Fivem

Fivem is a demanding multiplayer modification, and the data for the Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 shows a system that is heavily balanced toward GPU performance at higher resolutions, while revealing significant CPU limitations at 1080p. The measured results indicate that this combination is capable of excellent frame rates, but the scaling pattern suggests that the processor is the primary bottleneck in lower-resolution scenarios, a critical consideration for competitive play.

Resolution Scaling

The performance scaling from 1080p to 4K clearly illustrates where the bottleneck lies within this system. At 1920x1080 with High settings, the combo achieves an average of 165 FPS. Moving to 2560x1440 at the same settings drops the frame rate to 109 FPS, a reduction of 56 FPS. At 3840x2160, the average falls further to 60 FPS. This pattern shows a significant performance penalty as resolution increases, which is a hallmark of a GPU-bound scenario at higher pixel counts.

However, the low setting data tells a different story. At 1080p Low, the system produces 262 FPS, which is an exceptional result. When the resolution is increased to 1440p Low, the average only drops to 172 FPS, and at 4K Low, it still manages 96 FPS. The delta between 1080p and 1440p on Low settings is 90 FPS, which is a substantial drop, but the absolute numbers remain high. This suggests that while the GPU is working harder at higher resolutions, the CPU is able to feed it enough data to maintain playable frame rates even at 4K.

The relationship between settings and resolution is more telling. At 1080p Ultra, the average is 128 FPS, while at 1440p Ultra it drops to 84 FPS, and at 4K Ultra, it falls to 47 FPS. The scaling from 1440p to 4K on Ultra is a 37 FPS loss, which is a 44% reduction. This is a clear indicator that the RTX 4090's rendering load is the limiting factor at these extreme settings, as the CPU has enough headroom to process the game logic but cannot overcome the sheer pixel throughput required by the GPU.

The most critical observation is the scaling between Low and Ultra at the same resolution. At 1080p, the difference between Low (262 FPS) and Ultra (128 FPS) is 134 FPS. This is a massive gap that points to the GPU being underutilized at Low settings, as the CPU is likely hitting its maximum instruction throughput. The fact that the 265HX, with its 20 cores and 20 threads, is unable to push more frames at 1080p Low suggests that Fivem's single-threaded performance is a limiting factor, despite the processor's strong multi-core capabilities. The data shows that for maximum frame rates in esports-style scenarios, the resolution and settings must be carefully balanced to shift the load away from the CPU.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 in this configuration is a massive asset, but its role changes depending on the resolution and settings. With 24 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus, the card has a memory bandwidth of 1.01 TB/s. This is more than sufficient for Fivem at any resolution, as the high VRAM capacity ensures that texture streaming and asset loading are unlikely to cause stuttering. The 82.58 TFLOPS of FP32 compute power drives the high frame rates seen at 1440p and 4K, where the GPU becomes the primary workhorse.

The clock speeds of the RTX 4090, with a base of 2235 MHz and a boost of 2520 MHz, are high for a GPU of this class. The benchmark data shows a passmark G3D score of 38194, which places it in the 88th percentile of all GPUs. This performance ceiling is what allows the system to reach 109 FPS at 1440p High, a result that is only possible because the GPU can process the geometry and shading at a rapid pace. The 128 RT cores and 512 tensor cores also contribute to Fivem's rendering pipeline, although the game's core workload is more dependent on raw rasterization.

The GPU's memory configuration is a key factor in the 4K results. At 3840x2160, the average frame rates range from 47 FPS on Ultra to 96 FPS on Low. The 47 FPS at 4K Ultra shows that even a flagship GPU like the RTX 4090 is challenged by the combination of high resolution and maximum settings. This is not a VRAM limitation, as 24 GB is ample, but rather a raw compute limitation. The data indicates that the GPU is being fully saturated at this setting, which explains the 44% drop from 1440p Ultra to 4K Ultra.

Comparing the RTX 4090 to its nearest rivals in the benchmark database, the data shows a close grouping. The Intel Arc Pro A60 has a deltaPct of 0, while the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 is 0.3% ahead. The AMD Radeon Pro W6600M is 2.5% behind, and the AMD Radeon PRO V710 is 2.9% ahead. These are small margins, indicating that the RTX 4090's average benchmark score of 60347 is in a competitive tier, but the Fivem-specific results are what matter more. In this game, the GPU's role is to provide a solid foundation for high frame rates, but the CPU's ability to feed it becomes the deciding factor at lower resolutions.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings for this combo depend heavily on the target resolution. For a 1080p monitor, using Low settings yields 262 FPS, which is ideal for high-refresh-rate displays. However, the jump to Medium settings at 1080p still provides 207 FPS, which is a 55 FPS drop but remains exceptionally smooth. High settings at 1080p produce 165 FPS, which is still very playable, but the Ultra preset at 128 FPS is the least desirable for competitive play, as it introduces a larger performance penalty.

At 1440p, the decision is more nuanced. High settings at 109 FPS is the sweet spot for visual quality and performance, as it maintains a triple-digit frame rate. Medium settings at 136 FPS are better for those prioritizing smoothness, while Low at 172 FPS is the best for maximum responsiveness. Ultra at 84 FPS is below the 90 FPS threshold that many players consider optimal, so it is not recommended unless visual fidelity is the absolute priority. The data suggests that High is the best balance for 1440p, as it provides a 25 FPS improvement over Ultra while only sacrificing some shadow and texture quality.

