Microsoft Flight Simulator

Microsoft Flight Simulator

AVERAGE FPS
103
good

This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 103 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 57 61 83 102
1440p QHD 78 81 112 144
1080p Full HD 98 102 140 179

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 102
3840x2160 Medium 83
3840x2160 High 61
3840x2160 Ultra 57
2560x1440 Low 144
2560x1440 Medium 112
2560x1440 High 81
2560x1440 Ultra 78
1920x1080 Low 179
1920x1080 Medium 140
1920x1080 High 102
1920x1080 Ultra 98

Microsoft Flight Simulator with AMD Ryzen 9 5950X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070, In-Depth Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 5950X paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 delivers a robust experience in Microsoft Flight Simulator, with measured frame rates that scale predictably across resolutions and presets. The data shows a combination capable of exceeding 60 FPS at 4K on High settings, while the CPU’s 16 cores and 32 threads provide ample headroom for the simulator’s demanding physics and scenery streaming.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The Ryzen 9 5950X is a 16-core, 32-thread processor based on the Zen 3 architecture, running on the AMD Socket AM4 platform. Its base clock of 3.40 GHz can boost up to 4.90 GHz, which is critical for a flight simulator that often relies on single-threaded performance for core simulation logic. In synthetic benchmarks, the CPU scores 944 in 3dmark single-thread and 5450 in Cinebench R23 single-core, indicating strong per-core capability that helps maintain fluid frame pacing in scenarios with dense terrain.

However, Microsoft Flight Simulator also scales with multiple threads for tasks like AI traffic, weather simulation, and world generation. Here, the 5950X’s 32 threads prove beneficial. The processor achieves a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 38607 and a 3dmark max-threads score of 11597, placing it in the 93rd percentile among all CPUs. This headroom means that at lower resolutions, where the GPU is less stressed, the CPU is unlikely to become the primary bottleneck. The data supports this: at 1080p Low, the combo hits 179.1 FPS, which is the highest measured average across all tested configurations, suggesting the CPU can feed the RTX 5070 effectively even when the graphical load is light.

Compared to its nearest rivals, the 5950X’s average benchmark score of 49062 is essentially on par with the Intel Core i5-14600K (49166, a -0.2% delta) and the Intel Core i5-14600KF (49367, a -0.6% delta). It also slightly edges out the Intel Xeon Gold 5318H (48698, a +0.7% delta). This indicates that while the 5950X is not the absolute fastest in raw multi-threaded throughput, its combination of high single-core boost and substantial core count is well-suited for the hybrid workload of Flight Simulator, ensuring consistent performance across varied flight scenarios.

FAQ — 4-6 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Q: What is the highest average FPS achieved by this CPU-GPU combo in Microsoft Flight Simulator?

A: The highest average frame rate recorded is 179.1 FPS, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with the Low preset. This shows the combination’s ability to push very high frame rates when graphical demands are minimized.

Q: How does the combo perform at 4K Ultra settings compared to 1080p Ultra?

A: At 3840x2160 Ultra, the average FPS drops to 56.5, while at 1920x1080 Ultra it holds at 98.2 FPS. This represents a significant 42% reduction in frame rate when moving to 4K, highlighting the GPU’s dominant role at higher resolutions.

Q: Is the Ryzen 9 5950X a bottleneck for the RTX 5070 in this game?

A: At 1080p Low, the system reaches 179.1 FPS, but at 1080p Ultra it drops to 98.2 FPS. Since the resolution is identical, the 45% performance gap is attributable to the increased graphical workload on the GPU, indicating that the CPU is not the limiting factor at this resolution; rather, the rendering load drives the difference.

Q: How does this combo rank among all tested configurations for this game?

A: The combination ranks 364th out of 1795 tested combos in Microsoft Flight Simulator. This places it in the top 20% of all tested systems, indicating a strong overall performance tier.

Q: What is the difference in performance between the Medium and High presets at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, the Medium preset yields an average of 111.6 FPS, while the High preset produces 81.1 FPS. The jump from Medium to High results in a 27% performance cost, which is a notable trade-off for the visual improvements.

Q: Does the RTX 5070’s performance align with its closest GPU rivals?

A: The RTX 5070 has an average benchmark score of 41687, which is nearly identical to the AMD Radeon Pro 5300 (41610, +0.2% delta) and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 (41441, +0.6% delta). This suggests that in this game, the 5070’s performance is competitive with these established cards.

Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component

Examining the measured FPS data across resolutions reveals a clear scaling pattern that identifies the GPU as the primary performance limiter at higher settings. At the Low preset, the average frame rate declines from 179.1 FPS at 1080p to 144 FPS at 1440p, and further to 101.6 FPS at 4K. This represents a 43% drop from 1080p to 4K, which is a substantial decrease but still results in a playable experience.

