Inside

# Inside: AMD Ryzen 5 5600F + Intel Arc B370

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600F paired with the Intel Arc B370 ranks 2654th out of 2887 tested combinations for Inside, placing it in the lower tier of systems evaluated for this puzzle platformer. This ranking reflects a hardware pairing where the integrated-class GPU significantly constrains overall performance, despite the CPU being a comparatively strong component. The measured frame rates across resolutions and settings confirm that this combo is positioned for 1080p playable experiences rather than high-refresh or high-resolution gaming.

How This Combo Ranks

With a combo rank of 2654 out of 2887 tested systems, this pairing sits in the bottom 8% of all combinations evaluated for Inside. That placement is driven almost entirely by the GPU's limitations, as the Intel Arc B370 ranks in the 5th percentile among all GPUs, while the CPU ranks in the 85th percentile among all processors. The disparity between these two percentiles is stark and tells the core story of this build: a strong CPU paired with a very weak GPU creates a heavily GPU-bound system in nearly every scenario.

The CPU's benchmark average of 36,945 places it within 0.5% of several rivals, including the Intel Core Ultra 5 225 (36,938, 0% delta), the AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D (37,018, -0.2% delta), the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 (37,093, -0.4% delta), and the Intel Core i9-12900T (37,112, -0.5% delta). These near-identical scores mean the 5600F is effectively performance-equivalent to those four processors in general compute tasks, which is notable given the range of architectures and market positions represented. The GPU, by contrast, scores 1,184 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, sitting within 1.4% of the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 (1,186, -0.2%), the ATI Radeon HD 5770 (1,190, -0.5%), the AMD Radeon HD 7650M (1,192, -0.7%), and the AMD FirePro M2000 (1,168, 1.4%). These rival GPUs are all from earlier eras or mobile segments, underscoring how dated the Arc B370's performance level is.

The ranking data shows that this combo is not competitive for demanding modern titles at high settings, but Inside is a puzzle platformer with modest requirements, so the GPU's low absolute performance still allows for playable frame rates at lower settings. The rank of 2654 reflects the overall field of tested combos, many of which include discrete graphics solutions that far exceed the Arc B370's capabilities.

GPU Role

The Intel Arc B370 is built on the Xe3-LPG architecture with a Panther Lake chip, manufactured on Intel's 3 nm process. It operates with a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2400 MHz, which is a wide clock range that allows the GPU to scale up significantly under load. The memory configuration is entirely system-shared, with no dedicated VRAM, meaning the GPU relies on the host system's RAM for all frame buffer operations. Memory bandwidth is listed as system-dependent, which introduces variability based on the installed DDR4 memory configuration and whether dual-channel mode is active.

The GPU's compute resources include 1,280 shading units, 40 texture mapping units, 20 raster output units, and 10 ray tracing cores. Its pixel rate is 48.00 GPixel/s, the texture rate is 96.00 GTexel/s, and it delivers 6.144 TFLOPS of FP32 performance. The 25 W TDP classifies this as an integrated-class part, and its IGP bus interface means it is not a discrete card but rather a processor-integrated solution. The API support includes DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, which covers modern rendering requirements, though the raw throughput limits what can be achieved with those APIs.

In Inside, the GPU's role is decisive. At 1080p Low, the combo achieves 141 FPS average, but at 1080p Ultra, it drops to 67 FPS. That 74 FPS swing from Low to Ultra at the same resolution demonstrates how sensitive this GPU is to settings changes. The system-shared memory model means that texture-heavy settings at higher resolutions will strain memory bandwidth, which is consistent with the observed frame rate collapses at 4K Ultra (30 FPS). The GPU's 5th percentile ranking among all GPUs aligns with these results, showing it sits far below mainstream discrete solutions.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600F is a 5000-series desktop processor based on the Zen 3 architecture (Vermeer codename), manufactured on TSMC's 7 nm process. It offers 6 cores and 12 threads, with a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.00 GHz. The 65 W TDP is modest, and the socket is AMD Socket AM4. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB L1 per core, 512 KB L2 per core, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support is DDR4 with dual-channel configuration, providing 51.2 GB/s of bandwidth. The CPU supports PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes, and it has no integrated graphics, meaning the Arc B370 is the sole display output source.

