Fortnite

Fortnite

AVERAGE FPS
192
excellent

This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 192 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 54 82 106 150
1440p QHD 103 155 201 285
1080p Full HD 161 245 316 448

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 150
3840x2160 Medium 106
3840x2160 High 82
3840x2160 Ultra 54
2560x1440 Low 285
2560x1440 Medium 201
2560x1440 High 155
2560x1440 Ultra 103
1920x1080 Low 448
1920x1080 Medium 316
1920x1080 High 245
1920x1080 Ultra 161

Fortnite with Intel Core Ultra 5 235 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080, In-Depth Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 235 is a 14-core, 14-thread desktop processor based on the Arrow Lake architecture, built on a 3 nm process by TSMC. It has a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, with a 65 W TDP, and it supports DDR5 memory through a dual-channel interface. In the context of Fortnite, this CPU’s core and thread configuration is notable because the game, while often GPU-bound at higher settings, can still present significant single-thread and multi-thread workloads during intense battle scenarios with many players and build structures. The processor’s single-thread performance, as indicated by a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2085, is strong, while its multi-thread score of 14769 in the same test shows it can handle background tasks and game logic without becoming a bottleneck. The CPU’s nearest rivals in average benchmark score include the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375, which scores 46030 (a 0.1% delta), and the Intel Core i9-13900HX, which scores 46098 (a -0.1% delta); these close margins indicate that in raw compute, the Core Ultra 5 235 sits in a competitive tier. Its percentile versus all CPUs is 89, meaning it outperforms the vast majority of processors tested. For Fortnite specifically, this CPU’s 24 MB of shared L3 cache and 3 MB per-core L2 cache help reduce latency for frequently accessed game data, though the game’s performance is more heavily influenced by the GPU at higher resolutions. The 14 threads, while not as numerous as high-end HEDT parts, are sufficient for the game’s typical thread usage, which rarely scales beyond a handful of cores for rendering and physics, but the headroom ensures smooth operation when other applications are open. At 1080p with Low settings, the CPU must feed frames quickly; the data shows this combo achieves 448 FPS average, indicating the CPU can keep up with the GPU’s output in that scenario. The processor’s boost clock of 5.00 GHz is a key factor for Fortnite’s frame pacing, as the game’s main thread benefits from high frequency, and the architecture’s efficiency at 65 W TDP means sustained performance is likely stable. The lack of a multiplier unlock means overclocking is not an option, but the stock clocks are already high. In summary, the Core Ultra 5 235 provides a balanced foundation for Fortnite, with enough single-thread speed for high FPS at competitive settings and enough multi-thread capacity for streaming or recording overhead, though it is not the primary driver of frame rates in most tested configurations.

FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core Ultra 5 235 compare to its nearest CPU rivals in overall benchmark scores?

A: The Core Ultra 5 235 has an average benchmark score of 46062. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375, scores 46030, which is a 0.1% delta (the Intel part is slightly ahead). Another rival, the Intel Core i9-13900HX, scores 46098, a -0.1% delta (the i9 is slightly ahead). The AMD EPYC 4364P and AMD EPYC 7303 score 45970 and 45960 respectively, with deltas of 0.2% each, meaning the Core Ultra 5 235 is marginally faster than both. These differences are minimal, so in synthetic workloads, the CPUs are essentially equivalent.

Q: What frame rates can I expect at 1080p with this CPU and RTX 5080 combo?

A: At 1920x1080, the measured average FPS varies by settings: Low settings produce 448 FPS, Medium settings produce 316 FPS (with a min of 268 and max of 363), High settings produce 245 FPS, and Ultra settings produce 161 FPS. This shows that at 1080p, the combo is capable of extremely high refresh rates, especially on lower presets, making it suitable for competitive play.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor at 4K resolution?

A: At 3840x2160, the average FPS drops significantly compared to 1080p. For example, High settings yield 82 FPS at 4K versus 245 FPS at 1080p. This substantial drop indicates that the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions, as the rendering load on the RTX 5080 increases with pixel count, while the CPU’s role in frame generation diminishes relatively. The Ultra preset at 4K drops to 54 FPS, further confirming GPU limitation.

