Hard West
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 73 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 26 | 30 | 41 | 47 |
| 1440p QHD | 48 | 60 | 78 | 97 |
| 1080p Full HD | 73 | 96 | 126 | 150 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Hard West with Intel Core i5-14600K + Intel Arc B580, In-Depth Analysis
The Intel Core i5-14600K and Intel Arc B580 pairing delivers a solid, though not top-tier, experience in Hard West, a turn-based tactics title from 2015. The combination ranks in the lower portion of the database, at position 1316 out of 1699 tested combos, indicating that while this setup is far from the fastest available, it provides a stable baseline for the game's mechanics. The data shows a clear performance hierarchy across resolutions and settings, with the system's capabilities best expressed at 1440p and below.
CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results
The Intel Core i5-14600K is a 14-core, 20-thread processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture. It operates with a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz, which are substantial figures for a desktop part. The CPU's 24 MB of shared L3 cache and dual-channel memory support for DDR4 and DDR5 further bolster its capacity to handle game logic and unit AI. In Hard West, which is a turn-based tactics game rather than a fast-twitch shooter, the CPU's role is primarily to manage the simulation of enemy turns, pathfinding, and environmental interactions. The high boost clock is particularly relevant here, as turn-based games often have moments of intense single-threaded computation when calculating actions for multiple units on the map.
Benchmark results for the i5-14600K show a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32881 and a single-core score of 4642, alongside a Geekbench single-core score of 2803. These scores place the CPU in the 93rd percentile against all processors, signaling that it is a high-end part. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X, has an average benchmark score that is just 0.2% higher, making the performance difference virtually negligible in synthetic tests. In the context of Hard West, this level of CPU performance is unlikely to be a bottleneck at any resolution. The game's turn-based nature means that even at lower graphical settings, the processor has ample headroom to maintain frame pacing, as evidenced by the FPS figures remaining high when GPU load decreases. The 125W TDP and Intel Socket 1700 compatibility are standard for this generation, but the raw computational power ensures that the CPU is a stable foundation for the GPU to build upon.
GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results
The Intel Arc B580 is the primary graphics processor in this configuration, featuring 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 456.0 GB/s. The GPU's base and boost clocks are both set at 2670 MHz, with memory running at an effective speed of 19 Gbps. Built on the Xe2-HPG architecture with 2560 shading units and 80 ROPs, the B580 is designed to handle modern rendering workloads. For Hard West, a game released in 2015, the GPU has more than enough raw power to push high frame rates, but the data shows that performance scales significantly with settings and resolution, highlighting the GPU as the limiting component in more demanding scenarios.
The Arc B580's benchmark scores, such as a Passmark G3D score of 15748 and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 109672, place it in the 66th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060, has an average score that is only 0.7% higher, indicating that the B580 is competitive with mainstream options from the previous generation. In Hard West, the GPU's 12 GB VRAM is more than sufficient for the game's textures and effects, even at 4K Ultra settings, where the average FPS drops to 26. The GPU's memory bandwidth and clock speeds are adequate for the game's demands, but the performance drop from 1080p to 4K shows that the B580's compute capabilities are stretched at higher resolutions, particularly with Ultra settings enabled.
How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos
According to the database, this specific combination of the Intel Core i5-14600K and Intel Arc B580 ranks 1316 out of 1699 tested combos in Hard West. This position places it in the bottom 23% of all configurations, which is a notable finding given the individual components' strong benchmark standings. The rank suggests that while the CPU and GPU are each capable parts, their pairing does not yield top-tier performance in this particular title. This could be due to the game's age and its optimization, which may not fully utilize the Arc B580's architecture, or it could reflect the overall competition from higher-end GPUs and CPUs that are included in the database.
The combo rank is a relative measure, and the data shows that the system is capable of playable frame rates, but it is not a leader. For context, the CPU alone is in the 93rd percentile, and the GPU is in the 66th percentile, yet the combined rank is lower than either individual percentile. This discrepancy highlights that in Hard West, the GPU is the primary driver of performance, and the B580's mid-range standing pulls the combo down relative to systems with higher-tier graphics cards. The rank of 1316 means that there are 383 other combinations that perform better, which is a significant number, but it does not make the system unusable; it simply indicates that for competitive frame rates at high settings, users would need to look at more powerful GPU options.
Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers
The measured FPS data provides a clear picture of how the system performs across different resolutions and quality settings. At 1920x1080, the lowest resolution tested, the system achieves its best results. With Low settings, the average FPS is 150, which is exceptionally smooth and indicates that the CPU and GPU have plenty of headroom. Moving to Medium settings, the average FPS drops to 125.9, still well above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay. High settings yield an average of 95.8 FPS, while Ultra settings bring the average down to 72.6 FPS. These numbers show that at 1080p, the system can handle even the most demanding settings without dropping below playable levels.
At 2560x1440, the performance scales down as expected. Low settings deliver an average of 97.2 FPS, which is still very smooth. Medium settings produce 78.4 FPS, and High settings achieve 59.8 FPS, just shy of the 60 FPS mark. Ultra settings at 1440p result in an average of 48.2 FPS, which is playable but not ideal for fast-paced action, though Hard West's turn-based nature makes this acceptable. The step up to 3840x2160 (4K) shows a more significant drop. At 4K Low settings, the average FPS is 47.4, which is still usable. Medium settings yield 41 FPS, while High settings drop to 30.2 FPS. Ultra settings at 4K bring the average down to 26 FPS, which is below the threshold for smooth gameplay and indicates that the GPU is struggling to keep up with the pixel count. These figures demonstrate a consistent pattern: the system is best suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, with 4K reserved for lower settings.
Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component
The resolution scaling data reveals a clear trend in performance degradation. Moving from 1080p to 1440p at High settings, the average FPS drops from 95.8 to 59.8, a decrease of approximately 37.6%. The drop from 1440p to 4K at High settings is even steeper, from 59.8 to 30.2 FPS, a reduction of roughly 49.5%. This pattern indicates that the GPU is the limiting component, as the frame rate decreases disproportionately with the increase in pixel count. At 1080p, the CPU has enough power to feed the GPU, resulting in high frame rates, but as the resolution increases, the GPU's workload becomes the bottleneck.
The scaling from Low to Ultra settings at each resolution further confirms this. At 1080p, the difference between Low (150 FPS) and Ultra (72.6 FPS) is significant, showing that the GPU's shading units and ROPs are being taxed by the higher quality presets. At 4K, the difference between Low (47.4 FPS) and Ultra (26 FPS) is similarly large, but the absolute numbers are much lower, reinforcing that the GPU is struggling to maintain performance at higher resolutions. The data suggests that for a game like Hard West, which is not graphically intensive by modern standards, the Arc B580's mid-range architecture is the primary factor limiting performance at 4K, while the i5-14600K provides ample support without bottlenecking the system at lower resolutions. Users seeking higher frame rates at 4K would need to reduce settings to Low or Medium, while 1440p High settings offer a balanced experience.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core i5-14600K
Intel Arc B580
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core i5-14600K + Intel Arc B580 in Hard West
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 47.4 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 41.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 30.2 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 26.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 97.2 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 78.4 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 59.8 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 48.2 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 150.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 125.9 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 95.8 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 72.6 |
Hard West with ii5-14600K + Other GPUs
See how Hard West performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Hard West with Arc B580 + Other CPUs
See how Hard West performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with ii5-14600K + Arc B580
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.