Microsoft Flight Simulator

Microsoft Flight Simulator

AVERAGE FPS
96
good

This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 96 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 55 59 75 96
1440p QHD 76 78 100 133
1080p Full HD 94 94 129 166

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 96
3840x2160 Medium 75
3840x2160 High 59
3840x2160 Ultra 55
2560x1440 Low 133
2560x1440 Medium 100
2560x1440 High 78
2560x1440 Ultra 76
1920x1080 Low 166
1920x1080 Medium 129
1920x1080 High 94
1920x1080 Ultra 94

Microsoft Flight Simulator with AMD Ryzen 9 7900X + AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT, In-Depth Analysis

# FAQ

Q: What is the combo's overall standing in Microsoft Flight Simulator?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X paired with the AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT ranks 415th out of 1,795 tested combos in this game. This places the configuration in the top 23% of all tested systems, indicating a strong but not elite position.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals in general benchmarks?

A: The Ryzen 9 7900X has an average benchmark score of 50,556, placing it 0.1% behind the Intel Core Ultra 5 235, 0.4% behind the AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT, 0.5% behind the Intel Core i7-13850HX, and 0.8% behind the Intel Core i9-13980HX. These deltas show the 7900X performs essentially on par with its closest competitors.

Q: What is the GPU's relative position among all graphics cards?

A: The RX 9070 XT sits in the 82nd percentile of all GPUs. Its average benchmark score of 39,647 places it 0.1% ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro 575, 0.2% behind the NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile, 0.5% ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro 575X, and 0.6% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64.

Q: What frame rates can this combo achieve at 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080, the system delivers 165.7 FPS on Low settings, 129.4 FPS on Medium, 94.4 FPS on High, and 93.9 FPS on Ultra. The frame rate scaling from Medium to High is substantial, while the drop from High to Ultra is minimal at just 0.5 FPS.

Q: How does 4K performance compare to 1440p?

A: At 3840x2160, average frame rates range from 96 FPS on Low to 55 FPS on Ultra. At 2560x1440, the range extends from 133.4 FPS on Low to 75.8 FPS on Ultra. The resolution jump from 1440p to 4K costs roughly 28-40% of the frame rate depending on settings.

Q: Does the CPU's multi-threaded performance matter for this game?

A: The Ryzen 9 7900X scores 43,695 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 6,168 in single-core, with a PassMark multithread score of 51,406. Since Microsoft Flight Simulator is known for heavy single-thread dependency, the strong single-core result (93rd percentile overall for the CPU) is particularly relevant, while the 12-core, 24-thread configuration provides ample headroom for background tasks.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT is built on the RDNA 4.0 architecture with a 4 nm process and contains 53,900 million transistors on a 357 mm² die. Its memory subsystem consists of 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 644.6 GB/s of bandwidth. The card's base clock is 1,660 MHz, with a game clock of 2,400 MHz and a boost clock reaching 2,970 MHz.

In Microsoft Flight Simulator, the GPU's role becomes increasingly dominant as resolution climbs. The measured data shows a clear pattern: at 1080p, the frame rate ceiling is high enough that the CPU likely becomes the limiting factor, but at 4K, the GPU's workload scales dramatically. The 4K Ultra setting yields 55 FPS, while 4K Low produces 96 FPS — a 74.5% improvement from settings alone. This indicates that the RX 9070 XT's raw throughput, rated at 48.66 TFLOPS FP32, is being heavily taxed by the game's demanding terrain rendering and weather systems.

The GPU's 128 ROPs and 256 TMUs contribute to pixel and texture throughput rates of 380.2 GPixel/s and 760.3 GTexel/s, respectively. These specifications align with the observed performance scaling: the gap between Medium (74.8 FPS) and High (58.6 FPS) at 4K is 27.6%, suggesting that the High preset introduces significantly heavier shading and texture work. The 16 GB framebuffer proves adequate across all tested settings, with no evidence of memory capacity limiting performance in this dataset.

The card's 82nd percentile ranking among all GPUs places it in the upper tier, though its nearest rivals in aggregate benchmarks are older workstation and consumer cards like the Radeon Pro 575 and RX Vega 64. However, in this game specifically, the RX 9070 XT's architectural advantages in geometry processing and ray acceleration (64 dedicated RT cores) likely contribute to its ability to maintain playable frame rates at 4K Ultra, where many older cards would struggle.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X is a 12-core, 24-thread processor based on Zen 4 architecture, fabricated on a 5 nm TSMC process. It operates with a base clock of 4.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz, with a 170 W TDP. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB L1 and 1 MB L2 per core, plus a shared 64 MB L3 cache.

Microsoft Flight Simulator's frame rate behavior across resolutions reveals the CPU's influence. At 1080p Low, the system produces 165.7 FPS, dropping to 133.4 FPS at 1440p Low and 96 FPS at 4K Low. The 1080p-to-1440p drop of 19.5% suggests that even at Low settings, the GPU is beginning to become the bottleneck as resolution increases. However, the relatively small delta between 1440p and 4K Low (27.9%) indicates that the CPU is still contributing meaningfully at these settings.