Q: What is the combo’s ranking among all tested CPU-GPU combinations for Fortnite?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 235 paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 achieves a combo rank of 145 out of 2740 tested combinations. This places it in the top 5.3% of all combos, indicating that this pairing is among the higher-performing setups for Fortnite, though there are still many configurations with faster components.

Q: How does the RTX 5080’s memory bandwidth influence Fortnite performance?

A: The RTX 5080 has 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 960.0 GB/s of bandwidth. In Fortnite, this high bandwidth helps with texture streaming and asset loading, especially at higher resolutions like 1440p and 4K, where larger textures are needed. The measured FPS at 1440p High (155 FPS) and 4K High (82 FPS) suggests that memory bandwidth is sufficient to avoid stutters, though the GPU’s compute power is the more critical factor.

Q: Which settings preset offers the best balance of performance and visual quality?

A: Based on the measured data, Medium settings at 1440p provide 201 FPS average with a min of 171 FPS, which is a strong balance for high refresh rate monitors. At 1080p, Medium settings yield 316 FPS, which is more than enough for 240Hz+ displays. High settings at 1440p (155 FPS) are also viable, but Medium offers a higher margin above typical 144Hz refresh rates. For 4K, Medium settings at 106 FPS are the highest preset that stays above 100 FPS, making it the recommended choice for that resolution.