The scaling becomes more pronounced when moving to the Ultra preset. At 1080p Ultra, the system averages 98.2 FPS, which falls to 77.5 FPS at 1440p and bottoms out at 56.5 FPS at 4K. The total reduction from 1080p to 4K is 42.5%, mirroring the relative drop seen at Low settings. This consistency suggests that the RTX 5070’s rendering throughput is the dominant factor in determining frame rates, as the CPU’s workload does not change with resolution.

At 1080p, the difference between Low (179.1 FPS) and Ultra (98.2 FPS) is 45%, which is significant. However, the fact that the system can still exceed 90 FPS at 1080p Ultra indicates that the CPU has sufficient headroom to keep the GPU fed. The data points to a balanced pairing where the GPU becomes the bottleneck as resolution and graphical fidelity increase, while the CPU maintains its role as a capable foundation. For users targeting high refresh rates at 1080p, this combo excels, but at 4K Ultra, the frame rate dips below the 60 FPS threshold, suggesting that adjustments to settings are necessary for smoother gameplay.

Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience per the measured rows

Analyzing the measured presets across all three resolutions, the Medium setting offers the most balanced experience in terms of frame rate stability and visual quality. At 1080p, Medium delivers 139.7 FPS, which is only 22% lower than the Low preset but provides substantially better graphical fidelity. Moving to 1440p, Medium maintains an average of 111.6 FPS, which is comfortably above the 100 FPS mark and suitable for high-refresh-rate monitors.

At 4K, the Medium preset yields 82.8 FPS, which is a 47% improvement over the Ultra preset’s 56.5 FPS. This makes Medium the only preset at 4K that consistently stays above 80 FPS, providing a smooth experience without the significant performance hit of Ultra. The High preset at 4K offers 60.6 FPS, which is playable but leaves little margin for dips in complex scenes. Given the data, the Medium preset is the recommended starting point, as it provides the best compromise between visual enhancements and performance headroom across all tested resolutions.

For users with high-refresh-rate 1080p displays, the High preset at 101.5 FPS is also viable, as it offers better visuals than Medium with only a 27% reduction in frame rate. However, the Ultra preset at 1080p (98.2 FPS) is only marginally slower than High, making it a viable choice for those prioritizing image quality over the last few frames per second. At 4K, the Low preset (101.6 FPS) is surprisingly fast, but it sacrifices too much visual detail for a flight simulator where situational awareness is key. Therefore, the data supports Medium as the optimal preset for a balanced experience, with High as a strong alternative for 1080p users.

How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos

The combination of the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 achieves a rank of 364 out of 1795 tested combos in Microsoft Flight Simulator. This places the system in the top 20.3% of all configurations tested, which is a strong showing given the sheer number of possible hardware pairings. The rank reflects the aggregate performance across all measured settings and resolutions, indicating that this combo is well above average for this particular title.

The CPU’s percentile ranking of 93rd among all CPUs and the GPU’s 83rd percentile among all GPUs contribute to this overall position. While the GPU is slightly lower in its percentile compared to the CPU, the measured FPS data shows that the pairing still delivers excellent results, particularly at 1080p and 1440p. The rank of 364 suggests that there are 363 other combos that perform better, which likely include higher-tier GPUs or newer CPUs, but the 5950X and RTX 5070 combination remains a formidable setup.

In the context of the game’s release in 2020, this modern pairing demonstrates how far hardware has come, with the combo easily exceeding the requirements for smooth gameplay at high settings. The data shows that this combination is capable of handling the most demanding preset at 1440p (77.5 FPS) and only falls below 60 FPS at 4K Ultra. For users seeking a high-performance system for Microsoft Flight Simulator, this rank confirms that the 5950X and RTX 5070 are a well-matched duo, offering a compelling balance of CPU throughput and GPU rendering power.

Hardware Specifications

AMD Ryzen 9 5950X

Cores / Threads 16 / 32
Base Clock 3400 MHz
Boost Clock 4900 MHz
TDP 105W
Socket AMD Socket AM4
View Full CPU Details →

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070

VRAM 12 GB GDDR7
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2512 MHz MHz
TDP 250 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for AMD Ryzen 9 5950X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 in Microsoft Flight Simulator

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 101.6
3840x2160 Medium 82.8
3840x2160 High 60.6
3840x2160 Ultra 56.5
2560x1440 Low 144.0
2560x1440 Medium 111.6
2560x1440 High 81.1
2560x1440 Ultra 77.5
1920x1080 Low 179.1
1920x1080 Medium 139.7
1920x1080 High 101.5
1920x1080 Ultra 98.2

Microsoft Flight Simulator with Ryzen 9 5950X + Other GPUs

See how Microsoft Flight Simulator performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Microsoft Flight Simulator with RTX 5070 + Other CPUs

See how Microsoft Flight Simulator performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with Ryzen 9 5950X + RTX 5070

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.