Inside

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 combination delivers exceptionally high frame rates in Inside, a 2016 puzzle platformer. The measured data shows this pairing ranks 507th out of 3,716 tested combos, placing it in the top 14% of all configurations. This is a system built for extreme refresh rates, with even the most demanding preset at 4K producing over 120 frames per second on average.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo’s rank of 507 out of 3,716 tested configurations places it in the 86th percentile of all possible CPU-GPU pairings. This is a strong result for a game with modest hardware demands. The ranking reflects a system that is heavily overqualified for the title, but the data shows it does not sit at the very top, leaving headroom for even faster components. The position is driven by the combination of a high-end GPU and a capable mid-range CPU.

Benchmark results indicate that the RTX 4080 is the dominant factor in this pairing. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 54,247, which places it in the 86th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the RTX 4080 SUPER, scores 54,209, a delta of just 0.1%, making the performance difference between these two virtually indistinguishable. The AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB sits slightly ahead with a score of 55,698, a 2.6% delta, while the AMD Radeon 8060S is 2.7% ahead.

On the CPU side, the Ryzen 7 5800X has an average benchmark score of 29,123, placing it in the 81st percentile of all processors. Its nearest rival is the Intel Core Ultra 5 135H, which scores 29,093, a negligible 0.1% delta. The Intel Xeon Phi 7210 and Intel Core i5-13500HX are 0.4% and 0.5% behind, respectively, while the AMD Ryzen 5 5600XT is 0.6% ahead. These tight deltas show that the 5800X is in a performance cluster where small differences in synthetic benchmarks do not translate into meaningful gameplay disparities.

For Inside, the measured FPS data shows that the CPU is rarely the bottleneck. At 1080p with Low settings, the average FPS is 316, which is a clear indicator that the system is running at the edge of what the game engine can deliver. The combo rank of 507 suggests that while this is a top-tier setup, there are 506 other combinations that achieve even higher frame rates, likely featuring newer and more powerful CPUs and GPUs.

Settings Recommendations

The measured FPS data provides a clear picture of how settings impact performance. At 3840x2160, the Ultra preset averages 126 FPS. Moving down to High increases the average to 133 FPS, a modest 5.5% gain. However, dropping to Medium yields a significant jump to 212 FPS, a 68% improvement over Ultra. The Low preset pushes the average to 242 FPS.

At 2560x1440, the pattern is similar but with higher absolute numbers. The Ultra preset averages 201 FPS, High averages 211 FPS, and Medium jumps to 261 FPS. Low reaches 283 FPS. At 1920x1080, Ultra averages 239 FPS, High averages 243 FPS, and Medium reaches 292 FPS. Low tops out at 316 FPS.

The data suggests that the Medium preset offers the best balance of visual quality and performance. It provides a substantial frame rate increase over High and Ultra while maintaining a more polished look than Low. At 4K, the Medium preset’s minimum FPS is 181, with a maximum of 244, ensuring a consistently smooth experience. At 1440p, the minimum is 222 FPS, and at 1080p, the minimum is 248 FPS. These minimums are all well above the refresh rate of typical high-end monitors, making Medium the optimal choice for a stutter-free experience.

For players with 120Hz or 144Hz displays, even the Ultra preset at 4K, with its 126 FPS average, is playable. However, the data indicates that Medium is the sweet spot. It delivers frame rates that are high enough to eliminate any potential for screen tearing on standard 60Hz displays and provides ample headroom for high-refresh-rate monitors. The Low preset, while offering the highest averages, introduces a noticeable reduction in visual fidelity that is not worth the FPS gain, given that Medium already exceeds 200 FPS at every resolution tested.

FAQ

*Q: What is the highest average FPS this combo achieves in Inside?*

A: The highest measured average FPS is 316, achieved at 1920x1080 with the Low settings preset.

Q: What is the minimum FPS recorded for this combo?

A: The lowest recorded minimum FPS is 181, which occurs at 3840x2160 resolution with the Medium settings preset.

Q: How does the RTX 4080 compare to its closest rival in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The RTX 4080 has an average benchmark score of 54,247. Its nearest rival, the RTX 4080 SUPER, scores 54,209, which is a 0.1% difference.

Q: Is the Ryzen 7 5800X a bottleneck for the RTX 4080 in this game?

A: The data shows the CPU is not a bottleneck. At 1080p with Low settings, the combo achieves 316 FPS, indicating the system is running near the game engine’s limits. The CPU’s percentile rank is 81, while the GPU’s is 86, showing they are well-matched.

