Evolve

The AMD Ryzen 7 3700X paired with the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti represents a stark contrast in capabilities within the Evolve benchmark database. The CPU is a modern 8-core, 16-thread processor based on the Zen 2 architecture, while the GPU is an older, entry-level Pascal-based card. The measured results show a system that is heavily constrained by its graphics processor, with the CPU’s substantial resources largely left idle in this FPS title. This analysis examines how this specific pairing performs across resolutions and settings, interpreting the data to understand the bottleneck dynamics at play.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The AMD Ryzen 7 3700X brings a substantial amount of processing power to this combination. With 8 cores and 16 threads, it offers a high level of parallelism that is reflected in its benchmark scores, such as a Cinebench R15 multicore score of 2092 and a Geekbench multicore score of 8899. Its base clock of 3.60 GHz and boost clock of 4.40 GHz provide strong single-thread performance as well, evidenced by a Geekbench single-core score of 1593. This places the CPU in the 84th percentile of all processors, indicating that it is a high-end part relative to the broader market.

However, the data from Evolve suggests that this CPU power is not the limiting factor. The measured FPS at 1080p Low is 62, which is the highest average frame rate recorded for this combo. If the CPU were the bottleneck, we would expect to see similar frame rates across different settings, as the game logic and draw calls would be the limiting factor. Instead, the FPS drops significantly as settings increase, from 62 at Low to 48 at Medium, 38 at High, and 26 at Ultra. This scaling pattern is a clear indicator that the graphics card is the primary constraint, not the CPU.

The Ryzen 7 3700X's performance relative to its nearest rivals reinforces its headroom. Its average benchmark score of 34260 is nearly identical to the AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (34222) and the AMD EPYC 4244P (34220), with deltaPct values of 0.1%. It is also within 0.2% of the Intel Core i5-13450HX (34333) and 0.5% of the Intel Core Ultra 7 165H (34083). This shows that the 3700X is a competitive high-end CPU that would not be expected to struggle in a game released in 2015, especially at lower graphical settings where the GPU is less taxed. The CPU's 32 MB of L3 cache and support for DDR4 memory provide a solid foundation, but the game's frame rate is clearly not being dictated by these factors in this configuration.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is the clear performance bottleneck in this system. This GPU, based on the Pascal architecture and GP107 chip, has a modest 4 GB of GDDR5 memory on a 128-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 112.1 GB/s. Its base clock of 1291 MHz and boost clock of 1392 MHz help it achieve a Passmark G3D score of 6340, which places it in the 25th percentile of all GPUs. This is a very low ranking, and its nearest rivals are all older or integrated parts, such as the AMD Radeon R5 M330 and NVIDIA Quadro K2100M.

The measured FPS data tells the story of a GPU that is overwhelmed by the demands of Evolve at higher settings. At 1080p, the average frame rate drops from 62 at Low to 26 at Ultra, demonstrating that the GPU's processing power and memory bandwidth are quickly saturated. The 4 GB VRAM capacity is likely a significant factor at higher resolutions and settings, as the game may be exceeding this limit, leading to texture thrashing and reduced performance. The GPU's FP32 performance of 2.138 TFLOPS is quite low for a gaming card, and the 768 shading units are insufficient for heavy graphical loads.

The GPU's performance relative to its peers is equally telling. With an average benchmark score of 4193, it is only 0.6% faster than the AMD Radeon R5 M330 (4170) and 1% faster than the NVIDIA Quadro K2100M (4151). It is actually slower than the NVIDIA Quadro K3000M (4241) by 1.1% and the AMD Radeon Vega 3 (4268) by 1.8%. These figures confirm that the GTX 1050 Ti is at the very low end of the performance spectrum, and it is the component that dictates the playability of this game.

FAQ

Q: Why does the frame rate drop so dramatically when moving from Low to Ultra settings at 1080p?

A: The data shows a clear correlation between settings and performance, with average FPS falling from 62 at Low to 48 at Medium, 38 at High, and 26 at Ultra. This pattern indicates that the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is the limiting component, as its processing power and 4 GB of VRAM are insufficient to handle the increased graphical load without a significant performance penalty.

Q: Is the AMD Ryzen 7 3700X a good match for the GTX 1050 Ti in this game?

A: The benchmark results indicate that the CPU is severely underutilized. The Ryzen 7 3700X scores in the 84th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 34260, while the GPU only manages a 25th percentile ranking. The FPS scaling with settings confirms that the GPU is the bottleneck, meaning the CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads have ample headroom that is not being used.

Q: What is the best resolution to play Evolve with this hardware configuration?

A: According to the measured data, 1920x1080 is the only resolution that provides a consistently playable experience. At this resolution, the Low setting achieves 62 FPS and Medium achieves 48 FPS. At 2560x1440, the average FPS drops to 42 at Low, and at 3840x2160, even the Low setting only manages 24 FPS, making higher resolutions impractical.

Q: How does this combo rank compared to others tested in the database?

A: The combination of the Ryzen 7 3700X and GTX 1050 Ti ranks 3644 out of 3700 tested combos for Evolve. This places it in the bottom 1.5% of all configurations, which is consistent with the GPU's low benchmark percentile and the overall low frame rates measured.

Q: Can this system handle the Ultra settings preset in Evolve?

A: The data suggests that Ultra settings are not viable. At 1920x1080, the average FPS is only 26, and at 2560x1440 it drops to 17. At 3840x2160, it falls to just 10 FPS. These frame rates are well below what is generally considered acceptable for a smooth gaming experience.

Q: Is there a significant performance difference between the High and Ultra presets?

