Undisputed

The pairing of the Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 in Undisputed produces a dataset that clearly separates the responsibilities of the processor and the graphics card. The measured frames per second (FPS) across three resolutions and four quality presets show a system that is overwhelmingly GPU-limited at higher settings, yet still possesses enough CPU headroom to push extreme frame rates at 1080p. This analysis breaks down the scaling behavior, component roles, and practical settings for this specific combination.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS data reveals a classic performance curve where the impact of resolution is heavily modulated by the graphics settings. At the Low preset, the jump from 1080p to 1440p results in a drop from 377 FPS to 272 FPS, a reduction of 105 FPS. Moving from 1440p to 4K (3840x2160) at Low settings brings the average down to 172 FPS, another 100 FPS loss. This steep decline indicates that even at the lowest graphical fidelity, the rendering load on the GPU is scaling aggressively with pixel count, though the absolute numbers remain exceptionally high.

The High preset tells a similar story with slightly lower absolute values. At 1080p, the system produces 224 FPS. At 1440p, this falls to 162 FPS, and at 4K, it reaches 102 FPS. The percentage drop from 1080p to 4K is roughly 54%, which is substantial. This pattern suggests that while the RTX 4090 is powerful, the sheer pixel throughput required at 4K is a limiting factor, even before considering the more complex shading work in the High preset.

At the Ultra setting, the scaling becomes more pronounced. The 1080p result is 144 FPS, which is still very playable. At 1440p, the average drops to 104 FPS, and at 4K, it falls to 66 FPS. The delta between 1080p and 4K here is 78 FPS, or a 54% reduction, which mirrors the High preset's relative decline. This consistency across presets suggests that the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions is the GPU's fillrate and memory bandwidth, not the CPU's ability to feed it data.

The Medium preset provides the only min/max FPS data points in the set. At 1080p, the system averages 271 FPS with a minimum of 230 FPS and a maximum of 312 FPS. At 1440p, the average is 196 FPS, with a min of 166 and max of 225. At 4K, the average is 124 FPS, with a min of 105 and a max of 142. The tight min-to-max spread at each resolution indicates stable frame pacing, which is critical for a sports title where sudden movements are common. The 4K Medium result, with a 105 FPS minimum, shows that even in demanding scenes, the combo avoids severe stutters.

What this scaling data indicates is that the limiting component changes based on the target. At 1080p Low, with 377 FPS, the CPU is likely nearing its practical limit for frame generation, though the 20-core processor still delivers. As resolution increases, the GPU becomes the definitive bottleneck. The 4K Ultra result of 66 FPS is a clear sign that the RTX 4090 is working at its maximum capacity, and the CPU is no longer the primary constraint. The data shows a system that is versatile, but the user must choose between maximum visual fidelity and maximum frame rate.

CPU Role

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX is a 20-core, 20-thread processor based on the Arrow Lake-HX architecture, built on a 3 nm process. It has a base clock of 2.60 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz. In the context of Undisputed, a sports game that typically relies on single-thread performance for game logic and physics, these clocks are more relevant than the raw core count. The benchmark data shows a single-thread Passmark score of 4500 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5737, which positions it well for such tasks.

The processor's role is evident in the high frame rates at 1080p. At Low settings, the system reaches 377 FPS, a figure that often approaches CPU limits in many titles. The fact that the CPU can sustain this with the RTX 4090 indicates that the 265HX is not holding back the GPU at lower resolutions. The boost clock of 5.30 GHz is likely the key factor here, allowing for rapid instruction processing that keeps the GPU fed with draw calls and physics calculations.

However, the data also shows that the CPU's influence wanes as resolution increases. At 4K Ultra, the FPS drops to 66, a figure that is far below what the CPU could theoretically support. This is the GPU's domain. The CPU's multi-threaded capabilities, evidenced by a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 40642, are not fully utilized by Undisputed, but they provide a robust foundation for background tasks and streaming, should the user engage in those activities.

The processor's memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s and support for DDR5 memory are appropriate for feeding the high-end GPU. The data suggests that the 265HX is a capable partner for the RTX 4090 in this game, providing enough headroom to avoid being the primary bottleneck at any resolution below 4K Ultra. The percentile ranking of 93 for this CPU against all others indicates it is a top-tier performer, and this is reflected in the FPS figures, which never dip below 66 FPS in any tested configuration.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 is the dominant component in this analysis. With 24 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus, providing 1.01 TB/s of bandwidth, it is designed for high-resolution rendering. Its 16,384 shading units and boost clock of 2520 MHz contribute to its raw compute power, which is evident in the 4K performance metrics.

The GPU's role is most clearly defined by the scaling from Medium to Ultra at 4K. At Medium, the average FPS is 124, while at Ultra, it drops to 66. This 58 FPS difference is almost entirely due to the increased shading complexity and memory pressure of the Ultra preset. The 24 GB VRAM buffer is more than sufficient for Undisputed at any resolution, so capacity is not the issue; rather, it is the computational load of rendering the game at 3840x2160 with maximal effects.