Q: What is the frame rate difference between the Ultra and Medium presets at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset averages 201 FPS, while the Medium preset averages 261 FPS. This represents a 29.9% increase in average FPS when moving from Ultra to Medium.

Q: Does the combo rank in the top 10% of all tested systems?

A: No. The combo ranks 507th out of 3,716 tested combinations, which places it in the top 14% of all configurations.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 3840x2160, the Ultra preset delivers an average of 126 FPS. The High preset improves this to 133 FPS. The Medium preset is a significant step up, averaging 212 FPS with a minimum of 181 and a maximum of 244. The Low preset reaches an average of 242 FPS. This resolution shows a clear tiering where Medium offers a massive performance advantage over the higher quality settings.

At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset averages 201 FPS. High averages 211 FPS. The Medium preset averages 261 FPS, with a minimum of 222 and a maximum of 300. The Low preset averages 283 FPS. The margin between Medium and Low narrows at this resolution, but Medium still provides a 7.8% advantage over High and a 29.9% advantage over Ultra.

At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset averages 239 FPS. High averages 243 FPS. The Medium preset averages 292 FPS, with a minimum of 248 and a maximum of 335. The Low preset averages 316 FPS. At this resolution, the differences between presets are smaller in absolute terms, but the trend remains. The data shows that the Medium preset is the most efficient, providing a 21.8% increase over High while maintaining a minimum FPS above 240.

The scaling across resolutions is consistent. The RTX 4080’s performance is strong enough that even at 4K, the High preset maintains an average above 130 FPS. The measured results show a smooth progression of frame rates as resolution decreases, with the 1080p Low preset being the only configuration that approaches the engine’s apparent ceiling.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 is the primary driver of performance in this pairing. It features 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering a memory bandwidth of 716.8 GB/s. The GPU’s base clock is 2205 MHz, with a boost clock of 2505 MHz. The memory clock runs at 1400 MHz, with an effective data rate of 22.4 Gbps.

The GPU’s architecture is Ada Lovelace, built on a 5 nm process at TSMC. It contains 45,900 million transistors on a die size of 379 mm². The card has 9,728 shading units, 304 texture mapping units, and 112 raster output units. It also includes 76 RT cores and 304 tensor cores. Its FP32 performance is rated at 48.74 TFLOPS.

For Inside, the GPU’s capabilities are vastly underutilized. The game is a 2D puzzle platformer with simple visuals, so the RTX 4080’s massive compute power and 16 GB of VRAM are not taxed. The high memory bandwidth and fast clock speeds ensure that the GPU never becomes a limiting factor, as evidenced by the consistently high frame rates across all resolutions. The GPU’s average benchmark score of 54,247 and its 86th percentile rank confirm its high-end status, but the measured FPS data shows that even at 4K Ultra, the GPU is not being pushed to its limits.

The GPU’s power draw is rated at 320 W, with a recommended PSU of 700 W. The card is a triple-slot design, requiring a single 16-pin power connector. These physical characteristics are irrelevant to the game’s performance, but they indicate the hardware’s intended market segment. The GPU’s benchmark scores show it is 0.1% behind the RTX 4080 SUPER and 2.6% behind the Radeon RX 6750 GRE, but these differences do not manifest in the game’s FPS, which is already at extremely high levels.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800X is a desktop processor from the 5000 series, based on the Zen 3 architecture (codenamed Vermeer). It has 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz. The CPU is built on a 7 nm process at TSMC, with 4,150 million transistors on a 74 mm² die. It supports DDR4 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s.

The CPU’s cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 cache per core, and a 32 MB L3 cache. It uses the AMD Socket AM4 and supports PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes. The processor has a TDP of 105 W and was released with a launch MSRP of $449.

In synthetic benchmarks, the 5800X scores 15,476 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 1,574.5 in single-core. Its 3DMark scores range from 943 in single-thread to 7,586 in 16-thread tests. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 29,123, placing it in the 81st percentile of all CPUs.

For Inside, the CPU’s role is minimal. The game is not computationally intensive, and the measured FPS data shows that the system is capable of reaching 316 FPS at 1080p Low. This is likely near the engine’s limit, meaning the CPU is not a bottleneck. The 5800X’s high single-thread performance, as indicated by its 3DMark single-thread score of 943, is more relevant than its multi-core capabilities for this type of game. The CPU’s 8 cores and 16 threads are more than sufficient for the game’s threads, and its boost clock of 4.70 GHz ensures responsive frame pacing. The data shows that the CPU and GPU are well-balanced for this title, with neither component causing a performance ceiling that the other cannot overcome.