Fivem

Fivem is a demanding multiplayer modification, and the combination of the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 and AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT produces a performance profile that is highly dependent on resolution and graphical presets. The measured data reveals a system that can deliver excellent frame rates at 1080p and 1440p, but which begins to struggle at 4K, particularly when settings are pushed to their maximum. This analysis breaks down the measured FPS results to show exactly how this pairing behaves, where its strengths lie, and what settings will provide the most reliable experience.

Resolution Scaling

The performance drop from 1080p to 4K is steep and clearly illustrates the increasing load on the GPU as resolution scales. At 1080p with High settings, the combo achieves an average of 148 FPS. Moving to 2560x1440 at the same settings, the average drops to 98 FPS, a 34% decrease. The jump to 3840x2160 is even more punishing, with the average falling to 54 FPS, which is a 45% reduction from the 1440p figure and a 64% reduction from 1080p. This scaling pattern is typical for a game like Fivem, where the CPU can handle the lower resolution workloads, but the GPU becomes the limiting factor as pixel count increases.

The data suggests that at 1080p, the system is likely not fully GPU-bound, as the frame rates are high enough to suggest the CPU is doing a significant portion of the work. The 235 FPS average at 1080p Low settings further supports this, as it shows the GPU has headroom to render many more frames when the visual load is light. However, the rapid decline in performance at 4K, where the Ultra preset only yields 42 FPS, indicates that the RX 7800 XT's rendering capabilities are being maxed out. The gap between Low and Ultra settings also widens with resolution, from a 120 FPS difference at 1080p to a 44 FPS difference at 4K, showing that the GPU is struggling to maintain high frame rates when both resolution and settings are increased.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT is the dominant component in this configuration for determining frame rates at higher resolutions. Its 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 624.1 GB/s, is a substantial resource, but the data shows that raw bandwidth alone doesn't guarantee high FPS in Fivem. The GPU's boost clock of 2430 MHz and game clock of 2124 MHz provide a solid foundation, yet the measured performance at 4K reveals that the compute units are being fully utilized. The 3840 shading units and 96 ROPs are responsible for the pixel output, and at 4K Ultra, the workload is simply too heavy for this chip to maintain a smooth 60 FPS.

The data shows a clear limitation in the GPU's ability to handle the most demanding settings. At 1440p, the RX 7800 XT manages an average of 76 FPS on Ultra, which is playable, but dropping to High settings boosts it to 98 FPS, a 29% improvement. This indicates that while the GPU is powerful, it is not so overpowered that it can brute-force its way through Fivem's highest quality presets at higher resolutions. The GPU's performance is also reflected in its benchmark scores. Its Passmark G3D score of 24176 is decent, and it sits in the 51st percentile of all GPUs, but its nearest rivals in that benchmark include the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660, which is a much older and less capable card. This suggests that while the RX 7800 XT is a competent performer, it is not at the top of the GPU hierarchy, and its Fivem performance is in line with its mid-to-high range positioning.

FAQ

Q: Can this combo handle 4K gaming in Fivem?

A: The data shows it can, but with significant caveats. At 4K High settings, the average FPS is 54, which is below the 60 FPS target many consider smooth. At 4K Ultra, the average drops to 42 FPS. To get a more comfortable experience at 4K, you would need to use Medium settings, which yields an average of 68 FPS, or Low settings, which allows for 86 FPS.

Q: What is the best resolution to use for a high-refresh-rate monitor?

A: For 144Hz or higher refresh rates, 1080p is the clear choice. The data shows an average of 148 FPS at High settings and 186 FPS at Medium. Even at Ultra, the combo pushes 115 FPS. At 1440p, you can achieve a high frame rate on Low (155 FPS) or Medium (122 FPS), but High settings at 98 FPS might be limiting for a 144Hz display. For a 165Hz or 240Hz monitor, 1080p Low settings at 235 FPS is the only way to fully saturate the display.

Q: How much of a performance hit do Ultra settings take compared to High?

A: The penalty is significant. At 1080p, moving from High to Ultra reduces the average FPS from 148 to 115, a 22% drop. At 1440p, the drop is from 98 to 76, a 22% decrease as well. At 4K, the impact is slightly larger in absolute terms, with the average falling from 54 to 42 FPS, a 22% reduction. This consistent ~22% penalty suggests that Ultra settings impose a uniform increase in GPU load across all resolutions.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the main bottleneck in this system?

A: The bottleneck shifts depending on resolution. At 1080p, the high frame rates (up to 235 FPS on Low) suggest the GPU is not the primary limiting factor, and the CPU is doing more work to feed it. At 4K, the significant frame rate drops and the relatively small difference between Low (86 FPS) and High (54 FPS) settings indicate that the GPU is the clear bottleneck, as it cannot render enough frames regardless of the CPU's capability.

Q: What are the minimum FPS numbers like on Medium settings?

