Fivem

# FAQ

Q: What is the overall performance ranking of the Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX and AMD Radeon RX 7800M combination in Fivem?

A: This combo ranks 1988 out of 3005 tested combinations in Fivem, placing it in the lower-middle portion of the database for this specific game. The percentile position suggests that while the hardware is capable, many other pairings deliver higher frame rates in Fivem's multiplayer environments.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX has an average benchmark score of 67469, which is 0.3% lower than the Intel Xeon w5-3525 (67673) and 0.5% lower than the AMD EPYC 4484PX (67822). It sits 0.6% behind the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX (67868) but is 0.7% ahead of the Intel Xeon 6515P (67006). The CPU holds the 94th percentile among all processors.

Q: What is the GPU's performance standing relative to its closest competitors?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7800M scores 27883 on average, which is 0.2% higher than the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 (27839) and 0.3% ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro W5500X (27973). It trails the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti (28020) by 0.5% and the AMD FirePro S7150 (28117) by 0.8%. The GPU sits at the 73rd percentile among all graphics cards.

Q: What frame rates can be expected at 1080p with Medium settings?

A: At 1920x1080 with Medium settings, the combo delivers an average of 128 FPS, with a minimum of 109 FPS and a maximum of 147 FPS. This represents a solid baseline for competitive play, though not the highest possible frame rates.

Q: How does the 4K Ultra experience compare to lower settings at the same resolution?

A: At 3840x2160, Ultra settings yield only 29 FPS average, while High produces 37 FPS, Medium reaches 47 FPS, and Low achieves 59 FPS. The jump from Ultra to Low more than doubles the frame rate, indicating that the GPU is the primary constraint at this resolution.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics that could serve as a fallback?

A: Yes, the Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX includes Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 64 execution units. However, all measured FPS data in this analysis comes from the discrete AMD Radeon RX 7800M, so the integrated solution's gaming performance is not quantified here.

# GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 7800M is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture with the Navi 32 chip, manufactured on a 5 nm process by TSMC. It carries 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU's base clock runs at 1295 MHz, with a game clock of 2145 MHz and a boost clock reaching 2335 MHz. Memory operates at 2250 MHz, translating to 18 Gbps effective.

In Fivem, the GPU's memory capacity and bandwidth play a decisive role. The 12 GB frame buffer is substantial for a mobile-class GPU, and the 432.0 GB/s bandwidth prevents memory throughput from becoming a bottleneck at lower resolutions. The card's 3840 shading units, 240 texture mapping units, and 96 raster output processors provide the raw compute necessary for the game's draw calls and geometry processing.

The RX 7800M's pixel rate of 224.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 560.4 GTexel/s are directly relevant to Fivem's rendering workload. At 1080p, the GPU easily handles the pixel fill requirements, but at 4K the 29 FPS Ultra result shows the pixel throughput ceiling being approached. The 35.87 TFLOPS FP32 performance is the theoretical peak, but real-world gaming performance depends on how efficiently the architecture utilizes these resources.

The GPU's DirectX 12 Ultimate support (12_2) is particularly relevant for Fivem, which can leverage modern rendering features. Vulkan 1.4 and OpenGL 4.6 compatibility also mean the game has multiple API paths available. The 60 ray tracing cores are present, though Fivem's performance data here does not specifically isolate ray tracing workloads.

The 73rd percentile ranking among all GPUs indicates the RX 7800M performs above average in synthetic tests like Passmark G3D (17613) and Geekbench OpenCL (120778). The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2994 is a strong indicator of modern game performance, yet Fivem's multiplayer nature introduces CPU-dependent scenarios that can limit GPU utilization.

# Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data shows a clear pattern of performance degradation as resolution increases. At 1080p Low settings, the combo achieves 162 FPS. Moving to 1440p Low drops this to 107 FPS, a 34% reduction. At 4K Low, the frame rate falls to 59 FPS, another 45% decline. This scaling pattern is consistent with a GPU-bound scenario at higher resolutions.

At Medium settings, the progression is 128 FPS (1080p) → 84 FPS (1440p) → 47 FPS (4K). The 1440p result represents a 34% drop from 1080p, while 4K is 63% below 1080p. High settings show 102 FPS at 1080p, 67 FPS at 1440p (-34%), and 37 FPS at 4K (-64%). Ultra settings produce 79 FPS at 1080p, 52 FPS at 1440p (-34%), and 29 FPS at 4K (-63%).

The consistent 34% reduction from 1080p to 1440p across all settings suggests the rendering pipeline scales predictably with pixel count. The larger drop from 1440p to 4K (roughly 45-64%) indicates that at 4K, the GPU's memory bandwidth and pixel fill rate become increasingly strained. The RX 7800M's 432.0 GB/s bandwidth, while ample for 1080p, appears insufficient to maintain proportional performance at 4K.

The fact that 4K Low (59 FPS) barely exceeds 1440p Ultra (52 FPS) highlights the GPU's pivotal role. At 1080p, the CPU's strong single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2204) can feed the GPU adequately. As resolution rises, the GPU's raw throughput becomes the limiting factor, and the gap between settings narrows in relative terms.

# How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX and AMD Radeon RX 7800M ranks 1988 out of 3005 tested combos in Fivem. This places the pairing in the 34th percentile of all combinations, meaning roughly two-thirds of tested systems deliver higher average frame rates in this game.

The CPU's 94th percentile ranking (67469 average benchmark score) contrasts sharply with the combo's overall game ranking. This discrepancy suggests that Fivem's performance profile does not heavily reward the CPU's strengths, or that the GPU holds the pairing back. The GPU's 73rd percentile ranking (27883 average) is more aligned with the combo's game position but still above it.