The CPU's benchmark results show a balanced performer: multi-thread score of 19,236, single-thread score of 2,872, integer math at 59,339, floating-point math at 34,548, and extended instructions at 16,266. The data compression score is 232,836, data encryption is 13,839, find prime numbers is 120, physics is 1,043, and random string sorting is 23,422. The average benchmark score of 36,945 places it in the 85th percentile of all CPUs, and its nearest rivals are within 0.5% in either direction.

For Inside, the CPU is far more capable than the workload demands. Puzzle platformers rarely stress multi-core performance, and the 5600F's 6-core/12-thread configuration with Zen 3 architecture provides ample headroom. The 51.2 GB/s memory bandwidth is sufficient for the game's data streaming needs, and the PCIe Gen 4 interface ensures the GPU can communicate with the system without bottlenecking. The CPU's high percentile ranking (85th) compared to the GPU (5th) confirms that the processor is not the limiting factor in this combo; at every resolution and settings level, the GPU determines the achievable frame rate.

FAQ

Q: Why does this combo rank 2654th out of 2887 tested systems?

A: The ranking is driven by the GPU's low performance, as the Intel Arc B370 sits in the 5th percentile among all GPUs, while the CPU ranks in the 85th percentile. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1,184 places it near legacy parts like the ATI Radeon HD 5770 (1,190), which constrains overall gaming performance.

Q: What frame rate can I expect at 1080p with Medium settings?

A: The measured data shows 113 FPS average at 1920x1080 with Medium settings, with a minimum of 96 FPS and maximum of 130 FPS. This is the highest settings level that maintains a triple-digit average frame rate at 1080p.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the bottleneck in this system?

A: The GPU is the clear bottleneck. The CPU's average benchmark score of 36,945 is in the 85th percentile, while the GPU's 1,184 score is in the 5th percentile. The frame rate drops from 141 FPS at 1080p Low to 67 FPS at 1080p Ultra confirm that the GPU limits performance as settings increase.

Q: How does this combo perform at 4K resolution?

A: At 3840x2160, the combo achieves 64 FPS on Low settings, 51 FPS on Medium, 32 FPS on High, and 30 FPS on Ultra. The Medium setting shows a minimum of 43 FPS and maximum of 59 FPS, indicating playable but not smooth performance at this resolution.

Q: What is the CPU's performance relative to its closest rivals?

A: The Ryzen 5 5600F scores 36,945 on average, essentially tied with the Intel Core Ultra 5 225 (36,938, 0% delta), the AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D (37,018, -0.2%), the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 (37,093, -0.4%), and the Intel Core i9-12900T (37,112, -0.5%).

Q: Does the GPU support modern graphics APIs needed for this game?

A: Yes, the Intel Arc B370 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. These APIs are more than sufficient for Inside, which was released in 2016 and does not require the latest rendering features.

Resolution Scaling

The measured frame rates show how performance degrades as resolution increases, revealing the GPU-bound nature of this system. At Low settings, the average FPS drops from 141 at 1080p to 101 at 1440p and 64 at 4K. That represents a 28% decrease from 1080p to 1440p, and a further 37% decrease from 1440p to 4K. The total drop from 1080p Low to 4K Low is 77 FPS, or roughly 55% of the 1080p performance.

At Medium settings, the averages are 113 FPS at 1080p, 81 FPS at 1440p, and 51 FPS at 4K. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p is a 32 FPS drop (28%), and from 1440p to 4K is a 30 FPS drop (37%). The minimum and maximum values at Medium show consistent scaling: 96-130 FPS at 1080p, 69-93 FPS at 1440p, and 43-59 FPS at 4K. The frame pacing appears stable, with no extreme outliers in the measured range.

High settings show 70 FPS at 1080p, 51 FPS at 1440p, and 32 FPS at 4K. The drop from 1080p to 1440p is 19 FPS (27%), and from 1440p to 4K is 19 FPS (37%). Ultra settings produce 67 FPS at 1080p, 48 FPS at 1440p, and 30 FPS at 4K, with similar percentage drops. Across all settings, the consistent ~27-37% reductions per resolution step confirm that the GPU's fill rate and memory bandwidth are the limiting factors, not the CPU. The CPU's capabilities are far beyond what this game demands at any resolution.

