Inside
This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 177 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 77 | 78 | 127 | 159 |
| 1440p QHD | 124 | 130 | 204 | 251 |
| 1080p Full HD | 167 | 176 | 284 | 351 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Inside with AMD Ryzen 9 9900X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060, In-Depth Analysis
The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 combination delivers exceptional performance in Inside, a 2016 puzzle platformer that is far more demanding at high settings than its art style suggests. The data shows a system that is overwhelmingly GPU-bound at 4K, but capable of extreme frame rates at lower resolutions, with the combo ranking in the 718th position out of 1671 tested configurations.
Resolution Scaling
The frame rate scaling from 1080p to 4K clearly identifies the GPU as the primary limiting factor at higher resolutions, while the CPU’s headroom becomes apparent only at lower settings. At 1080p with Low settings, the combo achieves 351 FPS, which drops to 251.1 FPS at 1440p and 159.3 FPS at 4K. This represents a 28.5% decline from 1080p to 1440p and a further 36.6% decline from 1440p to 4K, indicating that the RTX 5060’s rendering throughput is the constraining resource as pixel count increases.
The scaling pattern shifts dramatically when moving to higher quality presets. At Ultra settings, the frame rate falls from 167.3 FPS at 1080p to 124.2 FPS at 1440p (a 25.8% drop) and then to 76.8 FPS at 4K (a 38.2% drop from 1440p). This steeper decline at 4K Ultra suggests that the GPU’s 8 GB of GDDR7 memory and 128-bit bus are being pushed to their limits, with the 448.0 GB/s bandwidth becoming a bottleneck when handling the highest resolution and quality combination.
The most telling data point is the gap between Low and Ultra settings at each resolution. At 1080p, the spread is 183.7 FPS (351 vs 167.3), while at 4K the spread narrows to 82.5 FPS (159.3 vs 76.8). This compression at 4K confirms that the GPU is saturated by pixel throughput alone, leaving little headroom for additional graphical features. The CPU’s 12 cores and 24 threads are never the limiting factor, as even the most demanding settings at 1080p still produce frame rates well above display refresh rates.
GPU Role
The RTX 5060’s specifications directly explain the measured performance patterns. With 3840 shading units, 120 TMUs, and 48 ROPs, the GPU has ample compute resources for a puzzle platformer, but its 8 GB memory capacity and 128-bit bus width (providing 448.0 GB/s bandwidth) create a clear ceiling at 4K Ultra. The boost clock of 2497 MHz and base clock of 2280 MHz are modest for the Blackwell architecture, yet the card still delivers 78.2 FPS at 4K High, which is smooth for this genre.
The GPU’s percentile ranking of 73 among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 30109, places it in a competitive position. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT, has an identical average score of 30097 (0% delta), while the NVIDIA Tesla M60 trails by 0.5% and the RTX 5070 Mobile is 0.6% behind. This parity suggests that the RTX 5060’s performance in Inside is typical for its class, with the 4K Ultra result of 76.8 FPS being the only scenario where the memory bandwidth becomes a tangible constraint.
The GDDR7 memory running at 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective) is a notable asset, providing double the bandwidth of the previous generation’s GDDR6 at comparable clocks. However, the 8 GB capacity is the more critical factor in this game. At 4K Ultra, the game’s texture and shading demands appear to exceed what the memory can efficiently manage, as evidenced by the disproportionate drop from 127.2 FPS at Medium to 76.8 FPS at Ultra—a 39.6% reduction that far exceeds the 18.4% drop from Medium to High (127.2 to 78.2). This indicates that the Ultra preset introduces memory pressure that the 8 GB frame buffer cannot fully absorb.
CPU Role
The Ryzen 9 9900X provides overwhelming computational headroom for Inside, with its 12 cores and 24 threads never approaching saturation in any tested configuration. The CPU’s base clock of 4.40 GHz and boost clock of 5.60 GHz, combined with 64 MB of shared L3 cache, deliver single-thread performance that is more than adequate for a game that primarily relies on a few threads for game logic and physics.
The CPU’s benchmark results reinforce this assessment. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 46438 and single-core score of 6555 place it in the 94th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 54450. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D, scores 54681 (just 0.4% higher), while the Intel Core i7-14700F trails by 0.7% and the Core Ultra 5 245K is 1.5% behind. These margins are negligible for gaming, and the data shows no scenario where CPU performance limits frame rates.
The only evidence of CPU involvement is the scaling at 1080p Low, where the system achieves 351 FPS. At this extreme frame rate, the CPU’s per-core performance becomes relevant, but even then, the 9900X’s single-thread score of 1286 in 3DMark and 4672 in PassMark indicates it is still not the bottleneck—the GPU simply runs out of work at this resolution and setting. The 24 threads provide massive parallel headroom that remains untapped, as Inside is not a multi-threaded workload, but this excess capacity ensures consistent frame pacing with no stutter from CPU contention.
FAQ
*Q: Can this combo run Inside at 4K Ultra smoothly?*
A: No. The measured 76.8 FPS at 4K Ultra is below the 90 FPS threshold that many players consider essential for smooth gameplay, though it is still playable. Dropping to High settings at 4K yields 78.2 FPS, which is only a marginal improvement, suggesting the Ultra preset’s extra features are not worth the performance cost at this resolution.
*Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Inside?*
A: 1440p is the sweet spot. The system achieves 129.5 FPS at High settings and 203.5 FPS at Medium, providing both visual fidelity and high refresh rates. At 1080p, frame rates exceed 167 FPS even at Ultra, but the visual detail gain from 1440p is significant, and the performance remains far above display refresh rates.
