Lockdown Protocol

Lockdown Protocol

AVERAGE FPS
117
good

This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 117 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 47 66 76 109
1440p QHD 78 102 121 164
1080p Full HD 108 142 159 229

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 109
3840x2160 Medium 76
3840x2160 High 66
3840x2160 Ultra 47
2560x1440 Low 164
2560x1440 Medium 121
2560x1440 High 102
2560x1440 Ultra 78
1920x1080 Low 229
1920x1080 Medium 159
1920x1080 High 142
1920x1080 Ultra 108

Lockdown Protocol with AMD Ryzen 9 5950X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti, In-Depth Analysis

Lockdown Protocol is a 2024 FPS that responds strongly to both CPU and GPU, and this pairing of the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti lands in the top 39% of all tested combos (rank 642 out of 1637). The 16-core, 32-thread Zen 3 processor provides a solid foundation, while the 8 GB Ampere GPU handles the graphical load. The data shows a clear pattern: this combo is capable of high refresh rate play at 1080p and 1440p, but 4K demands careful settings management. The measured FPS across resolutions and presets reveals a system that is well-balanced at lower resolutions but becomes GPU-limited as pixel count rises.

Settings Recommendations

The best experience per the measured rows depends heavily on your target resolution. At 1920x1080, the Low preset delivers an average of 229 FPS, which is ideal for competitive play on a high-refresh monitor. However, the jump to Medium yields 158.8 FPS, which is still exceptionally smooth and offers better visual fidelity. High settings at 1080p produce 142 FPS, a more modest drop, suggesting that the CPU is keeping pace well. Ultra at 1080p drops to 107.7 FPS, which is playable but suggests diminishing returns for the visual upgrade.

For 2560x1440, the sweet spot is the High preset at 102.3 FPS. This maintains a triple-digit average, which is excellent for most gaming scenarios. Medium at 1440p scores 121 FPS, but the visual difference between Medium and High is often significant. Low at 1440p hits 164.3 FPS, but that preset typically sacrifices too much visual quality. Ultra at 1440p falls to 78.2 FPS, which is borderline for fast-paced FPS gameplay, especially if you prefer a 100+ FPS target.

At 3840x2160, the measured data shows a different story. High settings yield 66 FPS, which is just above the console-like 60 FPS threshold but may feel less responsive. Medium at 4K scores 76.3 FPS, which is a better balance for a single-player or co-op experience. Low at 4K provides 108.6 FPS, which is surprisingly high and suggests the GPU has headroom when visual effects are minimized. Ultra at 4K is the outlier at 47.4 FPS, which is below the smoothness threshold for most players. The recommendation is clear: use High at 1080p and 1440p, and choose Medium at 4K to keep the frame rate above 70 FPS without the visual harshness of Low.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti is the primary driver of the resolution scaling in this game. It features 8 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 608.3 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU clock runs at a base of 1575 MHz and boosts to 1770 MHz, with a memory clock of 1188 MHz (19 Gbps effective). This configuration allows for 21.75 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, which is substantial for a card in its class. The data shows that at 1080p, the GPU is not the limiting factor, as even Ultra settings maintain over 100 FPS. However, at 4K, the GPU becomes the bottleneck, as evidenced by the steep drop from 108.6 FPS at Low to 47.4 FPS at Ultra.

The 8 GB VRAM is a key consideration. The benchmark results indicate that at 4K with Ultra settings, the frame rate collapses to 47.4 FPS, which suggests the GPU is either running out of memory or the memory bandwidth is insufficient for the texture load. The performance at 4K Low (108.6 FPS) compared to 4K High (66 FPS) shows a 42.5 FPS swing, which is a massive difference driven by the GPU's ability to handle the visual complexity. In terms of synthetic benchmarks, the RTX 3070 Ti scores 23356 in Passmark G3D and 137518 in Geekbench OpenCL, placing it at the 74th percentile against all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 6700 (deltaPct -0.8%) and the NVIDIA Quadro M5000 (deltaPct -0.9%), showing it sits in a competitive mid-range tier.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo rank of 642 out of 1637 puts this pairing in the 61st percentile of all tested combinations. This is a strong result, but not an elite one. The CPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5950X, is a high-end processor that ranks at the 93rd percentile against all CPUs. Its average benchmark score is 49062, which is nearly identical to the Intel Core i5-14600K (49166, deltaPct -0.2%) and the Intel Core i5-14600KF (49367, deltaPct -0.6%). This means the 5950X is not a performance outlier; it is a solid, consistent performer that does not hold back the GPU in most scenarios.

The GPU, RTX 3070 Ti, ranks at the 74th percentile, with an average benchmark score of 30849. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 6700, scores 31112 (deltaPct -0.8%), which is a negligible difference. This suggests that the GPU is the more average component in this pairing, and the overall combo rank is limited by the GPU's mid-tier positioning rather than the CPU's high-end capability. In Lockdown Protocol specifically, the combination of a powerful CPU and a mid-high GPU results in a system that excels at lower resolutions but cannot push 4K Ultra at high frame rates. The data implies that if you were to pair this CPU with a stronger GPU, the combo rank would likely improve substantially, but with the 3070 Ti, the ceiling is set by the graphics card.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the measured FPS across settings is as follows: Low averages 229 FPS, Medium averages 158.8 FPS, High averages 142 FPS, and Ultra averages 107.7 FPS. The gap between Low and Medium is 70.2 FPS, which is a significant jump, but the gap between Medium and High is only 16.8 FPS, indicating that High is a reasonable upgrade over Medium without a major performance hit. Ultra at 1080p is 34.3 FPS slower than High, which suggests that the Ultra preset includes effects that are particularly taxing on the GPU.

