Inside

Inside, the 2016 puzzle platformer from Playdead, presents a unique performance profile for the AMD Ryzen 7 3700X and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti combination. The benchmark data reveals a system that is heavily constrained by its graphics card, with the CPU’s substantial processing power largely untapped at most settings. This pairing ranks 3653rd out of 3716 tested combos for this specific title, placing it in the bottom 2% of all configurations, which underscores that while the game is playable, it demands careful settings management to achieve a smooth experience, particularly at higher resolutions.

FAQ

Q: Can this combo run Inside at 1080p with a smooth frame rate?

A: Yes, the data shows that at 1920x1080 with Low settings, the average frame rate is 109 FPS. Medium settings also provide a very playable 87 FPS average, while High and Ultra presets yield 54 FPS and 52 FPS respectively.

Q: What is the best resolution for this hardware in Inside?

A: Benchmark results indicate that 1920x1080 is the most suitable resolution. At 2560x1440, the average FPS drops below 80 even on Low settings, and at 3840x2160, only the Low preset achieves an average above 48 FPS, which may still be below the preference for many users.

Q: How does the GTX 1050 Ti's performance in this game compare to its closest rivals?

A: The GTX 1050 Ti's average benchmark score is 4193, which is 0.6% higher than the AMD Radeon R5 M330, 1% higher than the NVIDIA Quadro K2100M, 1.1% lower than the NVIDIA Quadro K3000M, and 1.8% lower than the AMD Radeon Vega 3. The performance deltas are very small, indicating these GPUs are closely matched.

Q: Is the Ryzen 7 3700X a bottleneck for the GTX 1050 Ti in this game?

A: No, the data suggests the opposite. The Ryzen 7 3700X is a high-end 8-core processor with a Passmark multithread score of 22458 and a single-thread score of 2656. The GTX 1050 Ti, with a Passmark G3D score of 6340, is the limiting factor, as evidenced by the significant FPS drops when increasing resolution or graphical settings.

Q: What is the difference between the Low and Ultra settings at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, the Low preset delivers an average of 78 FPS. Moving to Medium reduces the average to 62 FPS, and High drops it further to 39 FPS. The Ultra preset yields a 37 FPS average, which is less than half the frame rate of the Low setting.

Q: Does the game favor the CPU or GPU more in this configuration?

A: The performance data strongly indicates that the GPU is the primary determinant of frame rate. The Ryzen 7 3700X has a high average benchmark score of 34260, placing it in the 84th percentile of all CPUs. In contrast, the GTX 1050 Ti sits in the 25th percentile of all GPUs, making it the clear performance ceiling for this combo.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 7 3700X is a formidable processor that provides an immense amount of computational headroom for a game like Inside. With 8 cores and 16 threads based on the Zen 2 architecture, it operates with a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz. Its benchmark results are consistently strong, with a Cinebench R15 multicore score of 2092 and a Geekbench multicore score of 8899, highlighting its capability to handle heavily threaded workloads. For gaming, the single-thread performance is also robust, as seen in its Geekbench single-core score of 1593 and Passmark single-thread score of 2656.

However, the data from the measured FPS suggests that Inside does not present a significant challenge to this CPU. The frame rate scaling across different resolutions and settings points directly to the GPU as the limiting factor. For instance, at 1920x1080, the average FPS scales from 109 on Low to 52 on Ultra, a direct response to the graphics load. If the CPU were the bottleneck, we would expect to see a smaller performance delta between these settings, especially at lower resolutions where the GPU has less work to do. The Ryzen 7 3700X's performance percentile of 84 versus the GTX 1050 Ti's 25th percentile illustrates a massive imbalance in this pairing. The CPU is essentially waiting on the GPU to render frames, meaning its advanced architecture and high clock speeds are not the primary drivers of the final FPS numbers in this specific title.

How This Combo Ranks

The AMD Ryzen 7 3700X and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti combination is ranked 3653rd out of 3716 tested configurations in Inside. This places the pairing in the bottom 1.7% of all systems tested, a low ranking that is almost entirely attributable to the graphics card's performance tier. The Ryzen 7 3700X is a high-end desktop CPU, with an average benchmark score of 34260, placing it in the 84th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 with a score of 34222 and the Intel Core i5-13450HX with a score of 34333, showing it is competitive with modern mid-range and high-end mobile and desktop chips.

