Greedfall
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 87 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 31 | 49 | 54 | 69 |
| 1440p QHD | 53 | 83 | 91 | 116 |
| 1080p Full HD | 76 | 119 | 131 | 167 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Greedfall with Intel Core Ultra 7 165H + AMD Radeon 8060S, In-Depth Analysis
The Intel Core Ultra 7 165H paired with the AMD Radeon 8060S presents a compelling, if uneven, picture in Greedfall. The measured frame rates show a system that excels at 1080p and holds its own at 1440p, but the transition to 4K reveals a sharp performance cliff, particularly as settings climb. The data indicates a combination that is well-balanced for high-refresh-rate 1080p gaming, but which asks for careful settings management at higher resolutions to maintain playability.
Resolution Scaling
The frame rate deltas across resolutions are the clearest indicator of where the bottleneck lies in this system. Moving from 1920x1080 to 2560x1440, the average FPS at High settings drops from 119 to 83, a reduction of approximately 30%. This is a typical scaling factor for a GPU-bound scenario, but the subsequent drop from 1440p to 3840x2160 tells a more critical story. At 4K High, the average falls to 49 FPS, which is another 41% decrease from the 1440p figure. This steep decline is a hallmark of the GPU being pushed to its absolute limit, as the pixel count quadruples from 1080p, but the frame rate does not scale linearly.
The pattern is even more pronounced at Ultra settings. The 1080p Ultra average is 76 FPS, which is still very smooth. At 1440p Ultra, it drops to 53 FPS, and at 4K Ultra, it collapses to just 31 FPS. This 59% reduction from 1080p to 4K at Ultra settings shows that the Radeon 8060S, despite its high percentile ranking, cannot sustain the demands of Greedfall's maximum preset at high pixel densities. The data strongly suggests that the GPU is the primary limiting component at 4K. The CPU, with its 16 cores and 22 threads, is unlikely to be the constraint, as the frame rate drops follow a classic GPU-bound curve.
The scaling from Low to Ultra at each resolution further confirms this. At 1080p, the difference between Low (167 FPS) and Ultra (76 FPS) is substantial, showing headroom for visual fidelity. At 4K, the same settings span from 69 FPS to 31 FPS, a much narrower absolute range that indicates the GPU is saturated even at Low settings. The 4K Low result of 69 FPS being lower than the 1080p Ultra result of 76 FPS is a definitive sign that resolution is the dominant factor, and the integrated graphics are struggling to fill the massive number of pixels at 3840x2160.
FAQ
*Q: What is the best resolution for this CPU/GPU combo in Greedfall?*
A: Based on the measured FPS, 1920x1080 is the sweet spot. It achieves high average frame rates across all settings, from 76 FPS at Ultra to 167 FPS at Low, ensuring a consistently smooth experience. 2560x1440 is also viable, with averages ranging from 53 FPS at Ultra to 116 FPS at Low, but 4K requires significant settings compromises to stay above 60 FPS.
*Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming in Greedfall?*
A: Yes, but with caveats. At 4K with Low settings, the average FPS is 69, which is playable. At Medium, it drops to 54 FPS, and at High it's 49 FPS. The Ultra preset at 4K is the only configuration that falls below 30 FPS, averaging just 31 FPSikuha, which is not a smooth experience for an action RPG.
Q: How does the Ultra preset compare to High in terms of performance?
A: The performance cost of Ultra is steep. At 1080p, moving from High to Ultra reduces the average FPS from 119 to 76, a 36% performance penalty. At 1440p, it drops from 83 to 53 FPS, and at 4K, from 49 to 31 FPS. This indicates that the Ultra preset demands a significant amount of GPU headroom for its visual improvements.
Q: Is the Intel Core Ultra 7 165H a bottleneck for the AMD Radeon 8060S?
A: The benchmark data suggests the CPU is not the primary bottleneck in this game. The frame rates scale predictably with resolution and settings, which is characteristic of a GPU-limited scenario. The Ultra 7 165H, with a boost clock of 5.00 GHz and a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 14551, provides ample processing power. The 84th percentile ranking for all CPUs further indicates it is a strong performer, unlikely to hold back the GPU in Greedfall.
