Fivem

Fivem is a demanding and highly variable multiplayer title, and the benchmark results for the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7700 show a configuration that scales predictably across resolutions and settings. The data indicates a system that can deliver high refresh rates at 1080p with adjustments, but which becomes increasingly GPU-bound as resolution climbs, ultimately struggling to maintain smooth gameplay at 4K on higher presets.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data shows a clear and consistent pattern of performance degradation as resolution increases, which is typical for a GPU-bound scenario. At 1080p with High settings, the combo achieves an average of 126 FPS. Moving to 1440p at the same settings drops the average to 83 FPS, a reduction of 34%. At 4K, the average falls further to 46 FPS, which is a 45% drop from the 1440p result and a 63% drop from the 1080p baseline. This steep decline indicates that the rendering load is scaling heavily with pixel count, a hallmark of the GPU being the primary performance limiter.

The scaling pattern holds across all settings presets. With Medium settings, the average FPS goes from 158 at 1080p, to 104 at 1440p, and down to 58 at 4K. The Low preset shows a similar trajectory: 200 FPS at 1080p, 132 at 1440p, and 73 at 4K. The Ultra preset is the most demanding, with averages of 98 FPS at 1080p, 65 at 1440p, and a playability-questionable 36 FPS at 4K. The consistent nature of these drops—roughly halving or more from 1080p to 4K—suggests that the CPU is doing its job and is not the bottleneck at higher resolutions; the GPU is simply running out of pixel-pushing capability.

The fact that the 1080p to 1440p drop is less severe than the 1440p to 4K drop suggests that the RX 7700's memory bandwidth and compute resources are sufficient for the lower resolution but become saturated at 4K. For example, the jump from 1440p High (83 FPS) to 4K High (46 FPS) is a 45% loss, while the jump from 1080p High (126 FPS) to 1440p High (83 FPS) is a 34% loss. This non-linear scaling is a classic sign of a GPU approaching its limits, as the fill-rate and memory bandwidth demands of 4K exceed what the card can comfortably provide. Players targeting 4K will need to significantly lower settings or accept sub-60 FPS averages, while 1440p offers a much more balanced experience.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 7700 is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture and features a Navi 32 chip. It comes equipped with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 624.1 GB/s. The card's clocks are listed with a base of 1900 MHz, a game clock of 2041 MHz, and a boost clock of 2459 MHz. This combination of substantial VRAM and high bandwidth is crucial for a game like Fivem, which is known for its heavy modding community and custom assets that can quickly consume memory.

The benchmark results corroborate the GPU's role as the primary performance driver. At 4K Ultra, the average FPS drops to 36, which is below the threshold for smooth gameplay. This is not a CPU limitation, as the Core Ultra 5 245 has strong single-thread performance in other tests. Instead, it points to the GPU being overwhelmed by the combination of high resolution and maximum settings. The 16 GB VRAM buffer likely prevents stuttering from memory swapping, but the raw compute power of the RX 7700 is insufficient to maintain high frame rates at 4K with Ultra settings.

The GPU's percentile ranking also provides context. It sits in the 58th percentile of all GPUs, indicating it is a mid-pack performer in the current landscape. Its average benchmark score of 15852 places it in close competition with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, which has an average score of 16129, a delta of -1.7% for the RX 7700. This suggests that in raw compute, the RX 7700 is a direct competitor to that older but still popular card. However, in Fivem, the data shows that the RX 7700 is strong enough for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but its performance collapses at 4K, confirming that its 200 W TDP and dual-slot cooler are designed for mainstream gaming, not extreme high-resolution workloads.

How This Combo Ranks

In the grand scheme of tested combinations for Fivem, this specific pairing of the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 and AMD Radeon RX 7700 achieves a combo rank of 1318 out of 3005 total combos. This places it in the upper-middle tier of all tested systems, meaning it outperforms more than half of the configurations tested but is far from the top-tier setups. This rank is a holistic score that takes into account the combined capabilities of both the CPU and GPU in this specific game.

This ranking suggests that while the system is capable, it is not a high-end enthusiast setup. The CPU alone sits in the 90th percentile of all CPUs, showing that it is a strong processor. However, the GPU's 58th percentile ranking drags the overall combo down. The data indicates that the system is well-balanced for 1080p and 1440p gaming, where the CPU can feed the GPU adequately. The combo rank reflects this balance, putting it in a position where it will handle most games well, but it won't top any charts for maximum fidelity at 4K.

