Inside

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 pairing delivers a benchmark profile that is almost entirely defined by the GPU's raw output, even when the workload is a lightweight puzzle platformer. The measured frame rates across all resolutions are exceptionally high, but the data reveals a distinct pattern of scaling that points to the CPU as the eventual ceiling at lower resolutions. This analysis breaks down the specific performance metrics, component roles, and optimal settings for this combination.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 3 architecture (codename Vermeer), fabricated on a 7 nm process. Its base clock is 3.00 GHz, with a boost clock of 4.00 GHz. The chip features a 32 MB shared L3 cache, alongside 64 KB of L1 and 512 KB of L2 cache per core, which are typical specifications for a modern desktop processor. With a TDP of 65 W, it is a power-efficient part, and its benchmark scores place it in the 85th percentile of all CPUs, indicating strong general-purpose performance.

In the context of Inside, a side-scrolling puzzle platformer with modest CPU demands, the 5600F is more than sufficient for the game's logical simulation. The benchmark data supports this, as frame rates remain incredibly high even at 1080p, where CPU overhead is typically most pronounced. For instance, at 1080p Low, the combo achieves 257 FPS, and at 1080p High, it still manages 197 FPS. The processor's single-thread performance is strong, with a Passmark single-thread score of 2872, which is crucial for a game that may rely on a single main thread for its physics and game logic. The multi-threaded score of 19236 also ensures there is plenty of headroom for any background tasks.

The performance ceiling at lower resolutions is not a sign of CPU weakness, but rather an indication of how fast the GPU can render frames. The data shows that the gap between Low and Ultra settings at 1080p is 63 FPS (257 vs 194), while at 4K the gap is 57 FPS (197 vs 140). This suggests that the CPU is not the primary bottleneck; the GPU's workload is the main variable. The 5600F's 12 threads and high boost clock are sufficient to keep the RTX 4090 fed with data, allowing it to reach its maximum potential. The CPU's 85th percentile ranking and its proximity to rivals like the Intel Core Ultra 5 225 (score 36938) and AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D (score 37018) confirm that it is a high-performance part, more than capable of handling the game's requirements. The data indicates that the processor is not a limiting factor in this specific game.

Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience per the measured rows

Analyzing the measured FPS data, the "Ultra" preset is the most demanding, producing the lowest average frame rates at every resolution. At 1080p, Ultra yields 194 FPS, which is still a high number, but it is the least performant of the four settings. The "High" preset offers a substantial performance uplift over Ultra, with a 3 FPS increase at 1080p (197 FPS), a 3 FPS increase at 1440p (177 FPS), and a 7 FPS increase at 4K (147 FPS). While the visual difference between High and Ultra in a game like Inside may be subtle, the data suggests that High is a more efficient choice.

The "Medium" preset provides the best balance of visual fidelity and performance. At 1080p, it achieves 237 FPS, which is 43 FPS higher than High. At 1440p, it reaches 212 FPS, a 35 FPS improvement over High. At 4K, it hits 182 FPS, which is 35 FPS higher than High. The Medium preset also has the only recorded minimum and maximum FPS data points, showing a range of 201-272 FPS at 1080p, 180-244 FPS at 1440p, and 154-209 FPS at 4K. This indicates a stable frame time distribution.

For players with high refresh rate monitors, the "Low" preset is the clear winner. At 1080p, it achieves 257 FPS, which is 60 FPS higher than the High preset. At 1440p, it reaches 230 FPS, and at 4K, it still produces 197 FPS. The performance scaling from Low to Medium is significant, with an average increase of 20-25 FPS across resolutions, suggesting that the Low preset is the least GPU-intensive. However, given the game's simple art style, the visual compromise of Low may not be worth the extra frame rate. The data strongly suggests that the "Medium" preset is the recommended choice, as it delivers a high frame rate with a likely minimal visual penalty compared to High or Ultra, making it the most efficient setting for this hardware combination.

FAQ — 4-6 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

*Q: What is the maximum average FPS this combo can achieve in Inside?*

A: The highest average frame rate recorded is 257 FPS, which is achieved at a resolution of 1920x1080 with the Low settings preset.

Q: How does the Ryzen 5 5600F compare to its closest rival in CPU benchmarks?

A: According to the benchmark data, the Ryzen 5 5600F has an average benchmark score of 36945. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 5 225, has a score of 36938, resulting in a deltaPct of 0. This indicates they are statistically tied in overall CPU performance.

Q: What is the performance difference between the High and Ultra settings at 4K?

A: The measured data shows that at 3840x2160, the High preset yields an average of 147 FPS, while the Ultra preset yields 140 FPS. This represents a 7 FPS difference in favor of the High preset.

Q: Does the combo have a higher average FPS at 1440p with Medium settings than at 4K with Low settings?

A: No. At 2560x1440 with Medium settings, the average FPS is 212. At 3840x2160 with Low settings, the average FPS is 197. The 1440p Medium preset is 15 FPS faster.

Q: What is the GPU's average benchmark score and how does it rank?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 has an average benchmark score of 60347 and ranks in the 88th percentile of all GPUs, placing it in the top tier of graphics hardware.

Q: Are there any recorded minimum FPS values for the High or Ultra presets?

A: No. The only preset with recorded minimum and maximum FPS values is the Medium preset, which shows a minimum of 201 FPS at 1080p, 180 FPS at 1440p, and 154 FPS at 4K.

