Fivem

This page analyzes the measured performance of the Intel Core i7-14700K and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti combination running Fivem, based exclusively on the available benchmark data. The pairing sits at the extreme opposite ends of the hardware spectrum—a 94th-percentile flagship CPU from 2023 with a 25th-percentile entry-level GPU from 2016—and the Fivem results reflect that mismatch in a model that is far behind the rest of the test database.

FAQ

Q: What is the overall standing of this combo in the Fivem benchmark database?

A: According to the data, the Intel Core i7-14700K + GTX 1050 Ti combo ranks 3651st out of 3707 tested combinations, placing it within the bottom 56 pairings for this game.

Q: What is the GPU's VRAM and does it impact Fivem results?

A: The GTX 1050 Ti includes 4 GB of GDDR5 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 112.1 GB/s of bandwidth. The data shows a significant drop in average FPS when raising resolution from 1920x1080 to 3840x2160 (e.g., over 70% lower at Low settings), indicating substantial reliance on memory capacity and bandwidth.

Q: Which preset yields the highest playable frame rates?

A: The Low preset at 1920x1080 produces the highest average FPS at 62 frames per second. The same preset at 2560x1440 gives 41 fps and 22 fps at 3840x2160, highlighting the GPU's limited capability.

Q: What is the CPU’s core and thread configuration?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700K has 20 cores and 28 threads, with a base clock of 3.40 GHz and boost clock of 5.60 GHz, and 33 MB of L3 cache shared. It also includes an integrated UHD 770.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its closest measured rivals?

A: Against nearest rivals, the i7-14700K's average benchmark score is 0.1% lower than the AMD EPYC 9115, 0.2% lower than the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, 0.7% lower than the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX, and 0.9% lower than the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F.

Q: What are the full measured medium settings differences?

A: For the Medium preset, the measured data includes minimum and maximum FPS values: at 3840x2160 avg 18 (min 15 max 20), at 2560x1440 avg 32 (min 27 max 37), and at 1920x1080 avg 49 (min 41 max 56).

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is a Pascal-architecture card built on a 14 nm process (transistors 3,300 million, 132 mm² die). It features 768 shading units, 48 TMUs, 32 ROPs, and a pixel rate of 44.54 GPixel/s with a texture rate of 66.82 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is rated at 2.138 TFLOPS. These specifications position it at just the 25th percentile of all GPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 4193.

The memory subsystem is the primary bottleneck in Fivem: 4 GB of GDDR5 across a 128-bit bus, with effective bandwidth of 112.1 GB/s. Looking at the 4K (3840x2160) results, the GPU manages only 14 fps (High), 18 fps (Medium), and 22 fps (Low) respectively—indicative of a card that cannot buffer the scene geometry at high resolution. The testing shows a drastic scaling from 1080p to 4K: at Low the average drops from 62 fps to 22 fps, a 65% reduction. At Ultra, the 4K average falls to just 11 frames per second, while the 1080p Ultra yields 30 fps.

A comparative look at the GPU’s nearest rivals shows that the GTX 1050 Ti performs extremely close to its competition: within 0.6% of the AMD Radeon R5 M330 and 1.0% of the NVIDIA Quadro K2100M, and 1.8% higher score than the Radeon Vega 3, while being 1.1% below the Quadro K3000M. These are all entry-level mobile pieces, meaning the desktop card here is at the absolute floor of performance. Within the Fivem context, the GTX 1050 Ti’s 128-bit memory interface is a severe limiting factor; the 3840x2160 medium setting has an average FPS of 18, which is entirely unplayable for fluid multiplayer movement.

CPU Role

The Intel Core i7-14700K is a Raptor Lake Refresh desktop chip with 20 cores and 28 threads. It runs at a 3.40 GHz base and 5.60 GHz boost, consuming up to 125 W TDP. The L3 cache is 33 MB (shared) with a 2 MB L2 per core and the die size is 257 mm². The benchmark scores are impressive: Cinebench R23 multi-core 33440.5, single-core 2160; Geekbench multi-core 20767, single-core 2569; Passmark single-thread 4472 and multithread 52392. This places the CPU at the 94th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 69355—through that is over 26x the GPU’s own average score.

Comparisons to nearest rivals show the i7-14700K in a tight performance band: average score within ±0.8% of the AMD EPYC 9115 (delta +0.1%), the Ryzen 9 7950X (delta -0.2%), the Ryzen 9 7940HX (delta -0.7%) and the Ryzen 7 9700F (delta -0.9%). For Fivem it means that even with the biggest CPU performance, the frame rate is constrained entirely by the low-tier GPU. The measured 1080p Low avg is 62 fps, which matches the maximum that the CPU can feed for this title at that load. Achieving any higher would require a GPU with more shading power. The strong CPU is overshadowed by the GPU lack of data: the CPU's Passmark single-thread score of 4472 is exceptional, but the GTX 1050 Ti cannot deliver more than 62 frames per second at any resolution, regardless of the CPU's capability.

