Fivem

Fivem is a demanding multiplayer title that stresses both processor and graphics hardware. The measured data for the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 paired with the AMD Radeon RX 9060 reveals a configuration that scales predictably with resolution, with clear bottlenecks emerging at higher settings. This analysis breaks down the performance metrics from the benchmark database, focusing on resolution scaling, relative ranking, and the distinct roles of the CPU and GPU.

Resolution Scaling

The performance drop from 1080p to 4K is the first clear indicator of where this system’s limits lie. At 1080p with Low settings, the combo produces an average of 175 FPS. Moving to 1440p Low reduces that to 115 FPS, a 34% decrease. Stepping up to 4K Low yields 64 FPS, which is a further 44% drop from the 1440p figure. This steep decline as resolution increases points directly to the GPU becoming the primary limiting factor at higher pixel counts.

The pattern is consistent across all settings presets. At High settings, the average FPS falls from 111 at 1080p to 73 at 1440p and then to 40 at 4K. Similarly, at Medium settings, the numbers go from 138 at 1080p to 91 at 1440p and 50 at 4K. The Ultra preset shows the same trend, with averages of 86, 56, and 31 FPS across the three resolutions. The scaling is nearly linear, indicating that the graphics card’s rendering throughput is the dominant constraint once resolution increases.

This behavior suggests that the CPU has ample headroom at lower resolutions. The fact that 1080p Low reaches 175 FPS shows the processor can feed the GPU at high frame rates. However, as the pixel workload grows, the GPU’s fixed resources—its 8 GB of memory and 128-bit bus—become the ceiling. The 4K Ultra result of 31 FPS is particularly telling, as it demonstrates the GPU is saturated and cannot maintain playable frame rates at the highest fidelity. For users targeting high refresh rates at 1080p, this combo works well, but 4K gaming requires significant settings compromises.

How This Combo Ranks

Within the benchmark database, this specific pairing of the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 and AMD Radeon RX 9060 holds a rank of 1714 out of 3005 tested combos for Fivem. This places it in the lower-middle portion of the field, meaning a majority of other system configurations deliver higher average frame rates in this specific game. The percentile data for the individual components provides context for this ranking.

The CPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 245, sits at the 90th percentile when compared to all processors, which is a strong showing. Its nearest rivals in overall benchmark scores include the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G and the AMD Ryzen 9 7900, with deltaPct values of -0.4% and -0.5% respectively. This means the Core Ultra 5 245 is statistically nearly identical in performance to those higher-tier chips. It also beats the Intel Core i5-14600K by 0.8% in aggregate CPU benchmarks.

However, the GPU, AMD Radeon RX 9060, only reaches the 59th percentile among all graphics cards. Its average benchmark score of 16014 is just 0.7% lower than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, which is its closest rival. The Radeon RX 9060 is also only 1% faster than the AMD Radeon RX 7700 in synthetic tests. This mid-range GPU performance is what drags the combo’s rank down in a game that is heavily reliant on pixel throughput. The CPU is a high performer, but the GPU holds the system back from achieving a higher position in the Fivem rankings.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 9060 is built on the RDNA 4.0 architecture with a 4 nm process node. It features 1792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, and 64 render output units. The card has 28 ray tracing cores. Its core clocks are listed as a base of 1700 MHz, a game clock of 2400 MHz, and a boost clock of 2990 MHz. These specifications determine how quickly the card can process geometry and pixels.

Memory is a critical factor for modern games, and the RX 9060 comes equipped with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus. This configuration yields a memory bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s. In Fivem, this memory capacity appears to be a limiting factor at higher resolutions and settings. The measured FPS data shows a substantial drop when moving from Medium to High settings at the same resolution, which often correlates with texture memory usage exceeding the available 8 GB. The card’s pixel rate is 191.4 GPixel/s, and its texture rate is 334.9 GTexel/s, which are modest figures that align with its mid-range positioning.

The GPU’s compute capabilities are reflected in its benchmark scores. It achieves a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3322 and a Passmark G3D score of 17631. The Passmark DirectX 11 score of 182 and DirectX 12 score of 44 are low, indicating that the card may not excel in specific API overhead scenarios. The card’s TDP is 132 W, and it requires a single 8-pin power connector. In Fivem, the GPU is the clear bottleneck at 4K, as the frame rates drop to levels that are not consistently smooth, particularly on the Ultra preset.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The benchmark data provides specific average frame rates for each resolution and settings combination. At 1920x1080, the performance spans a wide range depending on the preset. Low settings deliver an average of 175 FPS, which is excellent for competitive play. Medium settings reduce the average to 138 FPS, with a minimum of 117 FPS and a maximum of 159 FPS. High settings produce an average of 111 FPS, while Ultra settings drop to 86 FPS. All 1080p results are playable, and even the Ultra preset maintains a frame rate above 60 FPS.

Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates decrease but remain mostly playable. Low settings average 115 FPS, which is still very smooth. Medium settings average 91 FPS, with a minimum of 77 and a maximum of 105 FPS. High settings average 73 FPS, which is acceptable for most users. Ultra settings drop to 56 FPS, which might be less desirable for those seeking a consistently high refresh rate experience, but it is still workable for slower-paced gameplay.

At 3840x2160, the GPU struggles significantly. Low settings yield an average of 64 FPS, which is the only preset at 4K that stays above the 60 FPS threshold. Medium settings drop to 50 FPS, with a minimum of 43 FPS and a maximum of 58 FPS. High settings average 40 FPS, and Ultra settings fall to 31 FPS. These numbers clearly indicate that 4K gaming with this combo requires using Low settings to achieve a playable frame rate. The step from 1440p to 4K is particularly harsh, with a roughly 44% performance loss at Low settings and a similar percentage loss at High settings.

CPU Role

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245 is a 14-core, 14-thread processor based on the Arrow Lake architecture. It has a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The processor includes 24 MB of shared L3 cache and supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. This CPU is a strong performer, ranking in the 90th percentile of all processors tested. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score is 32924, and its single-core score is 4648, indicating robust multi-threaded and single-threaded capabilities.

In Fivem, the CPU is likely not the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions, but its performance is crucial for maintaining high frame rates at 1080p. The fact that the system reaches 175 FPS at 1080p Low suggests that the CPU can handle the game’s simulation and draw calls efficiently. The processor’s Passmark multithread score of 38706 and Passmark single-thread score of 4394 support its ability to keep up with fast-paced multiplayer scenarios. The data shows that the CPU’s headroom is sufficient, as the frame rate drops are primarily driven by the GPU workload when resolution increases.

The nearest CPU rivals have nearly identical average scores, with the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G being just 0.4% slower and the AMD Ryzen 9 7900 being 0.5% slower. The Intel Xeon Gold 5318H is 0.6% faster, and the Intel Core i5-14600K is 0.8% faster. This indicates that the Core Ultra 5 245 is well-matched against other high-end desktop processors. Its 14 cores and 14 threads, combined with a high boost clock, provide ample performance for Fivem, which benefits from both strong single-core speed and sufficient multi-core resources for background tasks.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo to achieve 60+ FPS?

A: The data shows that at 2560x1440, all settings except Ultra average above 60 FPS. At 4K, only Low settings achieve an average of 64 FPS. Therefore, 1440p is the highest resolution where a 60 FPS average is achievable on High settings.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its closest rival?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 9060 has an average benchmark score of 16014, which is 0.7% lower than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti’s score of 16129. It is also 1% faster than the AMD Radeon RX 7700.

Q: Is the CPU a limiting factor in this game?

A: Based on the measured FPS, the CPU does not appear to be the main bottleneck. The system achieves 175 FPS at 1080p Low, indicating strong processing power. The frame rate drops are more closely tied to resolution increases, which affect the GPU more heavily.

Q: What is the frame rate difference between Medium and High settings at 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080, Medium settings average 138 FPS, while High settings average 111 FPS. This represents a 27 FPS difference between the two presets.

Q: Which preset at 4K provides the highest frame rate?

A: At 3840x2160, the Low preset delivers the highest average frame rate at 64 FPS. The Medium preset follows at 50 FPS, High at 40 FPS, and Ultra at 31 FPS.

Q: How does the CPU rank against all other processors?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 245 is at the 90th percentile when compared to all CPUs in the database. Its average benchmark score is 48995, placing it just behind the AMD Ryzen 9 7900.

Settings Recommendations

For users prioritizing a high refresh rate experience, the 1920x1080 resolution is the clear choice. At this resolution, even the Ultra preset maintains an average of 86 FPS, which is suitable for most monitors. For competitive play, the Low preset at 175 FPS offers the highest frame rates, minimizing input lag. Medium settings at 138 FPS provide a good balance between visual quality and speed.

At 2560x1440, the Medium preset is the recommended starting point. It delivers an average of 91 FPS with a minimum of 77 FPS, ensuring smooth gameplay. The High preset is also viable at 73 FPS, but users with high refresh rate displays might prefer the extra frames from Medium. The Ultra preset at 56 FPS should be avoided if consistent 60+ FPS is required.

For 4K gaming, the data strongly suggests using the Low preset. It is the only option that achieves an average above 60 FPS, coming in at 64 FPS. The Medium preset at 50 FPS is borderline playable but may feel inconsistent. The High and Ultra presets, at 40 and 31 FPS respectively, are not recommended for a smooth experience in this multiplayer game. The GPU’s 8 GB memory and bandwidth limitations become apparent at this resolution, making High and Ultra presets impractical.