Microsoft Flight Simulator

Microsoft Flight Simulator

AVERAGE FPS
101
good

This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 101 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 57 60 80 103
1440p QHD 78 82 109 139
1080p Full HD 96 101 135 173

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 103
3840x2160 Medium 80
3840x2160 High 60
3840x2160 Ultra 57
2560x1440 Low 139
2560x1440 Medium 109
2560x1440 High 82
2560x1440 Ultra 78
1920x1080 Low 173
1920x1080 Medium 135
1920x1080 High 101
1920x1080 Ultra 96

Microsoft Flight Simulator with AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile, In-Depth Analysis

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile delivers a formidable, high-refresh-rate experience in Microsoft Flight Simulator, though the data reveals a clear performance ceiling at the highest settings. The measured frames per second across resolutions indicate that while the combo is capable of smooth gameplay at 4K, the step from High to Ultra incurs a significant cost, making the High preset the optimal balance of visual fidelity and fluidity for this demanding flight simulator.

Settings Recommendations

The benchmark data for this combination provides a clear hierarchy of performance across its four settings presets: Low, Medium, High, and Ultra. Analyzing the average FPS at each resolution, the High preset emerges as the recommended choice for the best overall experience. At 3840x2160, High delivers a 60 FPS average, which is precisely the target for a smooth, locked 60Hz experience. Moving up to Ultra at the same resolution drops the average to 57 FPS, a marginal 5% decrease that may not justify the potential visual gains, especially since the data shows the system can hold a solid 60 FPS at High.

The case for High becomes even stronger at lower resolutions. At 2560x1440, the High preset achieves an 82 FPS average, offering a significant fluidity advantage over Ultra's 78 FPS. The gap widens considerably at 1920x1080, where High produces 101 FPS compared to Ultra's 96 FPS. While the difference between High and Ultra in terms of average FPS is relatively small, the data consistently shows High as the more performant option. The Medium preset, while achieving higher frame rates (80 FPS at 4K, 109 FPS at 1440p, 135 FPS at 1080p), likely represents a substantial visual downgrade that isn't necessary given the headroom the hardware provides.

For users with high-refresh-rate displays, the Low preset is the only option that truly unlocks the system's potential, pushing frame rates to 173 FPS at 1080p and 139 FPS at 1440p. However, this comes at the cost of visual fidelity, which is a critical component of the flight simulator experience. Therefore, the data suggests that High is the sweet spot. It provides a stable 60 FPS at 4K and comfortably high frame rates at 1440p and 1080p, ensuring a visually rich and responsive simulation without the performance penalty associated with the Ultra preset.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is a 16-core, 32-thread processor based on the Zen 5 architecture, with a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. Its substantial multi-threading capabilities are reflected in its benchmark scores, such as a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35314 and a Geekbench multi-core score of 20992. This processor is designed to handle heavy workloads, and its performance in Microsoft Flight Simulator confirms the game's ability to utilize multiple cores for tasks like terrain generation, physics, and AI traffic.

The data suggests that the CPU is a capable partner for the RTX 5090 Mobile in this title. At lower resolutions and settings, where the GPU load is reduced, the CPU's role becomes more prominent. The jump from Medium to Low at 1080p results in a massive FPS increase from 135 to 173, indicating that the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU at very high frame rates. The processor's high single-core performance, evidenced by a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2044, is also crucial for the game's main thread, which handles the core simulation logic.

The CPU's performance relative to its rivals further contextualizes its role. The benchmark data shows it is 2% faster than the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX and 1.6% faster than the AMD EPYC Embedded 8224P, while being 1.7% slower than the Intel Core i9-14900K. This places the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 in the upper echelon of processors, ensuring that it is not a bottleneck in this configuration. The 64 MB of shared L3 cache also likely contributes to reducing latency for frequently accessed data, which is beneficial for a simulation with complex and dynamic data streams.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile is the undisputed star of this combo, featuring 24 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a massive 896.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth. Its architecture, Blackwell 2.0, includes 10496 shading units and 82 RT cores, making it an exceptionally powerful mobile graphics solution. The GPU's raw compute power is evident in its FP32 performance of 31.80 TFLOPS, which is a key indicator of its ability to handle the complex shaders and lighting calculations in Microsoft Flight Simulator.

