Hitman 2

The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile combination delivers a playable, if not flawless, experience in Hitman 2, with performance that scales predictably across resolutions and settings. The data shows a system that is clearly capable of high refresh rates at 1080p, but which begins to show its limits at 4K with higher graphical presets.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H is a 16-core, 22-thread mobile processor based on the Meteor Lake architecture, built on Intel's 7 nm process. It features a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, with a TDP of 28 W. The CPU's cache hierarchy includes 112 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The processor also supports DDR5 memory via a dual-channel bus, offering a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. In synthetic benchmarks, the 155H scores 15,028 points in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 1,743 points in single-core, placing it in the 83rd percentile of all tested CPUs.

In Hitman 2, a stealth title that relies on complex AI, physics, and large, dynamic crowds, the CPU's role is significant. The game’s simulation load benefits from the 155H’s high thread count, but the single-core performance is often the more critical factor for frame pacing. The benchmark results suggest the 155H is more than sufficient to feed the RTX 5080 Mobile at lower resolutions. At 1080p, the average FPS at Low settings is 233, which is far beyond the refresh rate of most displays, indicating that the CPU is not a bottleneck in this scenario. However, the data does not provide direct CPU utilization metrics, so the exact headroom is inferred from the frame rate scaling.

When comparing the 155H to its nearest rivals, the data shows it is competitive but not dominant. The Intel Core i5-14600T scores 32,707 in the average benchmark, which is a 0% delta from the 155H’s 32,697 average score. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 is 0.1% slower, and the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F is 0.2% faster. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H leads this group with a 0.4% advantage. These differences are negligible in real-world gaming, meaning the 155H’s performance in Hitman 2 should be representative of this performance tier. The CPU's strong multi-threaded scores, such as the 24,873 in Passmark multithread and 87,670 in integer math, suggest it handles the game’s background simulation tasks without stutter, allowing the GPU to focus on rendering.

FAQ — 4-6 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Q: What is the average frame rate at 1080p with Medium settings?

A: The measured data shows an average of 175 FPS at 1920x1080 with Medium settings. The frame rate ranges from a minimum of 148 FPS to a maximum of 201 FPS, indicating smooth performance with no major dips.

Q: How does the RTX 5080 Mobile compare to the RTX 4080 Mobile in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The RTX 5080 Mobile has an average benchmark score of 38,349, while the RTX 4080 Mobile scores 38,135. The deltaPct is 0.6%, meaning the RTX 5080 Mobile is just 0.6% faster in this aggregate metric. The performance difference is essentially negligible.

Q: Is the combo bottlenecked by the GPU at 4K Ultra settings?

A: Yes, the data strongly suggests a GPU bottleneck. At 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, the average FPS drops to 33. In contrast, at the same resolution with Low settings, the average is 79 FPS. This significant drop across settings points to the GPU being the limiting factor at higher resolutions and presets.

Q: What is the best resolution for a 60 FPS experience on High settings?

A: According to the measured data, 2560x1440 with High settings yields an average of 84 FPS. At 4K with High settings, the average falls to 45 FPS. Therefore, 1440p is the appropriate choice for maintaining a frame rate well above 60 FPS at High settings.

Q: How does the CPU's single-core performance compare to its multi-core performance in relation to this game?

A: The CPU scores 1,743 in Cinebench R23 single-core and 15,028 in multi-core. Given that the frame rate at 1080p Low (233 FPS) is much higher than at 4K Ultra (33 FPS), the game is clearly not CPU-bound at lower resolutions. The high single-core score helps maintain high minimum frame rates, as seen in the Medium preset data, but it is not the limiting factor in this configuration.

Q: What is the combo's ranking among all tested systems for this game?

A: The combo ranks 1026 out of 3711 tested combinations for Hitman 2. This places it in the top 27.6% of all tested combos, indicating a solidly above-average performance level.

How This Combo Ranks

The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H and RTX 5080 Mobile combination ranks 1026th out of 3711 tested combos in Hitman 2. This percentile placement of roughly 72% (meaning it is faster than 72% of tested systems) shows a strong, but not elite, standing. The ranking reflects a balance between the CPU and GPU that is well-suited for this title. The high 1080p frame rates suggest that the combo is capable of delivering a competitive esports-like experience, but the 4K Ultra result of 33 FPS shows it is not a top-tier 4K system.

