Greedfall

The Intel Core i5-13400F and AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT combination ranks 1088th out of 1705 tested combos for Greedfall, placing it in the lower-middle tier of the database. This ranking of 1088 out of 1705 puts the combo in the 36th percentile of all tested pairings, indicating that while it can run the game, many other configurations will deliver higher frame rates. The data shows a system that is fundamentally capable of smooth 1080p gameplay but struggles to maintain playable performance at 4K with high detail settings, making it a pairing best suited for 1080p or 1440p monitors.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo's rank of 1088 out of 1705 tested combinations for Greedfall is a clear signal of its mid-range positioning. This is not a top-tier setup for this title, but it is far from the bottom. The ranking reflects a balance between the CPU's strong multi-threaded capability and the GPU's modest performance ceiling in this specific game. Benchmark results indicate that the pairing is competitive with other mainstream configurations, but it lacks the headroom required for high-refresh-rate 4K gaming. The data suggests that the limiting factor in this combo is the GPU, as the CPU's benchmark scores are relatively strong compared to its rivals. The CPU's percentile vs all CPUs is 82, meaning it outperforms 82% of all processors, while the GPU's percentile is 72, indicating it outperforms 72% of all graphics cards. This discrepancy in relative strength is a key indicator that the GPU will be the primary bottleneck in demanding scenarios.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution to use with this combo for Greedfall?

A: The data shows that at 1920x1080, the combo achieves an average of 113 FPS on High settings, which is well above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay. At 2560x1440, the average drops to 80.4 FPS on High, still playable. At 3840x2160, the average falls to 49.3 FPS on High, which is below the ideal for fast-paced action.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The Intel Core i5-13400F has an average benchmark score of 25236. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-13620H, scores 25201, making the i5-13400F 0.1% faster. The AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3D scores 25365, which is 0.5% faster than the i5-13400F, while the AMD EPYC 9474F and AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 are 0.5% behind.

Q: Is the GPU's VRAM capacity a concern for Greedfall?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory. At 4K resolution with Ultra settings, the average FPS drops to 27.8, which suggests the GPU is severely strained. The data does not specify VRAM usage, but the significant performance drop at 4K Ultra indicates the memory capacity and bandwidth are likely a limiting factor at that extreme setting.

Q: What is the difference in performance between Low and Ultra settings at 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080, the average FPS on Low settings is 155.6, while on Ultra settings it is 74.1. This represents a 52% reduction in frame rate when moving from the lowest to the highest preset, showing that Ultra settings are particularly demanding on this GPU.

Q: How does the GPU's synthetic benchmark score compare to its rivals?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT has an average benchmark score of 29024. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 6800M, scores 29011, which is a 0% difference. The AMD Radeon RX 470 scores 28996, making the RX 6650 XT 0.1% faster, while the Intel Arc A370M and AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH are 0.5% and 0.6% behind, respectively.

Q: Can this combo handle 4K gaming in Greedfall?

A: The benchmark data shows that at 3840x2160, the combo achieves an average of 49.3 FPS on High settings. While this is technically playable, it is below the 60 FPS target for a smooth experience. On Ultra settings at 4K, the average drops to 27.8 FPS, which is not a viable gaming experience.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data shows a clear pattern of performance degradation as resolution increases, which is a strong indicator of the GPU being the primary bottleneck. At 1920x1080 with High settings, the combo produces an average of 113 FPS. Moving to 2560x1440, the average drops to 80.4 FPS, a 29% decrease. At 3840x2160, the average plummets to 49.3 FPS, a further 39% decrease from the 1440p result. This steep drop-off is characteristic of a GPU that is running out of processing power and memory bandwidth at higher pixel counts. The CPU is less likely to be the limiting factor here, as its performance relative to other CPUs is stronger. The scaling from 1080p to 4K shows a total FPS reduction of 56%, from 113 to 49.3, highlighting that the RX 6650 XT is not well-suited for 4K gaming in this title. The gap between Low and Ultra settings also widens at higher resolutions, indicating that the GPU's fill rate and compute capabilities are being taxed more heavily.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combo delivers its best results. On Low settings, the average FPS is 155.6, providing a highly responsive experience for competitive play. Medium settings yield 125 FPS, still excellent for high-refresh-rate monitors. High settings produce 113 FPS, which is the recommended balance of visual quality and performance. Ultra settings drop the average to 74.1 FPS, which is playable but shows a significant cost for the highest visual fidelity.

