Inside

Inside

AVERAGE FPS
134
excellent

This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 134 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 64 69 108 131
1440p QHD 98 106 171 181
1080p Full HD 138 149 186 204

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 131
3840x2160 Medium 108
3840x2160 High 69
3840x2160 Ultra 64
2560x1440 Low 181
2560x1440 Medium 171
2560x1440 High 106
2560x1440 Ultra 98
1920x1080 Low 204
1920x1080 Medium 186
1920x1080 High 149
1920x1080 Ultra 138

Inside with AMD Ryzen 5 2600 + AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT, In-Depth Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 2600 and AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT combination delivers a decisive performance advantage in Inside, placing this pairing at rank 1307 out of 1671 tested combos. The data shows a system that is heavily GPU-limited at higher settings, yet capable of extreme frame rates that far exceed the requirements of this puzzle platformer. This analysis breaks down the specific roles of the CPU and GPU, the measured performance across resolutions, and the optimal settings for this hardware.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The AMD Ryzen 5 2600 is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen architecture, operating at a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 3.90 GHz. With a TDP of 65 W and support for DDR4 memory on the AMD Socket AM4 platform, it represents a solid mid-range foundation. Its benchmark scores, such as a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 11186 and a single-core score of 1579, place it in the 77th percentile of all CPUs. This indicates that while it is not a top-tier processor, it holds its own against a wide range of alternatives.

The CPU's role in Inside is not a bottleneck. The game is a 2D side-scrolling puzzle platformer, a genre that typically does not stress multi-core processors heavily. The Ryzen 5 2600's 12 threads provide ample headroom for game logic and physics, even at high frame rates. The data confirms this: at 1080p with Low settings, the system achieves an average of 204.4 FPS. This high frame rate is a strong indicator that the CPU is keeping up with the GPU's output, as a processor bottleneck would typically cap frame rates at a lower level, regardless of graphics settings.

Comparing the Ryzen 5 2600 to its closest rivals, its average benchmark score of 19616 is nearly identical to the Intel Core i5-1345U (19691, deltaPct -0.4) and the AMD Ryzen 5 7530U (19508, deltaPct 0.6). It is also within a fraction of a percent of the Intel Core i5-11600KF (19740, deltaPct -0.6) and Intel Core i7-10700F (19485, deltaPct 0.7). This places the 2600 in a performance bracket where it is effectively tied with these other processors, meaning any differences in Inside’s frame rates are far more attributable to the graphics card than to the CPU. The benchmark results indicate that the processor's single-thread performance, while not exceptional by modern standards, is more than adequate for the demands of this specific title.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT is the dominant component in this pairing. It is based on the RDNA 3.0 architecture with a Navi 33 chip, manufactured on a 6 nm process. It features a substantial 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s. With a boost clock of 2755 MHz and a game clock of 2470 MHz, it is a capable performer, and its benchmark scores, including a Passmark G3D score of 17132, place it in the 63rd percentile of all GPUs.

The GPU's massive 16 GB VRAM buffer is a key feature. For a game like Inside, which is not graphically intensive, this amount of memory is far more than is required at any of the tested settings. This means there is no risk of texture or asset loading bottlenecks. The GPU's raw compute power, measured at 22.57 TFLOPS FP32, is what drives the frame rates. The data shows that the GPU is the primary factor in performance scaling. For instance, the frame rate difference between 1080p and 4K at the same settings is substantial, which is a classic sign of a GPU-bound workload.

When compared to its nearest rivals, the RX 7600 XT's average benchmark score of 20146 is virtually identical to the AMD Radeon RX 460 (20088, deltaPct 0.3) and the AMD Radeon RX 7600 (20258, deltaPct -0.6). It also sits close to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER (19774, deltaPct 1.9) and RTX 3070 Mobile (20534, deltaPct -1.9). This suggests that in terms of raw benchmark scores, the RX 7600 XT is in a tight competitive cluster. However, in the context of Inside, the data shows that this GPU is powerful enough to push frame rates to very high levels, often exceeding 100 FPS, even at demanding 4K resolutions with medium settings.

FAQ

*Q: Is the AMD Ryzen 5 2600 a bottleneck for the RX 7600 XT in Inside?*

A: No. The data shows that frame rates scale significantly with resolution and settings, a hallmark of a GPU-bound scenario. At 1080p Low, the system hits 204.4 FPS, and at 4K Ultra, it drops to 63.8 FPS. This scaling indicates the CPU is not limiting performance.

Q: How much VRAM does the RX 7600 XT have, and is it needed for this game?

A: The RX 7600 XT has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory. For Inside, this is more than sufficient. The game runs at high frame rates at all tested settings, and the large memory buffer prevents any potential texture-related stuttering, even at 4K.

*Q: What is the best resolution to play Inside with this hardware?*

A: The data shows that the system can handle 4K well. At 4K High settings, it achieves an average of 68.9 FPS, which is playable. For higher refresh rates, 1440p is excellent, with the High preset hitting 105.9 FPS and the Low preset reaching 181.3 FPS.

Q: Is there a significant performance difference between the Low and Ultra presets?

A: Yes, the impact is substantial. At 1080p, the average frame rate drops from 204.4 FPS on Low to 138.4 FPS on Ultra. This represents a clear performance cost for the highest visual quality settings.

