Fivem

The Intel Core i7-13700K paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT delivers a robust Fivem experience, with benchmark data showing a clear progression from demanding 4K Ultra settings to high-refresh-rate 1080p gameplay. The measured results place this combination in the 678th position out of 1792 tested combos, indicating a solidly above-average pairing for this multiplayer title. Across all tested resolutions, the system maintains playable frame rates, though the gap between Low and Ultra presets widens considerably as resolution increases, pointing to the GPU as the primary scaling factor.

FAQ

Q: What is the best average frame rate achieved by this combo?

A: The highest recorded average is 234.5 FPS at 1080p with Low settings. This drops to 113.6 FPS at the same resolution when Ultra settings are enabled.

Q: How does the CPU's multi-threaded performance compare to its closest rivals?

A: The Core i7-13700K scores 47282 on the average benchmark, which is 0.1% behind the Intel Core i7-13700KF and 0.5% behind the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 5945. It sits 0.3% ahead of the AMD EPYC 4364P and 0.4% ahead of the Intel Core i9-12900F.

Q: Is this GPU faster than the NVIDIA P104-100 in synthetic benchmarks?

A: Yes, the Radeon RX 7800 XT has an average benchmark score of 32619, which is 0.4% higher than the NVIDIA P104-100's score of 32747, making the AMD card the faster of the two.

Q: What is the measurable difference between 1440p High and 4K High settings?

A: At 1440p High, the average FPS is 96.1, while at 4K High it drops to 53.3. This represents a reduction of 42.8 FPS when moving to the higher resolution.

Q: Does the 16 GB VRAM capacity appear sufficient for the highest settings tested?

A: The data shows the GPU handles 4K Ultra at 40.5 FPS average, indicating the 16 GB memory allocation is adequate for this game's demands at the tested settings, as the system still renders frames without dropping below playable thresholds.

Q: How does the combo rank among all tested configurations?

A: This specific pairing ranks 678th out of 1792 total combinations tested for Fivem, placing it in the upper portion of the distribution.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT brings 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 624.1 GB/s. The GPU's base clock runs at 1295 MHz with a boost clock of 2430 MHz, while its game clock is listed at 2124 MHz. These specifications support the measured frame rates across all resolution and settings combinations. The pixel rate of 233.3 GPixel/s and texture rate of 583.2 GTexel/s provide the raw throughput needed for Fivem's open-world rendering.

In synthetic benchmarks, the GPU scores 24176 in Passmark G3D and 4157 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, with a percentile ranking of 76 among all GPUs. The 60 ray accelerators and 3840 shading units handle the game's graphical workload, but the data indicates that settings adjustments have a more pronounced effect on performance than resolution changes alone. At 1080p, the difference between Low and Ultra is 120.9 FPS, while at 4K that same settings gap narrows to 45.7 FPS, suggesting the GPU becomes more constrained as resolution increases.

The GPU's 37.32 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 74.65 TFLOPS of FP16 performance (2:1 ratio) provide ample compute capability for this title. Benchmark results show the card's closest rival is the AMD FirePro S9300 X2, which trails by 0.2%, while the NVIDIA T600 Mobile leads by 0.7%. This positions the RX 7800 XT as a mid-to-upper tier performer in the database's broader GPU rankings.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the Intel Core i7-13700K and AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT achieves a rank of 678 out of 1792 tested combos for Fivem, placing it in the 62nd percentile of all configurations evaluated. This ranking reflects the measured FPS data across all resolutions and settings, indicating the pairing performs better than roughly six out of ten tested systems. The CPU's strong single-thread score of 1136 in 3DMark and 5505 in Cinebench R23 single-core supports the high frame rates seen at lower resolutions, where processor performance often becomes the limiting factor.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 47282 places it in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs, with its nearest rival being the Intel Core i7-13700KF at a 0.1% higher score. The GPU's average benchmark score of 32619 places it in the 76th percentile of all GPUs. When combined, these percentile rankings suggest the CPU is the stronger component in this pairing, which aligns with the FPS data showing larger performance drops from settings changes at 4K compared to 1080p. The combo's overall rank of 678 indicates that while the CPU is top-tier, the GPU holds the pairing back from the highest echelons of the performance rankings.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured data provides a complete grid across three resolutions and four quality presets. At 1920x1080, the system achieves 234.5 FPS on Low, 186.5 FPS on Medium, 144.8 FPS on High, and 113.6 FPS on Ultra. Moving to 2560x1440, the numbers drop to 150.7 FPS on Low, 121.9 FPS on Medium, 96.1 FPS on High, and 75.7 FPS on Ultra. At 3840x2160, the system produces 86.2 FPS on Low, 64.9 FPS on Medium, 53.3 FPS on High, and 40.5 FPS on Ultra.

The step from Low to Medium at 1080p costs 48.0 FPS, while the step from Medium to High costs 41.7 FPS, and High to Ultra costs 31.2 FPS. At 1440p, these same steps cost 28.8, 25.8, and 20.4 FPS respectively. At 4K, the steps are 21.3, 11.6, and 12.8 FPS. The diminishing returns pattern is consistent across resolutions, with the Low to Medium transition being the most expensive in absolute terms at every resolution tested.

Resolution Scaling

The performance drop from 1080p to 4K varies significantly by settings preset. At Low settings, the average FPS falls from 234.5 at 1080p to 86.2 at 4K, a reduction of 63.2%. At Medium settings, the drop is from 186.5 to 64.9 FPS, a reduction of 65.2%. At High settings, the fall is from 144.8 to 53.3 FPS, a reduction of 63.2%. At Ultra settings, the drop is from 113.6 to 40.5 FPS, a reduction of 64.3%.

The consistent percentage reduction across all presets indicates that resolution scaling is the dominant factor, with the GPU becoming the primary bottleneck as pixel count increases. The CPU's strong single-thread performance, evidenced by its 3DMark single-thread score of 1136 and Passmark single-thread score of 4333, allows it to maintain high frame rates at 1080p where the GPU has more headroom. However, at 4K, the GPU's rendering workload increases substantially, and the frame rates settle into a range that suggests the RX 7800 XT is the limiting component. The transition from 1440p to 4K at High settings results in a 42.8 FPS loss, which is proportionally similar to the 48.7 FPS loss seen when moving from 1080p to 1440p at the same settings.

Settings Recommendations

For players targeting 60 FPS as a baseline, the data shows that 4K Medium is the highest quality preset that achieves this threshold, with an average of 64.9 FPS. At 4K High, the average drops to 53.3 FPS, which falls below the 60 FPS target. At 1440p, all tested presets exceed 60 FPS, with Ultra averaging 75.7 FPS and High averaging 96.1 FPS, making either preset viable for high-refresh-rate monitors in the 75-100 Hz range.

At 1080p, the system comfortably exceeds 100 FPS on all presets, with High achieving 144.8 FPS and Ultra achieving 113.6 FPS. This makes 1080p Ultra the recommended setting for users with 144 Hz displays, as it provides the highest visual quality while still maintaining a frame rate above 100 FPS. For 4K users, the choice between Medium at 64.9 FPS and High at 53.3 FPS depends on whether visual fidelity or smoothness is prioritized, but the data suggests Medium offers the better balance for maintaining consistent frame pacing. The 16 GB VRAM capacity does not appear to cause any performance anomalies at any tested setting, as the frame rate scaling from Low to Ultra follows a predictable pattern at each resolution.