Lockdown Protocol

# Lockdown Protocol with Intel Core i5-12400F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB

The benchmark data for Lockdown Protocol with this Intel Core i5-12400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB combination reveals a system that is firmly positioned at the lower end of the tested spectrum, ranking 3269th out of 3714 total combos. This places the pairing in the 12th percentile of all tested configurations, indicating that while it can run the game, it will not deliver a high-refresh-rate experience at demanding settings. The measured frames per second across resolutions paint a picture of a GPU-bound setup where the 4 GB VRAM capacity and the GPU's compute throughput are the primary constraints, with the CPU's six performance cores providing sufficient headroom to avoid becoming the bottleneck in most scenarios.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS drop from 1080p to 4K in Lockdown Protocol is dramatic, and the data clearly indicates that the graphics card is the limiting component in this system. At Low settings, the average frame rate falls from 112 FPS at 1920x1080 to 82 FPS at 2560x1440, a reduction of 30 FPS (approximately 27%), and then further down to 53 FPS at 3840x2160. This scaling pattern shows that each resolution step imposes a heavier load on the GPU, with the 4K figure representing less than half of the 1080p performance.

The behavior at Medium settings follows a similar trajectory but with lower absolute numbers: 80 FPS at 1080p, 59 FPS at 1440p, and 38 FPS at 4K. The percentage drop from 1080p to 1440p is roughly 26%, while the drop from 1440p to 4K is about 36%, suggesting that the GPU struggles more as pixel count increases. At High settings, the trend continues with 70 FPS at 1080p, 51 FPS at 1440p, and 33 FPS at 4K. The Ultra preset is the most demanding, yielding 52 FPS at 1080p, 38 FPS at 1440p, and just 25 FPS at 4K.

This scaling behavior is characteristic of a GPU-limited scenario. The RTX 3050 4 GB has a 128-bit memory bus and 192.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which becomes increasingly stressed as resolution rises. The pixel rate of 55.68 GPixel/s and texture rate of 111.4 GTexel/s are modest figures for modern titles, and the data suggests that Lockdown Protocol's rendering demands at 4K simply exceed what this card can deliver at playable frame rates. The fact that 4K Ultra yields only 25 FPS average, while 4K Low produces 53 FPS, indicates that the GPU's compute units are the bottleneck rather than any CPU limitation.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB plays the dominant role in determining Lockdown Protocol's performance, and the VRAM capacity is a critical factor. With only 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, the card operates at a memory bandwidth of 192.0 GB/s. The base clock of 1545 MHz and boost clock of 1740 MHz are the operating frequencies that drive the 2048 shading units, 64 TMUs, and 32 ROPs.

The benchmark results show that the GPU's 7.127 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is the ceiling for frame generation. At 1080p Low, the system achieves 112 FPS, which is the highest measured value in the entire dataset. However, this drops precipitously as settings increase, with 1080p High at 70 FPS and 1080p Ultra at 52 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra at the same resolution is 60 FPS, representing a 54% performance loss when enabling the highest quality presets.

The 4 GB VRAM is particularly concerning for Lockdown Protocol at higher settings. The data shows that 4K Medium produces an average of 38 FPS with a minimum of 32 FPS and maximum of 43 FPS, while 1440p Medium delivers 59 FPS average with a 50 FPS minimum and 67 FPS maximum. These figures suggest that the card's memory capacity is sufficient for Medium settings at 1440p but becomes a limiting factor as resolution and texture quality increase. The 12 Gbps effective memory speed and the dual-slot cooler design indicate a card that is thermally capable, but the 90 W TDP and 250 W suggested PSU show this is an entry-level solution.

The GPU's percentile ranking of 50 among all GPUs places it at the median, which aligns with the measured results showing playable but not exceptional performance. The RTX 3050's support for DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4 ensures compatibility with Lockdown Protocol's rendering requirements, but the hardware's raw throughput is the deciding factor in the observed frame rates.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Lockdown Protocol?