For 4K gaming, the recommendations change entirely. Ultra at 47 FPS is not a good experience for a fast-paced multiplayer title, as it falls below the 60 FPS baseline. High settings at 60 FPS is exactly at that baseline, making it the minimum viable option for a playable experience. Medium settings at 75 FPS is a better choice, as it provides a 15 FPS uplift over High while still offering decent visual quality. Low at 96 FPS is the only preset that breaks the 90 FPS barrier at 4K, making it the recommended choice for players who want to maintain a high frame rate on a 4K display. In summary, the data points to a "High at 1440p" or "Low at 4K" strategy, depending on whether resolution or frame rate is more important.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The complete dataset provides a clear picture of performance across all resolutions and settings. At 1920x1080, the average FPS ranges from 262 on Low to 128 on Ultra. The Medium preset delivers 207 FPS, with a minimum of 176 FPS and a maximum of 238 FPS, showing a 62 FPS variance. High settings at 1080p produce 165 FPS. This shows a consistent degradation from Low to Ultra, with the gap between each tier being approximately 50-60 FPS, except for the jump from High to Ultra, which is 37 FPS.

At 2560x1440, the average FPS ranges from 172 on Low to 84 on Ultra. Medium settings deliver 136 FPS, with a minimum of 116 FPS and a maximum of 156 FPS, a variance of 40 FPS. High settings at 1440p produce 109 FPS. The scaling here is more compressed than at 1080p, with a 36 FPS difference between Low and Medium, a 27 FPS difference between Medium and High, and a 25 FPS difference between High and Ultra. This indicates that the GPU is becoming more of a limiting factor as resolution increases.

At 3840x2160, the average FPS ranges from 96 on Low to 47 on Ultra. Medium settings deliver 75 FPS, with a minimum of 64 FPS and a maximum of 87 FPS, a variance of 23 FPS. High settings at 4K produce 60 FPS. The scaling is the tightest here, with a 21 FPS difference between Low and Medium, a 15 FPS difference between Medium and High, and a 13 FPS difference between High and Ultra. This pattern shows that at 4K, the GPU is the dominant constraint, and settings changes have a smaller relative impact on performance.

The data also reveals that the Medium preset is the only one with recorded minimum and maximum FPS values across all resolutions. This suggests that the variance is more stable at Medium settings, which could be a factor in player experience. At 1080p Medium, the variance is 62 FPS, while at 1440p Medium, it is 40 FPS, and at 4K Medium, it is 23 FPS. This decreasing variance with increasing resolution indicates that the frame pacing becomes more consistent when the GPU is more heavily loaded, reducing the chances of sudden spikes or drops.

How This Combo Ranks

In the benchmark database, this specific combination of the Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 ranks 625th out of 3005 tested combos for Fivem. This places it in the top 20.8% of all configurations, which is a strong showing given the game's demanding nature. The rank is a composite measure that takes into account the measured FPS across all resolutions and settings, and it reflects the system's overall capability.

The CPU's individual performance is a key contributor to this rank. The Core Ultra 7 265HX has a percentileVsAllCpus of 93, meaning it is in the top 7% of all processors. Its average benchmark score is 63173, which is nearly identical to the Intel Core i7-13790F, with a deltaPct of 0.1%. It is also within 0.7% of the Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX, showing that the 265HX is a high-tier mobile processor. However, the Fivem results show that this CPU strength is not fully utilized at lower resolutions, which holds back the combo rank from being even higher.

The GPU's performance also plays a role. The RTX 4090 has a percentileVsAllGpus of 88, placing it in the top 12% of all graphics cards. Its average benchmark score of 60347 is competitive with peers like the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M, which is only 2.5% ahead. Despite the GPU being a top-tier part, the combo rank of 625 suggests that the CPU bottleneck at 1080p prevents the system from achieving a higher placement. If the game were more GPU-bound at all resolutions, this combo would likely rank higher.

The rank of 625 out of 3005 is a solid result, but it is not a top-100 placement. The data indicates that while the RTX 4090 provides excellent raw performance, the Core Ultra 7 265HX's architecture is not optimized for Fivem's single-threaded nature. This is a common issue with high-core-count processors in games that do not scale well across many threads. The combo's rank reflects this limitation, showing that it is a capable system but not the absolute best for this specific title.

FAQ

Q: What is the best settings preset for 1080p gaming with this combo?

A: The data shows that Low settings at 1080p yield 262 FPS, while Medium provides 207 FPS. For competitive play, Low is the best choice to maximize frame rate. If visual quality is a priority, High at 165 FPS is a strong alternative, but Ultra at 128 FPS is the least recommended.

Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming smoothly?

A: Yes, but only at lower settings. At 4K Low, the average FPS is 96, which is smooth. Medium at 75 FPS is also playable, but High at 60 FPS and Ultra at 47 FPS are below the ideal threshold for a fast-paced game.

Q: Why is the FPS drop from 1080p to 1440p so large on Low settings?

A: At 1080p Low, the CPU is the bottleneck, allowing the GPU to output 262 FPS. When the resolution increases to 1440p, the GPU has to render more pixels, which increases its workload and causes the frame rate to drop to 172 FPS. This shift indicates the system is becoming more GPU-bound.

Q: How does the CPU's performance compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Core Ultra 7 265HX has an average benchmark score of 63173, which is 0.1% higher than the Intel Core i7-13790F and 0.7% higher than the Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX. It is also 0.2% lower than the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G, showing it is a highly competitive processor.

Q: Is the RTX 4090's 24 GB of VRAM necessary for Fivem?

A: The 24 GB of VRAM is more than sufficient for Fivem at any resolution. The data does not show any VRAM-related performance issues, as the bottleneck at 4K is due to compute limitations, not memory capacity. The high bandwidth of 1.01 TB/s ensures smooth texture streaming.

Q: What is the combo's rank among all tested systems?

A: The combo ranks 625th out of 3005 tested combinations for Fivem. This places it in the top 20.8% of all systems, which is a strong result. The rank is influenced by the CPU bottleneck at lower resolutions, which prevents the system from achieving a higher placement.