The GPU's role is clearly the primary driver of performance, especially at higher resolutions. The data shows a consistent and significant FPS drop as resolution increases across all settings, which is the classic signature of a GPU-bound scenario. For instance, at High settings, the average FPS drops from 101 at 1080p to 82 at 1440p and finally to 60 at 4K. This scaling pattern indicates that the RTX 5090 Mobile is the limiting factor, as the CPU is more than capable of handling the simulation logic at these frame rates.

The GPU's 24 GB of VRAM is a considerable asset for this game. Microsoft Flight Simulator is known for its immense texture and terrain data, and having a large frame buffer prevents stuttering and texture pop-in, particularly at 4K with high-resolution assets. The GPU's benchmark scores, such as a Passmark G3D score of 30034 and a Geekbench OpenCL score of 201834, place it at the 84th percentile of all GPUs, confirming its high-end status. While its nearest rivals in the database appear to be desktop-class cards like the RTX 4070 Ti, from which it is 0.8% faster, this mobile chip's performance is remarkable for its power envelope.

FAQ

Q: Can this combo run Microsoft Flight Simulator at 4K with smooth frame rates?

A: Yes, the data shows a 60 FPS average at 3840x2160 on the High preset. This indicates that the combination is capable of delivering a smooth, console-quality experience at 4K, though Ultra settings will cause the average to dip to 57 FPS.

Q: What is the best settings preset to use for a high-refresh-rate monitor at 1440p?

A: For a 1440p display with a high refresh rate, the High preset is recommended, as it delivers an 82 FPS average. While the Low preset offers a much higher 139 FPS, the High preset provides a balance of visual quality and performance, keeping the experience above the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: How demanding is the Ultra preset compared to High?

A: The Ultra preset is measurably more demanding. At 1920x1080, it drops the average FPS from 101 (High) to 96 (Ultra). At 3840x2160, the drop is from 60 FPS to 57 FPS, a 5% performance decrease.

Q: Is the performance difference between 1080p and 4K significant?

A: Yes, the data shows a substantial performance hit. At High settings, the average FPS falls from 101 at 1920x1080 to 60 at 3840x2160, representing a 41% reduction in frame rate. This indicates that the GPU is heavily taxed at higher resolutions.

Q: How does the GPU compare to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti?

A: According to the benchmark data, the RTX 5090 Mobile is 0.8% faster than the RTX 4070 Ti in average benchmark score. This places the mobile chip's performance on par with a previous-generation desktop card.

Q: Is the CPU a bottleneck for this GPU in this game?

A: The data suggests the CPU is not the primary bottleneck. The consistent FPS scaling with resolution indicates a GPU-bound workload. The CPU's high multi-core score (35314 in Cinebench R23) and its 2% performance advantage over the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX show it has sufficient headroom to support the GPU.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data reveals a clear and predictable scaling pattern as resolution increases, which provides insight into the system's performance limits. At the High settings preset, the average frame rate scales from 101 FPS at 1920x1080, down to 82 FPS at 2560x1440, and finally to 60 FPS at 3840x2160. This represents a 19% drop from 1080p to 1440p, and a further 27% drop from 1440p to 4K. This steep decline is a strong indicator that the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile is the limiting component.

The pattern is consistent across all settings presets. At Low settings, the FPS drops from 173 at 1080p to 139 at 1440p (a 20% decrease) and then to 103 at 4K (a 26% decrease). Similarly, at Ultra settings, the average falls from 96 at 1080p to 78 at 1440p and finally to 57 at 4K. The proportional nature of these drops across all presets confirms that the workload is scaling with pixel count, which is the definition of GPU-bound performance. If the CPU were the bottleneck, the FPS would remain relatively constant regardless of resolution, as the CPU's workload is primarily tied to game logic, not pixels.