The individual component rankings support this analysis. The CPU's nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 9 7900, with a delta of -0.5%, and the Intel Core i5-14600K, with a delta of 0.8%. These are all high-performance processors, and the Core Ultra 5 245 is keeping pace with them. On the GPU side, the RX 7700 is close to the RTX 3060 Ti, a card that was a staple of 1440p gaming in its generation. This pairing of a top-tier CPU with a mid-range GPU is a common and sensible configuration, and the combo rank of 1318/3005 reflects that it is a solid, mainstream gaming machine rather than a niche extreme-performance build.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The full set of measured FPS data provides a detailed look at the system's performance across all tested scenarios. At 1920x1080, the system is highly capable. With Low settings, it achieves an average of 200 FPS, which is excellent for competitive play. Medium settings yield 158 FPS, with a minimum of 134 and a maximum of 182, showing good frame pacing. High settings produce 126 FPS, and even Ultra settings maintain a respectable 98 FPS average. This resolution is clearly where the system shines, offering high refresh rate potential across the board.

Moving to 2560x1440, performance remains strong but demands more from the GPU. Low settings deliver an average of 132 FPS, which is still very smooth. Medium settings drop to 104 FPS, with a recorded minimum of 88 and maximum of 120, indicating some variance but generally stable performance. High settings yield 83 FPS, which is playable for most users. Ultra settings, however, bring the average down to 65 FPS, which is on the lower edge of what is considered smooth for fast-paced action.

At 3840x2160, the system's limitations are clear. Low settings are the only preset that provides a comfortable experience, with an average of 73 FPS. Medium settings drop to 58 FPS, with a minimum of 49 and maximum of 66, which can feel inconsistent. High settings average 46 FPS, and Ultra settings fall to 36 FPS. These numbers show that 4K gaming is only viable with significant compromises in visual quality. The data suggests that 1440p is the sweet spot for this combo, offering a good balance between visual fidelity and performance, while 1080p is where it truly excels.

CPU Role

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245 is a 14-core, 14-thread processor based on the Arrow Lake architecture, built on a 3 nm process by TSMC. It has a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The CPU also features 24 MB of shared L3 cache and supports DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. These specifications indicate a modern, high-performance processor that is well-suited for gaming and multitasking.

In Fivem, the CPU's role appears to be secondary to the GPU, but it is not insignificant. The game is known for being CPU-intensive in certain scenarios, particularly in multiplayer areas with many players and complex scripts. The high single-thread performance of the Core Ultra 5 245, evidenced by its Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4648, is crucial for maintaining consistent frame times in these situations. Its multi-threaded capabilities, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32924, also ensure that background tasks and game logic don't cause stutters.

The benchmark data shows that the CPU is not the bottleneck in this configuration. At 1080p Low, the system hits 200 FPS, which suggests the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU at high frame rates. If the CPU were weak, we would expect to see a plateau in FPS regardless of resolution or settings. Instead, we see FPS scaling with resolution, which confirms that the GPU is the limiting factor. The CPU's high percentile ranking (90th) and its close performance to rivals like the Intel Core i5-14600K (0.8% delta) and AMD Ryzen 9 7900 (-0.5% delta) show that it is a top-tier processor that will not hold back modern GPUs in most games, including Fivem.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings for this combo depend heavily on the target resolution and refresh rate. For players with a 1080p monitor, the system is powerful enough to handle any preset. Ultra settings at 98 FPS is a great choice for those prioritizing visual quality. For competitive players who want maximum frame rates, Low settings at 200 FPS or Medium at 158 FPS are excellent options, providing a significant advantage in responsiveness.

For 1440p, the recommendation is to stick with High settings, which yields a solid 83 FPS average. This provides a good balance between visual fidelity and smooth gameplay. Medium settings at 104 FPS is also a strong option for those who prefer higher frame rates, and Low at 132 FPS is suitable for fast-paced multiplayer. Ultra settings at 65 FPS is playable, but the lower frame rate may be a disadvantage in competitive scenarios, making High the best overall choice for this resolution.

For 4K, the data suggests that users will need to make significant sacrifices. Low settings at 73 FPS is the only preset that provides a consistently smooth experience. Medium settings at 58 FPS is borderline, and the minimum FPS of 49 can lead to noticeable hitches. High and Ultra settings are not recommended for 4K gaming, as the average FPS of 46 and 36, respectively, fall below the threshold for enjoyable gameplay. Therefore, for 4K, the best experience per the measured rows is to use Low settings, or to consider a lower resolution for a better overall experience.