Fivem

The Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX paired with the AMD Radeon 880M is a combination that pits a high-end 24-core mobile processor against an integrated GPU. In Fivem, a game known for its demanding multiplayer environments and heavy CPU reliance, the measured frame rates reveal a system that is decisively constrained by its graphics solution. At 1080p with Low settings, the combo averages 74 FPS, but this drops sharply as resolution and graphical load increase, illustrating that the Radeon 880M is the limiting component for playable performance.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data shows a clear and consistent pattern: performance degrades significantly as resolution increases from 1920x1080 to 3840x2160. At Low settings, the average frame rate falls from 74 FPS at 1080p to 49 FPS at 1440p, and then to just 27 FPS at 4K. This represents a 63% reduction in average FPS from 1080p to 4K. The scaling is slightly less steep at High settings, where the average drops from 47 FPS at 1080p to 31 FPS at 1440p and finally to 17 FPS at 4K, a 64% decrease overall. These numbers indicate that the Radeon 880M’s rendering throughput is the primary bottleneck, as the 24-core Ultra 9 275HX is unlikely to be the limiting factor at such low frame rates.

Looking at the Medium preset, the pattern continues. At 1080p, the average is 59 FPS with a minimum of 50 FPS and a maximum of 67 FPS. Moving to 1440p, the average drops to 39 FPS (min 33, max 44), and at 4K it falls to 21 FPS (min 18, max 25). The Ultra preset, which likely stresses the GPU the most, shows the most severe scaling: 36 FPS at 1080p, 24 FPS at 1440p, and a barely playable 13 FPS at 4K. The fact that even at 1080p Ultra the system only manages 36 FPS suggests that the integrated graphics are overwhelmed by the game’s visual demands, regardless of the CPU’s capabilities.

The data implies that the limiting component is unequivocally the GPU. The Radeon 880M, with its 768 shading units and boost clock of 2900 MHz, simply cannot keep up with the pixel count at higher resolutions. The CPU’s performance, on the other hand, is far above average, sitting in the 94th percentile of all CPUs. If the CPU were the bottleneck, we would expect more consistent frame rates across resolutions, since the CPU workload does not scale linearly with pixel count. Instead, the dramatic FPS drops point directly to the GPU’s fill-rate and shading limitations. This is a classic case of an integrated graphics solution being paired with a processor that far exceeds its graphical capabilities, leaving significant performance on the table at every resolution above 1080p.

FAQ

Q: What is the highest average FPS this combo can achieve in Fivem?

A: The highest measured average FPS is 74, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings. This is the only setting combination that approaches a smooth experience.

Q: Is this combo capable of 4K gaming in Fivem?

A: No, the data shows that at 3840x2160, the average FPS ranges from 13 (Ultra) to 27 (Low). Even the highest 4K result, 27 FPS at Low, is below the 30 FPS threshold typically considered playable.

Q: How does the CPU’s benchmark score compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX has an average benchmark score of 67469. It trails the Intel Xeon w5-3525 by 0.3%, the AMD EPYC 4484PX by 0.5%, and the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX by 0.6%. It leads the Intel Xeon 6515P by 0.7%. These are extremely close margins, indicating the CPU is competitive with high-end workstation chips.

Q: What is the GPU’s performance percentile compared to all GPUs?

A: The AMD Radeon 880M sits in the 43rd percentile of all GPUs, which places it below the median. Its average benchmark score is 8436, with its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX, scoring 8427, a delta of 0.1%.

Q: At which resolution and settings does the combo achieve the most consistent frame times?

A: The data shows that the Medium preset at 1920x1080 has a minimum FPS of 50 and a maximum of 67, with an average of 59. This is the only measured row with a narrow spread between min and max, suggesting more consistent frame pacing than other settings.

Q: Does the Ultra preset ever become playable?

A: No, the Ultra preset yields average FPS of 36 at 1080p, 24 at 1440p, and 13 at 4K. These results are all below the 60 FPS target and even the 1080p result is marginal for fast-paced multiplayer.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo ranks 2933 out of 3005 tested combinations in Fivem. This places it in the bottom 3% of all tested systems, which is a poor result for a pairing that includes a top-tier CPU. The rank reflects the overall measured performance across all tested scenarios, and the low frame rates at higher resolutions drag the combined score down significantly. While the CPU itself is a high performer, sitting in the 94th percentile of all CPUs, the GPU’s 43rd percentile ranking effectively nullifies that advantage in Fivem.

This ranking suggests that the system is not well-balanced for this particular game. In Fivem, which can be heavily CPU-bound in crowded multiplayer scenarios, the 24-core Ultra 9 275HX should theoretically excel. However, the measured FPS data shows that the system is GPU-bound even at 1080p Low, where the average is only 74 FPS. If the CPU were the limiting factor, we would expect to see higher frame rates at Low settings, with the GPU only becoming the bottleneck at higher graphical presets. The fact that FPS drops to 47 at High settings and 36 at Ultra at the same resolution confirms that the GPU cannot sustain even modest frame rates.

The rank of 2933 indicates that most other tested combinations, including those with weaker CPUs but stronger GPUs, outperform this setup in Fivem. For a game that rewards high and consistent frame rates, this combo’s performance is a significant disappointment. The data implies that the Radeon 880M is simply not suited for Fivem beyond the lowest settings, and even then, it only achieves a passable 74 FPS. Users would need to drastically lower their expectations or consider a discrete GPU to get a competitive experience.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings for this combo in Fivem are Low at 1920x1080. This is the only configuration that provides an average FPS above 60, hitting 74 FPS. While the Medium preset at 1080p offers a more balanced visual experience with an average of 59 FPS, it comes closer to the edge of playability. The measured min of 50 FPS for Medium suggests that dips could occur in demanding scenes, potentially impacting the multiplayer experience.

