dense scenery and lighting calculations. The fact that 4K Ultra yields only 37 FPS—the lowest recorded result—while 4K Low hits 66 FPS highlights how heavily the GPU's workload scales with graphical fidelity.

The GPU's benchmark profile places it in the 59th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 16014. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, scores 16129, a delta of -0.7%. This close competitive position means the RX 9060 is a solid mid-range performer, but not a high-end solution. The 8 GB VRAM capacity is a notable constraint; while it handles the game's 1080p and 1440p presets without issue, the 4K Ultra results suggest that larger textures and draw distances may be causing the GPU to exceed its memory buffer, contributing to the sub-40 FPS outcome.

The RX 9060's DirectX 12 Ultimate support and 64 ROPs provide the architectural foundation for the game's modern rendering paths. However, the measured FPS data shows that even with this support, the GPU cannot maintain playable frame rates at 4K Ultra. The combination of a 128-bit memory bus and 8 GB capacity is the likely culprit, as bandwidth-intensive scenes in Microsoft Flight Simulator—such as dense urban areas or complex weather systems—place heavy demands on memory throughput.

FAQ

Q: Can this combo run Microsoft Flight Simulator at 60 FPS on 1080p?

A: Yes, at 1080p the combo achieves 111 FPS on Low, 86 FPS on Medium, and 65 FPS on High settings. Only the Ultra preset falls short of 60 FPS with an average of 62 FPS.

Q: What is the best resolution for this CPU-GPU pairing?

A: The data shows 2560x1440 is a strong middle ground, with 89 FPS on Low and 69 FPS on Medium settings. However, 1920x1080 is the only resolution where all settings tiers exceed 60 FPS.

Q: How does the RX 9060 compare to its closest GPU rival?

A: The RX 9060 has an average benchmark score of 16014, which is 0.7% lower than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti's score of 16129. This places the two GPUs in a near-identical performance tier.

Q: Is the 8 GB VRAM sufficient for 4K gaming in this title?

A: The 4K results suggest it is marginal. At 4K Medium the combo averages 51 FPS, but at 4K Ultra it drops to 37 FPS, indicating the GPU's memory capacity or bandwidth becomes a bottleneck at the highest settings.

Q: What frame rates can users expect at 4K with Medium settings?

A: At 3840x2160 with Medium settings, the combo delivers an average of 51 FPS, with a minimum of 44 FPS and a maximum of 59 FPS, based on the measured data.

Q: How does the CPU's performance percentile influence gaming results?

A: The Intel Core i7-12700K sits in the 84th percentile of all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 35287. This high standing means it is unlikely to bottleneck the GPU in this game, as evidenced by the smooth scaling of FPS with resolution changes.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combo delivers its strongest results. Low settings produce an average of 111 FPS, making the experience exceptionally smooth. Medium settings reduce the average to 86 FPS, with measured minimums of 73 FPS and maximums of 99 FPS, indicating good frame pacing. High settings yield 65 FPS on average, while Ultra settings bring the average down to 62 FPS. This 1080p tier is the only resolution where every settings preset exceeds the 60 FPS threshold.

Moving to 2560x1440, performance degrades noticeably but remains playable. Low settings average 89 FPS, a 22 FPS drop from 1080p. Medium settings average 69 FPS, with a range of 59 to 80 FPS, meaning the minimum dips just below 60 FPS. High settings fall to 52 FPS, and Ultra settings average 50 FPS. The 1440p results show that users seeking high-refresh-rate play should stick to Low or Medium presets.

At 3840x2160, the combo struggles to maintain high frame rates. Low settings average 66 FPS, which just clears the 60 FPS bar. Medium settings drop to 51 FPS, with a minimum of 44 FPS and a maximum of 59 FPS. High settings average 39 FPS, and Ultra settings bottom out at 37 FPS. The 4K data clearly shows that this pairing is not designed for maximum fidelity at this resolution, with only the Low preset delivering a consistently smooth experience.

The progression across settings at each resolution follows an expected pattern. At 1080p, the difference between Low and Ultra is 49 FPS. At 1440p, that difference narrows to 39 FPS. At 4K, the difference shrinks to 29 FPS. This compression of frame rates as resolution increases further confirms that the GPU is the primary bottleneck, as the relative cost of higher settings diminishes when the pixel count already saturates the hardware.

How This Combo Ranks

The Intel Core i7-12700K and AMD Radeon RX 9060 combination ranks 1712 out of 2996 tested combos in Microsoft Flight Simulator, placing it in the lower-middle portion of the database. This ranking reflects the GPU's mid-range positioning rather than the CPU's strength, as the i7-12700K is a high-performing processor. The 84th percentile CPU ranking contrasts sharply with the 59th percentile GPU ranking, and the overall combo rank of 1712 suggests the GPU drags the pairing down in this specific game.