Q: What is the performance difference between Low and Medium settings?
A: The jump from Low to Medium is relatively modest. At 1080p, the average FPS goes from 167 to 131, a drop of about 22%. At 1440p, it goes from 116 to 91 FPS, and at 4K, it goes from 69 to 54 FPS. This suggests that Medium offers a significant visual upgrade over Low for a manageable performance cost.
Q: How does this combo rank compared to all other tested combinations?
A: For Greedfall, this specific combination of the Intel Core Ultra 7 165H and AMD Radeon 8060S ranks 2150 out of 3703 tested combos. The data is measured, and this places it in the lower half of all possible pairings, but this ranking is against all CPUs and GPUs, including high-end desktop parts. The GPU itself ranks in the 87th percentile of all GPUs, which is a more relevant metric for this game's performance.
CPU Role
The Intel Core Ultra 7 165H is a mobile processor built on Intel's Meteor Lake architecture. It features 16 cores and 22 threads, a configuration designed for heavy multi-threaded workloads. Its base clock is 3.80 GHz, which can boost up to 5.00 GHz, providing strong single-thread performance when needed. In the context of Greedfall, an Action RPG, the CPU's role is to handle game logic, AI, and physics, while the GPU renders the visuals. The measured frame rates, which show a clear GPU bottleneck at higher resolutions, indicate that this processor is more than capable of feeding the Radeon 8060S with data.
The CPU's benchmark scores support this conclusion. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 14551 and single-core score of 1759 are robust figures. The PassMark multi-thread score of 25933 and single-thread score of 3509 further demonstrate a balanced processor. The 84th percentile ranking against all CPUs places it in the upper echelon of processors, and its nearest rivals, such as the Intel Core Ultra 5 338H and AMD Ryzen 7 3700X, have nearly identical average benchmark scores, with deltas of 0.3% and -0.5%, respectively. This means the 165H is a very capable chip, and the low FPS numbers at 4K cannot be attributed to CPU limitations.
The fact that the FPS scales so consistently with resolution is the key evidence. If the CPU were the bottleneck, we would expect the frame rates at 1080p to be significantly lower and the scaling to be less pronounced. Instead, we see a clear GPU-bound curve. The 22 threads available in the Ultra 7 165H are far more than Greedfall would require, ensuring that even in busy scenes with many NPCs, the CPU is unlikely to be the limiting factor. The 24 MB of shared L3 cache also helps with data throughput, reducing potential stalls.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured data provides a clear picture of performance across a matrix of resolutions and settings. At 1920x1080, the system is exceptionally strong. With Low settings, it averages 167 FPS, making it more than sufficient for a high-refresh-rate monitor. Medium settings bring the average to 131 FPS, with a minimum of 112 FPS and a maximum of 151 FPS, showing excellent consistency. High settings average 119 FPS, which is still very smooth. Even the demanding Ultra preset maintains a 76 FPS average, ensuring a fluid experience without any major tweaks.
Moving to 2560x1440, performance remains respectable. Low settings yield an average of 116 FPS, which is still excellent. Medium settings drop to 91 FPS, with a min of 77 FPS and max of 105 FPS, keeping the experience above the 60 FPS threshold for most of the time. High settings average 83 FPS, which is very playable. The Ultra preset, however, falls to 53 FPS, which, while playable, begins to require a compromise between visual fidelity and smoothness for some players who prefer a locked 60 FPS.
The 3840x2160 results are where the system's limitations become evident. At Low settings, the average FPS is 69, which is just above the 60 FPS baseline. This is the only 4K setting that provides a comfortable experience. Medium settings drop to 54 FPS, with a minimum of 46 FPS, indicating some noticeable dips. High settings average 49 FPS, and the Ultra preset falls to a 31 FPS average, which is not a recommended configuration for an action game where timing is important. The data clearly shows that 4K gaming with this combo is only viable at Low settings, or perhaps Medium if the player can tolerate occasional frame drops.
