Inside

FAQ

Q: What is the combo rank of the AMD Ryzen 7 5700G with the AMD Radeon RX 9070 in Inside?

A: This combination ranks 534th out of 1671 tested combos in the database for this game, placing it in the upper-middle portion of all tested systems.

Q: How does the Ryzen 7 5700G compare to its nearest rivals in average benchmark score?

A: The Ryzen 7 5700G scores 25626 on average, which is 0.3% lower than the AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (25706), 0.4% higher than the Intel Xeon D-2752TER (25532), and 0.5% higher than the Intel Core 5 210H (25490).

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking among all GPUs?

A: The Radeon RX 9070 sits in the 79th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 34780. Its closest rival, the NVIDIA A2, scores 34866, a delta of -0.2%.

Q: What are the best and worst average FPS results recorded for this combo?

A: The highest average FPS recorded is 302.4 at 1080p Low settings, while the lowest is 92.7 at 4K Ultra settings. Both represent the extremes across all resolution and settings combinations.

Q: Does the data show this combo can run Inside at 4K with high detail?

A: Yes, at 4K High settings the combo achieves an average of 97.7 FPS, and at 4K Ultra it drops to 92.7 FPS. Both remain above 90 FPS, indicating a playable experience at maximum resolution.

Q: What is the CPU's percentile ranking and how does it compare to rivals?

A: The Ryzen 7 5700G ranks in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the Ryzen 7 6800U, is nearly identical in performance, with only a 0.3% difference in average score.

GPU Role

The Radeon RX 9070 brings substantial graphics horsepower to Inside, and the measured FPS data reflects a GPU that is rarely the limiting factor at lower resolutions. The GPU's 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus provides 644.6 GB/s of bandwidth, which is ample for a puzzle platformer of this visual scope. Clock speeds are notable: a base of 1330 MHz, a game clock of 2070 MHz, and a boost of 2520 MHz, with memory running at 2518 MHz (20.1 Gbps effective). These specifications translate into raw throughput figures like 36.13 TFLOPS FP32 and a pixel rate of 322.6 GPixel/s, which explain why the card can push 302.4 FPS at 1080p Low without breaking a sweat.

The GPU's benchmark profile shows a passmark G3D score of 25381 and a Geekbench OpenCL score of 133741, placing it in the 79th percentile overall. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA A2, is virtually identical in average score (34866 vs 34780, a -0.2% delta), suggesting that the RX 9070 delivers competitive compute performance in this class. However, the measured game data tells a more interesting story: at 4K Ultra, the combo still manages 92.7 FPS, which indicates the GPU is handling the resolution and settings load well, but the scaling from 1080p to 4K reveals where the GPU's workload intensifies. The gap between 1080p High (219 FPS) and 4K High (97.7 FPS) shows a 55.4% drop, a clear sign that the GPU is being stressed at higher resolutions despite its strong specifications.

CPU Role

The Ryzen 7 5700G is an 8-core, 16-thread processor based on Zen 3 architecture (Cezanne codename) on a 7 nm process, with a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost of 4.60 GHz. Its cache hierarchy includes 64 KB L1 per core, 512 KB L2 per core, and 16 MB L3, with a 51.2 GB/s memory bandwidth over dual-channel DDR4. The CPU's benchmark scores show a solid multithreaded performer: Cinebench R23 multicore hits 20755, while single-core reaches 2930. Geekbench scores are 8970 multicore and 2016 single-core, with a Passmark multithread score of 24419. The CPU sits in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs, with its nearest rival being the Ryzen 7 6800U, which is only 0.3% behind in average score.

In Inside, the CPU's role becomes clear when examining the FPS deltas between settings at the same resolution. At 1080p, the jump from Low (302.4 FPS) to Ultra (206 FPS) is a 31.9% drop, which is substantial but not indicative of a CPU bottleneck—the GPU is still producing high frame rates. The 16 threads and high boost clock of 4.60 GHz ensure that the game's physics and logic never starve the GPU. However, the data suggests that at 1080p Low, the combo approaches a ceiling where the CPU's single-thread performance (Passmark single-thread score of 3283) may start to limit the absolute maximum frame rate. The difference between 1080p Low (302.4 FPS) and 1440p Low (270.4 FPS) is only 10.6%, which is smaller than the drop from 1440p Low to 4K Low (197.1 FPS, a 27.1% decrease), indicating that the CPU is more capable of feeding frames at lower resolutions.

