Inside

The Intel Core i5-12400F paired with the Intel Arc B570 produces a combination that sits near the lower end of the performance spectrum for Inside. With a combo rank of 2301 out of 2887 tested combinations, this system outperforms only about 20% of the configurations in the database for this specific title. This places it firmly in the lower quartile of tested hardware, suggesting that while the game is playable, the experience will not be pushing high refresh rates at demanding settings. The data indicates a pairing that is more suited to 1080p and 1440p gaming rather than being a high-end 4K powerhouse.

How This Combo Ranks

The ranking of 2301 out of 2887 combos is a clear signal that this hardware configuration is not optimized for extreme performance in Inside. This position, which is in the 20th percentile of tested combos, suggests that the system is capable of running the game smoothly at moderate settings, but it will not compete with top-tier gaming rigs. The data implies that the primary bottleneck is likely the GPU, as the CPU's benchmark scores are respectable, but the overall frame rates are limited by the graphics card's processing power at higher resolutions.

This ranking is not a condemnation but a classification. It tells us that the combination is a mid-to-low tier performer for this title. When compared to the entire pool of 2887 combos, the i5-12400F and Arc B570 fall behind many newer and more powerful pairings. The system’s performance is adequate for a smooth experience at 1080p, but users expecting to max out settings at 4K will find the hardware struggling to maintain high frame rates. The data shows a clear ceiling for this combo, which is defined by the GPU's capabilities.

GPU Role

The Intel Arc B570 is the defining component in this combo's performance profile. Its 10 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus provides a memory bandwidth of 380.0 GB/s. This bandwidth is a critical factor for texture streaming and data transfer at higher resolutions. The GPU's base and boost clock are both set at 2500 MHz, which is a relatively high frequency, but the raw compute power is capped by its 2304 shading units. This configuration yields an FP32 performance of 11.52 TFLOPS, which is a moderate figure for modern games.

In the context of Inside, a puzzle platformer with a distinct art style, the GPU's role is to handle the rendering of its atmospheric lighting and shadow effects. The data shows that the GPU is the limiting factor when moving from 1080p to 4K. The frame rate drops dramatically at 4K Ultra, indicating that the 10 GB VRAM and the GPU's processing power are being taxed heavily. The benchmark results suggest that the Arc B570 is well-suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but it begins to show its limitations at 4K, where the demand on the GPU increases significantly.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data reveals a clear and consistent pattern of performance scaling across resolutions. At 1080p Low, the combo achieves an average of 240 FPS, which is a very high frame rate. This drops to 172 FPS at 1440p Low and further to 108 FPS at 4K Low. This scaling is expected, as the number of pixels being rendered increases from 2.07 million at 1080p to 8.29 million at 4K. The data shows a 55% reduction in frame rate from 1080p to 4K at Low settings, which indicates that the GPU is the primary bottleneck.

The scaling pattern becomes more pronounced at higher settings. At 1080p Ultra, the average FPS is 114, which drops to 82 FPS at 1440p Ultra and 52 FPS at 4K Ultra. This is a 54% drop from 1080p to 4K at Ultra settings. The consistency of this drop across settings suggests that the GPU's compute capability is the limiting factor. The CPU does not appear to be a bottleneck, as it maintains high performance even at low resolutions, but the GPU cannot keep up with the increased pixel count at 4K. The data implies that this combo is best suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, where it can deliver high frame rates.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive look at the combo's performance across different settings and resolutions. At 1920x1080, the system excels. With Low settings, it achieves an average of 240 FPS, which is a very smooth experience for any display. Moving to Medium settings, the average drops to 192 FPS, with a minimum of 163 FPS and a maximum of 221 FPS. This indicates that the game remains highly playable with a comfortable margin above 144 Hz. At High settings, the average is 120 FPS, and at Ultra, it is 114 FPS. The data shows that even at the highest settings, the combo can maintain a frame rate above 100 FPS at 1080p.

At 2560x1440, the performance remains strong but shows the GPU's strain. Low settings yield an average of 172 FPS, which is still very high. Medium settings produce an average of 138 FPS, with a minimum of 117 FPS and a maximum of 159 FPS. This is a solid performance for 1440p gaming. High settings average 86 FPS, and Ultra settings drop to 82 FPS. The data suggests that 1440p High is a viable option, but users may prefer Medium settings for a more comfortable frame rate cushion. The transition from High to Ultra at 1440p results in a minimal 4 FPS difference, indicating that the visual gains from Ultra may not be worth the slight performance hit.

