Control

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER delivers a robust 1440p and 4K experience in Control, with the GPU clearly acting as the dominant performance driver. The data shows a strong scaling pattern across resolutions, where the combination of a 6-core Zen 3 processor and a high-end Ada Lovelace graphics card produces frame rates that comfortably exceed 60 FPS at maximum settings in 4K, while providing exceptional headroom for high-refresh-rate 1440p displays. This analysis examines the measured performance, component roles, and optimal settings based strictly on the provided benchmark data.

FAQ

*Q: What is the overall performance rank of this CPU and GPU combination in Control?*

A: This combo ranks 180th out of 1636 tested combinations in the game, placing it in the top 11% of all systems tested, indicating a very strong pairing for this title.

Q: How does the Ryzen 5 5600GT's multi-threaded performance compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The CPU's average benchmark score of 20740 is nearly identical to its closest rival, the Intel Core i7-10700, which scores 20746 (a delta of 0%). It also performs within a narrow band of others, trailing the AMD Ryzen 5 5600X by only 0.3% and the Intel Core i5-12490F by 0.3%.

Q: What is the maximum average frame rate achievable at 1080p with this setup?

A: The highest recorded average frame rate at 1920x1080 is 224.3 FPS, achieved with the Low preset. This indicates the system has significant performance headroom at this resolution.

*Q: Can this combination handle 4K gaming in Control?*

A: Yes, the data indicates it can. At 3840x2160 with the Ultra preset, the system achieves an average of 66 FPS. Dropping to High settings yields 74.3 FPS, and the Low preset pushes the average to 117.7 FPS, all of which are playable.

Q: How much of a performance gap exists between the High and Ultra presets at 1440p?

A: The difference is substantial. At 2560x1440, the High preset delivers an average of 106.4 FPS, while the Ultra preset drops to 93.8 FPS. This represents a performance cost of 12.6 FPS for the highest visual fidelity settings.

Q: What is the GPU's standing among all tested graphics cards?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has an average benchmark score of 48704 and sits in the 86th percentile of all GPUs. Its closest rival, the NVIDIA CMP 50HX, scores 49071, which is a performance difference of only 0.7%.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER secures the 180th position out of 1636 tested configurations in Control. This ranking places the combo in the 89th percentile of all systems tested, signifying that it outperforms the vast majority of other hardware pairings in this specific game. The CPU's contribution to this ranking is supported by its 78th percentile standing among all processors, while the GPU's 86th percentile among all graphics cards is the more influential factor in this title's performance.

Benchmark results indicate that the processor is well-matched with its direct competitors. The Ryzen 5 5600GT's average score of 20740 is effectively tied with the Intel Core i7-10700, which scores 20746, showing no significant performance delta. It is also within a hair of the AMD Ryzen 5 5600X, which leads by a mere 0.3%. This places the CPU in a performance tier where it does not bottleneck the high-end GPU, allowing the graphics card to operate near its full potential. The high combo rank is a direct result of this balanced pairing, where the CPU provides sufficient throughput for the GPU to deliver its high frame rates.

The data suggests that the GPU is the primary driver of the high ranking. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's average score of 48704 is just 0.7% behind the NVIDIA CMP 50HX, its closest rival, and it leads the NVIDIA RTX A2000 by 1.6%. This level of graphics performance, when combined with the capable 6-core processor, ensures that the system is not limited by CPU-bound scenarios in Control, allowing the measured FPS to scale primarily with the GPU's workload. The 180th rank out of 1636 combos is a strong indicator of a high-end system capable of delivering a premium gaming experience.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is the undisputed performance leader in this pairing, and its specifications align directly with the measured results in Control. The GPU is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture and features 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 672.3 GB/s. This substantial memory allocation and bandwidth are critical for handling high-resolution textures and complex shaders at 4K, which is reflected in the playable frame rates at 3840x2160. The GPU's boost clock of 2610 MHz, combined with its 8448 shading units, allows it to process the game's geometry and effects efficiently.

