Inside

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 combination delivers exceptionally high frame rates in Inside, a puzzle platformer from 2016. The measured data shows that this pairing is capable of pushing even 4K Ultra settings well past the 100 FPS mark, indicating that the game’s workload is easily handled by both components. The benchmark results reveal a system where the GPU is the dominant force, yet the CPU provides ample headroom to avoid bottlenecks at high refresh rates.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture. It operates with a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, which are substantial frequencies for a desktop part. This CPU is built on a 5 nm process at TSMC and features a 32 MB shared L3 cache, alongside 1 MB of L2 cache per core. For a game like Inside, which is not heavily threaded, the single-core performance is often the primary factor, and this processor’s boost clock is well-suited for that task.

In synthetic benchmarks, the Ryzen 5 7500F scores 974 in 3DMark single-thread and 3218 in Cinebench R23 single-core. These scores place it in a competitive position, as indicated by its 77th percentile ranking among all CPUs. The multi-threaded results are equally strong, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22799 and a Geekbench multi-core score of 12362. The data suggests that while the game may not utilize all 12 threads, the processor’s overall throughput ensures that background tasks and game logic do not interfere with frame delivery.

The processor’s 65 W TDP and unlocked multiplier make it an efficient and flexible option. Its nearest rivals in the benchmark database include the Intel Core i7-11850H, which scores 24935 with a deltaPct of 0.1, and the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F, which scores 25005 with a deltaPct of -0.2. These tiny percentage differences imply that the 7500F is essentially on par with those chips in average benchmark scores, meaning any performance differences in Inside would likely stem from other system factors or the game’s engine. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 6376 and max-thread score of 6379 show consistent scaling, but for Inside, the single-thread score of 974 is more indicative of the CPU’s ability to handle the game’s physics and logic updates efficiently. The data implies that this CPU is more than sufficient for the game, providing a stable foundation for the GPU to operate at its full potential.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 is a flagship graphics card built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. It features 32 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 512-bit bus, delivering a massive 1.79 TB/s of memory bandwidth. The GPU has a base clock of 2017 MHz and a boost clock of 2407 MHz, with memory running at 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective). This configuration is overkill for a game like Inside, which is visually simple by modern standards, but the data shows that the GPU still scales with settings and resolution.

The RTX 5090’s raw compute power is immense, with 21760 shading units and 680 tensor cores. Its FP32 performance is rated at 104.8 TFLOPS, and it holds a 92nd percentile ranking among all GPUs. In synthetic tests, it scores 39650 in Passmark G3D and 334370 in Geekbench OpenCL. The GPU’s nearest rivals include the NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB, which scores 79605 with a deltaPct of 0.3, and the AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT, which scores 78940 with a deltaPct of 1.1. These comparisons highlight that the RTX 5090 is at the top of the performance stack, though the deltaPct values are small, suggesting that the card’s lead over these rivals is not as large as the price difference might imply.

For Inside, the GPU’s role is to render the game’s atmospheric 2.5D environments and lighting effects. The measured FPS data shows that the GPU is rarely the limiting factor, even at 4K. At 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, the average FPS is 143, which is still very high. The card’s 32 GB of VRAM is far beyond what the game requires, but it ensures that there are no memory-related stutters or texture pop-ins. The boost clock of 2407 MHz is crucial for maintaining high frame rates, and the data indicates that the GPU can sustain these speeds across all tested settings. The 575 W TDP and 950 W suggested PSU are notable characteristics, but they do not impact the game’s performance metrics directly.

FAQ

Q: What is the average frame rate at 1080p with High settings?

A: The measured average FPS is 270 at 1920x1080 with High settings. This is a very high frame rate that exceeds the refresh rate of most standard monitors.

Q: How much does the frame rate drop from 1080p to 4K at Ultra settings?

A: At 1920x1080 Ultra, the average FPS is 265, while at 3840x2160 Ultra, the average FPS drops to 143. This represents a significant reduction of approximately 46%, indicating that the GPU is being pushed harder at higher resolutions.

Q: Is the RTX 5090 the limiting factor at 4K Low settings?

A: At 3840x2160 Low, the average FPS is 269. This is nearly identical to the 1080p High result of 270 FPS, suggesting that the CPU or game engine is starting to cap performance at this level, rather than the GPU.

Q: What is the minimum FPS recorded for Medium settings?

A: For Medium settings, the minimum FPS values are 275 at 1080p, 246 at 1440p, and 204 at 4K. These minimums are still very playable, with no noticeable stuttering expected.

Q: How does this combo rank among all tested combinations?

A: This specific CPU and GPU combination ranks 218th out of 3716 tested combos for Inside. This places it in the top 6% of all systems tested for this game.

Q: What is the single-thread performance of the Ryzen 5 7500F?

A: The CPU scores 974 in 3DMark single-thread and 3218 in Cinebench R23 single-core. These scores are strong for a 6-core part and support high frame rates in lightly threaded games like Inside.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 achieves a rank of 218 out of 3716 tested combos in Inside. This rank places the system in the top 5.9% of all configurations, a very strong showing. The high rank is expected given the flagship nature of the GPU and the capable CPU, but it also reflects the game’s low system requirements. The data implies that many other, less expensive combinations could also achieve high ranks, but this pairing ensures maximum performance headroom.

The rank is determined by the measured FPS across all settings and resolutions. The fact that the combo sits at 218, rather than higher, suggests that there are 217 other combinations that score slightly better. These could be systems with even faster CPUs, such as those with higher single-thread scores, or perhaps combinations that are more balanced for this specific game. The Ryzen 5 7500F’s nearest rivals, such as the Intel Core i7-11850H and AMD Ryzen 5 8400F, show that the CPU is not the absolute fastest, but it is close. The RTX 5090’s rivals, like the Tesla P100, are not gaming cards, so the GPU’s ranking is more about raw compute than game-specific performance.

