Fivem

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile is a measured Fivem combination that ranks 1011th out of 3,707 tested combos. The CPU sits at the 93rd percentile among all CPUs, the GPU at the 81st percentile among all GPUs, and the measured FPS data covers 1920x1080, 2560x1440, and 3840x2160 across Low, Medium, High, and Ultra settings.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX is a 20-core, 20-thread Arrow Lake-HX processor. Its base clock is 2.60 GHz and its boost clock is 5.30 GHz. It is built on TSMC's 3 nm process with 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die, and it carries a 55 W TDP. Each core has 192 KB of L1 cache and 3 MB of L2 cache, with 30 MB of shared L3 cache. The memory interface is dual-channel DDR5 rated at 102.4 GB/s.

The CPU's benchmark data places it at the 93rd percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 63173. In Cinebench R23 it scores 5737 single-core and 40642 multi-core. PassMark results list 4500 for single-thread performance and 47985 for multithread performance. Its nearest rivals in the aggregate database are tightly clustered: the Intel Core i7-13790F has an average score of 63080 with a deltaPct of 0.1, the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G scores 63331 with a deltaPct of -0.2, the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 scores 62839 with a deltaPct of 0.5, and the Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX scores 62738 with a deltaPct of 0.7.

In the measured Fivem data, the highest average FPS occurs at 1920x1080 Low with 256 FPS. That row is the least resolution-heavy workload in the measured set, so it is the clearest direct view of the CPU's ability to sustain a high frame rate. The 5.30 GHz boost clock and 5737 Cinebench R23 single-core score align with that ceiling. The 40642 multi-core score and 20 threads provide broad headroom for the rest of the measured set, but the data does not isolate a separate CPU-only FPS result.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile uses the GB203 chip and Blackwell 2.0 architecture, built on TSMC's 5 nm process with 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die. It has 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 896.0 GB/s. The memory clock is listed as 1750 MHz, or 28 Gbps effective. The base GPU clock is 975 MHz and the boost clock is 1500 MHz.

The GPU has 7680 shading units, 240 texture mapping units, 96 ROPs, 60 RT cores, and 240 Tensor cores. Its FP32 throughput is 23.04 TFLOPS, with FP16 also listed at 23.04 TFLOPS. Its aggregate benchmark score is 38349, placing it at the 81st percentile among all GPUs. In the aggregate nearest-rival list, the NVIDIA GeForce MX570 scores 38299 with a deltaPct of 0.1, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile scores 38135 with a deltaPct of 0.6, the NVIDIA GeForce MX570 A scores 38691 with a deltaPct of -0.9, and the AMD Radeon Pro 580X scores 38706 with a deltaPct of -0.9.

The measured Fivem FPS rows show a clear settings order at every resolution: Low produces the highest average, followed by Medium, then High, then Ultra. At 3840x2160, the progression is Low 94, Medium 74, High 59, Ultra 46. At 2560x1440 it is 169, 133, 107, and 83. At 1920x1080 it is 256, 202, 162, and 126. Those results track the GPU workload added by higher settings, with the 3840x2160 Ultra row being the heaviest measured load for this combination.

FAQ

Q: What is the combo's overall rank in Fivem?

A: This combination is ranked 1011th out of 3,707 tested combos. The CPU is at the 93rd percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU is at the 81st percentile among all GPUs.

Q: Which preset gives the highest average FPS at each resolution?

A: Low settings give the highest measured averages at every resolution: 256 FPS at 1920x1080, 169 FPS at 2560x1440, and 94 FPS at 3840x2160. Medium is the highest preset that also has recorded min/max values in the data: 202 FPS with a 172-233 range at 1080p, 133 FPS with a 113-153 range at 1440p, and 74 FPS with a 63-85 range at 4K.

Q: How does the RTX 5080 Mobile's aggregate score compare to the RTX 4080 Mobile?

A: The RTX 5080 Mobile has an average benchmark score of 38349, while the RTX 4080 Mobile is listed at 38135, a deltaPct of 0.6.