Q: How does this combo rank compared to other tested systems?

A: This pairing ranks 1307 out of 1671 tested combos. While this might seem low, it is important to note that this is a relative rank against all possible combinations. The absolute performance in Inside is very high, with even the most demanding 4K Ultra preset producing a playable 63.8 FPS average.

Q: What is the processor's single-thread performance like?

A: The Ryzen 5 2600 has a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1579. This is sufficient for Inside, as the game's engine does not appear to be heavily reliant on a single fast core, given the high frame rates achieved in the tests.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the AMD Ryzen 5 2600 and the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT is positioned at rank 1307 out of 1671 tested combos in Inside. This rank of 1307 puts this system in the lower half of the tested configurations. It is crucial to interpret this ranking correctly. The rank is against all other CPU/GPU pairings in the database, many of which will include far more powerful and expensive components. In absolute terms, the performance of this combo is excellent.

The data shows that this pairing is capable of producing very high frame rates. At 1080p, it never drops below 138.4 FPS on the Ultra preset, and at 1440p, it maintains an average of over 97 FPS on the same settings. Even at 4K, the system delivers a smooth experience on High settings (68.9 FPS). The rank of 1307 is a reflection of the relative position against the entire database, not a measure of the experience in this specific game. For a puzzle platformer like Inside, this level of performance is far beyond what is required for a fluid and responsive experience, making the specific rank less relevant than the absolute frame rates.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings for the AMD Ryzen 5 2600 and RX 7600 XT depend on the target resolution and refresh rate. For users with a 4K display, the High preset is the recommended choice. It delivers an average of 68.9 FPS, which is comfortably within the range for smooth gameplay. The Ultra preset at 4K drops to 63.8 FPS, which is still playable but offers a diminishing return in visual fidelity for a noticeable performance hit.

For 1440p displays, the High preset is again the sweet spot, providing an average of 105.9 FPS. This is ideal for 100 Hz or 144 Hz monitors. The Medium preset at 1440p offers a significant boost to 170.6 FPS, which can be used for very high refresh rate displays, but the visual difference between Medium and High is often more noticeable than the frame rate gain. At 1080p, the Ultra preset is perfectly viable, achieving 138.4 FPS. However, for competitive or high-refresh-rate play, the Medium preset at 186.4 FPS or Low at 204.4 FPS will maximize smoothness. The data suggests that High is the best overall balance of visual quality and performance across all resolutions.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured frame rates show a clear and consistent scaling pattern across resolutions and settings. At 1920x1080, the system is extremely fast. The Ultra preset averages 138.4 FPS, while High increases to 148.9 FPS. Medium jumps to 186.4 FPS, and Low reaches the highest average of 204.4 FPS.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance remains high. The Ultra preset averages 97.6 FPS, and High achieves 105.9 FPS. There is a substantial leap to Medium at 170.6 FPS, and Low is the top performer at 181.3 FPS. At 3840x2160, the GPU begins to show its workload. The Ultra preset produces an average of 63.8 FPS, while High improves this to 68.9 FPS. The Medium preset is significantly faster at 107.5 FPS, and Low doubles the Ultra performance to 131.1 FPS. The data indicates that the step from High to Ultra is consistently the most expensive, while the jump from Medium to Low is less impactful, suggesting that the Ultra preset includes particularly demanding effects.

Resolution Scaling

The scaling of performance from 1080p to 4K reveals the limiting component. At High settings, the average frame rate drops from 148.9 FPS at 1080p to 105.9 FPS at 1440p, a decrease of 43 FPS. From 1440p to 4K, it drops further to 68.9 FPS, a decrease of 37 FPS. This consistent and substantial drop with increasing resolution is a clear indicator that the GPU is the primary limiting factor.

At Low settings, the scaling is even more pronounced: 204.4 FPS at 1080p drops to 181.3 FPS at 1440p and then to 131.1 FPS at 4K. The fact that the frame rate continues to fall as resolution increases, even with the lowest settings, confirms that the RX 7600 XT's rendering pipeline is the bottleneck. If the CPU were the limiting factor, the frame rates would remain relatively flat across resolutions, as the CPU workload does not change significantly with resolution. The data shows a strong inverse relationship between frame rate and pixel count, which is the definitive signature of a GPU-bound system. Therefore, the RX 7600 XT is the component determining the performance ceiling for this pairing in Inside.

Hardware Specifications

AMD Ryzen 5 2600

Cores / Threads 6 / 12
Base Clock 3400 MHz
Boost Clock 3900 MHz
TDP 65W
Socket AMD Socket AM4
View Full CPU Details →

AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT

VRAM 16 GB GDDR6
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2755 MHz MHz
TDP 190 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 2600 + AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT in Inside

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 131.1
3840x2160 Medium 107.5
3840x2160 High 68.9
3840x2160 Ultra 63.8
2560x1440 Low 181.3
2560x1440 Medium 170.6
2560x1440 High 105.9
2560x1440 Ultra 97.6
1920x1080 Low 204.4
1920x1080 Medium 186.4
1920x1080 High 148.9
1920x1080 Ultra 138.4

Inside with Ryzen 5 2600 + Other GPUs

See how Inside performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Inside with RX 7600 XT + Other CPUs

See how Inside performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with Ryzen 5 2600 + RX 7600 XT

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.