The percentage scaling pattern is remarkably consistent regardless of settings, which indicates a uniform GPU bottleneck. If the CPU were limiting, lower resolutions would show smaller performance gaps relative to higher ones, but the data shows proportional drops at every settings level.

Settings Recommendations

The optimal settings for this combo depend on the target resolution and desired frame rate. At 1080p, Medium settings provide 113 FPS average with a minimum of 96 FPS, which is the best balance of visual quality and smoothness. The Low preset offers 141 FPS, but the visual fidelity loss is substantial for only a 28 FPS gain. The High preset at 70 FPS and Ultra at 67 FPS are both playable, but the frame rate drops below the 100 FPS threshold that many players prefer for responsive gameplay.

At 1440p, Medium settings deliver 81 FPS average with a minimum of 69 FPS, which remains playable for a puzzle platformer. The Low preset at 101 FPS is smoother, but Medium provides a significantly better visual experience at a still-acceptable frame rate. High settings at 51 FPS and Ultra at 48 FPS are borderline, with frame rates dipping into the 40s during demanding scenes, which could feel less responsive.

At 4K, the Medium preset at 51 FPS average (43 FPS minimum) is the highest settings level that maintains a playable frame rate. The Low preset at 64 FPS is smoother, while High at 32 FPS and Ultra at 30 FPS are below the threshold for comfortable gameplay, especially in a game that requires precise timing for puzzle mechanics. The measured data indicates that Medium is the recommended setting for 4K, provided the player accepts the visual compromises of the medium-quality presets.

Across all resolutions, Medium represents the sweet spot for this hardware combination. It offers the highest settings level that consistently stays above 50 FPS at 4K, above 80 FPS at 1440p, and above 110 FPS at 1080p. Players prioritizing frame rate over visuals can drop to Low for a substantial performance boost, while those wanting maximum visual quality will find High and Ultra playable only at 1080p.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combo produces its best results. Low settings yield 141 FPS average, Medium yields 113 FPS with a minimum of 96 and maximum of 130, High yields 70 FPS, and Ultra yields 67 FPS. The gap between Low and Medium is 28 FPS, while the gap between Medium and High is 43 FPS, showing a steep drop when transitioning from Medium to High. The difference between High and Ultra is only 3 FPS, indicating that the Ultra preset adds little graphical benefit relative to its performance cost.

At 2560x1440, Low settings deliver 101 FPS average, Medium delivers 81 FPS with a minimum of 69 and maximum of 93, High delivers 51 FPS, and Ultra delivers 48 FPS. The performance pattern mirrors 1080p, with Medium offering the best balance. The drop from Low to Medium is 20 FPS, from Medium to High is 30 FPS, and from High to Ultra is 3 FPS. The 1440p results show a consistent ~28% reduction from 1080p at each settings level.

At 3840x2160, Low settings produce 64 FPS average, Medium produces 51 FPS with a minimum of 43 and maximum of 59, High produces 32 FPS, and Ultra produces 30 FPS. The drop from Low to Medium is 13 FPS, from Medium to High is 19 FPS, and from High to Ultra is 2 FPS. At 4K, only Low and Medium exceed 50 FPS average, while High and Ultra both fall below 33 FPS, making them unsuitable for smooth gameplay.

The full data set shows a consistent pattern: Medium settings provide the highest frame rate that remains above 50 FPS at all resolutions, and the step from Medium to High incurs a significant performance penalty at every resolution. The Ultra preset consistently delivers only 2-3 FPS less than High, suggesting it is not worth the additional graphical load. The measured minimum and maximum values at Medium settings show tight frame pacing, with the 1080p range spanning 34 FPS (96-130), the 1440p range spanning 24 FPS (69-93), and the 4K range spanning 16 FPS (43-59). This narrowing range at higher resolutions indicates the GPU is increasingly saturated, reducing the variance in frame delivery.