Lockdown Protocol
This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 126 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 52 | 71 | 83 | 115 |
| 1440p QHD | 83 | 112 | 129 | 183 |
| 1080p Full HD | 115 | 151 | 175 | 244 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Lockdown Protocol with AMD Ryzen 5 7500F + AMD Radeon RX 9070, In-Depth Analysis
The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F and AMD Radeon RX 9070 pairing delivers a high-refresh-rate experience in Lockdown Protocol, but the data shows a CPU that is evenly matched with its immediate rivals. The 7500F, a 6-core, 12-thread Zen 4 part, posts an average benchmark score of 24993, placing it in the 82nd percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-11850H, scores 24974, a delta of just 0.1 percent—a statistical tie. Similarly, the AMD Ryzen 7 2700X and Ryzen 5 8400F are within 0.3 percent, while the Ryzen 9 6900HX trails by 0.4 percent. This suggests the 7500F is a solid, mid-pack performer whose multithreaded capabilities are sufficient for the game’s demands without being a bottleneck.
The cores themselves are clocked at a base of 3.70 GHz with a boost of 5.00 GHz. In multi-threaded workloads like Cinebench R23, the 7500F scores 22799, while its single-core score of 3218 highlights strong per-thread performance. For a competitive FPS, this single-thread strength matters; the data indicates that at 1080p Low, the combo averages 244 FPS, which is more dependent on CPU headroom than GPU limits. The processor’s 32 MB of shared L3 cache and dual-channel DDR5 memory support (83.2 GB/s bandwidth) help feed the GPU quickly. At 1440p Medium, the system hits 128.9 FPS, showing that the CPU can keep pace when the resolution climbs. However, the benchmark results do not isolate CPU-only gaming scores; instead, the measured FPS reflects the entire combo’s behavior, where the 7500F’s role is to maintain frame pacing without introducing stutter.
Settings Recommendations
The measured FPS rows reveal a clear hierarchy across presets, and the best experience depends entirely on the target resolution. At 3840x2160, the Ultra preset drops to 51.8 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS threshold many players consider playable. High at 4K yields 71.1 FPS, which is playable but not ideal for a fast-paced FPS. The Medium preset at 4K offers 83.1 FPS, a 17 percent improvement over High, making it the optimal choice for 4K if visual fidelity can be slightly compromised. Low at 4K jumps to 114.5 FPS, but that preset often sacrifices too much detail for a competitive edge.
At 2560x1440, the story changes. Ultra delivers 82.7 FPS, which is smooth, but High improves that to 112 FPS, a 35 percent gain. Medium further raises the average to 128.9 FPS, which is the sweet spot for 1440p: it provides a comfortable margin above 120 FPS while maintaining decent visuals. Low at 1440p reaches 182.8 FPS, but that is overkill for most monitors. For 1920x1080, every preset is playable. Ultra hits 114.7 FPS, High reaches 151.2 FPS, and Medium climbs to 174.8 FPS. Low pushes to 244 FPS, which is ideal for 240 Hz displays, but the difference between Medium and Low is 69 FPS, suggesting that Medium is the better balance for most users at 1080p.
The data shows diminishing returns at lower resolutions. At 1080p, the gap between High and Ultra is 36.5 FPS, while at 4K, the gap between High and Ultra is 19.3 FPS. This indicates the GPU scales well with settings, but the CPU becomes less relevant as resolution rises. The recommendation is: for 4K, use Medium; for 1440p, use High or Medium depending on refresh rate; for 1080p, Medium is the best all-around preset, offering 174.8 FPS without the visual degradation of Low.
FAQ
Q: What is the average FPS at 1440p with High settings?
A: The measured average FPS at 2560x1440 with High settings is 112 FPS. This is a strong result for a 1440p monitor with a 120 Hz or 144 Hz refresh rate, as it keeps frame times consistent.
Q: Can this combo handle 4K gaming?
A: Yes, but with compromises. At 3840x2160, the Ultra preset averages 51.8 FPS, which is below 60. The Medium preset averages 83.1 FPS, which is playable, while Low reaches 114.5 FPS. For a competitive FPS, Medium is the highest preset that maintains comfortable frame rates.
Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?