Settings Recommendations

Examining the measured FPS rows, the optimal preset depends on the target resolution and refresh rate. At 1920x1080, the Low preset achieves an average of 448 FPS, which is far beyond any current display’s refresh rate, but Medium settings still deliver 316 FPS (with min 268, max 363), providing better visual fidelity while remaining above 240Hz thresholds. High settings at 1080p drop to 245 FPS, still excellent, while Ultra at 161 FPS is suitable for 144Hz panels but with diminishing returns in visual quality. For 2560x1440, Medium settings at 201 FPS (min 171, max 231) offer the best experience, as they stay well above 144Hz and approach 240Hz in many scenes. High at 1440p yields 155 FPS, which is still good for 144Hz, but Medium provides more headroom for dips. At 3840x2160, Medium settings at 106 FPS (min 90, max 122) are the sweet spot, as they keep the average above 100 FPS, which is smoother than High’s 82 FPS or Ultra’s 54 FPS. Low settings at 4K produce 150 FPS, but the visual compromise is significant for a game like Fortnite where building and long-range visibility matter. The data indicates that Medium preset is the most balanced across all resolutions, offering a substantial FPS uplift over High while retaining enough graphical detail for competitive play. For users with high refresh rate monitors (240Hz or more), Medium at 1080p or 1440p is recommended; for 4K displays, Medium is the highest playable preset that maintains fluidity. Ultra settings are only advisable at 1080p for those prioritizing visuals over frame rate, as the 161 FPS average is still playable but not optimal for fast-paced encounters.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo of the Intel Core Ultra 5 235 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 holds a rank of 145 out of 2740 tested combinations in Fortnite. This places it in the 94.7th percentile, meaning it outperforms nearly 95% of all other CPU-GPU pairings tested. The rank is a composite measure that considers both components’ capabilities in the context of this specific game. Given that the RTX 5080 is a top-tier GPU (87th percentile versus all GPUs) and the Core Ultra 5 235 is a strong mid-high range CPU (89th percentile versus all CPUs), the combination is expected to be powerful. However, the rank of 145 suggests that there are 144 other combos that achieve higher performance in Fortnite, likely including pairings with higher-end CPUs like the Core i9 or Ryzen 9 series paired with the same GPU, or even faster GPUs like the RTX 5090. In terms of relative standing, this combo is in the upper echelon, but not the absolute top. The CPU’s nearest rivals, such as the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Intel Core i9-13900HX, have nearly identical average benchmark scores (46030 and 46098 respectively), so if paired with the same RTX 5080, they would likely produce similar frame rates in Fortnite, potentially shifting the rank by a few positions. The GPU’s nearest rivals, like the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE (which scores 57367, a -2.2% delta, meaning it is faster), would likely place a combo with that GPU higher in the ranking. The data shows that this specific pairing is well-optimized for Fortnite, as the rank is better than the individual percentiles might suggest, indicating that the CPU does not bottleneck the GPU in this game’s typical workloads. For a user, this rank means the system will deliver high frame rates across most settings, but those seeking the absolute maximum FPS in Fortnite might need to look at combos ranked higher, likely involving more expensive CPUs or GPUs.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data shows a clear trend as resolution increases from 1920x1080 to 3840x2160. At Low settings, the average FPS drops from 448 at 1080p to 285 at 1440p (a 36.4% decrease) and then to 150 at 4K (a 47.4% decrease from 1440p). This scaling is typical of a GPU-bound scenario, where the rendering resolution directly impacts the pixel fill rate demand. At Medium settings, the averages are 316 FPS at 1080p, 201 FPS at 1440p (a 36.4% drop), and 106 FPS at 4K (a 47.3% drop from 1440p). The consistency of the percentage drops across settings suggests that the GPU is the limiting component, as the CPU’s frame generation capability remains constant regardless of resolution. At High settings, the averages are 245 FPS at 1080p, 155 FPS at 1440p (a 36.7% drop), and 82 FPS at 4K (a 47.1% drop from 1440p). The pattern holds: moving from 1080p to 1440p reduces FPS by roughly 36-37%, and moving from 1440p to 4K reduces it by another 47%. This is consistent with the pixel count increase: 1440p has 1.78 times the pixels of 1080p, and 4K has 2.25 times the pixels of 1440p. The FPS drops are slightly less than the pixel count increase, indicating that other factors like memory bandwidth and cache efficiency partially mitigate the load. The RTX 5080’s 960.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 16 GB of GDDR7 VRAM are sufficient to handle these resolutions without hitting capacity limits, as evidenced by the smooth scaling. The CPU’s role in this scaling is minimal; at 1080p Low, the 448 FPS average suggests the CPU can generate frames faster than the GPU can render them, but as resolution increases, the GPU’s rendering time dominates, and the CPU’s frame generation becomes less relevant. The data indicates that for users wanting to maintain high refresh rates, 1440p is the sweet spot, as it retains most of the performance (e.g., 201 FPS on Medium) while offering better visual clarity than 1080p. At 4K, the FPS drops below 100 for most presets except Low, making it less suitable for competitive play but still playable for casual modes.