Comparing to nearest rivals, the CPU is essentially performance-equivalent to workstation Xeon and EPYC parts within 0.7% deltaPct. The GPU similarly matches desktop-class cards like the GTX 980 Ti within 0.5%. Yet the combo's game ranking suggests that Fivem's specific engine characteristics—likely its heavy single-thread reliance and multiplayer server overhead—do not scale with the multi-core advantages this CPU offers.

The 3005 total combos in the database include a wide range of hardware pairings. A rank of 1988 indicates this particular setup is below median for Fivem. Users seeking higher frame rates would need to consider GPU upgrades primarily, as the CPU side already sits near the top of the synthetic benchmark charts.

# CPU Role

The Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX is a 24-core, 24-thread processor based on the Arrow Lake architecture, built on a 3 nm TSMC process. It has a base clock of 2.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, with a TDP of 55 W. The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB L1 per core, 3 MB L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support is DDR5 with dual-channel configuration and 102.4 GB/s bandwidth.

In Fivem, the CPU's role is complex due to the game's multiplayer nature. The 24 threads provide ample parallel processing capability for server-side simulation and entity management. The 5.40 GHz boost clock is crucial for single-threaded game logic, where Fivem often bottlenecks. Cinebench R23 scores of 35589 multi-core and 2204 single-core demonstrate both high throughput and strong per-core performance.

The CPU's Passmark single-thread score of 4713 and Geekbench single-core score of 2458 indicate robust single-core capabilities. These are directly relevant to Fivem, where the game's main thread typically handles core simulation tasks. The 24 cores ensure that background tasks and other game systems do not compete with the primary thread for resources.

However, the combo's 1988 rank suggests that the CPU's 94th percentile synthetic performance does not translate to top-tier Fivem results. This could be due to the game's engine being more sensitive to memory latency than raw core count, or the multiplayer component introducing variable workloads that challenge even high-end CPUs. The 36 MB L3 cache helps with frequently accessed game data, but the dual-channel memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s may limit scenarios with high entity counts.

The CPU's 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die show the complexity of Arrow Lake. The 3 nm process enables high clock speeds at reasonable power, which is beneficial for sustained gaming sessions. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 64 EUs provides a fallback but is not relevant for the measured discrete GPU performance.

# Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combo delivers the following average frame rates:

• Low: 162 FPS
• Medium: 128 FPS (min 109, max 147)
• High: 102 FPS
• Ultra: 79 FPS

The 1080p results show a smooth progression with diminishing returns as settings increase. The jump from Low to Medium costs 34 FPS, Medium to High costs 26 FPS, and High to Ultra costs 23 FPS. This indicates that the GPU has headroom at 1080p, with the CPU capable of feeding it adequately.

At 2560x1440:

• Low: 107 FPS
• Medium: 84 FPS (min 72, max 97)
• High: 67 FPS
• Ultra: 52 FPS

The 1440p results show a similar pattern but with tighter spacing. The drop from Low to Medium is 23 FPS, Medium to High is 17 FPS, and High to Ultra is 15 FPS. The diminishing returns become more pronounced as the GPU approaches its limits.

At 3840x2160:

• Low: 59 FPS
• Medium: 47 FPS (min 40, max 54)
• High: 37 FPS
• Ultra: 29 FPS

The 4K results show the GPU becoming the dominant constraint. The gap between Low and Medium is 12 FPS, Medium to High is 10 FPS, and High to Ultra is 8 FPS. The 29 FPS Ultra result is below playable thresholds for most users, while Low at 59 FPS is borderline.

The Medium settings rows are the only ones with min/max values recorded across all resolutions. At 1080p Medium, the 109-147 FPS range shows 38 FPS variance. At 1440p Medium, the 72-97 FPS range shows 25 FPS variance. At 4K Medium, the 40-54 FPS range shows 14 FPS variance. This narrowing variance at higher resolutions indicates that frame pacing becomes more consistent as the GPU becomes the bottleneck.

# Settings Recommendations

For 1080p gaming, the Medium preset at 128 FPS average offers the best balance of visual quality and performance. The 109 FPS minimum ensures smooth gameplay even in demanding multiplayer scenarios. The Ultra preset at 79 FPS is still playable, but the 49 FPS drop from Medium may not justify the visual improvements in a fast-paced multiplayer environment.

At 1440p, Medium at 84 FPS is the recommended preset. The 72 FPS minimum remains above the 60 FPS threshold, providing a consistent experience. High at 67 FPS is acceptable for users prioritizing visual fidelity, but the 17 FPS penalty versus Medium is notable. Ultra at 52 FPS falls below ideal smoothness for competitive play.

For 4K, no preset delivers ideal performance. Low at 59 FPS is the only setting approaching playability, but it sacrifices most visual quality. Medium at 47 FPS is borderline, with a 40 FPS minimum that could cause noticeable stutter in busy scenes. High at 37 FPS and Ultra at 29 FPS are not recommended for active gameplay.

The data suggests that 1440p Medium is the sweet spot for this hardware combination in Fivem. It provides 84 FPS average with a 72 FPS minimum, which is sufficient for most multiplayer scenarios. Users with high refresh rate 1080p monitors can comfortably use High settings at 102 FPS, while those prioritizing frame rate above all can achieve 162 FPS at Low.

The min/max data for Medium settings across resolutions provides additional confidence. The 1080p Medium range of 109-147 FPS indicates the combo can handle frame spikes well. At 1440p Medium, the 72-97 FPS range shows less headroom but still maintains playable minimums. The 4K Medium range of 40-54 FPS highlights the GPU's limitations at this resolution, reinforcing the recommendation against 4K gaming with this setup.