The 7900X's single-thread performance is particularly relevant here. Its Geekbench single-core score of 2,952 and Cinebench R20 single-core score of 2,590 reflect strong per-core efficiency. In a flight simulator where draw call submission and physics simulation often run on limited threads, this single-core strength helps maintain frame pacing. The processor's PassMark single-thread score of 4,238 supports this interpretation.

Multi-threaded performance is not wasted, however. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 43,695 and PassMark multithread score of 51,406 show that background tasks like AI traffic simulation or scenery loading can run concurrently without starving the main game thread. The 93rd percentile ranking among all CPUs confirms that this processor is a top-tier performer, and its 0.1% to 0.8% delta against nearest rivals means that swapping to a different high-end CPU would yield negligible differences in this title.

Settings Recommendations

The measured frame rates provide clear guidance for optimizing the experience. At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset delivers 93.9 FPS, which is only 0.5 FPS lower than High (94.4 FPS). This negligible difference makes Ultra the obvious choice at 1080p, as there is no measurable cost for the maximum visual quality.

At 2560x1440, the story changes. High produces 78.3 FPS, while Ultra drops to 75.8 FPS — a 3.3% reduction. Both remain comfortably playable, so the choice depends on whether the visual enhancements of Ultra justify the small frame rate hit. For users prioritizing smoothness, High is the safer pick, but Ultra remains viable.

At 3840x2160, the decision becomes more consequential. High yields 58.6 FPS, while Ultra drops to 55 FPS — an 8.2% reduction. Medium produces 74.8 FPS, offering a 27.6% improvement over High. For 4K displays, the Medium preset appears to be the sweet spot: it maintains a frame rate well above 60 FPS while still providing substantial visual fidelity over Low (96 FPS). The jump from Medium to High costs 21.6% of the frame rate, which may be too steep for those seeking consistent smoothness. Low at 4K yields 96 FPS, but the visual compromises are likely substantial.

Across all resolutions, the data suggests that the Medium preset offers the best balance of visual quality and performance. At 1080p, however, the Ultra preset's negligible cost makes it the recommended choice. The 1440p High setting provides 78.3 FPS, which is suitable for most displays, while 4K users should consider Medium to stay above 70 FPS.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X and AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT ranks 415th out of 1,795 tested combos in Microsoft Flight Simulator, placing it in the 76.9th percentile of all configurations. This is a strong result, though not among the absolute elite — the top-ranked combos likely feature higher-tier GPUs or CPUs with more aggressive boost behavior.

Examining the component-level rankings provides context. The CPU sits in the 93rd percentile among all processors, while the GPU is in the 82nd percentile. The combo's 76.9th percentile ranking is lower than both component percentiles, which suggests that the pairing does not achieve the sum of its parts in this particular game. This discrepancy likely stems from the game's engine characteristics: Microsoft Flight Simulator is notoriously demanding on both CPU and GPU, and the balanced nature of this system means neither component can fully compensate for the other's workload.

The CPU's nearest rivals — the Intel Core Ultra 5 235, AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT, Intel Core i7-13850HX, and Intel Core i9-13980HX — all have aggregate benchmark scores within 0.8% of the 7900X. This clustering means that CPU choice among these options has minimal impact on overall system performance. The GPU's nearest rivals show more variance in their benchmark deltas, but again within a narrow band of 0.6%.

The measured frame rates across all 12 resolution-settings combinations confirm that this combo is well-balanced. No single resolution or setting produces a frame rate below 55 FPS, and the system exceeds 90 FPS in 7 of the 12 tested scenarios. This consistency indicates that the combo handles the game's varying demands across different visual loads without significant bottlenecks. The rank of 415th out of 1,795 combos means that approximately 1,380 tested configurations perform worse, while 415 perform better — placing this system in a solid upper-midrange position for flight simulation enthusiasts.

Hardware Specifications

AMD Ryzen 9 7900X

Cores / Threads 12 / 24
Base Clock 4700 MHz
Boost Clock 5600 MHz
TDP 170W
Socket AMD Socket AM5
View Full CPU Details →

AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT

VRAM 16 GB GDDR6
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2970 MHz MHz
TDP 304 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for AMD Ryzen 9 7900X + AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT in Microsoft Flight Simulator

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 96.0
3840x2160 Medium 74.8
3840x2160 High 58.6
3840x2160 Ultra 55.0
2560x1440 Low 133.4
2560x1440 Medium 99.5
2560x1440 High 78.3
2560x1440 Ultra 75.8
1920x1080 Low 165.7
1920x1080 Medium 129.4
1920x1080 High 94.4
1920x1080 Ultra 93.9

Microsoft Flight Simulator with Ryzen 9 7900X + Other GPUs

See how Microsoft Flight Simulator performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Microsoft Flight Simulator with RX 9070 XT + Other CPUs

See how Microsoft Flight Simulator performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with Ryzen 9 7900X + RX 9070 XT

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.