The RTX 4090's performance relative to its rivals, based on the nearestRivals data, shows it is closely matched with several professional-grade GPUs. It scores 38194 in Passmark G3D, which places it in a similar tier to the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M, which has a deltaPct of -2.5, and the AMD Radeon PRO V710, with a deltaPct of 2.9. This indicates that while the 4090 is a consumer flagship, its compute capabilities are on par with workstation cards, which explains its ability to handle High settings at 4K with a 102 FPS average.

The GPU's memory clock is listed as 1313 MHz, with an effective data rate of 21 Gbps. This high-speed memory is critical for the 4K results, as the bandwidth is necessary to move textures and geometry data. The 1.01 TB/s bandwidth is a key specification that allows the card to maintain the 102 FPS average at 4K High, a figure that would be unattainable with a lesser memory subsystem. The data shows that the RTX 4090 is the primary driver of FPS in this combo, with its performance ceiling being the main factor limiting the system's output at high resolutions and settings.

How This Combo Ranks

In the database of tested combinations, this specific pairing of the Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 holds a rank of 830 out of 3718 total combos in Undisputed. This places it in the top 22.3% of all tested systems, which is a strong showing. The rank considers the overall performance across all resolutions and settings, and a position in the top quarter indicates that this combo delivers a high level of performance.

However, the rank also reveals that there are many other combos that outperform this one in the game. The fact that this pairing is not in the top 10% suggests that the CPU, despite its strong single-thread scores, may not be the absolute best match for the RTX 4090 in this specific title. The nearestRivals for the CPU show that it is closely matched with the Intel Core i7-13790F (deltaPct 0.1) and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G (deltaPct -0.2). These processors likely produce similar FPS figures when paired with the same GPU.

The GPU's nearestRivals, such as the Intel Arc Pro A60 (deltaPct 0) and the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M (deltaPct -2.5), suggest that the 4090's performance is not unique among high-end cards. The rank of 830 indicates that while this combo is fast, it is not at the absolute pinnacle of performance for Undisputed. The data implies that a different CPU, perhaps one with higher single-thread performance, could push this GPU to a higher rank, but the current pairing is still highly capable.

The combo's rank should be interpreted in context. With 3,718 combos tested, being in the 830th position means that over 2,800 other systems are slower. This is a significant achievement, and the measured FPS figures support this, with no configuration dropping below 66 FPS. For the vast majority of gamers, this level of performance will be more than sufficient, and the rank reflects a system that is well-balanced for high-refresh-rate gaming at 1440p and smooth 4K experiences.

FAQ

*Q: What is the highest average FPS this combo achieves in Undisputed?*

A: The highest average FPS is 377, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with the Low preset.

Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming?

A: Yes, the data shows it can. At 3840x2160 with the High preset, it averages 102 FPS, and even at the Ultra preset, it maintains a 66 FPS average, which is playable.

Q: What is the difference in performance between the Low and Ultra presets at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, the Low preset averages 272 FPS, while the Ultra preset averages 104 FPS, a difference of 168 FPS.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor at 1080p Low?

A: At 1080p Low with 377 FPS, the CPU is likely the limiting factor, as the GPU has excess capacity at such a low resolution and preset.

Q: How does this combo rank compared to all other tested combos?

A: This combo ranks 830 out of 3718 total combos, placing it in the top 22.3% of all tested systems for Undisputed.

Q: What is the minimum FPS recorded for the Medium preset at 4K?

A: At 3840x2160 with Medium settings, the minimum FPS is 105, with an average of 124 FPS.

Settings Recommendations

The measured data provides a clear path for optimizing the experience in Undisputed based on the user's display and preference for frame rate versus visual quality. For users with a 1080p display, the High preset is the optimal choice. It delivers 224 FPS on average, which is well above the refresh rate of most monitors, and it ensures that the game looks visually appealing. The Ultra preset at 1080p still provides 144 FPS, which is excellent, but the jump to High offers a significant FPS increase (80 FPS) with only a minor visual sacrifice, making High the better balance.

For 1440p users, the High preset is again the best recommendation. It produces a 162 FPS average, which is ideal for high-refresh-rate monitors (144Hz or 165Hz). The Medium preset also works well, with 196 FPS, but the visual quality difference between Medium and High is often noticeable in a sports title, and the FPS drop from Medium to High (34 FPS) is acceptable to maintain the 162 FPS average. The Ultra preset at 1440p, with 104 FPS, is a viable option for users with a 120Hz display, but it is not the best use of the system's capabilities.

At 4K, the recommendation depends on the refresh rate of the display. For a 60Hz display, the Ultra preset is the best choice, as the 66 FPS average is above 60, and it provides the best visual fidelity the game can offer. For a 120Hz display, the High preset is the sweet spot, delivering a 102 FPS average, which is close to the 120Hz target and offers a significant improvement over the 66 FPS of Ultra. The Medium preset at 4K also performs well, with 124 FPS, and it should be used if the user prioritizes frame rate over the highest level of detail.

The Low preset is generally not recommended for any resolution, as the visual quality is significantly reduced, and the FPS gains are only necessary for competitive play, which is less common in a sports simulation like Undisputed. The data shows that the system is powerful enough to run the game at High or Ultra settings at playable frame rates, so using Low would be leaving performance on the table. The final choice should be guided by the display's refresh rate, with the goal of matching or exceeding it without dropping below the minimum FPS thresholds seen in the Medium preset data.