This scaling behavior implies that the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 has ample processing power to keep up with the RTX 5090 Mobile. The GPU's performance is the primary factor determining the final frame rate. The fact that even at 4K Ultra, the system maintains a playable 57 FPS average, shows that this is a high-end combination capable of handling the most demanding scenarios the game can present. The data clearly shows that to achieve higher frame rates, one must lower the resolution, a trade-off that is expected with such a graphically intensive title.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The following breakdown details the exact average FPS figures measured for the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile combination.

1920x1080:

  • At Low settings, the system achieves its highest average frame rate of 173 FPS.
  • The Medium preset produces an average of 135 FPS, with a minimum of 114 FPS and a maximum of 155 FPS.
  • High settings deliver 101 FPS on average, a solid result for high-refresh-rate gaming.
  • The Ultra preset yields an average of 96 FPS, the lowest at this resolution.

2560x1440:

  • Low settings maintain a very high average of 139 FPS.
  • The Medium preset averages 109 FPS, with a recorded range of 92 to 125 FPS.
  • High settings are still excellent, averaging 82 FPS.
  • Ultra settings bring the average down to 78 FPS, still a playable level.

3840x2160:

  • Low settings are the only preset that significantly exceeds 60 FPS, achieving an average of 103 FPS.
  • Medium settings average 80 FPS, with a minimum of 68 FPS and a maximum of 92 FPS.
  • High settings hit exactly 60 FPS on average, which is ideal for a standard 60Hz display.
  • Ultra settings produce an average of 57 FPS, just below the 60 FPS target.

The data shows a consistent performance hierarchy across all resolutions, with Low being the fastest, followed by Medium, then High, and finally Ultra. The gaps between settings are substantial, particularly at 1080p, where the difference between Low and Ultra is 77 FPS. This provides users with a wide range of options to tailor the experience to their display's capabilities and their preference for visual fidelity versus raw frame rate.

How This Combo Ranks

Within the benchmark database, this specific combination of the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile is ranked 784th out of 3714 tested combos for Microsoft Flight Simulator. This places it in the top 21% of all tested systems, a strong showing that underscores its high-performance credentials.

The rank reflects the synergy between the two components. The CPU's 95th percentile ranking among all processors and the GPU's 84th percentile ranking among all GPUs contribute to this impressive overall position. While not at the absolute top of the chart, this combo is clearly in the upper echelon of gaming systems. The data shows that it can handle the game at high resolutions and settings, and its performance is competitive with systems featuring previous-generation desktop-class components, as evidenced by the GPU's performance parity with the RTX 4070 Ti.

The rank of 784 also highlights the specialized nature of this workload. Microsoft Flight Simulator is an extremely demanding title, and many other combinations in the database, likely featuring top-tier desktop CPUs and GPUs, will outperform this mobile setup. However, for a mobile platform, this result is exceptional. It demonstrates that the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 and RTX 5090 Mobile are more than capable of delivering a premium gaming experience in one of the most hardware-intensive games available, solidifying its position as a top-tier mobile gaming solution.

Hardware Specifications

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395

Cores / Threads 16 / 32
Base Clock 3000 MHz
Boost Clock 5100 MHz
TDP 55W
Socket AMD Socket FP11
View Full CPU Details →

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile

VRAM 24 GB GDDR7
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 1515 MHz MHz
TDP 95 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile in Microsoft Flight Simulator

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 103.0
3840x2160 Medium 80.0
3840x2160 High 60.0
3840x2160 Ultra 57.0
2560x1440 Low 139.0
2560x1440 Medium 109.0
2560x1440 High 82.0
2560x1440 Ultra 78.0
1920x1080 Low 173.0
1920x1080 Medium 135.0
1920x1080 High 101.0
1920x1080 Ultra 96.0

Microsoft Flight Simulator with Ryzen AI Max+ 395 + Other GPUs

See how Microsoft Flight Simulator performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Microsoft Flight Simulator with RTX 5090 Mobile + Other CPUs

See how Microsoft Flight Simulator performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with Ryzen AI Max+ 395 + RTX 5090 Mobile

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.