Fivem
This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 127 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 46 | 60 | 75 | 95 |
| 1440p QHD | 84 | 108 | 135 | 171 |
| 1080p Full HD | 127 | 163 | 204 | 259 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Fivem with Intel Core Ultra 9 290K Plus + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, In-Depth Analysis
Fivem is a demanding multiplayer title that scales heavily with both CPU and GPU resources. This analysis examines the measured performance of the Intel Core Ultra 9 290K Plus paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti across three resolutions and four quality presets. The data provides a clear picture of where this combo excels and where it falls short, offering practical guidance for optimizing your experience.
Resolution Scaling
The measured FPS data reveals a significant shift in system bottleneck as resolution changes. At 1920x1080, the combination is clearly CPU-limited in many scenarios, evidenced by the massive frame rates achieved. With the Low preset, the system produces 259 FPS on average. Moving to Medium drops this to 204 FPS, while High and Ultra settings yield 163 FPS and 127 FPS respectively. The scaling from Low to Ultra at 1080p is a 132 FPS difference, showing that even at this resolution, the GPU is still being tasked heavily as settings increase, but the sheer headroom suggests the processor is doing the heavy lifting to maintain such high numbers.
At 2560x1440, the frame rates remain very playable but show a clear step down. The Low preset averages 171 FPS, which is a 34% reduction from the 1080p Low result. Medium settings drop to 135 FPS, High to 108 FPS, and Ultra to 84 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra at 1440p is 87 FPS, which is narrower than at 1080p. This narrowing indicates that the GPU is starting to become a more significant factor, but the CPU is still providing enough throughput to keep the system from being completely GPU-bound at lower settings.
The most telling data comes from 3840x2160, where the RTX 3080 Ti becomes the clear limiting component. At 4K Low, the average FPS is 95, which is only a 44% drop from 1080p Low. However, the scaling from there is steep. Medium settings produce 75 FPS, High drops to 60 FPS, and Ultra falls to 46 FPS. The delta between 1440p and 4K at each preset is substantial: Low drops by 76 FPS, Medium by 60 FPS, High by 48 FPS, and Ultra by 38 FPS. This pattern confirms that the GPU's rendering load is the primary constraint at 4K, as the frame rate differences are proportionally larger than what the CPU alone would cause.
The limiting component analysis is clear. At 1080p, the Core Ultra 9 290K Plus allows the RTX 3080 Ti to stretch its legs, with the CPU preventing any significant bottleneck. At 1440p, the balance is more even, with both components sharing the load. At 4K, the GPU is the definitive bottleneck, as its 12 GB of VRAM and memory bandwidth are taxed heavily by the higher pixel count, while the CPU's 24 cores and 24 threads remain underutilized. The data suggests that users targeting 4K should expect to use lower presets to maintain smooth frame rates, while 1440p offers a strong balance of visual fidelity and performance.
How This Combo Ranks
Within the benchmark database, this specific combination of the Intel Core Ultra 9 290K Plus and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti ranks 705th out of 3005 tested combos for Fivem. This places it in the top 23.5% of all systems tested, which is a solid position for a high-end desktop configuration. The percentile ranking for the CPU alone is 96, meaning it outperforms 96% of all CPUs in the database, while the GPU sits at the 83rd percentile. The discrepancy between these two percentiles highlights that the GPU is the weaker link in this pairing for this specific game.
The combo's rank is influenced by the GPU's age relative to the CPU. The RTX 3080 Ti, while still a capable card, has an average benchmark score of 41187, placing it just 2% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 and 0.8% ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro 5300. In contrast, the CPU's average score of 84003 puts it 0.2% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K and 1.1% ahead of the AMD EPYC 4584PX. This means the processor is competing with the top-tier desktop and server chips, while the GPU is only marginally better than mid-range modern alternatives. The result is a system that can push high frame rates at lower resolutions but will fall behind combos featuring newer, faster GPUs at higher resolutions.
The rank also reflects the game's specific demands. Fivem is a multiplayer title that often relies on single-threaded performance for server-side and physics calculations. The Core Ultra 9 290K Plus excels here, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 7303 and a Passmark single-thread score of 4823. This strength helps maintain high minimum frame rates, as evidenced by the Medium preset data at 1440p, which shows a 114 FPS minimum against a 135 FPS average. However, the GPU's raw throughput, as measured by its Passmark G3D score of 26896, is what ultimately limits the system's ability to compete with top-ranked combos that use more powerful graphics cards.
Settings Recommendations
The measured data provides a clear hierarchy for settings optimization based on resolution. At 1080p, the system has enough headroom to run Ultra settings at 127 FPS, which is above the typical 60 FPS target for smooth gameplay. However, for competitive play where higher frame rates matter, the Medium preset at 204 FPS offers a significant boost with only a visual quality trade-off. The High preset at 163 FPS is a good middle ground for those who want both quality and speed.
At 1440p, the Medium preset is the standout choice. It delivers 135 FPS on average with a minimum of 114 FPS, ensuring a smooth experience even in busy multiplayer scenes. The High preset at 108 FPS is also viable, but the 27 FPS reduction from Medium may be noticeable. Ultra at 84 FPS is playable but approaches the lower end of what is comfortable for fast-paced action. For most users, Medium at 1440p offers the best balance of visual fidelity and frame rate stability.