The percentile ranking of 77 for the CPU and 92 for the GPU indicates that both components are in the upper echelon of their respective categories. However, the combo rank of 218 suggests that the game’s performance is not solely defined by these percentiles. It is possible that the game engine has a frame rate cap or that the CPU’s memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s becomes a factor at very high FPS. The data shows that this is a top-tier combination, but it is not the absolute best, leaving room for other configurations to edge it out in this specific title.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data reveals interesting scaling patterns across resolutions. Starting at 1920x1080, the average FPS for Low settings is 351, which drops to 324 for Medium and 270 for High, then to 265 for Ultra. The drop from Low to Ultra at 1080p is about 24.5%, showing that the GPU is handling the increased graphical load without major issues. At 2560x1440, the Low setting yields 314 FPS, which is a 10.5% drop from 1080p Low. The High setting at 1440p yields 239 FPS, a drop of 11.5% from 1080p High. This indicates that resolution scaling is relatively linear at these lower settings.

The most dramatic drop occurs when moving to 3840x2160. The Low setting at 4K averages 269 FPS, which is only a 14.3% drop from 1080p Low, but the High setting drops to 150 FPS, a 44.4% drop from 1080p High. The Ultra setting at 4K averages 143 FPS, which is a 46% drop from the 1080p Ultra result. This non-linear scaling suggests that the GPU is becoming the bottleneck at 4K with higher settings. The render targets and pixel count quadruple from 1080p to 4K, and the data shows that the RTX 5090 can still handle it, but the frame rate penalty is steep.

The scaling from 1440p to 4K is also telling. The High setting drops from 239 FPS at 1440p to 150 FPS at 4K, a 37.2% reduction. The Medium setting drops from 290 FPS to 240 FPS, a 17.2% reduction. The Low setting drops from 314 FPS to 269 FPS, a 14.3% reduction. The data implies that at Low settings, the CPU or memory system starts to limit performance, as the FPS does not drop as much as the pixel count increases. At High and Ultra settings, the GPU’s shading and memory bandwidth are more stressed, leading to larger drops. This analysis shows that the limiting component changes based on the settings, with the CPU becoming more relevant at lower settings and higher resolutions.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data for this combination is comprehensive, covering three resolutions and four settings levels. At 1920x1080, the Low setting produces an average of 351 FPS. The Medium setting reduces this to 324 FPS, with a minimum of 275 and a maximum of 372 FPS. High settings yield 270 FPS average, while Ultra settings produce 265 FPS. The consistency between High and Ultra at 1080p is notable, with only a 5 FPS difference, suggesting that the game’s Ultra preset does not add a significant load over High.

Moving to 2560x1440, the Low setting averages 314 FPS. Medium settings average 290 FPS, with a minimum of 246 and a maximum of 333 FPS. High settings average 239 FPS, and Ultra settings average 228 FPS. The drop from Low to Ultra at 1440p is 86 FPS, or about 27.4%. This is a larger drop than at 1080p, indicating that the GPU is working harder. The Medium setting’s minimum of 246 FPS is still very high, ensuring smooth gameplay.

At 3840x2160, the Low setting averages 269 FPS. Medium settings average 240 FPS, with a minimum of 204 and a maximum of 276 FPS. High settings average 150 FPS, and Ultra settings average 143 FPS. The gap between Medium and High at 4K is substantial, with a 90 FPS difference. This suggests that the High preset introduces effects or shading that heavily tax the GPU. The Ultra setting’s 143 FPS average is still excellent for 4K gaming, but it is a 47% reduction from the Low setting’s 269 FPS. The data shows a clear hierarchy: to maximize frame rates, players should lower settings, but even at the highest settings, the game remains highly playable.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings for this combination depend on the user’s display and preference for frame rate versus visual fidelity. For players with a 1080p 144Hz monitor, the High preset at 270 FPS is ideal, as it provides a smooth experience well above the refresh rate. The Ultra preset at 265 FPS is nearly identical, so the visual upgrade is essentially free. For 1440p 144Hz displays, the High preset at 239 FPS is the best choice, offering a high frame rate with good visuals. The Ultra preset at 228 FPS is also viable, staying above 144 FPS and providing the maximum visual quality.

For 4K displays, the recommendation is more nuanced. The Ultra preset at 143 FPS is excellent for a 120Hz or 144Hz display, but it is close to the refresh rate limit. The High preset at 150 FPS offers a similar experience with slightly lower visual fidelity. The Medium preset at 240 FPS is the best choice for players who prioritize frame rate over everything else, as it provides a massive boost over High and Ultra while maintaining a minimum FPS of 204. The Low preset at 269 FPS is unnecessary for most, as the Medium preset already delivers a very high frame rate with better visuals.

The data suggests that the Medium preset is the sweet spot for this combination, especially at higher resolutions. At 4K Medium, the average FPS of 240 is 60% higher than Ultra, and the minimum of 204 ensures no drops below 200 FPS. At 1440p Medium, the 290 FPS average is exceptionally high, and the 246 minimum is still far above any display’s refresh rate. The Medium preset appears to balance the CPU and GPU loads effectively, avoiding the steep penalties seen at High and Ultra settings. For the best overall experience, the Medium preset is recommended, as it provides the highest frame rates with a significant visual improvement over Low, without the performance cost of the higher presets.