A: Yes, the data shows a substantial drop. At 1080p, moving from High to Ultra reduces the average FPS from 38 to 26, a decrease of 12 frames per second. This is a larger relative drop than from Medium to High (48 to 38), indicating that the Ultra preset introduces a particularly heavy load that the GTX 1050 Ti cannot handle well.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data for this combination reveals a consistent pattern of performance degradation as resolution and settings increase. At 1920x1080, the most common gaming resolution, the system achieves an average of 62 FPS on Low settings. This is the highest frame rate recorded for this combo. Moving to Medium settings, the average drops to 48 FPS, with a minimum of 41 and a maximum of 55. High settings yield an average of 38 FPS, and Ultra settings bring the average down to 26 FPS.

At 2560x1440, the performance becomes more constrained. The Low preset delivers an average of 42 FPS, which is a noticeable step down from the 1080p result. Medium settings produce an average of 32 FPS, with a minimum of 27 and a maximum of 37. High settings drop further to 25 FPS, while Ultra settings only manage an average of 17 FPS. This resolution is borderline playable only on the Low preset.

The 3840x2160 resolution shows that this hardware is not suited for 4K gaming. The Low preset yields an average of 24 FPS, which is already below playable thresholds. Medium settings drop to 18 FPS, with a minimum of 16 and a maximum of 21. High settings produce just 14 FPS, and Ultra settings fall to an average of 10 FPS. None of these results are within a usable range for a fast-paced FPS game.

Resolution Scaling

The data shows a dramatic decrease in performance as resolution increases, which is a classic indicator of a GPU-bound system. Moving from 1920x1080 to 2560x1440 at Low settings, the average FPS drops from 62 to 42, a reduction of approximately 32%. This is a significant hit that suggests the GPU's fill rate and memory bandwidth are being stressed. The transition from 2560x1440 to 3840x2160 at Low settings is even more severe, with average FPS falling from 42 to 24, a 43% reduction.

This scaling pattern is consistent across all settings. At Medium, the FPS goes from 48 at 1080p to 32 at 1440p and then to 18 at 4K. At High, the numbers are 38, 25, and 14, respectively. The consistent and large drops at each resolution step strongly imply that the GTX 1050 Ti is operating at its absolute limit. The CPU, with its high percentile ranking and powerful multi-threaded capabilities, is not a factor in this scaling; the resolution increase only adds to the GPU's workload, which it cannot handle.

If the CPU were the bottleneck, the frame rate would remain relatively constant across resolutions, as the CPU's workload (game logic, physics) does not change with resolution. The fact that the FPS plummets with each resolution increase provides definitive evidence that the limiting component is the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti. The 4 GB VRAM and 112.1 GB/s bandwidth are simply insufficient for the demands of higher resolution rendering in this game.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS, the optimal way to play Evolve with this hardware is to prioritize achieving a playable frame rate over visual fidelity. The data shows that the only preset that consistently delivers a smooth experience is Low at 1920x1080, with an average of 62 FPS. This is the only configuration that approaches the 60 FPS target, which is desirable for an FPS game. The Medium preset at 1080p, with an average of 48 FPS, is also viable for those who can tolerate a slightly lower frame rate in exchange for better visuals, as its minimum of 41 FPS is still acceptable.

At higher resolutions, the options are severely limited. At 2560x1440, the Low preset achieves an average of 42 FPS, which may be playable for some, but the Medium preset drops to 32 FPS with a minimum of 27, which is likely to feel choppy. At 3840x2160, no preset provides a playable experience, with the best result being 24 FPS on Low. Therefore, the practical choice is to stick to 1080p and choose between Low and Medium settings. The data suggests that the Ultra preset is not a viable option at any resolution, as it consistently delivers the lowest frame rates, including a 10 FPS average at 4K.

The experience is fundamentally constrained by the graphics card. The Ryzen 7 3700X has the power to handle much higher settings, but the GTX 1050 Ti cannot keep up. For users who prioritize frame rate, the Low preset at 1080p is the clear recommendation. For those who want a balance, Medium at 1080p is the best compromise, offering a 48 FPS average while maintaining a playable minimum. Pushing to High or Ultra settings results in a significant performance penalty that outweighs the visual benefits in a fast-paced game.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the AMD Ryzen 7 3700X and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti ranks 3644 out of 3700 tested combos in the Evolve database. This is a remarkably low ranking, placing this system in the bottom 1.5% of all configurations tested. This poor ranking is almost entirely attributable to the GPU's weak performance. The GTX 1050 Ti is in the 25th percentile of all GPUs, and its average benchmark score of 4193 places it in the company of integrated graphics and older mobile parts. In contrast, the CPU is in the 84th percentile, indicating a massive imbalance in the system's capabilities.

The data from the measured FPS supports this dismal ranking. The highest average frame rate recorded for this combo is 62 FPS at 1080p Low, which is a modest result for a game from 2015. At more demanding settings and resolutions, the system falls well below playable thresholds. This is in line with the GPU's benchmark position. Its nearest rivals, such as the AMD Radeon R5 M330 and NVIDIA Quadro K2100M, are not considered gaming GPUs, confirming the GTX 1050 Ti's status as an entry-level part.

This rank is a direct consequence of pairing a high-end CPU with a very low-end GPU. While the Ryzen 7 3700X provides a robust foundation, the GTX 1050 Ti is a severe bottleneck that prevents the system from performing anywhere near its potential in this game. The result is a configuration that is fundamentally limited for gaming, and its 3644th place ranking out of 3700 combos accurately reflects its poor performance in Evolve. The data makes it clear that the GPU is the single most important factor holding this system back.