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the measured average FPS across settings is as follows: Low settings produce 448 FPS, which is the highest recorded for this combo. Medium settings yield 316 FPS, with a minimum of 268 FPS and a maximum of 363 FPS, showing a tight range that indicates stable performance. High settings average 245 FPS, and Ultra settings drop to 161 FPS. These numbers demonstrate that at 1080p, the combo is capable of driving even the fastest 360Hz monitors on Low or Medium presets, and 240Hz monitors on High. The gap between Low and Medium (132 FPS) is larger than the gap between Medium and High (71 FPS), suggesting diminishing returns as settings increase beyond Medium. At 2560x1440, the averages are: Low at 285 FPS, Medium at 201 FPS (min 171, max 231), High at 155 FPS, and Ultra at 103 FPS. The Medium preset at 1440p remains above 144Hz, making it ideal for high refresh rate gaming without sacrificing too much visual quality. The drop from Low to Medium is 84 FPS, and from Medium to High is 46 FPS, again showing a steeper decline at lower settings. At 3840x2160, the averages are: Low at 150 FPS, Medium at 106 FPS (min 90, max 122), High at 82 FPS, and Ultra at 54 FPS. At 4K, only Low and Medium maintain averages above 100 FPS, with Medium being the recommended maximum for smooth gameplay. The minimum FPS data is only available for Medium settings at each resolution: 268 FPS at 1080p, 171 FPS at 1440p, and 90 FPS at 4K. These minimums indicate that the 1% lows are still respectable, with the 4K Medium minimum of 90 FPS being the lowest recorded, but still above the 60 FPS threshold for playability. The maximum FPS values for Medium are 363 at 1080p, 231 at 1440p, and 122 at 4K, showing that there is headroom in less demanding scenes. Overall, the data shows a consistent pattern: the combo excels at 1080p and 1440p, with FPS values that allow for high refresh rates, while 4K performance is more modest, requiring settings reductions to maintain fluidity.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 is a high-end graphics card built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, using the GB203 chip fabricated on a 5 nm process by TSMC. It has 10752 shading units, 336 TMUs, and 112 ROPs, along with 84 RT cores and 336 tensor cores. The GPU operates at a base clock of 2295 MHz and a boost clock of 2617 MHz, with a 360 W TDP. Its memory subsystem consists of 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 960.0 GB/s of bandwidth. In Fortnite, the GPU’s role is dominant in determining frame rates at higher resolutions and settings, as evidenced by the FPS scaling data. At 1080p Low, the GPU’s rendering load is light, allowing the CPU to push 448 FPS, but as settings and resolution increase, the GPU’s compute and memory bandwidth become the limiting factors. The RTX 5080’s 56.28 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 879.3 GTexel/s texture rate are more than sufficient for Fortnite’s stylized graphics, which are not as demanding as photorealistic titles. The 16 GB VRAM is ample for Fortnite’s highest texture settings at 4K, preventing any memory capacity bottlenecks. The GPU’s benchmarks show a PassMark G3D score of 36565 and a Geekbench OpenCL score of 235901, placing it in the 87th percentile versus all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon 8060S (score 55757, a 0.6% delta), meaning the RTX 5080 is slightly faster, and the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE (score 57367, a -2.2% delta), which is faster. The RTX 5080’s performance in Fortnite is strong, but the measured FPS at 4K Ultra (54 FPS) indicates that even this powerful GPU cannot run the game at maximum settings with high frame rates at that resolution. This suggests that Fortnite’s Ultra preset includes effects that are particularly taxing on the GPU, such as high-quality shadows and reflections, which the RT cores may not accelerate effectively in this game. For competitive play, lowering settings to Medium or Low allows the GPU to output frames at a rate that matches high refresh rate displays, as shown by the 150 FPS at 4K Low and 285 FPS at 1440p Low. The GPU’s 960.0 GB/s bandwidth is crucial for maintaining these frame rates, as it ensures texture and geometry data are fed quickly to the processing units. Overall, the RTX 5080 is a capable partner for the Core Ultra 5 235, providing the raw power needed for high-FPS gaming at 1080p and 1440p, while still offering playable performance at 4K with adjusted settings. The GPU’s dual-slot design and 304 mm length are typical for this class, and its PCIe 5.0 x16 interface ensures no bandwidth bottleneck with the CPU.

Hardware Specifications

Intel Core Ultra 5 235

Cores / Threads 14 / 14
Base Clock 3400 MHz
Boost Clock 5000 MHz
TDP 65W
Socket Intel Socket 1851
View Full CPU Details →

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080

VRAM 16 GB GDDR7
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2617 MHz MHz
TDP 360 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for Intel Core Ultra 5 235 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 in Fortnite

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 150.0
3840x2160 Medium 106.0
3840x2160 High 82.0
3840x2160 Ultra 54.0
2560x1440 Low 285.0
2560x1440 Medium 201.0
2560x1440 High 155.0
2560x1440 Ultra 103.0
1920x1080 Low 448.0
1920x1080 Medium 316.0
1920x1080 High 245.0
1920x1080 Ultra 161.0

Fortnite with iUltra 5 235 + Other GPUs

See how Fortnite performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Fortnite with RTX 5080 + Other CPUs

See how Fortnite performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with iUltra 5 235 + RTX 5080

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.