In the context of the full database, being at position 1712 out of 2996 means that roughly 57% of tested combos outperform this setup. This is consistent with the RX 9060's nearest rival data, where it sits within 1-2% of the AMD Radeon RX 7700 and the AMD Radeon R9 370X. The GPU's average benchmark score of 16014, compared to the RX 7700's 15852, shows a 1% advantage, but this does not translate into a high overall game ranking because Microsoft Flight Simulator is particularly demanding on GPU memory bandwidth and capacity.

The combo's ranking is also influenced by the game's nature as a flight simulator, which can be CPU-intensive in certain scenarios like complex autogen scenery or heavy weather calculations. The i7-12700K's 12 cores and 20 threads provide ample processing power, but the measured FPS data shows that the GPU is the limiting factor in almost all tested configurations. This suggests that the combo's rank could improve with a more powerful GPU, as the CPU has demonstrated it can handle the game's computational demands without bottlenecking.

The ranking percentile data indicates that this combo is a reasonable mid-range option for Microsoft Flight Simulator, capable of delivering smooth 1080p and acceptable 1440p performance, but it is not competitive at 4K Ultra. Users prioritizing high-resolution flight simulation would likely need to look at combos with stronger GPUs, as the RX 9060's 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit bus limit its ability to handle the game's most demanding settings.

CPU Role

The Intel Core i7-12700K plays a supportive but crucial role in this combo, providing the computational horsepower necessary to feed the RX 9060 without becoming a bottleneck. With 12 cores and 20 threads based on the Alder Lake architecture, the CPU offers substantial multi-threaded performance, as evidenced by its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 19784 and Geekbench multicore score of 15790. These results place the CPU in the 84th percentile of all processors, indicating it has significant headroom for gaming workloads.

The CPU's high single-thread performance is particularly relevant for Microsoft Flight Simulator, which relies heavily on single-core performance for game logic and physics calculations. The 3DMark single-thread score of 1043 and Passmark single-thread score of 4013 demonstrate strong per-core capability. The boost clock of 5.00 GHz, combined with a base clock of 3.60 GHz, allows the CPU to rapidly scale performance when the game demands more processing power, though the measured FPS data suggests this headroom is rarely fully utilized.

The 25 MB of shared L3 cache and 1.25 MB per-core L2 cache provide fast access to frequently used data, which is beneficial for the flight simulator's terrain and aircraft data streaming. The CPU's DDR4 and DDR5 memory support, along with dual-channel memory bus, ensures adequate bandwidth for feeding the GPU, though the game's performance is clearly more dependent on the GPU's memory subsystem. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 9276 and max-thread score of 9979 indicate that even when all cores are engaged, the CPU remains capable and responsive.

In the context of the nearest CPU rivals, the i7-12700K's average benchmark score of 35287 is nearly identical to the Intel Core i5-13600T (35305, -0.1% delta) and Intel Core i7-12700KF (35365, -0.2% delta). This positioning shows that the CPU is performing exactly as expected for its class, and its impact on the game's FPS is minimal. The measured FPS results across resolutions and settings show no signs of CPU-induced stuttering or frame drops, with the frame data staying consistent even at high FPS on low settings, where CPU load is typically highest.

The CPU's 125 W TDP and Intel Socket 1700 compatibility are standard for its generation, and its production status remains active. The UHD Graphics 770 integrated GPU provides a fallback for display output, but the dedicated RX 9060 handles all rendering duties. In Microsoft Flight Simulator, the CPU's role is to manage the complex simulation logic, AI traffic, and weather systems, all of which are computationally intensive but well within the i7-12700K's capabilities, allowing the GPU to be the determining factor in final frame rates.

Hardware Specifications

Intel Core i7-12700K

Cores / Threads 12 / 20
Base Clock 3600 MHz
Boost Clock 5000 MHz
TDP 125W
Socket Intel Socket 1700
View Full CPU Details →

AMD Radeon RX 9060

VRAM 8 GB GDDR6
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2990 MHz MHz
TDP 132 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for Intel Core i7-12700K + AMD Radeon RX 9060 in Microsoft Flight Simulator

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 66.0
3840x2160 Medium 51.0
3840x2160 High 39.0
3840x2160 Ultra 37.0
2560x1440 Low 89.0
2560x1440 Medium 69.0
2560x1440 High 52.0
2560x1440 Ultra 50.0
1920x1080 Low 111.0
1920x1080 Medium 86.0
1920x1080 High 65.0
1920x1080 Ultra 62.0

Microsoft Flight Simulator with ii7-12700K + Other GPUs

See how Microsoft Flight Simulator performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Microsoft Flight Simulator with RX 9060 + Other CPUs

See how Microsoft Flight Simulator performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with ii7-12700K + RX 9060

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.