For users prioritizing smooth gameplay over visual fidelity, Low at 1080p is the clear choice. The jump from Low to Medium at 1080p costs 15 FPS on average (from 74 to 59), which is a significant trade-off. At higher resolutions, no setting is recommended. At 1440p, the best average FPS is 49 (Low), which is below the 60 FPS target. At 4K, the best is 27 FPS (Low), which is not playable for a fast-paced multiplayer title.

The Ultra preset should be avoided entirely, as it drops below 40 FPS even at 1080p. The data suggests that the Radeon 880M’s 768 shading units and 16 ROPs are insufficient for Fivem’s higher preset requirements. Users should also note that the Medium preset at 1440p yields 39 FPS, which is playable but not ideal. However, given that the Low preset at 1080p provides the highest headroom over the 60 FPS threshold, it is the safest recommendation for consistent performance. If visual quality is paramount, Medium at 1080p is the only other viable option, but it carries a higher risk of frame drops.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the system shows its best performance. With Low settings, the average FPS is 74. Moving to Medium, the average drops to 59, with a minimum of 50 and a maximum of 67. High settings yield an average of 47 FPS, and Ultra settings bring the average down to 36 FPS. The spread between min and max at Medium (50-67) indicates some variability, but it remains more stable than the other settings which only report average FPS.

At 2560x1440, the performance falls off considerably. Low settings produce an average of 49 FPS, which is just below the 60 FPS target. Medium settings average 39 FPS, with a minimum of 33 and a maximum of 44. High settings average 31 FPS, and Ultra settings average 24 FPS. None of these results are ideal for multiplayer gaming, as even the highest average (49 FPS) is susceptible to drops below 40 FPS in busy areas.

At 3840x2160, the system struggles to maintain playable frame rates. Low settings yield an average of 27 FPS, which is below the 30 FPS threshold. Medium settings average 21 FPS, with a minimum of 18 and a maximum of 25. High settings average 17 FPS, and Ultra settings average 13 FPS. These numbers confirm that 4K is not viable for Fivem with this hardware. The data shows a consistent pattern: each resolution increase of roughly 2.25x (from 1080p to 1440p) or 4x (from 1080p to 4K) results in a proportional drop in FPS, reinforcing that the GPU is the primary bottleneck.

CPU Role

The Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX is a formidable processor with 24 cores and 24 threads, based on the Arrow Lake architecture. It has a base clock of 2.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, and is manufactured on a 3 nm process. Its cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 36 MB L3 cache. In synthetic benchmarks, it scores 35589 in Cinebench R23 multicore and 2204 in single-core. Its Geekbench scores are 20795 multicore and 2458 single-core. These figures place it in the 94th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 67469.

In Fivem, the CPU’s role is to handle the game’s simulation, scripting, and network logic, particularly in multiplayer servers with many players. The 24 cores and 24 threads should provide ample headroom for these tasks. However, the measured FPS data shows that the CPU is not the limiting factor. At 1080p Low, the system achieves 74 FPS, which suggests that the CPU can feed frames faster than the GPU can render them. The fact that FPS drops to 47 at High settings and 36 at Ultra at the same resolution indicates that the GPU’s workload is the bottleneck, not the CPU’s ability to issue draw calls or process game logic.

The CPU’s single-thread performance, as evidenced by its 2204 score in Cinebench R23 single-core, is also strong. Fivem’s engine may not fully utilize all 24 cores, but the high boost clock of 5.40 GHz ensures that single-threaded tasks are handled efficiently. The data implies that the Ultra 9 275HX is more than capable of running Fivem at high frame rates, but it is held back by the integrated GPU. If paired with a discrete graphics card, this CPU would likely deliver much higher FPS in Fivem, as its processing power is not being fully utilized in the current configuration.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon 880M is an integrated graphics processor based on the RDNA 3.5 architecture, built on a 4 nm process. It features 768 shading units, 48 TMUs, and 16 ROPs, with 12 ray tracing cores. Its base clock is 400 MHz, and it boosts to 2900 MHz. The GPU has no dedicated VRAM; instead, it uses system memory, with bandwidth described as "System Dependent." Its FP32 performance is 4.454 TFLOPS, and it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. In benchmarks, its Passmark G3D score is 7615, and its Geekbench Vulkan score is 40006. It sits in the 43rd percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 8436.

In Fivem, the GPU’s role is to render the game world, including character models, vehicles, and environmental details. The measured FPS data shows that the Radeon 880M is the primary constraint on performance. At 1080p Low, it manages 74 FPS, but this drops to 59 FPS at Medium, 47 FPS at High, and 36 FPS at Ultra. This scaling suggests that the GPU’s shading units and ROPs are overwhelmed by the increased graphical demands of higher presets. The low ROP count of 16 is particularly problematic for high resolutions, as it limits the pixel fill rate.

The GPU’s reliance on shared system memory is another factor. With DDR5 memory support on the CPU side and a dual-channel bus, the bandwidth is 102.4 GB/s, but this is shared with the CPU. In Fivem, which can have large textures and many objects, the lack of dedicated VRAM may cause additional stuttering or slowdowns. However, the measured data shows consistent average FPS, so this is not the main issue. The core problem is the raw compute and fill-rate limits of the 880M. Its 43rd percentile ranking confirms that it is a mid-to-low tier GPU, and the benchmark results in Fivem reflect this, with even the best case (74 FPS at 1080p Low) being only marginally acceptable for a competitive multiplayer title.