Lockdown Protocol

This database entry covers the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti combination in Lockdown Protocol. The measured data set includes 12 distinct frame-rate rows, spanning three resolutions and three quality presets, plus fully synthetic CPU and GPU benchmarks, ranking data, and nearest-rival comparisons. This analysis unpacks that information to characterize a pairing that sits at less than the midpoint of known configurations in this game.

The Ryzen 5 7500F is a six-core, twelve-thread CPU with a base clock of 3.7 GHz, a boost clock of 5.0 GHz, and a TDP of 65 W. The RTX 3070 Ti uses the Ampere architecture with 6144 shading units, base and boost clocks of 1575 MHz and 1770 MHz, an 8 GB GDDR6X memory pool on a 256-bit bus, and a measured memory bandwidth of 608.3 GB/s. The synthetic results place the CPU at the 77th percentile relative to all CPUs and the GPU at the 75th percentile relative to all GPUs. In Lockdown Protocol, the combination itself is positioned at rank 1324 out of 3714 measured configurations, underlining that these two mid-high components do not break into the top slice of frame rates for this title.

Settings Recommendations

The measured rows provide four preset levels—Low, Medium, High, and Ultra—within each target resolution. Across all resolutions, the Medium setting appears to be the equilibrium point where average FPS remains within reasonable reach of the lower settings while still preserving some visual primitives. At 1080p, Medium scores 160 average FPS compared to 225 on Low, 139 on High, and 105 on Ultra. At 1440p, the gap narrows: Medium yields 117 average FPS, while Low is 165, High is 102, and Ultra is 77. At 4K, Medium is the only high preset beside Low that exceeds the 76 average already recorded at 4K Medium; High and Ultra degrade further to 66 and 49 respectively.

A ranking of the recommended preset is relatively straightforward from the data. For users who want the highest possible refresh without sacrificing, Medium at 2560x1440 is the best compromise because it brings a 117 average while keeping a non-trivial graphics load. It is also the only preset that records both min and max at 1440p: 99 and 135. At 1080p, Medium at 160 average is 21 fps lower than High but still well above a comfortable playable level, and 65 fps above Ultra. At 4K, Medium’s 74 average does not drop to the volatile 49 of Ultra, and it outperforms High by about one-quarter of its own value. The recommendation across all resolutions is, therefore, Medium.

GPU Role

The RTX 3070 Ti’s 8GB frame buffer is the most prominent GPU attribute for this game. The measured frames taper off sharply as resolution increases, and the memory bandwidth of 608.3 GB/s appears to be the limit. The steepest single setting that triggers this is the Ultra preset at 4K, which produces just 49 FPS, exactly a third of what 1080p Ultra delivers (105). The step from Medium to High at any resolution is also large: at 1440p the 117 FPS Medium drops to 102 on High, a loss of 15, and at 4K it drops from 76 to 66. This pattern is consistent with the 8 GB memory depth becoming insufficient to hold the larger texture datasets that High and Ultra require at high pixel counts.

The measured GPU synthetic scores reinforce this: the G3D score (23356) and passmark GPU compute (11601) situate it among the mainstream upper tiers, but the 4K resolution is still heavy. The nearest GPU rival is the GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile, which carries a for measured average score difference of only 0.1%. Its 0.5% delta against the Radeon RX 6800 also shows the RTX 3070 Ti sits in a very tightly crowded segment; modest improvements in that band will not overcome the memory ceiling at 4K. The 8 MB, 256-bit memory path is the single factor that matters most resolution progressions.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination ends up at 1324th overall among the 3714 measured Lockdown Protocol configurations. At rank 1324, it sits almost exactly in the upper half of known results—neither prominent nor an outlier. Given the CPU sits at the 77th percentile and the GPU at the 75th, we expect the system to trend toward a mid-table finish, but the game’s reliance on float throughput and bandwidth makes the RTX 3070 Ti the deciding factor. The CPU’s nearest rivals in comparable scores—the Intel Core i7-11850H (0.1% higher), the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F (0.2% lower), and the Intel Core i7-13620H (0.2% higher)—differ by less than one process node and provide the same class of multi-thread capability. On the GPU side, the nearest competitor is the RTX 5070 Mobile (0.1% ahead), with the RX 6800 (0.5% behind) and the 2080 Ti (0.5% behind) as near equivalents. Much suggests that the combo’s rank is a sum of the GPU ranking alone: the CPU is good enough, but the GPU is fairly easily pushed by 0.4% of alternatives.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The following table shows every measured frame-rate entry directly from the dataset.

| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS | Min FPS | Max FPS |

|---|---|---|---|---|

| 3840x2160 | High | 66 | - | - |

| 3840x2160 | Low | 106 | - | - |

| 3840x2160 | Medium | 76 | 64 | 87 |

| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 49 | - | - |

| 2560x1440 | High | 102 | - | - |

| 2560x1440 | Low | 165 | - | - |

| 2560x1440 | Medium | 117 | 99 | 135 |

| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 77 | - | - |

| 1920x1080 | High | 139 | - | - |

| 1920x1080 | Low | 225 | - | - |

| 1920x1080 | Medium | 160 | 136 | 164 |

| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 105 | - | - |

The 1920x1080 rows contain three contiguous presets that span 100 FPS: Low at 225, Medium at 160, and High at 139. The drop continues to 105 at Ultra, which is still above most 144Hz displays. At 2560x1440, the scale is lower but the same progression holds: 165, 117, 102, and 77. Only at 4K does the High setting fall below 73, and Ultra falls below 50. The min and max columns are populated only in the Medium rows (one exception is the 1080p Medium row, which lacks a min because the presented value is the only one). For the game as a whole, the data proves this GPU and CPU pairing can reliably deliver 60-plus averages at 1440p on Medium.

Resolution Scaling

From 1920x1080 to 3840x2160, the frame rate decreases roughly proportionally with the pixel count, but not uniformly. The Low preset drops from 225 to 106 across that range, while Medium drops from 160 to 106 across the same span. Most interestingly, High goes from 139 to 102; Ultra goes from 105 to 49. The scaling curve is more severe in the Ultra column: 105 to 49 is a 56-point fall that pushes the 4K result below half of the 1080p value. The medium settings, meanwhile, have a span of 160→117→76, which is a less steep cliff.

Those numbers indicate that the limit on 4K is not the CPU. The 6-core, 12-thread chip can maintain 1080p Low at 225 FPS, which is only a moderate fraction of its multi-thread headroom (the CPU scores 3216 in Cinebench R23 single threaded and 30523 in passmark data compression). As the resolution increases, the GPU’s quadratic memory workload become the bottleneck. The 8GB VRAM is still enough for the lowest preset, which at 4K yields 106 FPS—far above any 60 FPS target. However, at Ultra the 4K result (49) is exactly one-fifth of the 225 found at 1080p Low, confirming again that factory-level settings are not viable at the highest fixtures.

CPU Role

The CPU provides enough bandwidth and instruction throughput for high-FPS low-Raster conditions. The 6 cores, 12 threads, and 3.6–5.0 GHz boost range translate to a passmark multi-thread score of 26825 and a Cinebench 22799 multi-core, which in game results show no stress. The single-core score of 3216 in Cinebench R23 produces a high ceiling for the by-frame update inherent to a fast run. The measured 1080p Low average of 225 and Medium of 160 both sit within the processor’s buffer; it is only when the same board jumps from Low to Ultra that performance begins to outpace the core logic. At 1440p Ultra it still reaches 77 FPS, which is very reasonable, but at 4K Ultra it drops to 49. So the CPU itself is not the gate—only at 4K does the scalar performance become the limiting bit.

In more precise terms, the Ryzen 5 7500F’s 65 W TDP allows it to sustain a three-hundred vs. 4 of what it can at 1080p. The fit is also the power connector rating: a 600 W suggested power supply, which is consistent with a middle-priced system. For users who already have an RTX 3070 Ti and a 65W processor, this CPU will never limit the GPU until past the 1440p threshold.

FAQ

Q: What is the fastest measured FPS for this combination?

A: That figure is 225, which is recorded at 1920x1080 resolution on the Medium—in the dataset it appears for 1920x1080 with the Low settings as 225.

Q: Does this combo support many rendering settings at 4K?

A: At 3840x2160, the only preset that exceeds 70 FPS is Low, which averages 106. Medium sits at 76 and High lowers to 66; Ultra is not playable above 49.

Q: What is the VRAM capacity of the GPU?

A: The RTX 3070 Ti has 8 GB of GDDR6X, with a 256-bit interface and an aggregate bandwidth of 608.3 GB/s.

Q: Does the CPU include integrated graphics?

A: No, this CPU (AMD Ryzen 5 7500F) has an integratedGraph field representing null; without a discrete GPU, display output would not be possible.

Q: Which rivals are closest in performance?

A: On the CPU side, the Intel Core i7-11850H, AMD Ryzen 5 8400F, and Intel Core i7-13620H all sit within 0.2% of the Ryzen’s average score. On the GPU side, the NVIDIA RTX 3070 Ti is closest to the RTX 5070 Mobile (0.1% delta) and the Radeon RX 6800 (0.5% lower average).

Q: What is the overall rank of this configuration in Lockdown Protocol?

A: The combo is ranked 1324 out of 3714 in the game’s measured result set, meaning slightly over 2300 combos are faster than it.