The data indicates that the combo’s performance is more dependent on the GPU than the CPU. The synthetic benchmarks for the RTX 5080 Mobile show it is 0.6% faster than the RTX 4080 Mobile, and 0.1% faster than the MX570, though the latter is a significantly different product tier. The CPU’s rivals are within a 0.4% delta, meaning the 155H is not providing a distinct advantage or disadvantage. In Hitman 2, this translates to a system that is consistently fast but never at the absolute top of the charts. The rank of 1026 is a clear indicator that while this is a high-end mobile configuration, there are many other tested combos that offer superior performance, particularly at 4K.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive view of the combo's performance across three resolutions and four settings levels. At 1920x1080, the combo excels. The Low preset yields an average of 233 FPS. Medium settings provide 175 FPS, with a minimum of 148 and a maximum of 201. High settings reduce the average to 132 FPS, while the Ultra preset still manages a smooth 97 FPS. These numbers indicate that at 1080p, the system has substantial headroom, and even Ultra settings will be fluid on a high refresh rate display.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance remains strong but shows the expected decline. The Low preset averages 149 FPS, which is still excellent for competitive play. Medium settings deliver 112 FPS (min 95, max 128), and High settings provide 84 FPS. The Ultra preset drops to an average of 62 FPS, which is right at the threshold for a 60 Hz display. The data shows that 1440p Ultra is playable, but users seeking higher frame rates should use High settings.

At 3840x2160, the GPU begins to struggle with the higher workload. The Low preset averages 79 FPS, which is playable but not ideal for fast-paced action. Medium settings drop to 60 FPS (min 51, max 68), which is acceptable for a single-player stealth game. High settings fall to 45 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS target. The Ultra preset yields just 33 FPS, indicating a poor experience. The data shows a clear progression: 4K is only viable at Low or Medium settings, while 1080p and 1440p are the sweet spots for this combo.

Resolution Scaling

The resolution scaling data reveals a significant drop in performance as resolution increases, which highlights the GPU as the primary limiting component. From 1080p to 1440p, the average FPS at High settings drops from 132 to 84, a 36% reduction. From 1440p to 4K, the average FPS falls from 84 to 45, a 46% reduction. The total drop from 1080p to 4K is from 132 FPS to 45 FPS, a 66% decrease. This pattern is consistent across all settings.

The scaling is not linear, and the frame rate drops become more pronounced at higher resolutions. For instance, at Low settings, the transition from 1080p to 1440p sees a drop from 233 to 149 FPS (36%), and from 1440p to 4K, the drop is from 149 to 79 FPS (47%). The similar percentage drops across settings suggest that the GPU is the bottleneck, as the CPU's workload does not change significantly with resolution. If the CPU were the limiting factor, the frame rates would be more consistent across resolutions, particularly at lower settings. The data clearly shows that the RTX 5080 Mobile is being pushed to its limits at 4K, while the CPU has ample capacity to handle the game's simulation at all tested resolutions.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured data, the optimal settings for this combo depend on the user's display and performance goals. For users with a 1080p display, the Ultra preset is the best choice. The 97 FPS average provides a smooth experience, and the visual fidelity is maximized. For 1440p displays, the High preset is recommended. The 84 FPS average is well above the 60 FPS threshold, and the visual quality is excellent. Using the Ultra preset at 1440p would yield 62 FPS, which is playable, but High offers a better balance of image quality and performance.

For 4K displays, the situation is more nuanced. The Medium preset provides an average of 60 FPS, which is the minimum for a acceptable experience. The Low preset offers 79 FPS, which is smoother but with reduced visual quality. The data suggests that Medium is the best choice for 4K, as it provides a playable frame rate while retaining more visual detail than Low. The High and Ultra presets are not recommended for 4K, as they result in average frame rates below 60 FPS.

In summary, the best experience is achieved by matching the settings to the resolution. For 1080p, use Ultra. For 1440p, use High. For 4K, use Medium. This approach ensures that the game runs at or above 60 FPS in most cases, while providing the highest possible visual quality that the hardware can support at that resolution.