Microsoft Flight Simulator

Microsoft Flight Simulator

AVERAGE FPS
74
good

This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 74 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 42 44 59 75
1440p QHD 57 60 79 102
1080p Full HD 70 74 98 126

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 75
3840x2160 Medium 59
3840x2160 High 44
3840x2160 Ultra 42
2560x1440 Low 102
2560x1440 Medium 79
2560x1440 High 60
2560x1440 Ultra 57
1920x1080 Low 126
1920x1080 Medium 98
1920x1080 High 74
1920x1080 Ultra 70

Microsoft Flight Simulator with AMD Ryzen 5 7600X + AMD Radeon RX 7700, In-Depth Analysis

Microsoft Flight Simulator is a uniquely demanding title, and the data for the AMD Ryzen 5 7600X paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7700 provides a clear picture of its capabilities. The measured FPS across resolutions and settings reveals a system that is firmly balanced for high-refresh-rate 1080p and smooth 1440p gameplay, while 4K requires careful compromise. This analysis breaks down the measured performance, the role of each component, and how this specific combination ranks against other tested configurations.

Resolution Scaling

The data shows a classic pattern of performance degradation as resolution increases, but the rate of that decline tells a significant story about where the bottleneck lies. At High settings, the average frame rate drops from 74 FPS at 1920x1080 to 60 FPS at 2560x1440, a reduction of 14 FPS (or roughly 18.9%). Pushing further to 3840x2160, the average falls to 44 FPS, another 16 FPS drop from the 1440p figure. This linear and substantial decline strongly indicates that the AMD Radeon RX 7700's rendering throughput is the primary limiting factor as pixel count increases.

The scaling pattern is consistent across other presets. On Medium settings, the drop from 98 FPS at 1080p to 79 FPS at 1440p is a 19 FPS decrease, and then to 59 FPS at 4K, another 20 FPS decrease. This near-constant ~20 FPS penalty for each step up in resolution at Medium settings reinforces that the GPU is being saturated. The Low preset shows the same trend, with 126 FPS at 1080p, 102 FPS at 1440p, and 75 FPS at 4K. The Ultra preset, while the most demanding, follows the same trajectory: 70 FPS at 1080p, 57 FPS at 1440p, and 42 FPS at 4K.

This data suggests that the Ryzen 5 7600X is not the limiting factor in most scenarios. If the CPU were the bottleneck, we would expect to see a much smaller difference between 1080p and 4K at a given setting, as the GPU would be waiting on the CPU at lower resolutions but would have more time to render at higher ones. Instead, the consistent and significant FPS drops at each higher resolution point directly to the GPU being the performance ceiling. The 16 GB of VRAM on the RX 7700 is sufficient to prevent memory capacity from being the issue, so the constraint is purely the compute and fill-rate capabilities of the GPU itself.

Settings Recommendations

For users targeting a standard 60 FPS experience, the data provides a clear hierarchy of choices. At 1920x1080, High settings deliver a very playable 74 FPS average, offering a substantial visual upgrade over Medium at 98 FPS. Even Ultra is playable at 70 FPS, but the 4 FPS difference between Ultra and High does not justify the potential for instability, making High the optimal balance for 1080p. At 2560x1440, High settings hit the 60 FPS mark exactly, making it the ideal preset for a 60Hz monitor. Medium at 1440p is a much smoother experience at 79 FPS, but the visual sacrifice may not be necessary unless the user has a high-refresh-rate display and wants to stay above 75 FPS.