A: The data shows 1920x1080 is the only resolution where the system consistently exceeds 60 FPS across all settings. At 1080p, the average FPS ranges from 52 at Ultra to 112 at Low, while 1440p drops to a range of 38-82 FPS and 4K falls to 25-53 FPS.

Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming in Lockdown Protocol?

A: It can technically run at 3840x2160, but the results are marginal. The best 4K result is 53 FPS at Low settings, while Medium yields 38 FPS, High gives 33 FPS, and Ultra produces only 25 FPS. These figures indicate that 4K is only viable at Low settings for a smooth experience.

Q: How does the GPU's VRAM affect performance in this game?

A: The 4 GB VRAM capacity appears to be a constraint at higher resolutions and settings. The measured data shows 1440p Ultra at 38 FPS and 4K Ultra at 25 FPS, suggesting that memory capacity and bandwidth limitations become more pronounced as the rendering load increases.

Q: What is the CPU's contribution to gaming performance here?

A: The Intel Core i5-12400F with 6 cores and 12 threads appears sufficient for Lockdown Protocol. The CPU's single-thread performance of 909 in 3dmark and 3481 in Passmark single-thread tests, combined with its 4.40 GHz boost clock, likely prevents it from bottlenecking the GPU in most scenarios.

Q: Is there a significant difference between Medium and High settings?

A: Yes, the data shows a consistent drop from Medium to High across all resolutions. At 1080p, Medium averages 80 FPS while High averages 70 FPS. At 1440p, the difference is 59 FPS versus 51 FPS, and at 4K it is 38 FPS versus 33 FPS.

Q: What does the combo rank indicate about this system?

A: The combo ranks 3269th out of 3714 tested combinations, placing it in the bottom 12% of systems. This indicates that Lockdown Protocol will run, but the experience will be below what most tested setups deliver.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the Intel Core i5-12400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB ranks 3269th out of 3714 tested combos in Lockdown Protocol. This position places the system in the bottom 12% of all configurations, which is a sobering statistic for anyone expecting high-end performance. The rank reflects the measured frame rates across all resolutions and settings, and the data confirms that this is an entry-level gaming setup.

The CPU's individual percentile of 73 against all CPUs is relatively strong, meaning the i5-12400F outperforms nearly three-quarters of all processors in general benchmarks. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS with an average score of 19047 and a delta of 0%, and the Intel Core 3 201E at 19056 with a delta of -0.1%. This suggests the CPU is not the weak link in the system.

However, the GPU tells a different story. The RTX 3050 4 GB has a percentile of 50 against all GPUs, which is the median. This, combined with the lack of nearest rival data for the GPU, indicates that it is a middling performer. The 4 GB VRAM limitation and the 128-bit memory bus are significant drawbacks for modern games, and the measured FPS data confirms that the GPU drags the overall combo ranking down substantially.

The rank difference between the CPU's strong showing and the GPU's mediocre one highlights the imbalance in this pairing. While the i5-12400F could support a more powerful graphics card, the RTX 3050 4 GB holds the system back. For Lockdown Protocol specifically, the combo rank of 3269 out of 3714 means that most other tested systems deliver better frame rates, and users should temper their expectations accordingly.

CPU Role

The Intel Core i5-12400F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor from the Alder Lake architecture, built on Intel's 10 nm process. It operates with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. The CPU's cache configuration includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 18 MB of shared L3 cache, which provides a solid foundation for gaming workloads.

In Lockdown Protocol, the CPU's role appears to be secondary to the GPU, as the measured FPS scaling with resolution suggests the graphics card is the primary bottleneck. The CPU's single-thread performance is respectable, with a 3dmark single-thread score of 909 and a Passmark single-thread score of 3481. These figures indicate that the processor can handle the game's logic and physics calculations without becoming a limiting factor at the tested settings.

The multi-threaded performance is also noteworthy, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12380 and a Passmark multi-thread score of 19433. Lockdown Protocol, being a modern FPS title, likely benefits from multiple threads, and the 12 threads available on this CPU provide ample parallelism. The 3dmark 16-thread score of 5895 and max-thread score of 5912 show that the CPU scales well with increased thread utilization, though the game's actual thread usage may vary.