How This Combo Ranks

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700G paired with the AMD Radeon RX 9070 ranks 534th out of 1671 tested combos in Inside, placing it in the 68th percentile of all tested systems. This ranking is noteworthy because the GPU alone sits in the 79th percentile, while the CPU is in the 83rd percentile—yet the combo's game-specific rank is lower than either component's individual percentile. This suggests that Inside's performance demands are not evenly matched to this pairing, or that other combos with different component mixes achieve higher frame rates in this specific title.

The rank becomes more interpretable when considering the measured FPS data. At 4K Ultra, the combo produces 92.7 FPS, which is far above playable thresholds, yet many other combos presumably exceed this figure. The gap between the combo's component percentiles and its game rank hints that Inside may favor GPUs with higher memory bandwidth or different architectural characteristics. The RX 9070's nearest rival, the NVIDIA A2, has a nearly identical average score, but the A2 might pair differently with other CPUs in this game. The rank of 534 out of 1671 means roughly two-thirds of tested combos perform better, which is a surprising outcome given the high-end nature of both components. This could point to Inside being more sensitive to certain CPU-GPU balance points than raw compute power.

Settings Recommendations

The measured data provides clear guidance on which settings preset offers the best experience across different resolutions. At 1080p, the Medium preset delivers 279.4 FPS, which is only 7.6% lower than Low (302.4 FPS) but offers improved visual fidelity. High drops to 219 FPS, and Ultra to 206 FPS—the latter still being exceptionally smooth. For 1080p users, Medium represents the sweet spot: it maintains over 270 FPS while providing better image quality than Low.

At 1440p, Medium again stands out with 249.4 FPS, just 7.8% below Low (270.4 FPS). High delivers 159.1 FPS, and Ultra drops to 148.3 FPS. The data shows that Medium at 1440p offers nearly the same frame rate as High at 1080p, making it the recommended choice for users with 1440p displays. At 4K, the situation shifts: Medium produces 156.6 FPS, while High and Ultra drop to 97.7 and 92.7 FPS, respectively. Low at 4K hits 197.1 FPS, but the visual compromise may not be worth it. For 4K users, Medium is the best balance, offering 156.6 FPS—well above the 144 Hz threshold for high-refresh displays.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combo achieves its highest frame rates: Low settings hit 302.4 FPS, Medium reaches 279.4 FPS, High produces 219 FPS, and Ultra delivers 206 FPS. The step from High to Ultra is a mere 5.9% drop, while the jump from Medium to High is a more significant 21.6% decrease. This suggests that the High preset includes a substantial visual upgrade that costs performance, whereas Ultra adds little overhead beyond that.

At 2560x1440, the numbers are 270.4 FPS (Low), 249.4 FPS (Medium), 159.1 FPS (High), and 148.3 FPS (Ultra). The relative pattern mirrors 1080p: Low and Medium are close (7.8% apart), while High represents a steep 36.2% drop from Medium. At 3840x2160, the frame rates are 197.1 FPS (Low), 156.6 FPS (Medium), 97.7 FPS (High), and 92.7 FPS (Ultra). The drop from Low to Medium is 20.5%, and from Medium to High is 37.6%, showing that the GPU has less headroom at 4K to absorb the visual quality increases.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS scaling from 1080p to 4K reveals the limiting component at each resolution. At Low settings, the drop from 1080p (302.4 FPS) to 1440p (270.4 FPS) is 10.6%, and from 1440p to 4K (197.1 FPS) is 27.1%. The total drop from 1080p to 4K is 34.8%, which is moderate and suggests the GPU is increasingly stressed at higher resolutions, but the CPU still has enough headroom to feed frames at 4K Low.

At High settings, the scaling is steeper: 1080p (219 FPS) to 1440p (159.1 FPS) is a 27.4% drop, and 1440p to 4K (97.7 FPS) is a 38.6% drop. The total reduction from 1080p to 4K is 55.4%, indicating that the GPU becomes the dominant bottleneck as resolution increases with higher quality settings. At Ultra, the pattern is similar: 1080p (206 FPS) to 1440p (148.3 FPS) is 28.0%, and 1440p to 4K (92.7 FPS) is 37.5%, for a total drop of 55.0%.

The data implies that at Low settings, the combo is CPU-limited at 1080p and 1440p, as frame rates remain above 270 FPS. At High and Ultra, the GPU takes over as the limiting factor, with the 4K frame rates (97.7 and 92.7 FPS) showing that the RX 9070 is working hard but still delivering smooth performance. The fact that the 1080p-to-1440p drop at High (27.4%) is almost double the drop at Low (10.6%) confirms that the GPU's workload scales more aggressively with resolution when visual quality is higher, while the CPU's contribution remains relatively constant across resolutions.