Greedfall
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 81 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 29 | 46 | 51 | 64 |
| 1440p QHD | 49 | 77 | 85 | 108 |
| 1080p Full HD | 71 | 111 | 122 | 156 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Greedfall with Intel Core Ultra X7 368H + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060, In-Depth Analysis
Greedfall, a 2019 Action RPG, presents a demanding workload for mobile hardware. This analysis examines the measured performance of the Intel Core Ultra X7 368H paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060, based exclusively on the provided benchmark data. The data reveals a configuration that is capable of high refresh rate gaming at 1080p but struggles to maintain playable frame rates at 4K with maximum settings. The following sections break down the performance characteristics, scaling behavior, and component roles based on the measured FPS rows.
Resolution Scaling
The measured FPS data shows a clear and predictable trend: performance degrades significantly as resolution increases from 1920x1080 to 3840x2160. This is the expected behavior for a GPU-bound scenario, where the number of pixels rendered becomes the dominant factor. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p and then to 4K is not linear, and the magnitude of the drop varies depending on the graphics preset.
At the High preset, the average frame rate falls from 111 FPS at 1920x1080 to 77 FPS at 2560x1440, a reduction of 34 FPS. Moving from 1440p to 4K, the average drops further from 77 FPS to 46 FPS, a 31 FPS decrease. This indicates that each step up in resolution imposes a substantial load on the GPU, with the 4K resolution proving to be particularly taxing. The transition from 1080p to 4K at High settings results in a total performance loss of 65 FPS, highlighting the extreme cost of rendering four times the pixels.
The Low preset shows a similar pattern. The average frame rate at 1920x1080 is 156 FPS, which drops to 108 FPS at 2560x1440 and then to 64 FPS at 3840x2160. While the absolute numbers are higher, the percentage drop between each resolution step is significant, demonstrating that the RTX 5060 is the limiting component even at the lowest quality settings. The scaling factor from 1080p to 4K is roughly 2.4x, which is close to the pixel count difference, suggesting that the GPU's fill rate and memory bandwidth are the primary constraints.
The Medium preset provides the only complete data set with min and max FPS values. At 1920x1080, the average is 122 FPS with a minimum of 104 FPS and a maximum of 141 FPS. At 2560x1440, the average drops to 85 FPS, with a minimum of 72 FPS and a maximum of 98 FPS. Finally, at 3840x2160, the average falls to 51 FPS, with a minimum of 43 FPS and a maximum of 58 FPS. The narrowing of the gap between min and max FPS at higher resolutions suggests that frame times become more consistent as the GPU becomes fully saturated, but the overall experience still suffers from lower average performance.
The data indicates that the 1080p resolution is where this combination excels, delivering high frame rates across all presets. The 1440p resolution is a viable option for High and Medium settings, but the 4K resolution is only playable at Low settings, with the Ultra preset being almost unplayable at 29 FPS. The scaling behavior clearly points to the GPU as the bottleneck, as the CPU's performance is not the limiting factor in these tests.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 is the central component in these benchmark results, and its characteristics directly explain the observed performance. The GPU features 8 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s. This memory configuration is a critical factor at higher resolutions and settings, where the demand for texture data and frame buffer space increases.
The VRAM capacity of 8 GB likely becomes a limiting factor at 4K Ultra settings, contributing to the low 29 FPS average. The combination of high-resolution textures and complex shading effects can exceed this capacity, forcing the GPU to manage memory more aggressively. The 448.0 GB/s bandwidth, while substantial, may also struggle to feed the GPU's 3840 shading units at 4K, which explains the steep performance drop from 1440p to 4K.
The GPU's clock speeds, with a base of 2280 MHz and a boost of 2497 MHz, are relatively high, allowing for strong performance at lower resolutions where the memory system is not the primary bottleneck. The 19.18 TFLOPS of FP32 compute power is sufficient to drive high frame rates at 1080p and 1440p, as evidenced by the measured results. However, the architecture's limits become apparent when the pixel workload increases.
The performance at 4K is telling. At High settings, the average FPS is 46, which is below the 60 FPS target for smooth gameplay. At Ultra settings, the average drops to 29 FPS, which is a significant compromise. This suggests that the RTX 5060 is not designed for native 4K gaming in demanding titles like Greedfall, and users should target lower resolutions for a better experience. The GPU's 72nd percentile ranking among all GPUs and its average benchmark score of 26331 place it as a mid-range performer, which is consistent with its observed gaming capabilities.
How This Combo Ranks
The combination of the Intel Core Ultra X7 368H and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 achieves a rank of 2454 out of 3703 tested combos for Greedfall. This places the configuration in the lower third of all tested systems, which is a somewhat surprising result given the individual component specifications. This ranking suggests that while the hardware is competent, many other combinations deliver higher frame rates in this specific game.
The rank is determined by the measured FPS across all tested settings and resolutions, and the data shows that this combo is held back by its performance at 4K. The relatively low score at 4K Ultra (29 FPS) and 4K High (46 FPS) likely drags down the overall ranking. A system that performs better at higher resolutions would rank higher, even if its 1080p performance is similar.
The combo's rank of 2454 out of 3703 means it outperforms roughly 34% of tested configurations. This is not a strong showing, and it indicates that other hardware combinations, possibly with more powerful GPUs or different CPU-GPU pairings, are better suited for Greedfall. The data suggests that the RTX 5060 is the limiting factor, as its performance ceiling is reached at 1440p, and the CPU's potential is not fully utilized at higher resolutions. This ranking is a key metric for users who prioritize 4K gaming, as it highlights the combo's weakness in that area.