At 4K, the situation changes dramatically. The Ultra preset at 46 FPS is borderline unplayable for a game like Fivem, where quick reactions are necessary. The High preset at 60 FPS is exactly at the threshold for acceptable performance, but it leaves no headroom for drops during intense moments. The Medium preset at 75 FPS provides a more comfortable margin and is the recommended starting point for 4K. The Low preset at 95 FPS is the best option for players who prioritize frame rate over everything else, but the visual compromise is significant. The data suggests that 4K gaming with this combo requires either accepting Medium settings or lowering the resolution to 1440p for a better experience.
FAQ
Q: What is the best resolution to play Fivem with this combo?
A: The data shows that 2560x1440 with the Medium preset provides the best overall experience, with an average FPS of 135 and a minimum of 114 FPS. This resolution offers a good balance between visual detail and performance, avoiding the GPU bottleneck seen at 4K and the CPU headroom wasted at 1080p.
Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming in Fivem?
A: Yes, but with limitations. The measured 4K results show an average of 60 FPS on High settings and 75 FPS on Medium. While these are playable, the Ultra preset drops to 46 FPS, which is not recommended for smooth gameplay. Users should stick to Medium or High at 4K.
Q: How does the CPU affect performance in Fivem?
A: The Intel Core Ultra 9 290K Plus provides excellent single-threaded performance, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 7303. This helps maintain high frame rates at lower resolutions, as seen with 259 FPS at 1080p Low. The CPU's 24 cores and 24 threads also ensure it never becomes a bottleneck, even when the GPU is under heavy load.
Q: Is the RTX 3080 Ti a bottleneck for this CPU?
A: At 1080p and 1440p, the GPU is not the primary limiting factor, as frame rates are high. However, at 4K, the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck, with frame rates dropping significantly. The GPU's 83rd percentile ranking versus the CPU's 96th percentile confirms that the graphics card is the weaker component in this pairing.
Q: What settings should I use for competitive play?
A: For maximum frame rates, use the Low preset at 1080p, which averages 259 FPS. At 1440p, the Low preset still delivers 171 FPS. If you need a balance of quality and speed, the Medium preset at 1080p (204 FPS) or 1440p (135 FPS) is recommended.
Q: How does this combo compare to others in the database?
A: This combo ranks 705th out of 3005 tested combos, placing it in the top 23.5%. The CPU is a top-tier performer, but the GPU's age limits the overall ranking. The combo is 2% ahead of a system with an RTX 5070, but the RTX 3080 Ti's performance is close to that of the AMD Radeon Pro 5300.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti is the limiting factor in this combination for Fivem, particularly at higher resolutions. Its 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus provides 912.4 GB/s of bandwidth, which is substantial but not enough to prevent a significant performance drop at 4K. The card's boost clock of 1665 MHz and base clock of 1365 MHz are standard for the Ampere architecture, but the 8nm process node from Samsung means it draws 350 W of power, which is high by modern standards.
The GPU's benchmark scores reflect its mid-tier status in the current landscape. Its Passmark G3D score of 26896 places it in the 83rd percentile of all GPUs, which is respectable but not elite. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5077 shows it can handle modern APIs, but the card's age is evident. The nearest rivals in the database include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070, which is 2% faster on average, and the AMD Radeon Pro 5300, which is 0.8% slower. This indicates that the RTX 3080 Ti is still competitive but has been surpassed by newer mid-range offerings.
In Fivem specifically, the GPU's role is most pronounced at 4K. The data shows a 49 FPS difference between Low (95 FPS) and Ultra (46 FPS) at this resolution, demonstrating that the card's shading units (10240), TMUs (320), and ROPs (112) are being pushed to their limits. The texture rate of 532.8 GTexel/s and pixel rate of 186.5 GPixel/s are high, but the game's draw calls and rendering complexity at 4K overwhelm the card. The 12 GB VRAM is sufficient for this game, but the memory bandwidth becomes a constraint as resolution increases. For users with this GPU, the recommendation is to favor lower settings at 4K or drop to 1440p to utilize the card's full potential.
CPU Role
The Intel Core Ultra 9 290K Plus is a powerhouse that ensures the system is never held back by processing power in Fivem. Its 24 cores and 24 threads, based on the Arrow Lake Refresh architecture, provide a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 51731 and a single-core score of 7303. This single-thread performance is crucial for a multiplayer game like Fivem, which often relies on a few cores for game logic and network handling. The Passmark single-thread score of 4823 further confirms this strength.
The CPU's high boost clock of 5.80 GHz and base clock of 3.70 GHz allow it to respond quickly to changing workloads, which is essential in a dynamic multiplayer environment. The 36 MB of shared L3 cache helps reduce latency when accessing frequently used data, contributing to the high minimum frame rates seen in the data. At 1440p Medium, the minimum FPS of 114 against an average of 135 shows that the CPU can maintain consistent performance even during demanding scenes.
The CPU's 96th percentile ranking among all CPUs places it ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K by 0.2% and the AMD EPYC 4584PX by 1.1%. This demonstrates that it is one of the best processors available for gaming, and its role in this combo is to provide a stable foundation for the GPU. At 1080p, the CPU allows the RTX 3080 Ti to reach 259 FPS on Low settings, which confirms its ability to feed the GPU with data quickly. For this game, the CPU is not a bottleneck at any resolution, and users can expect consistent performance regardless of the graphics settings chosen.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core Ultra 9 290K Plus
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core Ultra 9 290K Plus + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti in Fivem
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 95.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 75.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 60.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 46.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 171.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 135.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 108.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 84.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 259.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 204.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 163.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 127.0 |
Fivem with iUltra 9 290K Plus + Other GPUs
See how Fivem performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Fivem with RTX 3080 Ti + Other CPUs
See how Fivem performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with iUltra 9 290K Plus + RTX 3080 Ti
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.