Microsoft Flight Simulator

# FAQ

Q: What is the overall ranking of this CPU/GPU combination in Microsoft Flight Simulator?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 5700G paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT ranks 2344 out of 3714 tested combos for this game, placing it in the lower-middle portion of the benchmark database.

Q: How does the Ryzen 7 5700G compare to its nearest CPU rivals in average benchmark score?

A: The Ryzen 7 5700G scores 27051 on average, which is 0.2% below the Intel Core i9-9900K (27097), 0.4% above the AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 (26936), 0.4% below the Intel Core i5-14400T (27166), and 0.6% above the Intel Core i7-1370P (26900).

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration, and how does it affect this simulation?

A: The RX 7600 XT has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 288.0 GB/s bandwidth. This large capacity is well-suited for Microsoft Flight Simulator's demanding texture streaming at higher resolutions.

Q: What is the best average FPS recorded for this combo at 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the combo achieves 106 FPS average. The Medium preset delivers 82 FPS, High gives 62 FPS, and Ultra yields 59 FPS.

Q: How does performance scale when moving from 1080p to 4K at High settings?

A: At High settings, the average FPS drops from 62 at 1920x1080 to 50 at 2560x1440, then further to 37 at 3840x2160. This represents a 40% reduction from 1080p to 4K.

Q: Is the RX 7600 XT's benchmark score close to any well-known competitor?

A: The GPU's average benchmark score is 17083, which is 0.3% above the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 (17037) and 0.7% below the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 (17208), indicating it sits in a comparable performance tier.

---

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the AMD Ryzen 7 5700G and AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT achieves a rank of 2344 out of 3714 tested combos in Microsoft Flight Simulator. This percentile placement of roughly 63% means the combo outperforms nearly two-thirds of all tested configurations, though it is far from the top tier. The ranking reflects a balanced pairing where neither component dramatically bottlenecks the other, but the overall system lands in the mid-pack for this demanding flight simulator.

The CPU itself carries a percentile rank of 79 among all tested processors, indicating strong general-purpose performance. Its average benchmark score of 27051 places it within 0.7% of several close rivals, including the Intel Core i9-9900K and the Intel Core i5-14400T. This suggests the processor is capable of feeding the GPU adequately in most scenarios, though the GPU's percentile rank of 60 among all tested graphics cards implies it is the more limiting factor in this pairing for flight simulation workloads.

The combo rank of 2344 suggests that while the CPU is a solid mid-range performer, the GPU holds the system back from higher positions. Many combos above this rank likely pair the same or similar CPUs with more powerful graphics cards. The measured FPS data confirms this interpretation, as the system struggles to maintain high frame rates at 4K Ultra settings, but performs respectably at lower resolutions and settings.

---

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture with the Navi 33 chip, manufactured on a 6 nm process at TSMC. It contains 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, with 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 render output units. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1980 MHz, a game clock of 2470 MHz, and a boost clock of 2755 MHz.

Memory bandwidth is a critical factor in Microsoft Flight Simulator, which streams massive amounts of terrain and scenery data. The RX 7600 XT provides 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, yielding 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This capacity is generous for the game's high-resolution texture requirements, but the relatively narrow bus width limits raw throughput compared to wider-memory GPUs.

The GPU's benchmark scores show a mixed profile. Its Passmark G3D score is 17132, while the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 2348. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 92426 and Vulkan score of 48366 indicate solid compute capability. In terms of relative performance, the GPU sits 0.3% above the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 and 0.7% below the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 in average benchmark score, which places it in a competitive mid-range segment.

For Microsoft Flight Simulator specifically, the GPU's 16 GB memory capacity proves advantageous at 4K Ultra settings, where texture caching demands are high. However, the measured FPS at 3840x2160 Ultra averages only 35 FPS, indicating that the GPU's compute throughput, not memory capacity, is the limiting factor at maximum settings.

---

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combo delivers an average of 106 FPS at Low settings. This drops to 82 FPS at Medium, 62 FPS at High, and 59 FPS at Ultra. The Medium preset shows a minimum of 70 FPS and a maximum of 95 FPS, demonstrating some frame-time variance but generally smooth gameplay. The gap between High and Ultra is only 3 FPS, suggesting diminishing returns at the highest preset.

Moving to 2560x1440, the averages fall to 85 FPS at Low, 66 FPS at Medium, 50 FPS at High, and 47 FPS at Ultra. The Medium preset here ranges from 56 to 76 FPS. The resolution increase from 1080p to 1440p costs roughly 19-20% of performance across all settings, which is a moderate penalty consistent with a GPU-bound scenario.