At 2560x1440, the performance is still respectable but begins to show the GPU's limitations. Low settings average 108.5 FPS, while Medium settings yield 86.7 FPS. High settings drop to 80.4 FPS, which is still above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay. Ultra settings average 51.1 FPS, which is below the ideal target and indicates that this resolution and setting combination is too demanding for consistent fluidity.

At 3840x2160, the combo struggles. Low settings average 64.4 FPS, which is barely playable. Medium settings drop to 51 FPS, and High settings to 49.3 FPS. Ultra settings are the worst, with an average of 27.8 FPS, making the game essentially unplayable at that quality level. The data shows that 4K gaming with this combo is only feasible on Low settings, and even then, the frame rate is not ideal.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT is the clear limiting factor in this combo for Greedfall. With 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, the memory bandwidth of 280.3 GB/s is a modest figure. The GPU's base clock is 2055 MHz, with a boost clock of 2635 MHz and a game clock of 2410 MHz. These clocks are relatively high for a mainstream card, but the underlying architecture, with 2048 shading units and 64 ROPs, has a finite pixel rate of 168.6 GPixel/s. The data shows that the GPU's performance in Greedfall is not sufficient to maintain high frame rates at 4K, especially on Ultra settings where the average FPS is 27.8. The GPU's benchmark percentile of 72 indicates it is a mid-tier performer. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 6800M, has an average score of 29011, which is essentially identical (0% difference). This suggests that in synthetic tests, the RX 6650 XT is on par with a mobile high-end GPU, but in real-world gaming, its 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit memory interface become a bottleneck at higher resolutions and settings.

CPU Role

The Intel Core i5-13400F provides a solid foundation for this combo, with its performance not being the primary constraint in Greedfall. The CPU has 10 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. Its 20 MB of shared L3 cache is a reasonable amount for gaming. The CPU's synthetic benchmark scores are strong, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21279 and a single-core score of 3004. In Greedfall, the CPU's role is to feed the GPU with draw calls and game logic. At 1080p, where the GPU has more headroom, the CPU is able to push the frame rate to 155.6 FPS on Low settings, indicating it is not holding back the system. The CPU's percentile vs all CPUs is 82, meaning it outperforms 82% of all processors. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-13620H, has an average score of 25201, which is 0.1% slower. This shows the i5-13400F is a highly capable gaming CPU. The benchmark results indicate that the CPU can handle the demands of Greedfall, and the bottleneck is almost entirely on the GPU side, especially at higher resolutions and settings.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS rows, the ideal setting for this combo depends on the resolution. For 1920x1080, the High preset is the best choice, yielding 113 FPS, which is a smooth and responsive experience. This is the sweet spot, as it balances visual quality with a high frame rate. For players with a 144Hz or higher refresh rate monitor, the Medium preset at 125 FPS is also viable, but High is recommended for better visuals. The Ultra preset at 74.1 FPS is playable, but the 34% performance drop from High may not be worth the visual gains.

For 2560x1440, the High preset at 80.4 FPS is the recommended choice. It provides a solid 60+ FPS experience with good visual fidelity. The Medium preset at 86.7 FPS is also a good option for those who prefer a higher frame rate. The Ultra preset at 51.1 FPS is not recommended, as it falls below the 60 FPS threshold. For 3840x2160, the data suggests that only the Low preset at 64.4 FPS is viable. The High preset at 49.3 FPS and Medium at 51 FPS are below the ideal playable range. The Ultra preset at 27.8 FPS is not recommended under any circumstances. In summary, the best experience is achieved at 1080p with High settings, or at 1440p with High settings for a balance of visual quality and performance.