Across all resolutions, the Medium preset shows the most consistent frame times, as evidenced by the min and max FPS data points. The difference between the min and max FPS at 1080p Medium is 39 FPS, at 1440p it's 28 FPS, and at 4K it's 16 FPS. This suggests that as the GPU becomes more stressed, the frame pacing becomes more consistent, albeit at a lower average, which is a typical characteristic of a GPU-bound workload.
How This Combo Ranks
In the overall ranking for Greedfall, this specific pairing of the Intel Core Ultra 7 165H and the AMD Radeon 8060S sits at position 2150 out of 3703 tested combos. This rank of 2150 places the combination in the bottom 42% of all tested systems. However, this metric is heavily influenced by the inclusion of many desktop-class components with dedicated high-end graphics cards. The context of this ranking is important; it is a holistic measure of all components, not just the GPU's gaming prowess.
The AMD Radeon 8060S itself is a high performer, ranking in the 87th percentile of all GPUs. Its average benchmark score of 55757 puts it in the same league as the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB, which is a delta of only 0.1% away. It even trades blows with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080, with a delta of -0.6%, and is 2.8% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080. This demonstrates that the integrated GPU is a serious piece of silicon, capable of competing with discrete mobile and even some desktop parts. The low combo rank is therefore not a reflection of the GPU's capability but rather the fact that it is an integrated part in a mobile system, which is often paired with lower-power CPUs in the overall database.
The CPU's rank of 84th percentile is also strong. The deltaPct values for its nearest rivals are all within a very tight band, from +0.3% to -0.5%, indicating that the Ultra 7 165H is a very well-rounded processor that performs at the level of a desktop Ryzen 7 3700X. The 2150 rank for the combo is likely dragged down by the fact that there are thousands of other combinations with more powerful desktop CPUs and GPUs. For a mobile platform, this ranking is actually quite respectable, and the measured game performance confirms that it is a capable gaming system.
Settings Recommendations
Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal experience for this system in Greedfall depends heavily on the target resolution. For 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is the best choice for players who prioritize visual quality, as it maintains a 76 FPS average, which is well within the smooth range. For those who want to push a high-refresh-rate display to its limit, the Low preset at 167 FPS is an option, but the Medium preset at 131 FPS offers a much better balance of visual fidelity and performance, with a minimum of 112 FPS ensuring no major hitches.
At 2560x1440, the High preset is the recommended starting point, yielding an 83 FPS average. This provides a good balance between image quality and fluidity. If a player wants to ensure a locked 60 FPS with more headroom, dropping to Medium (91 FPS) is a safe bet. The Ultra preset at 53 FPS is playable, but the lower average frame rate makes it less ideal for an action RPG where combat responsiveness is key)Skip it if you prefer a higher frame rate margin.
For 3840x2160, the choices are more constrained. The Low preset, with a 69 FPS average, is the only setting that delivers a consistently smooth experience. The Medium preset at 54 FPS is playable but may show occasional dips to 46 FPS, which could be noticeable in fast-paced scenes. The High and Ultra presets at 49 FPS and 31 FPS, respectively, are not recommended for a good experience. The data suggests that 4K gaming with this combo is only viable for players who are willing to sacrifice most graphical settings for playable frame rates)Skip the High and Ultra presets entirely at this resolution.
In summary, the best experience is to play at 1080p with Medium or High settings for a high frame rate, or at 1440p with High settings for a balance of detail and performance. The Ultra preset is best reserved for 1080p, where the system has enough overhead to handle it. At 4K, the only sensible choice is Low settings, with Medium as a compromise for those who can tolerate a sub-60 FPS experience. This combo is a strong 1080p and capable 1440p gaming solution, but it is not a 4K powerhouse.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core Ultra 7 165H
AMD Radeon 8060S
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core Ultra 7 165H + AMD Radeon 8060S in Greedfall
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 69.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 54.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 49.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 31.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 116.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 91.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 83.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 53.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 167.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 131.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 119.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 76.0 |
Greedfall with iUltra 7 165H + Other GPUs
See how Greedfall performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Greedfall with 8060S + Other CPUs
See how Greedfall performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with iUltra 7 165H + 8060S
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.