The 4K resolution is where compromises become mandatory. The Medium preset at 3840x2160 yields an average of 59 FPS with a minimum of 50 FPS, which is borderline playable but will dip below 60 FPS in demanding scenes. The High preset at 4K drops to 44 FPS, which is a significant reduction in smoothness. For a locked 60 FPS experience, the data suggests that Medium is the highest preset that can be considered, though the 50 FPS minimum indicates that users may need to accept occasional frame rate dips. The Low preset at 4K, at 75 FPS, provides a large performance headroom, but the visual impact on a flight simulator, where reading instruments and spotting terrain details is crucial, is likely too severe. Therefore, the data points to Medium at 1440p or High at 1440p/1080p as the "best experience" per the measured rows, balancing visual fidelity with a stable frame rate above 60 FPS.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 7600X is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture. Its base clock of 4.70 GHz and boost clock of 5.30 GHz are high, and the benchmark results show strong single-thread performance, scoring 1,965 in Cinebench R23 single-core and 1,060 in 3DMark single-thread. This is critical for Microsoft Flight Simulator, which has historically been heavily reliant on single-core performance for its core simulation loop. The high boost clock of 5.30 GHz ensures that the CPU can deliver the necessary instructions to the GPU as quickly as possible.

In this specific pairing, the CPU's role appears to be to feed the GPU sufficiently at lower resolutions. At 1080p, the CPU's strong single-thread performance is what allows the RX 7700 to achieve 126 FPS on Low settings. If the CPU were weaker, we would see this number capped at a lower value. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15,236 shows that the CPU is also capable in multi-threaded scenarios, which is relevant for the game's scenery and AI processing. The 32 MB of shared L3 cache also helps to reduce memory latency, which can be beneficial for the complex data streams in a flight simulator.

The data strongly suggests that the CPU is not the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions, as the FPS drops are so pronounced when moving to 4K. The CPU is able to maintain its end of the bargain; it is the GPU that cannot keep up with the increased pixel workload. The Ryzen 5 7600X's position in the 79th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 27,636, places it as a capable mid-range to upper-mid-range processor. Its nearest rivals, such as the AMD Ryzen 7 5700X and Intel Core i5-12600K, have average scores with a delta of only 0.2%, showing that the 7600X is competitive with those chips in synthetic tests, which aligns with its ability to avoid bottlenecking the GPU in this game.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the Ryzen 5 7600X and the Radeon RX 7700 in Microsoft Flight Simulator is placed at rank 1,324 out of 2,996 tested combos. This places it in the 55.8th percentile of all systems (calculated by 1 - (1324/2996)), meaning it outperforms a slight majority of tested configurations. This is a solid mid-pack ranking, indicating that while the combo is not a top-tier performer, it is far from being a low-end configuration. The ranking suggests that many other systems with more powerful GPUs or CPUs will achieve higher frame rates, but this combo provides a respectable level of performance.

The fact that this combo is ranked just above the middle of the pack makes sense given the component choices. The RX 7700 is a mid-range GPU, and the Ryzen 5 7600X is a strong mid-range CPU. The combo is balanced, but it does not contain the top-of-the-line parts that would push it into the higher percentiles. The data implies that to achieve a better rank, a user would need to pair the CPU with a more powerful GPU, or pair the GPU with a higher-end CPU. However, for the target audience of a 1080p or 1440p gamer, this rank indicates that the system is well within the range of capable performance, being neither a weak link nor a standout performer in the grand scheme of tested hardware.

FAQ

Q: Can this combo run Microsoft Flight Simulator at 60 FPS on 1080p?

A: Yes. The measured data shows that at 1920x1080, the High preset achieves 74 FPS, and the Medium preset achieves 98 FPS, both of which are comfortably above the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: What is the best settings preset for 1440p gameplay?

A: The data indicates that High settings at 2560x1440 deliver an average of exactly 60 FPS, making it the highest preset that can achieve a locked 60 FPS experience. Medium is faster at 79 FPS, but High offers a better visual quality without dropping below 60 FPS on average.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU more of a limiting factor at 4K?

A: The benchmark results indicate the GPU is the primary limiting factor at 3840x2160. The average FPS drops significantly at 4K across all settings (e.g., from 60 FPS at 1440p High to 44 FPS at 4K High), which points to the graphics card being unable to handle the increased pixel load.