The data substantiates the fact that Fivem is GPU-bound in this combination. For example, the difference in 1080p High from 26 fps at 1440p vs. 39 fps at 1080p shows sensitivity to resolution and geometry. Intel’s integrated UHD 770 is a part of the chip, but here id does not process any game load, as the dedicated GPU is the only output.

How This Combo Ranks

The combined measured average across all settings and resolutions shows a Combo Rank of 3651 out of 3707 configs listed in the Fivem database—with only 56 combinations performing worse in this title. This rank clearly announces, the dataset indicates, a pairing that is mismatched to the game’s requirements. Where does this rank come from? The CPU's own percentile (94th) is impressive, but the GPU's (25th) drags the final output. The average frame rate at 1920x1080 across all presets: Low 62, Medium 49, High 39, Ultra 30—all below 60 frames except the Low setting. At 1440p the numbers drop to 41, 32, 26, 20, and at 4K to 22, 18, 14, 11. The combo rank of 3651/3707 places this combo in the bottom 5% of all tested pairings for Fivem, which makes the initial couple of hundred configs the only ones that can deliver a truly smooth experience.

The gap between the CPU's average score and GPU's score also matters: the CPU average benchmark is 69355 while the GPU’s is 4193, a factor of over 16. In practical FPS terms, the combo's inability to reach 60 FPS at 1080p (except Low) proves the mesh is not on the CPU. The extreme low rank implies that almost any other tested configuration with a mid-range GPU (even one near the 30th percentile) could outperform this pairing. The 4K High preset yields a 14-fps average, which is below the threshold for most multiplayer scenarios, making the dataset call attention the severe bottleneck.

Measured FPS Breakdown

Here is the complete measured average frame rate data for the i7-14700K + GTX 1050 Ti combo in Fivem, along with the minimum and maximum frames at Medium:

• 3840x2160 (4K Ultra-widescreen): High – 14 fps; Low – 22 fps; Medium – avg 18 fps (min 15 fps, max 20 fps); Ultra – 11 fps
• 2560x1440 (QHD): High – 26 fps; Low – 41 fps; Medium – avg 32 fps (min 27 fps, max 37 fps); Ultra – 20 fps
• 1920x1080 (Full HD): High – 39 fps; Low – 62 fps; Medium – avg 49 fps (min 41 fps, max 56 fps); Ultra – 30 fps

These numbers reveal a few things from the resolution scaling. At 1440p the Low setting produces 41 averages, which is roughly 66% of the 1080p Low value (62), a well-behaved trend. But at 4K, the Low is only 22 fps, which is only a third of 1080p Low. The Memory bandwidth that shrinks the slope—the 128-bit bus with 112 GB/s cannot feed the higher pixel count. The Ultra preset is the most extreme, hitting 30 fps at 1080p, 20 at 1440p, and just 11 at 4K; these values make this GPU unsuitable for anything above 1080p.

The one data point that includes min/max frames is the Medium settings at each resolution. At 1080p, the frame rate fluctuates in the range 41 to 56 frames, a variance of 15 parts; at 1440p it dips to 27–37, and at 4K it witnesses 15–20. This means the 1% lows are also close to the average, indicating a consistent stutter near the GPU's limits.

Settings Recommendations

Given the measured data, the only preset that provides a steady, high-framerate experience is Low at 1920x1080, which the data lists at 62 fps. This is the only configuration in the entire benchmark set that reaches the typically desirable 60 FPS target. Dropping to Medium at the same resolution yields 49 fps, still the sweet spot between visuals and smoothness. High at 1080p is 12 39 fps, and Ultra 30 fps, both unremarkable.

For users who favor resolution, the situation is worse. At 2560x1440, even the Low setting yields just 42 fps, meaning that playing above 1080p requires sacrificing preset quality. The ideal experience offered by the measured rows is to set the graphics preset to Low at 1920x1080 with the occasional use of Medium if the player accepts a lower frame rate but still in the playable zone.

Because the CPU is never a constraint here, the senior recommendation is to minimize the GPU investment and use the Low preset at 1080p. The Medium preset at 1080p is the second option with 49 fps, but if fluid 60 FPS is a goal, the game should be tuned to Low. The absolute worst settings—4K and 4K Ultra—produce just 11–14 fps, which falls far outside of what is evidence of playable interaction. In any instance, the data strongly supports that this combo should stay at 1080p, Low or at most Medium, to deliver a bearable experience in Fivem.