Inside

Inside is a 2016 puzzle platformer with modest graphical demands, and the combination of an Intel Core i7-13700K with an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 produces a benchmark dataset that illustrates extreme performance headroom. The measured results, all captured at an average frame rate, show this pairing rarely dropping below the triple-digit range, even at 4K with the most demanding settings. This analysis walks through the CPU and GPU contributions, how the frame rates scale across resolutions, and what the final rankings mean for this specific hardware configuration.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The Intel Core i7-13700K is a 16-core, 24-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, with a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. For a game like Inside, which is not known for heavy multi-threaded workloads, this processor is substantially overqualified. The benchmark data shows the CPU’s synthetic performance is strong, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30745 and a single-core score of 2116. These figures place the CPU in the 89th percentile among all tested CPUs, indicating it is a high-end part by any measure.

In the context of Inside, the CPU’s role is to feed the GPU with draw calls and game logic updates. The game’s puzzle-platformer nature means the physics and interaction systems are not particularly demanding. The data suggests that even at 1080p, where CPU bottlenecks are most likely to appear, the i7-13700K does not become a limiting factor. At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the combo achieves an average of 396 FPS, which is a clear indicator that the CPU is capable of processing frames far faster than this game requires.

The processor’s 30 MB of shared L3 cache and 2 MB per-core L2 cache provide ample fast memory for the game’s assets. Its memory support for DDR4 and DDR5 with a dual-channel bus adds flexibility, though the specific memory configuration was not part of the measured data. The nearest rival for this CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 5900, has an average benchmark score that is 0.2% lower, placing the Intel part in a virtual tie. This close margin suggests that for Inside, the CPU choice between these two would not yield any observable difference in frame rates, as the game is not CPU-bound.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture and features 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 716.8 GB/s. The GPU has a base clock of 2205 MHz and a boost clock of 2505 MHz, with a memory clock rated at 1400 MHz (22.4 Gbps effective). This hardware configuration is designed for high-end 4K gaming, and the benchmark results for Inside reflect that capability. The GPU’s 9728 shading units and 304 texture mapping units are far more than this puzzle platformer can utilize.

The RTX 4080’s average benchmark score of 54247 places it in the 86th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER, is only 0.1% faster in average score, indicating that the two are effectively equivalent in raw performance. For Inside, the GPU is the primary driver of frame rates, particularly at higher resolutions and settings. The data shows that at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, the combo averages 126 FPS, which is still well above the refresh rate of most monitors. This demonstrates that the RTX 4080 has enough raw power to push this game to extreme frame rates without breaking a sweat.

The 16 GB of VRAM is a key asset, though Inside’s visual complexity does not likely require such a large frame buffer. The game’s art style and lighting effects are not demanding enough to approach the memory capacity. The GPU’s support for DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4 ensures compatibility with modern rendering paths, though the game’s 2016 release date means it likely relies on older APIs. Regardless, the measured FPS data indicates the GPU is never the bottleneck, as even the lowest frame rate recorded, 126 FPS at 4K Ultra, is exceptionally high.

Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component

The measured FPS data provides a clear picture of how the system scales with resolution. At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the combo averages 396 FPS. Moving to 2560x1440 with Low settings drops that to 355 FPS, a reduction of 41 FPS (approximately 10.4%). At 3840x2160 with Low settings, the average further drops to 265 FPS, which is a 33% reduction from the 1440p figure. This scaling pattern is typical for a system where the GPU becomes more stressed as resolution increases, but the absolute frame rates remain so high that the CPU is still not the limiting factor.

Examining the High settings preset across resolutions shows a similar trend. At 1080p High, the average is 294 FPS; at 1440p High, it drops to 211 FPS (a 28.2% decrease); and at 4K High, it further drops to 133 FPS (a 37% decrease from 1440p). The drop from 1080p to 4K High is from 294 FPS to 133 FPS, a total reduction of 54.8%. This indicates that the GPU is scaling as expected with the increase in pixel count, but the frame rates remain playable at every resolution.

The data for Medium settings includes minimum and maximum FPS values, which provide additional insight. At 1080p Medium, the average is 366 FPS with a minimum of 311 and a maximum of 421. At 1440p Medium, the average is 328 FPS with a minimum of 279 and a maximum of 377. At 4K Medium, the average is 212 FPS with a minimum of 181 and a maximum of 244. The minimum FPS values at 4K are still above 180, which is far higher than what most games would target. The resolution scaling data suggests that the GPU is the primary limiter at 4K, but the CPU’s headroom is so vast that it does not constrain performance at any tested setting.