FAQ
Q: What is the average frame rate at 1920x1080 with High settings?
A: The measured average FPS is 111 at 1920x1080 with the High preset.
Q: Is the 4K Ultra preset playable with this hardware?
A: The data shows an average FPS of 29 at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, which is below the generally accepted threshold for smooth, playable performance.
Q: How does the combo rank among all tested configurations for Greedfall?
A: It ranks 2454 out of 3703 tested combos, placing it in the lower third of all systems.
Q: What is the minimum FPS recorded at 2560x1440 with Medium settings?
A: The minimum FPS recorded at 2560x1440 with Medium settings is 72.
Q: Which resolution provides the highest average frame rate?
A: The highest average frame rate of 156 FPS is achieved at 1920x1080 with the Low preset.
Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth?
A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 has a memory bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s.
CPU Role
The Intel Core Ultra X7 368H is a 16-core, 16-thread processor from the Core Ultra Series 3, based on the Panther Lake architecture. It has a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. This is a high-core-count mobile CPU designed for multi-threaded workloads, and its benchmark scores reflect that. For example, it scores 28221 in Cinebench R23 multicore and 3984 in single-core, indicating strong multi-threaded and capable single-threaded performance.
In the context of Greedfall, the CPU's role is to feed the GPU with draw calls and handle game logic. The data suggests that the CPU is not the bottleneck at any resolution, as the frame rates scale consistently with the GPU load. At 1080p, where the GPU is less stressed, the CPU is able to deliver high frame rates, reaching 156 FPS at Low settings. This indicates that the CPU can handle the game's single-threaded and multi-threaded demands without limiting the GPU.
The CPU's 18 MB of shared L3 cache and dual-channel LPDDR5X memory support with 153.6 GB/s bandwidth provide adequate data throughput for the game. Its 87th percentile ranking among all CPUs and average benchmark score of 40518 show it is a top-tier mobile processor. The nearest rivals, such as the Intel Core 7 253PE and AMD Ryzen 9 7940H, have very similar average scores, with delta percentages of -0.1 and 0.2 respectively, confirming that the Ultra X7 368H is competitively positioned.
The fact that the combo ranks 2454 out of 3703, despite having a powerful CPU, reinforces the conclusion that the GPU is the limiting component. If the CPU were the bottleneck, we would expect to see less variation in FPS across different resolutions. Instead, the FPS drops significantly as resolution increases, which is a classic sign of GPU limitation. The CPU's high core count and clock speeds ensure it is not holding back the RTX 5060 in this game.
Settings Recommendations
Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings depend on the user's target resolution and desired frame rate. The data provides clear guidance on which presets are playable at each resolution.
For 1920x1080, all presets are playable. The Ultra preset delivers an average of 71 FPS, which is smooth, while the High preset offers 111 FPS, Medium 122 FPS, and Low 156 FPS. For the best balance of visual quality and performance, the High preset is recommended, as it provides a significant visual upgrade over Medium while maintaining a high frame rate. The Ultra preset is also viable for users who prioritize image quality over raw frame rate.
At 2560x1440, the choice is more constrained. The Ultra preset averages 49 FPS, which may be borderline for some users, and the High preset averages 77 FPS, which is a solid experience. The Medium preset averages 85 FPS, providing a good balance. For a smooth experience, the High or Medium presets are recommended, as they both maintain averages above 60 FPS. The Ultra preset should be avoided if a consistent 60 FPS is desired.
For 3840x2160, the options are limited. The Low preset averages 64 FPS, which is playable, while the Medium preset drops to 51 FPS and High falls to 46 FPS. The Ultra preset is not recommended, as it averages only 29 FPS. For 4K gaming, the Low preset is the only setting that provides a consistently playable experience. Users who wish to play at higher settings should consider lowering the resolution to 1440p.
In summary, the best experience per the measured rows is achieved at 1920x1080 with the High preset, offering a high frame rate with good visual fidelity. For 1440p, the Medium or High preset is recommended. At 4K, only the Low preset is advisable.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The following is a detailed breakdown of the measured average FPS for each resolution and settings combination.
1920x1080:
- Low: 156 FPS average.
- Medium: 122 FPS average, with a minimum of 104 FPS and a maximum of 141 FPS.
- High: 111 FPS average.
- Ultra: 71 FPS average.
2560x1440:
- Low: 108 FPS average.
- Medium: 85 FPS average, with a minimum of 72 FPS and a maximum of 98 FPS.
- High: 77 FPS average.
- Ultra: 49 FPS average.
3840x2160:
- Low: 64 FPS average.
- Medium: 51 FPS average, with a minimum of 43 FPS and a maximum of 58 FPS.
- High: 46 FPS average.
- Ultra: 29 FPS average.
The data shows a consistent pattern: the Low preset always yields the highest frame rate, followed by Medium, High, and then Ultra. The Medium preset is the only one with complete min and max FPS data, providing insight into frame time consistency. At 1080p, the minimum of 104 FPS at Medium settings indicates a stable experience, while at 4K, the minimum of 43 FPS shows more significant dips. This breakdown serves as a definitive reference for what users can expect from this hardware combination in Greedfall.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core Ultra X7 368H
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core Ultra X7 368H + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 in Greedfall
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 64.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 51.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 46.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 29.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 108.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 85.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 77.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 49.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 156.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 122.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 111.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 71.0 |
Greedfall with iUltra X7 368H + Other GPUs
See how Greedfall performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Greedfall with RTX 5060 + Other CPUs
See how Greedfall performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with iUltra X7 368H + RTX 5060
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.