The CPU's memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5, with dual-channel configuration, offers flexibility for system builders. The 18 MB of shared L3 cache is adequate for gaming, and the PCIe Gen 5 support with 20 lanes ensures that the GPU can communicate at full bandwidth. The CPU's release date of January 2022 and its active production status indicate a mature platform with good driver support.

The data suggests that the i5-12400F is not the constraint in this system. The 4.40 GHz boost clock provides strong single-thread performance, and the 6-core/12-thread configuration is more than sufficient for Lockdown Protocol's requirements. If the GPU were upgraded, this CPU would likely continue to deliver adequate performance without bottlenecking a more powerful graphics card.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data for Lockdown Protocol with this combo provides a comprehensive view of performance across three resolutions and four settings presets. At 1920x1080, the system delivers 112 FPS average at Low settings, 80 FPS at Medium (with a minimum of 68 and maximum of 92), 70 FPS at High, and 52 FPS at Ultra. This represents a clear performance hierarchy where each settings tier costs a measurable amount of frame rate.

Moving to 2560x1440, the averages drop to 82 FPS at Low, 59 FPS at Medium (minimum 50, maximum 67), 51 FPS at High, and 38 FPS at Ultra. The 1440p results show that the system can maintain playable frame rates at Low and Medium settings, but High and Ultra fall below the 60 FPS threshold that many gamers consider the minimum for smooth gameplay.

At 3840x2160, the performance becomes marginal. Low settings produce 53 FPS average, Medium yields 38 FPS (minimum 32, maximum 43), High gives 33 FPS, and Ultra drops to 25 FPS. The 4K Medium data provides the only min/max figures at this resolution, showing a range of 32 to 43 FPS, which indicates inconsistent frame pacing that could result in noticeable stuttering.

The data reveals that the step from Low to Medium settings costs approximately 32 FPS at 1080p, 23 FPS at 1440p, and 15 FPS at 4K. The step from Medium to High costs 10 FPS at 1080p, 8 FPS at 1440p, and 5 FPS at 4K. The step from High to Ultra costs 18 FPS at 1080p, 13 FPS at 1440p, and 8 FPS at 4K. These diminishing returns at higher resolutions indicate that the GPU's compute resources are being saturated, and the absolute frame rate differences shrink as the resolution increases.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings for this system depend heavily on the target resolution and the desired frame rate. At 1920x1080, the Medium preset provides 80 FPS average, which offers a good balance between visual quality and smoothness. The High preset at 70 FPS is also viable, but the 10 FPS drop from Medium may not justify the visual improvement for competitive play. The Ultra preset at 52 FPS is playable but falls below the 60 FPS mark, making it less ideal for fast-paced FPS action.

For 2560x1440 users, the Low preset at 82 FPS is the only option that exceeds 60 FPS comfortably. The Medium preset at 59 FPS is borderline, with a minimum of 50 FPS that could cause noticeable dips during intense scenes. Given that the average is just below 60, most players would likely prefer the smoother experience of Low settings at this resolution, sacrificing visual fidelity for consistent performance.

At 3840x2160, none of the presets achieve 60 FPS. The Low preset at 53 FPS is the best option, but even this falls short of the threshold for smooth gameplay. The Medium preset at 38 FPS, with a minimum of 32 FPS, would likely result in a frustrating experience for a fast-paced FPS. The data suggests that 4K gaming is not practical with this combo, and users should either lower the resolution or accept significant compromises in frame rate.

The best overall experience per the measured rows appears to be 1080p with Medium settings, delivering 80 FPS average with a minimum of 68 FPS. This configuration provides a good balance of visual quality and performance, ensuring that the game remains responsive during combat. For players who prioritize frame rate above all else, 1080p Low at 112 FPS offers the highest headroom, while those who want the best visuals should consider 1080p High at 70 FPS as a reasonable compromise between quality and playability.