A: The measured data includes minimum FPS only for Medium settings. At 1080p Medium, the minimum FPS is 158, with an average of 186. At 1440p Medium, the minimum is 104, with an average of 122. At 4K Medium, the minimum is 58, with an average of 68. These minimums show that Medium settings provide a fairly stable frame rate, especially at lower resolutions.

Q: How does this combo's performance compare to its benchmark scores?

A: The CPU has a score of 48995 in its average benchmark, placing it in the 90th percentile of all CPUs. The GPU has an average benchmark score of 11627, placing it in the 51st percentile of all GPUs. The Fivem performance data shows that this CPU strength doesn't translate to 4K performance, as the game is clearly GPU-bound at that resolution. The GPU's mid-pack percentile is a better predictor of its 4K capabilities.

How This Combo Ranks

In the overall database of tested combinations for Fivem, this pairing of the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 and AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT ranks 959th out of 3005 combos. This puts it in the upper third of all tested systems, which is a respectable position. The rank reflects the balanced nature of the components; the CPU is a strong performer, and the GPU is adequate, but neither is top-tier. The rank suggests that there are many other combinations that can achieve higher frame rates, likely those with more powerful GPUs.

The CPU's performance in synthetic benchmarks is strong. Its average benchmark score of 48995 is nearly identical to that of its nearest rivals. For instance, it is only 0.4% behind the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G and 0.5% behind the AMD Ryzen 9 7900. It is also 0.6% ahead of the Intel Xeon Gold 5318H and 0.8% ahead of the Intel Core i5-14600K. This indicates that the Ultra 5 245 is a very capable processor, and its performance is on par with several other high-end chips. However, its 14 cores and 14 threads are a notable feature, and its 90th percentile ranking among all CPUs underscores its strength. The GPU, on the other hand, has a more modest standing, with a 51st percentile ranking. Its average benchmark score is close to its rivals, being 0.5% behind the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 and 0.9% ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro 5500M. This data suggests that the GPU is the component that holds this combo back from ranking higher, as the CPU is clearly not the limiting factor.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The following data provides a complete picture of the measured frame rates for this combination across all tested resolutions and settings.

1920x1080:

• Low: Average 235 FPS.
• Medium: Average 186 FPS, with a minimum of 158 FPS and a maximum of 214 FPS.
• High: Average 148 FPS.
• Ultra: Average 115 FPS.

At 1080p, the system is highly capable. The Low preset's 235 FPS average is exceptionally high, and even at Ultra, the 115 FPS average is smooth for most displays. The Medium preset offers a good balance, with a minimum FPS of 158 ensuring minimal stuttering.

2560x1440:

• Low: Average 155 FPS.
• Medium: Average 122 FPS, with a minimum of 104 FPS and a maximum of 141 FPS.
• High: Average 98 FPS.
• Ultra: Average 76 FPS.

At 1440p, performance remains strong. The 155 FPS average on Low is excellent for high refresh rate gaming. The Medium preset's 122 FPS average is also very good. High and Ultra settings are still playable, but the frame rates start to dip below the 100 FPS mark, which may be noticeable on a 144Hz monitor.

3840x2160:

• Low: Average 86 FPS.
• Medium: Average 68 FPS, with a minimum of 58 FPS and a maximum of 78 FPS.
• High: Average 54 FPS.
• Ultra: Average 42 FPS.

At 4K, the system's limitations become apparent. Only the Low preset manages to stay above 60 FPS. Medium settings provide a playable, though not always smooth, experience with an average of 68 FPS. High and Ultra presets fall below the 60 FPS threshold, making them less desirable for a consistently fluid experience.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured data, the optimal settings depend heavily on your target resolution and refresh rate.

For 1080p gaming, the High preset is the recommended starting point. It delivers an average of 148 FPS, which is high enough to take advantage of most high-refresh-rate monitors. If you have a 240Hz display, the Medium preset is a better fit, with an average of 186 FPS and a minimum of 158 FPS that will keep the frame rate consistently high. The Ultra preset is also viable at 115 FPS, but the 22% performance drop compared to High makes it less attractive unless you prioritize visual fidelity over frame rate.

For 1440p, the Medium preset offers the best balance of visual quality and performance. The 122 FPS average is smooth, and the minimum of 104 FPS ensures a stable experience. The High preset is still very playable at 98 FPS and is a good choice for those with a 100Hz or 144Hz monitor who want better visuals. The Low preset is there for maximum frame rates, hitting 155 FPS, but the visual compromise is significant. The Ultra preset, at 76 FPS, is best left for less demanding scenes or for players who prefer a more cinematic experience over competitive frame rates.

For 4K gaming, the Medium preset is the most practical choice. The 68 FPS average is close to the 60 FPS target, and the minimum of 58 FPS means that you will rarely see a large drop in performance. The Low preset is the only option that consistently stays above 60 FPS, with an 86 FPS average, but it sacrifices a lot of visual detail. The High preset's 54 FPS average is borderline playable, but the Ultra preset at 42 FPS is not recommended for a smooth experience. If you are targeting 4K, be prepared to either lower settings to Medium or accept a frame rate below 60 FPS.