At 3840x2160, the combo's limitations become clear. Low settings achieve an average of 108 FPS, which is playable. Medium settings drop to an average of 87 FPS, with a minimum of 74 FPS and a maximum of 100 FPS. This is a playable experience, but the frame rate is not as stable as at lower resolutions. High settings average 54 FPS, and Ultra settings drop to 52 FPS. These figures are on the edge of playability, and the data suggests that 4K gaming is only really viable at Low or Medium settings. The jump from Medium to High at 4K results in a significant 33 FPS drop, which highlights the GPU's struggle with the higher pixel count.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings for this combo depend on the resolution and the user's preference for frame rate versus visual fidelity. For 1080p, the data shows that even Ultra settings provide an average of 114 FPS, which is a smooth experience. However, the step from High to Ultra is small in terms of performance, suggesting that Ultra is a safe choice for users who want the best visuals without sacrificing smoothness. For those with high refresh rate monitors, Medium settings at 192 FPS would be the best choice to utilize a 144 Hz or 165 Hz display fully.

At 1440p, Medium settings provide the best balance, with an average of 138 FPS and a minimum of 117 FPS. This ensures a stable experience well above 60 FPS. High settings are also viable, with an average of 86 FPS, but the frame rate is lower and may be noticeable to users accustomed to higher refresh rates. Ultra settings at 1440p are not recommended, as the 82 FPS average is close to the High setting's performance, and the visual difference is likely minimal. For 4K, the data suggests that Medium settings are the only viable option for a smooth experience, with an average of 87 FPS. Low settings provide a higher frame rate at 108 FPS, but the visual quality may be too compromised for some users. High and Ultra settings at 4K are not recommended, as the average FPS drops to 54 and 52, respectively, which is below the ideal 60 FPS threshold for many gamers.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo to achieve a high frame rate?

A: The data shows that 1920x1080 is the best resolution for high frame rates. At Low settings, the combo achieves 240 FPS, and at Ultra settings, it still maintains an average of 114 FPS.

Q: Can this combo handle 4K gaming?

A: Yes, but with limitations. At 4K Low settings, the average FPS is 108, and at Medium settings, it is 87. However, at High and Ultra settings, the average FPS drops to 54 and 52, respectively, which may not be smooth enough for all users.

*Q: How does the CPU's core count affect performance in Inside?*

A: The Intel Core i5-12400F has 6 cores and 12 threads. The benchmark data does not show a CPU bottleneck, as the frame rates scale consistently with resolution changes, indicating that the GPU is the limiting factor.

Q: What is the minimum FPS recorded for this combo?

A: The only minimum FPS values recorded are for Medium settings. At 1080p, the minimum is 163 FPS, at 1440p, it is 117 FPS, and at 4K, it is 74 FPS. This shows that even at the lowest point, the frame rate remains playable at Medium settings.

Q: Is there a significant difference between High and Ultra settings?

A: The data shows a minimal difference at 1080p and 1440p. At 1080p, the difference is 6 FPS (120 vs 114), and at 1440p, it is 4 FPS (86 vs 82). However, at 4K, the difference is also small (54 vs 52), but both are below 60 FPS.

Q: How does this combo compare to other hardware in terms of GPU benchmarks?

A: The Intel Arc B570 has an average benchmark score of 20556, which places it in the 65th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile, which has a score of 20534, a delta of 0.1%.

CPU Role

The Intel Core i5-12400F plays a supporting role in this combo, and the data suggests it is not the primary bottleneck for Inside. The CPU features 6 cores and 12 threads, with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz. Its benchmark scores are respectable, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12380 and a single-core score of 1680. These figures indicate that the CPU has sufficient processing power for gaming workloads. The CPU's 18 MB of shared L3 cache and support for DDR4 and DDR5 memory also contribute to its solid performance.

In the context of Inside, a game that is not heavily CPU-dependent, the i5-12400F's performance is more than adequate. The measured FPS data shows that the frame rate scales directly with resolution changes, which is a classic sign of a GPU bottleneck. If the CPU were the limiting factor, we would expect to see similar frame rates across different resolutions, as the CPU would be struggling to keep up with the game's logic. Instead, the data shows a clear drop in FPS as resolution increases, which confirms that the GPU is the limiting component. The CPU's 73rd percentile ranking among all CPUs further supports this conclusion, indicating that it is a mid-to-high tier processor that is well-matched for this GPU in less demanding titles.