Q: Does the Core Ultra 7 265HX have more threads than cores?

A: No. It has 20 cores and 20 threads, so the thread count matches the core count. It also has 192 KB of L1 and 3 MB of L2 per core, with 30 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: What are the memory specifications for the RTX 5080 Mobile?

A: The GPU has 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus, 896.0 GB/s of bandwidth, and a memory clock of 1750 MHz, or 28 Gbps effective.

Q: What FPS does the combo deliver at 4K Ultra?

A: The measured average is 46 FPS at 3840x2160 Ultra. At the same resolution, High averages 59 FPS, Medium averages 74 FPS with a 63-85 min/max range, and Low averages 94 FPS.

How This Combo Ranks

The measured rank for this pairing is 1011th out of 3,707 combinations, placing it in the upper portion of the database but not near the top. The CPU's 93rd-percentile standing is higher than the GPU's 81st-percentile standing. That asymmetry matters for interpreting the combo rank.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 63173 is closely matched by its nearest rivals: the Core i7-13790F at 63080, the Ryzen AI 7 450G at 63331, the Ryzen AI Embedded P185 at 62839, and the Core Ultra 7 255HX at 62738. All of those are within a 0.7 deltaPct band. The GPU's average score of 38349 is also closely matched by its listed aggregate neighbors, including the RTX 4080 Mobile at 38135 and the MX570 at 38299, all within 0.9 deltaPct. Because the CPU holds a higher percentile than the GPU, the 1011th combo rank is more likely driven by the GPU side and by the resolution-heavy FPS results than by CPU compute.

Measured FPS Breakdown

| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS | Min FPS | Max FPS |

|---|---:|---:|---:|---:|

| 1920x1080 | Low | 256 | null | null |

| 1920x1080 | Medium | 202 | 172 | 233 |

| 1920x1080 | High | 162 | null | null |

| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 126 | null | null |

| 2560x1440 | Low | 169 | null | null |

| 2560x1440 | Medium | 133 | 113 | 153 |

| 2560x1440 | High | 107 | null | null |

| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 83 | null | null |

| 3840x2160 | Low | 94 | null | null |

| 3840x2160 | Medium | 74 | 63 | 85 |

| 3840x2160 | High | 59 | null | null |

| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 46 | null | null |

The Medium rows are the only measured rows with recorded minimum and maximum FPS values. All other rows have null min/max values in the fact pack.

Settings Recommendations

Looking at the measured rows, Low is the clear highest-average choice: 256 FPS at 1080p, 169 FPS at 1440p, and 94 FPS at 4K. However, Low rows do not include any recorded min/max values, so the data provides no frame consistency information for that preset.

Medium is the strongest measured preset when a documented frame range is required. At 1080p it averages 202 FPS with a minimum of 172 FPS and a maximum of 233 FPS. At 1440p it averages 133 FPS with a 113-153 range. At 4K it averages 74 FPS with a 63-85 range. Medium also sits above High at every resolution: 202 over 162 at 1080p, 133 over 107 at 1440p, and 74 over 59 at 4K.

Ultra is still viable at lower resolutions. It averages 126 FPS at 1080p and 83 FPS at 1440p. At 4K it falls to 46 FPS, the lowest average in the entire measured set. For a balance between average FPS, documented minimum values, and a quality setting above Low, Medium is the best measured fit.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS drops consistently as resolution increases. At Low settings, average FPS falls from 256 at 1080p to 169 at 1440p to 94 at 4K. Medium falls from 202 to 133 to 74. High falls from 162 to 107 to 59. Ultra falls from 126 to 83 to 46.

In every preset, the 4K average is below half of the 1080p average. The CPU's specifications, including 20 cores, a 5.30 GHz boost clock, and 30 MB of L3 cache, remain fixed across all of those rows. The variable that changes is the resolution-driven workload given to the GPU. This pattern points to the GPU becoming the limiting component as resolution scales, with 3840x2160 Ultra representing the heaviest measured condition for this pairing.