How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos

The combination of the Intel Core i7-13700K and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 achieves a combo rank of 150 out of 3716 tested combinations in Inside. This places the pairing in the top 4% of all tested systems, which is a strong performance indicator. Given the game’s low system requirements, the high rank is expected, as the hardware is far more capable than needed. The rank reflects the absolute frame rates achieved, and the data shows this combo is among the fastest for this title.

Comparing the individual components to their nearest rivals helps contextualize the rank. The CPU’s closest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 5900, has a nearly identical average score, with a delta of -0.2%. The GPU’s closest rival, the RTX 4080 SUPER, is 0.1% faster. If this combo were tested with those parts, the rank would likely be very similar, as the performance differences are negligible. The data shows that the combination is not held back by either component, and the rank of 150 reflects the raw power of the RTX 4080 more than the CPU, since the game is not CPU-intensive.

The percentile rankings also support this analysis. The CPU is in the 89th percentile while the GPU is in the 86th percentile, and the combo’s rank of 150 out of 3716 corresponds to roughly the 96th percentile. This improvement over the individual component percentiles indicates that the pairing is well-balanced for this game, with the GPU pushing the frame rates to the top tier.

FAQ — 4-6 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Q: What is the average FPS at 4K with Ultra settings for this combo?

A: The measured average FPS at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings is 126 FPS.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival in average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core i7-13700K has an average benchmark score of 46881, which is 0.2% lower than the AMD Ryzen 9 5900’s score of 46971.

Q: What is the highest average FPS recorded across all tested settings?

A: The highest average FPS is 396, achieved at 1920x1080 with Low settings.

Q: What is the minimum FPS recorded at 1440p with Medium settings?

A: The minimum FPS at 2560x1440 with Medium settings is 279 FPS, with a maximum of 377 FPS.

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 4080 have in this configuration?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 has 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus.

Q: What is the combo rank in this game, and how many total combos are tested?

A: The combo ranks 150th out of 3716 tested combinations in Inside.

Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers

The measured FPS data is presented in full below, organized by resolution and settings. All values are average FPS unless otherwise noted.

1920x1080:

• Low: 396 FPS
• Medium: 366 FPS (minimum 311, maximum 421)
• High: 294 FPS
• Ultra: 280 FPS

2560x1440:

• Low: 355 FPS
• Medium: 328 FPS (minimum 279, maximum 377)
• High: 211 FPS
• Ultra: 201 FPS

3840x2160:

• Low: 265 FPS
• Medium: 212 FPS (minimum 181, maximum 244)
• High: 133 FPS
• Ultra: 126 FPS

The data shows a consistent pattern where increasing resolution reduces FPS, but the reductions are not linear. The largest drop occurs from 1440p to 4K, where the pixel count more than doubles. For example, at High settings, the drop from 1440p (211 FPS) to 4K (133 FPS) is 78 FPS, which is a 37% reduction. The frame rate differences between Low and Ultra settings at each resolution are also notable. At 1080p, the range is from 396 FPS (Low) to 280 FPS (Ultra), a 116 FPS spread. At 1440p, the range is from 355 FPS to 201 FPS, a 154 FPS spread. At 4K, the range is from 265 FPS to 126 FPS, a 139 FPS spread. This indicates that the Ultra preset imposes a significant load on the GPU, but the RTX 4080 still maintains high frame rates.

Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience per the measured rows

Based on the measured FPS data, the High preset offers the best balance between visual quality and performance for most users. At 1080p High, the average is 294 FPS, which is only 14 FPS lower than Ultra’s 280 FPS. At 1440p High, the average is 211 FPS, which is 10 FPS higher than Ultra’s 201 FPS. At 4K High, the average is 133 FPS, which is 7 FPS higher than Ultra’s 126 FPS. The visual difference between High and Ultra in a game like Inside is likely minimal, given its stylized art direction, so the slight performance gain from High makes it the recommended preset.

For users with high refresh rate monitors, the Medium preset provides even more headroom. At 1080p Medium, the average is 366 FPS with a minimum of 311, ensuring a smooth experience on a 360Hz display. At 1440p Medium, the average is 328 FPS with a minimum of 279, which is sufficient for a 240Hz monitor. At 4K Medium, the average is 212 FPS with a minimum of 181, which is still suitable for a 144Hz display. The Medium preset’s minimum FPS values are all above 180, indicating no significant frame time spikes.

The Low preset is only recommended for competitive or maximum FPS scenarios. At 1080p Low, the average is 396 FPS, which is the highest recorded. However, the visual downgrade from Low to Medium is likely noticeable, and the performance gain is only 30 FPS at 1080p. The Ultra preset, while offering the highest visual fidelity, provides the lowest FPS at every resolution. Given that the High preset is only marginally slower than Ultra, it is the most sensible choice for a balanced experience. The data suggests that High is the sweet spot, as it keeps the average FPS above 133 at 4K, which is well above the standard 60 FPS target.