At 3840x2160, the averages are 63 FPS at Low, 49 FPS at Medium, 37 FPS at High, and 35 FPS at Ultra. The Medium preset records a minimum of 42 FPS and a maximum of 56 FPS. The jump from 1440p to 4K is more severe, with performance dropping by 26-30% depending on the preset. At 4K Ultra, the system barely maintains playable frame rates, and at 4K High it hovers around the 37 FPS mark, which may be acceptable for a flight simulator but is below the 60 FPS threshold many users prefer.

The data shows a clear pattern: the combo is capable of 60+ FPS at 1080p Medium and above, but at 4K, only Low settings break past 60 FPS. The Medium preset at 4K offers a playable 49 FPS average, while High and Ultra dip into the mid-to-high 30s.

---

Resolution Scaling

The FPS drop from 1080p to 4K reveals important insights about the limiting component in this system. At High settings, the averages are 62 FPS at 1080p, 50 FPS at 1440p, and 37 FPS at 4K. This represents a 19% drop from 1080p to 1440p, and a further 26% drop from 1440p to 4K. The increasing percentage decline at higher resolutions indicates the GPU becomes more heavily loaded as pixel count grows.

At Low settings, the scaling is similar: 106 FPS at 1080p, 85 FPS at 1440p, and 63 FPS at 4K. The percentage drops are 20% and 26% respectively. The consistency of these scaling patterns across settings suggests that resolution scaling is primarily a GPU workload, and the RX 7600 XT handles it predictably.

The fact that performance does not collapse entirely at 4K indicates that the CPU is keeping pace, at least at the frame rates being achieved. The Ryzen 7 5700G's 8 cores and 16 threads, with a boost clock of 4.60 GHz, provide sufficient processing power for the game's simulation logic even at lower FPS levels. If the CPU were severely bottlenecked, we would expect to see smaller FPS differences between resolutions, as the CPU would cap performance regardless of GPU load.

The measured data shows the GPU is the primary scaling bottleneck, with the CPU providing adequate headroom. This is a healthy balance for a mid-range system, though it means users targeting 4K gameplay will need to make significant settings sacrifices to achieve smooth frame rates.

---

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700G is an 8-core, 16-thread processor based on the Zen 3 architecture, codenamed Cezanne, manufactured on a 7 nm process at TSMC. It operates with a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. The processor has 16 MB of L3 cache, with 64 KB L1 and 512 KB L2 per core. Its memory bandwidth is rated at 51.2 GB/s over a dual-channel DDR4 interface.

In Microsoft Flight Simulator, the CPU handles simulation logic, physics calculations, and AI traffic. The benchmark data shows the 5700G performs strongly in multi-threaded workloads, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12830.5 and a single-core score of 1494. The Passmark multi-thread score of 24419 and single-thread score of 3283 further confirm its capability.

Compared to its nearest rivals, the 5700G is essentially tied with the Intel Core i9-9900K and Intel Core i5-14400T, with delta percentages of -0.2% and -0.4% respectively. It is slightly ahead of the AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 and Intel Core i7-1370P, with deltas of 0.4% and 0.6%. This places it in a competitive position for a processor from the 5000 series.

The CPU's 16 threads are well-utilized by Flight Simulator, which can scale across multiple cores for various subsystems. However, the measured FPS data suggests the CPU is not the primary bottleneck in this pairing. At 1080p Low, the system achieves 106 FPS, which is a solid result, but the GPU's limits become apparent at higher resolutions and settings. The CPU's percentile rank of 79 among all processors indicates it has ample headroom for more demanding GPU upgrades.

---

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings depend on the user's resolution and frame rate targets. At 1920x1080, the Medium preset offers the best balance with an 82 FPS average and a minimum of 70 FPS, ensuring smooth gameplay with good visual quality. The High preset at 62 FPS is also acceptable, but the Ultra preset at 59 FPS provides only marginal visual benefits over High for a 3 FPS loss.

At 2560x1440, the Medium preset at 66 FPS is the recommended choice, as it maintains a comfortable frame rate with a minimum of 56 FPS. The High preset at 50 FPS is playable but may feel less responsive during demanding scenes. Users prioritizing visual fidelity could choose High, but Medium offers a safer experience for consistent performance.

At 3840x2160, the Low preset at 63 FPS is the only setting that reliably exceeds 60 FPS. The Medium preset at 49 FPS is a reasonable compromise for users who want better visuals while maintaining playability, as its minimum of 42 FPS stays above the stutter threshold. High at 37 FPS and Ultra at 35 FPS are borderline for a flight simulator, which often involves slow, deliberate camera movements, but they may be too choppy for users who prefer smooth panning.

For most users, the Medium preset across all resolutions provides the best experience per the measured rows. It balances visual quality with playable frame rates, and the minimum FPS data indicates it avoids severe frame-time spikes. Users with high-refresh-rate 1080p displays could opt for Low to maximize frame rates, while those on 4K displays should accept Medium as the practical ceiling for this combo.