In contrast, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is a much older and lower-tier component. Its average benchmark score of 4193 puts it in the 25th percentile of all GPUs, and its nearest rivals are entry-level mobile and workstation parts like the AMD Radeon R5 M330 and the NVIDIA Quadro K2100M. This massive disparity in relative performance between the CPU and GPU is the defining characteristic of this combo. The system's low rank in this game is not a reflection of the CPU's capability but rather a direct consequence of the GPU's inability to keep pace. The data shows a pairing where a top-tier processor is held back by an entry-level graphics solution, resulting in a system that is severely unbalanced for modern gaming.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data for Inside reveals a clear performance hierarchy across resolutions and settings. At 1920x1080, the game is quite playable. The Low preset delivers an average of 109 FPS, which is exceptionally smooth. Medium settings still provide a highly enjoyable experience with an average of 87 FPS and a minimum of 74 FPS. High and Ultra presets are nearly identical, with averages of 54 FPS and 52 FPS respectively. These figures indicate that for a 60Hz display, the High and Ultra settings are marginal, while Medium is the sweet spot for a consistent frame rate.

Moving up to 2560x1440, the load on the GTX 1050 Ti becomes more apparent. The Low preset average drops to 78 FPS, which is still smooth. Medium settings produce an average of 62 FPS with a minimum of 53 FPS, placing it on the edge of a 60 FPS target. High and Ultra presets fall below this threshold, with averages of 39 FPS and 37 FPS respectively, making them less ideal for a fluid experience. At 3840x2160, the GPU is clearly overburdened. The Low preset is the only playable option, with an average of 49 FPS. Medium settings drop to an average of 39 FPS, while High and Ultra are largely unplayable, with averages of 25 FPS and 23 FPS respectively. The performance scaling from 1080p Low to 4K Ultra shows a drop from 109 FPS to 23 FPS, a clear indication of the GPU's limited memory bandwidth and compute power.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is the defining component in this system's gaming performance. Built on the 14 nm Pascal architecture, it features 768 shading units and 4 GB of GDDR5 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 112.1 GB/s. With a base clock of 1291 MHz and a boost clock of 1392 MHz, its compute power is rated at 2.138 TFLOPS. The benchmark results confirm its entry-level standing, with a 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 305 and a Passmark G3D score of 6340, placing it in the 25th percentile of all GPUs. Its closest competitors are the AMD Radeon R5 M330 and the NVIDIA Quadro K2100M, which have nearly identical average scores.

The GPU's role as the performance bottleneck is unmistakable in the measured FPS data. The frame rate is highly sensitive to resolution and settings changes, which are operations that primarily stress the GPU. For example, the 109 FPS at 1080p Low drops to 49 FPS at 4K Low, a 55% decrease that is solely due to the increased pixel rendering workload. The 4 GB VRAM capacity is also a likely factor at higher resolutions; at 3840x2160, the demand for texture storage and memory bandwidth likely exceeds what the card can efficiently provide, contributing to the sub-30 FPS averages on High and Ultra settings. The data shows a GPU that is adequate for older or less demanding titles at lower resolutions, but it struggles to maintain playable frame rates when pushed.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal experience for the AMD Ryzen 7 3700X and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti in Inside is achieved by prioritizing a stable frame rate over visual fidelity. For users with a 1920x1080 display, the Medium preset is the clear recommendation. It delivers a strong average of 87 FPS with a minimum of 74 FPS, ensuring a smooth and responsive experience that is well above the 60 FPS threshold. While the Low preset offers an even higher average of 109 FPS, the visual upgrade offered by Medium is worth the modest performance cost. The High and Ultra presets, with averages around 52-54 FPS, are not recommended for consistent smoothness, as they will likely result in noticeable frame pacing issues.

For 2560x1440 displays, the choices are more constrained. The Low preset is the only setting that guarantees a consistently smooth frame rate, with an average of 78 FPS. The Medium preset, with an average of 62 FPS and a minimum of 53 FPS, is playable but may experience occasional dips below 60 FPS. It is a viable option for those who prioritize image quality and can tolerate minor stutters. The High and Ultra presets, with averages of 39 FPS and 37 FPS, should be avoided. At 3840x2160, the Low preset is the only reasonable option, providing an average of 49 FPS. All other settings at 4K are not recommended for a satisfactory gaming experience. The data suggests that for this hardware, the best overall experience is at 1920x1080 with Medium settings, which provides a balanced mix of performance and visual quality.