How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos

The combined performance of the AMD Ryzen 5 5600F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 places this system at rank 846 out of 2887 tested combinations in Inside. This rank, which falls in the 29th percentile of all tested combos, is surprisingly low for a system with such a powerful GPU. This indicates that while the raw FPS numbers are very high, there are many other combinations that achieve even higher frame rates, likely due to having a more powerful CPU that can push the frame rate even higher.

The rank reflects the total system performance, and the data suggests that the RTX 4090 is the dominant component. The 5600F, while a capable processor, may be holding the system back from reaching the absolute top tier of rankings. For instance, a combo with a higher-end CPU might be able to push the 1080p Low setting from 257 FPS to over 300 FPS, which would significantly improve its rank. The fact that this combo is ranked 846th out of 2887 indicates that while the system is fast, it is not the fastest possible configuration for this game.

This positioning is logical when considering the component benchmarks. The CPU's 85th percentile ranking is strong, but the GPU's 88th percentile ranking is not the highest possible. The combination of a top-15% CPU and a top-12% GPU does not guarantee a top-12% system ranking in a game that is so heavily GPU-bound. The data shows that the system is a high-performance machine, but the rank suggests that the CPU is the limiting factor for achieving the highest possible frame rates. The gap between the CPU's performance and the GPU's performance is the reason the combo does not rank higher.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 is the powerhouse of this configuration. It is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture and features a massive 24 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 1.01 TB/s. Its base clock is 2235 MHz, with a boost clock of 2520 MHz. The GPU has 16,384 shading units, 512 TMUs, and 176 ROPs, along with 128 RT cores and 512 Tensor cores. It is a colossal piece of hardware with a 450 W TDP and a launch MSRP of 1,599 USD.

In Inside, the RTX 4090's role is overkill, but it results in exceptional performance. The game is not graphically demanding, but the GPU's raw power ensures that it can render frames at an incredible rate. The measured FPS data shows that even at 4K Ultra, the GPU produces 140 FPS, and at 4K Low, it achieves 197 FPS. The differences between presets are due to the GPU's workload, not a lack of VRAM or bandwidth. The 24 GB VRAM is far more than the game requires, and the 1.01 TB/s bandwidth ensures that there is no memory bottleneck.

The GPU's benchmark scores, such as a Passmark G3D score of 38194 and a Passmark GPU Compute score of 26613, confirm its dominance. Its average benchmark score of 60347 places it in the 88th percentile of all GPUs. However, its nearest rivals are not other high-end gaming GPUs, but rather professional workstation cards like the Intel Arc Pro A60 and AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48, which have average scores of 60326 and 60140, respectively. This suggests that the benchmark database aggregates scores across different types of workloads, and the RTX 4090's gaming performance is even more impressive than its overall score suggests. The data shows that the GPU is not the bottleneck in this system; it is the primary driver of the high FPS numbers, and its performance scales predictably with resolution and settings.

Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers

The measured FPS data provides a clear picture of the system's performance across various configurations.

3840x2160 (4K):

• Low: 197 FPS average
• Medium: 182 FPS average (min 154, max 209)
• High: 147 FPS average
• Ultra: 140 FPS average

2560x1440 (1440p):

• Low: 230 FPS average
• Medium: 212 FPS average (min 180, max 244)
• High: 177 FPS average
• Ultra: 174 FPS average

1920x1080 (1080p):

• Low: 257 FPS average
• Medium: 237 FPS average (min 201, max 272)
• High: 197 FPS average
• Ultra: 194 FPS average

The data shows a consistent pattern. At any given resolution, the Low preset provides the highest FPS, followed by Medium, High, and then Ultra. The step from Low to Medium is significant, with an average decrease of about 20-25 FPS across all resolutions. The step from Medium to High is larger, with a decrease of 40-55 FPS, and the step from High to Ultra is smaller, with a decrease of only 3-7 FPS. This suggests that the High and Ultra presets are very similar in terms of GPU load, while the transition from Low to Medium and Medium to High introduces significantly more graphical effects that impact performance. The minimum FPS values are only recorded for the Medium preset, indicating that it may produce more consistent frame pacing, while the other presets are likely also stable but without recorded data.

Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component

The performance scaling from 1080p to 4K reveals a classic GPU-bound scenario. When moving from 1920x1080 to 2560x1440, the FPS drops by an average of 10-12% across all settings. For example, at High settings, the FPS drops from 197 to 177, a decrease of 20 FPS. When moving from 1440p to 4K, the FPS drops by an average of 17-20%, with the High setting dropping from 177 to 147 FPS, a decrease of 30 FPS. This is a clear indication that the GPU is the primary bottleneck. As the resolution increases, the GPU has to render more pixels, which directly impacts its frame output.

The fact that the FPS is still so high at 4K (140 FPS at Ultra) shows that the RTX 4090 has immense headroom. However, the percentage drop from 1080p to 4K is substantial. For instance, at Low settings, the FPS drops from 257 at 1080p to 197 at 4K, a 23% decrease. At High settings, the drop is from 197 to 147, a 25% decrease. This scaling behavior is typical for a GPU-bound game, where the CPU's performance is not the limiting factor.

If the CPU were the bottleneck, we would expect to see a smaller FPS drop when increasing resolution, because the CPU would be producing the same number of frames regardless of resolution, and the GPU would be the one struggling. However, the data shows a significant drop, which means the GPU is doing the heavy lifting. The CPU's role is to prepare the frames, and it is doing so fast enough to keep the GPU saturated at 1080p. As the resolution increases, the GPU's render time increases, and the FPS drops accordingly. This analysis confirms that the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 is the limiting component in this system, and the AMD Ryzen 5 5600F is providing ample support without becoming a bottleneck.