At 2560x1440, the numbers are: Low at 164.3 FPS, Medium at 121 FPS, High at 102.3 FPS, and Ultra at 78.2 FPS. The transition from Low to Medium costs 43.3 FPS, and from Medium to High costs 18.7 FPS. The Ultra preset at 1440p is 24.1 FPS slower than High, which is a similar relative drop to what you see at 1080p. This resolution is where the balance between CPU and GPU starts to shift, as the GPU is working harder to fill more pixels.

At 3840x2160, the results are: Low at 108.6 FPS, Medium at 76.3 FPS, High at 66 FPS, and Ultra at 47.4 FPS. The difference between Low and Medium is 32.3 FPS, and between Medium and High is 10.3 FPS. The Ultra preset at 4K is the only configuration that falls below 50 FPS, which is a clear outlier. The data shows that at 4K, the GPU is the limiting factor, as even the drop from Low to Medium is more severe than the drop from Medium to High, indicating that the card is struggling with the pixel fill rate and memory bandwidth.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS scaling from 1080p to 4K reveals the bottleneck. At Low settings, the average FPS drops from 229 at 1080p to 164.3 at 1440p (a 28.3% reduction) and then to 108.6 at 4K (a 52.6% reduction from 1440p). This scaling is nearly linear with pixel count, which indicates that the CPU is not the limiting factor at Low settings; the GPU is doing the heavy lifting. At High settings, the drop is less severe in absolute terms: 142 FPS at 1080p, 102.3 FPS at 1440p (a 28% drop), and 66 FPS at 4K (a 35.5% drop from 1440p). The smaller percentage drop at High settings suggests that the CPU is starting to become more relevant, as the GPU is not fully saturated at lower resolutions.

At Ultra settings, the scaling is stark: 107.7 FPS at 1080p, 78.2 FPS at 1440p (a 27.4% drop), and 47.4 FPS at 4K (a 39.4% drop from 1440p). The fact that the 1080p Ultra frame rate is below the 1440p High frame rate (107.7 vs 102.3) shows that the Ultra preset has a substantial GPU cost. The data indicates that this combo is CPU-bound at 1080p Low and Medium, as the frame rates are high enough that the 16-core processor can keep up. However, at 4K, the GPU is clearly the limiting component, as the frame rates drop proportionally with the increase in pixels, regardless of settings. The 5950X's high single-thread score of 5450 in Cinebench R23 single-core and 944 in 3DMark single-thread ensures that it is not holding back the GPU at any resolution, confirming that the RTX 3070 Ti is the primary determinant of performance at higher resolutions.

FAQ

Q: Is the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X a good match for the RTX 3070 Ti in Lockdown Protocol?

A: Yes, the data shows a balanced pairing. The CPU ranks at the 93rd percentile, and the GPU at the 74th, but the measured FPS indicates that the CPU does not bottleneck the GPU at any resolution. The combo achieves 142 FPS at 1080p High and 102.3 FPS at 1440p High, which are solid results.

Q: What is the best settings preset for a 1440p monitor?

A: Based on the measured data, High settings at 2560x1440 provide 102.3 FPS, which is the best balance of visual quality and smoothness. Medium offers 121 FPS, but the visual upgrade to High is worth the 18.7 FPS loss for most players.

Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming?

A: It can, but with compromises. At 4K Medium, the average FPS is 76.3, which is playable. 4K High drops to 66 FPS, and 4K Ultra falls to 47.4 FPS, which is below the preferred threshold for fast-paced FPS. The 8 GB VRAM is a limiting factor at this resolution.

Q: How does the RTX 3070 Ti compare to its closest rivals?

A: The GPU's average benchmark score of 30849 is within 1% of the AMD Radeon RX 6700 (31112, deltaPct -0.8%) and the NVIDIA Quadro M5000 (31142, deltaPct -0.9%). This means performance is essentially on par with these cards, making the 3070 Ti a mid-tier option.

Q: Is the CPU holding back performance at 1080p?

A: No. The 5950X has a single-thread score of 5450 in Cinebench R23, which is high. At 1080p Low, the combo hits 229 FPS, indicating that the CPU can feed the GPU effectively at high frame rates. The bottleneck is the GPU, not the CPU.

Q: What is the biggest performance jump in settings?

A: The largest drop occurs when moving from Low to Medium at 1080p, where the average FPS falls from 229 to 158.8, a loss of 70.2 FPS. This suggests that the Medium preset adds significant visual effects that heavily tax the GPU.

Hardware Specifications

AMD Ryzen 9 5950X

Cores / Threads 16 / 32
Base Clock 3400 MHz
Boost Clock 4900 MHz
TDP 105W
Socket AMD Socket AM4
View Full CPU Details →

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

VRAM 8 GB GDDR6X
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 1770 MHz MHz
TDP 290 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for AMD Ryzen 9 5950X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti in Lockdown Protocol

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 108.6
3840x2160 Medium 76.3
3840x2160 High 66.0
3840x2160 Ultra 47.4
2560x1440 Low 164.3
2560x1440 Medium 121.0
2560x1440 High 102.3
2560x1440 Ultra 78.2
1920x1080 Low 229.0
1920x1080 Medium 158.8
1920x1080 High 142.0
1920x1080 Ultra 107.7

Lockdown Protocol with Ryzen 9 5950X + Other GPUs

See how Lockdown Protocol performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Lockdown Protocol with RTX 3070 Ti + Other CPUs

See how Lockdown Protocol performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with Ryzen 9 5950X + RTX 3070 Ti

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.