A: The Ryzen 5 7500F’s average benchmark score is 24993. Its closest rival, the Intel Core i7-11850H, scores 24974, a delta of 0.1 percent. The AMD Ryzen 7 2700X scores 25057, which is 0.3 percent higher, while the Ryzen 5 8400F is 0.3 percent lower at 25064. These are negligible differences.
Q: What is the best preset for 1080p gaming?
A: Medium is the best choice, with an average of 174.8 FPS. Low offers 244 FPS, but the visual downgrade is significant. High provides 151.2 FPS, which is also viable, but Medium offers the best balance of frame rate and image quality.
Q: Does the GPU bottleneck the CPU at any resolution?
A: At 1080p Low, the system averages 244 FPS, suggesting the CPU is capable of very high frame rates. At 4K Ultra, the average drops to 51.8 FPS, which indicates the GPU is the limiting factor. The data shows the CPU’s performance is more visible at lower resolutions.
Q: Is the 7500F a good match for the RX 9070?
A: The combo ranks 539 out of 1637 tested combinations, placing it in the top third of all pairings. The CPU’s 82nd percentile ranking and the GPU’s 79th percentile ranking suggest they are well-matched, with neither component dramatically outclassing the other.
How This Combo Ranks
The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F and AMD Radeon RX 9070 combination holds a rank of 539 out of 1637 tested combos in Lockdown Protocol. This places it in the 67th percentile of all pairings, meaning roughly two-thirds of tested systems perform better, but a substantial portion performs worse. The CPU’s individual percentileVsAllCpus is 82, while the GPU’s percentileVsAllGpus is 79, indicating both components are above-average performers. The combination’s rank is lower than either component’s individual percentile would suggest, implying that the pairing is not perfectly optimized for this specific title, likely due to the game’s engine favoring other architectures.
When contextualized with the measured FPS, the rank makes sense. At 1080p Ultra, the combo hits 114.7 FPS, which is excellent, but at 4K Ultra, it falls to 51.8 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS mark. This inconsistency across resolutions likely contributes to the mid-tier rank. The CPU’s nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-11850H, has a nearly identical average score (24974 vs 24993), yet the combo’s rank suggests that other factors, such as memory latency or platform efficiency, influence the final outcome. The data does not specify which combos rank higher, but the 539th position indicates that while this setup is capable, it is not a top-tier pairing for this game.
GPU Role
The AMD Radeon RX 9070 is the dominant component in this pairing, with its 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus providing 644.6 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU’s boost clock of 2520 MHz and game clock of 2070 MHz drive its 3584 shading units, which produce 36.13 TFLOPS of FP32 compute. In Lockdown Protocol, the GPU’s role is to handle the rendering load, and the data shows its performance scales predictably with settings. At 1080p Low, the combo averages 244 FPS, but at 4K Ultra, it drops to 51.8 FPS—a 79 percent reduction, which is typical for a GPU-bound scenario.
The GPU’s average benchmark score is 34780, placing it in the 79th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA A2, scores 34866, a delta of -0.2 percent, making them effectively equal. The AMD Radeon HD 7970 is 0.7 percent slower, and the Radeon PRO W6400 is 0.8 percent slower. This suggests the RX 9070 is a solid mid-range performer, but it is not a flagship. The GPU’s memory bandwidth of 644.6 GB/s is crucial for 4K textures, yet the measured FPS at 4K High (71.1 FPS) versus 4K Medium (83.1 FPS) indicates that VRAM capacity is not a limiting factor—both presets fit within the 16 GB frame buffer. The GPU’s DirectX 12 Ultimate support and Vulkan 1.4 API ensure compatibility with modern rendering features, but the benchmark data shows that Lockdown Protocol does not heavily tax the GPU at lower settings, allowing the CPU to shine at 1080p and 1440p.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 5 7500F
AMD Radeon RX 9070
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 7500F + AMD Radeon RX 9070 in Lockdown Protocol
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 114.5 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 83.1 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 71.1 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 51.8 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 182.8 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 128.9 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 112.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 82.7 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 244.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 174.8 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 151.2 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 114.7 |
Lockdown Protocol with Ryzen 5 7500F + Other GPUs
See how Lockdown Protocol performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Lockdown Protocol with RX 9070 + Other CPUs
See how Lockdown Protocol performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 5 7500F + RX 9070
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.