The GPU's role becomes more defined when examining the performance scaling across presets. At 4K, the difference between the Low and Ultra presets is 51.7 FPS (117.7 vs. 66), demonstrating that the graphics card has enough raw power to handle the increased load of higher settings without collapsing. This is further supported by the GPU's 86th percentile ranking and its average benchmark score of 48704, which is only 0.7% behind the NVIDIA CMP 50HX. The data indicates that the GPU has ample compute resources, as its FP32 performance of 44.10 TFLOPS suggests, allowing it to maintain high frame rates even when the game's visual complexity increases.

The 16 GB VRAM capacity is a significant asset for Control, a game known for its physics-heavy environments and detailed textures. The measured FPS at 4K Ultra (66 FPS) suggests the GPU is not hitting a memory capacity wall, as performance degrades gracefully through the preset levels rather than exhibiting a sudden drop. The GPU's role is to provide consistent performance across all tested resolutions, and the data confirms this, with the 1080p Low preset reaching 224.3 FPS and even the most demanding 4K Ultra preset staying above the 60 FPS threshold. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is the clear workhorse here, with the CPU playing a supportive role.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings depend on the user's display resolution and refresh rate target. For 4K displays, the High preset at 3840x2160, delivering an average of 74.3 FPS, offers the best balance between visual fidelity and smoothness. The Ultra preset drops to 66 FPS, which is still playable but provides less headroom for demanding scenes, while the Medium preset at 86.2 FPS is a viable alternative for users who prioritize frame rate over maximum detail. The Low preset at 117.7 FPS is recommended for competitive play or for users with high-refresh-rate 4K panels.

For 1440p gaming, the High preset is the clear recommendation, as it achieves an average of 106.4 FPS. This frame rate is ideal for 100Hz+ monitors and offers a significant visual upgrade over the Medium preset, which runs at 125.2 FPS. The Ultra preset at 93.8 FPS is also a strong choice for users with 144Hz displays who prefer maximum quality, as it remains well above the 60 FPS threshold. The Low preset at 171.1 FPS provides the highest frame rates but sacrifices too much visual quality for a game like Control, where the atmosphere is a core part of the experience.

At 1080p, the system has substantial performance headroom. The High preset delivers 144.8 FPS, which is perfect for 144Hz monitors. The Ultra preset at 123.4 FPS is also a solid choice, offering the best image quality while still maintaining high refresh rates. The Medium preset at 161.7 FPS and Low preset at 224.3 FPS are only recommended for users with 240Hz+ displays or those who prioritize competitive performance. The data shows that the High preset is the "sweet spot" across all resolutions, providing a consistent balance of visual quality and high frame rates without pushing the GPU to its limits.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data reveals a consistent scaling pattern across all resolutions and settings. At 1920x1080, the system demonstrates its peak performance, with the Low preset achieving an average of 224.3 FPS. The Medium preset drops to 161.7 FPS, representing a 62.6 FPS decrease from Low. The High preset further reduces performance to 144.8 FPS, and the Ultra preset settles at 123.4 FPS. This shows a clear performance hierarchy, with the Ultra preset being 44.9% slower than the Low preset at this resolution.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance scales down proportionally. The Low preset averages 171.1 FPS, which is 53.2 FPS lower than the 1080p Low result. The Medium preset achieves 125.2 FPS, the High preset delivers 106.4 FPS, and the Ultra preset drops to 93.8 FPS. The gap between the Low and Ultra presets at 1440p is 77.3 FPS, indicating that the GPU is still the primary bottleneck as resolution increases. The High preset's 106.4 FPS result is particularly notable, as it shows the system can handle high-refresh-rate 1440p gaming without compromise.

At 3840x2160, the system still maintains playable frame rates across all settings. The Low preset averages 117.7 FPS, which is surprisingly high for 4K and indicates the GPU's strong compute capabilities. The Medium preset drops to 86.2 FPS, and the High preset achieves 74.3 FPS. The Ultra preset, while the most demanding, still delivers an average of 66 FPS, which is above the standard 60 FPS target. The scaling from Low to Ultra at 4K is 51.7 FPS, a smaller absolute difference than at lower resolutions, suggesting that the GPU is becoming more pixel-bound. Overall, the data shows that this combo is capable of delivering a high-quality experience at any resolution, with the High preset providing the most balanced performance across the board.