Q: How does this combo rank compared to other tested systems?

A: This specific combination of the AMD Ryzen 5 7600X and AMD Radeon RX 7700 is ranked 1,324 out of 2,996 tested combos in Microsoft Flight Simulator, placing it in the upper half of all tested systems.

Q: What is the minimum FPS I can expect at 1440p on Medium settings?

A: For the 2560x1440 Medium preset, the measured minimum FPS is 67, with a maximum of 91. This indicates a stable and smooth experience without severe frame drops.

Q: Is the 16 GB of VRAM on the RX 7700 sufficient for this game at 4K?

A: The data suggests yes, as the performance scaling from 1440p to 4K is consistent and does not show a sudden drop that would indicate a VRAM capacity issue. The RX 7700's 16 GB is sufficient to avoid memory-related stuttering, as the performance decline is due to raw GPU compute limits, not memory capacity.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The following table details the exact measured average FPS for each resolution and settings preset combination.

| Resolution | Settings | Average FPS | Minimum FPS | Maximum FPS |

| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |

| 1920x1080 | Low | 126 | - | - |

| | Medium | 98 | 84 | 113 |

| | High | 74 | - | - |

| | Ultra | 70 | - | - |

| 2560x1440 | Low | 102 | - | - |

| | Medium | 79 | 67 | 91 |

| | High | 60 | - | - |

| | Ultra | 57 | - | - |

| 3840x2160 | Low | 75 | - | - |

| | Medium | 59 | 50 | 67 |

| | High | 44 | - | - |

| | Ultra | 42 | - | - |

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 7700 is the performance driver in this system, and its characteristics directly shape the FPS results. With 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, the memory bandwidth of 624.1 GB/s is ample for the game at all tested resolutions. The GPU's boost clock of 2459 MHz and game clock of 2041 MHz are high for its class, and its 25.18 TFLOPS of FP32 compute power is what ultimately determines the frame rates. The data shows that this compute power is sufficient for smooth gameplay at 1080p and 1440p but is stretched thin at 4K.

The GPU's percentile ranking of 58th place among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 15,852, aligns with its mid-range positioning. Its nearest rivals in terms of synthetic benchmarks include the AMD Radeon RX 9060 and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, with the RX 7700 performing within a few percentage points of these cards. In Microsoft Flight Simulator, this translates to the observed performance: capable of high refresh rates at lower resolutions but not a 4K powerhouse. The 200W TDP and dual-slot design are typical for this performance class, and the PCIe 4.0 x16 interface ensures sufficient bandwidth. The GPU's role is clear: it provides a solid foundation for high-fidelity 1080p and 1440p flight simulation, but users seeking consistent 4K performance would need to look at a higher-tier graphics card.

Hardware Specifications

AMD Ryzen 5 7600X

Cores / Threads 6 / 12
Base Clock 4700 MHz
Boost Clock 5300 MHz
TDP 105W
Socket AMD Socket AM5
View Full CPU Details →

AMD Radeon RX 7700

VRAM 16 GB GDDR6
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2459 MHz MHz
TDP 200 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 7600X + AMD Radeon RX 7700 in Microsoft Flight Simulator

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 75.0
3840x2160 Medium 59.0
3840x2160 High 44.0
3840x2160 Ultra 42.0
2560x1440 Low 102.0
2560x1440 Medium 79.0
2560x1440 High 60.0
2560x1440 Ultra 57.0
1920x1080 Low 126.0
1920x1080 Medium 98.0
1920x1080 High 74.0
1920x1080 Ultra 70.0

Microsoft Flight Simulator with Ryzen 5 7600X + Other GPUs

See how Microsoft Flight Simulator performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Microsoft Flight Simulator with RX 7700 + Other CPUs

See how Microsoft Flight Simulator performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with Ryzen 5 7600X + RX 7700

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.