*Q: Is the 8 GB VRAM sufficient for Inside at 4K?*
A: The data suggests it is marginal. At 4K Ultra, the frame rate drops to 76.8 FPS, and the scaling from Medium (127.2 FPS) to Ultra is disproportionately steep, indicating memory bandwidth or capacity pressure. At 4K High, performance is similar at 78.2 FPS, which further suggests that the GPU’s memory subsystem, not the shading units, is the limiting factor.
Q: How does this combo compare to the RTX 5060’s closest rivals in overall GPU performance?
A: The RTX 5060’s average benchmark score of 30109 is statistically tied with the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT (30097, 0% delta) and the AMD Radeon RX 570 (30158, -0.2% delta). The NVIDIA Tesla M60 and RTX 5070 Mobile are 0.5% and 0.6% behind, respectively. This means the GPU’s Inside results are representative of its class, with no rival offering a meaningful advantage.
*Q: Does the CPU’s 12-core configuration provide any benefit in Inside?*
A: No measurable benefit. The game’s frame rates are entirely GPU-limited at all tested settings, and the 9900X’s 24 threads are never utilized beyond a fraction. The CPU’s high single-thread performance (6555 in Cinebench R23 single-core) ensures it never bottlenecks, but the extra cores are irrelevant for this title.
Q: What frame rate can be expected at 1080p with High settings?
A: The measured average is 175.5 FPS. This is well above 144 Hz displays and only 9.2% lower than the Medium preset’s 283.5 FPS, indicating that High is an efficient setting choice at 1080p, offering most of the visual benefits of Ultra (167.3 FPS) with a modest performance gain.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the combo delivers 351 FPS on Low, 283.5 FPS on Medium, 175.5 FPS on High, and 167.3 FPS on Ultra. The gap between Low and Medium is 67.5 FPS (19.2% reduction), while the gap between Medium and High is 108 FPS (38.1% reduction), and between High and Ultra is only 8.2 FPS (4.7% reduction). This pattern shows that the Low preset leaves massive GPU headroom, while High and Ultra are nearly identical in performance cost.
At 2560x1440, the frame rates are 251.1 FPS on Low, 203.5 FPS on Medium, 129.5 FPS on High, and 124.2 FPS on Ultra. The scaling from Low to Medium is a 19.0% drop, while Medium to High is a 36.4% drop, and High to Ultra is a 4.1% drop. The consistency of the High-to-Ultra gap across resolutions (4.7% at 1080p, 4.1% at 1440p) suggests that the Ultra preset adds minimal rendering work compared to High.
At 3840x2160, the results are 159.3 FPS on Low, 127.2 FPS on Medium, 78.2 FPS on High, and 76.8 FPS on Ultra. The Low-to-Medium drop is 20.2%, but the Medium-to-High drop is 38.5%, which is the steepest single-step decline in the entire dataset. This indicates that the High preset at 4K introduces a significant rendering burden, likely related to texture filtering or shadow resolution, that the GPU cannot fully hide. The High-to-Ultra difference is a negligible 1.8%.
Settings Recommendations
The optimal preset depends on the target resolution, but the data strongly favors High settings for most users. At 1080p, High delivers 175.5 FPS, which is only 4.7% lower than Ultra but provides identical visual quality in most scenes, as the 8.2 FPS difference is imperceptible. At 1440p, High’s 129.5 FPS is 4.1% lower than Ultra’s 124.2 FPS, but the slight performance gain does not justify any visual compromise, making High the clear choice.
At 4K, the recommendation shifts to Medium. The Medium preset’s 127.2 FPS is 62.7% higher than High’s 78.2 FPS, and the visual difference between Medium and High in a puzzle platformer is likely minimal given the game’s stylized art direction. The Ultra preset at 4K (76.8 FPS) offers no benefit over High (78.2 FPS) and should be avoided entirely.
For users with high refresh rate displays (144 Hz or higher), 1080p with Medium or High settings is the best experience, as both exceed 175 FPS. For 1440p displays, High is the recommended preset, providing 129.5 FPS, which is sufficient for 120 Hz panels. The Low preset is only useful for extreme frame rate chasing, with 351 FPS at 1080p, but it sacrifices too much visual quality for a game that does not require competitive response times.
How This Combo Ranks
The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 combination ranks 718th out of 1671 tested combos in Inside, placing it in the upper-middle tier of all configurations. This ranking is notable because the combo’s component-level percentiles (CPU 94th, GPU 73rd) would suggest a higher overall position, but the game’s low system requirements mean that even mid-range GPUs can achieve high frame rates, compressing the ranking distribution.
The rank is primarily driven by the GPU’s 4K Ultra performance of 76.8 FPS, which is below the 80 FPS threshold that many higher-ranked combos exceed. At 1080p and 1440p, the combo’s frame rates are competitive with systems featuring more powerful GPUs, as the CPU’s headroom ensures no bottleneck. However, the RTX 5060’s 8 GB memory capacity becomes a differentiator at 4K, where combos with 16 GB GPUs likely achieve higher Ultra settings frame rates.
The 718th rank out of 1671 means the combo outperforms approximately 57% of all tested configurations, which is a respectable result given that the GPU is not a top-tier part. The data indicates that the combo’s performance in Inside is limited almost entirely by the GPU, and users seeking higher 4K Ultra frame rates would need to upgrade the graphics card rather than the CPU. For the target resolution of 1440p, however, this combo ranks effectively at the top tier, as its 129.5 FPS at High settings exceeds what most users can perceive on standard monitors.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 9 9900X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 9 9900X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 in Inside
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 159.3 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 127.2 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 78.2 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 76.8 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 251.1 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 203.5 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 129.5 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 124.2 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 351.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 283.5 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 175.5 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 167.3 |
Inside with Ryzen 9 9900X + Other GPUs
See how Inside performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Inside with RTX 5060 + Other CPUs
See how Inside performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 9 9900X + RTX 5060
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.